EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

04.01.19

Patent Trolls Destroy the European Economy Because EPO Gives Them Questionable Patents

Posted in Europe, Patents at 2:02 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Demolishing crane eating the building

Summary: The EPO’s lust for patents (as many as possible, as that’s what productivity or “success” will be measured by) is a blessing not for European businesses but for those eager to prey on them

NOTHING is improving at the European Patent Office (EPO), certainly not the quality of granted patents. António Campinos can smile and flatter himself all he wants, but he hasn’t done a darn thing to improve matters, except at the most superficial level (like silencing the union and representatives*). He or his administration is aggressively promoting European software patents, which are favoured among patent trolls.

“How long can the EPO grant patents on nature, life, maths and even food without the public retaliating?”The EPO doesn’t speak about “software patents”; it uses all sorts of sneaky buzzwords such as “AI”. One can see Bristows LLP staff getting slapped down for spreading “AI” hype and lies a few days ago. To quote the comment: “Stop taking us for simple minds and define something as being intelligent which actually only is something defined by a programmer.”

We used to write a lot of articles about this “AI” hype and how it relates to patents. We no longer do this as it would seem repetitive. Last week Bastian Best wrote: “AI and patents: Does the @EPOorg grant software patents for text document classifiers?”

Those classifiers aren’t “AI” but algorithms; The EPO will typically grant software patents if one calls them “AI”, however, so Best’s colleague Patrick Heckeler wrote (without invoking this buzzwords nonsense) that it is considered “non-technical”, as per the Board:

As a result, the Board ruled that a the claimed mathematical algorithm does not contribute to the technial character of the claimed method. The only implementation features specified in the claim are references to the method being “computerized” and the text documents being “digitally represented in a computer”. The skilled person, when given the task of implementing the algorithm, would certainly have chosen to represent text documents “digitally in a computer”. The Board further considers that the skilled person, using only his common general knowledge, would have had

Bastian Best did a post of his own and said aloud: “Data modelling is hardly patentable in Europe, at least on an abstract level…”

There’s a case (referral to the Board) coming soon that can eliminate every such patent (by mean of legal extrapolation). There may also be a decision to end patents on seeds and plants some time soon (see “Open-source seeds: protecting new crops from privitisation”, a new article written by Katie Burton).

How long can the EPO grant patents on nature, life, maths and even food without the public retaliating?

We have sadly seen IAM rearing its ugly face again in recent days. It gave a platform for Team Battistelli and then wrote: “The @EPOorg received over 7,000 4IR-related patent applications in 2017, says Yann Meniere the office’s chief economist…” [sic]

More buzzwords for software patents from the EPO. How does he even define “4IR” and classify patents accordingly? It’s pseudoscience. This man is a pseudo ‘scientist’, who calls himself an “economist” when all he really did was perpetuation of Battistelli’s lies (that’s his real job).

IAM also proceeded to promoting a patent troll, as it so habitually does (it’s paid for it). “Big news from Sisvel this morning,” it wrote, “the launch of a new licensing programme covering VP9 and AV1 video compression technology. Should cause a few waves!”

It linked to this puff piece outside the paywall: (to help the troll)

Sisvel has announced that it is launching a new platform which will license patents reading on the VP9 video encoding format, made available by Google in June 2013, and the AV1 (AOMedia Video 1) open video coding format developed by the Alliance for Open Media (a consortium founded in 2015 by Apple, ARM, Cisco, Facebook, Google, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Mozilla and Netflix), the first version of which was released in June 2018.

Both VP9 and AV1 have been described as royalty free, but Sisvel claims that there are a number of innovators whose patent protected inventions have been implemented by the codecs.

This is about European trolls, which aren’t being discussed enough in the media (not in English anyway). IAM is advertising a blackmail expert and a patent troll, Sisvel. And if one checks the funding sources of IAM, it’s ever more clear that it’s a front group of trolls.

Jan Ozer, over in “Online Video News”, was also doing a puff piece (maybe they don’t realise how truly evil this troll is). Here is the corresponding press release. It’s about software patents.

If nowadays in Europe patent trolls can write articles and present talks, even keynotes, why not issue press releases too? Thanks to corrupt EPO management, these patent trolls (some from the US!) nowadays get a treatment of a 'celebrity' (EPO is constantly legitimising trolls).

“Luxembourg smells fiscal evasion,” Benjamin Henrion remarked on this particular troll. “Sisvel patent troll now attacking Google’s “royalty-free” VP9 and AV1,” he added, “the patent nightmare continues in the quest for a “free web”…”

This troll was last mentioned yesterday by IAM. “Sisvel is launching a new video compression licensing programme covering patents reading on the VP9 video encoding format and the AV1 open video coding format,” it wrote. Hardly a good description of what’s happening here. These are software patents being leveraged by a villainous troll in Europe, without having to even face a court.

Days ago we saw this report that said: “Intel has released an open source CPU encoder for the AV1 video format developed by the Alliance of Open Media (AOMedia) consortium. As one of its founding members, Intel has been involved in the development of the royalty-free next-generation format that was released last year.”

Meanwhile the patent troll from Europe goes after it with software patents that aren’t valid in Europe.

But worry not; according to IAM, there's no troll problem in Europe. IAM denies the underlying facts while flattering the EPO for “quality” of its patents. A few days ago IAM also cheered for US trolls that buy patents in auctions. “We recently released an analysis of US patent sales for the last three months of 2018 using data provided by Allied Security Trust,” IAM wrote. “Although the amount of assets transacted significantly dropped from 3,977 to 1,831, due to the absence of large-scale transactions, deal numbers increased 25% compared to the same period in 2017.”

So they spin the numbers, turning the halving in number into “increase”. Nice spin you got there. Typical IAM.

This patent trolls’ lobby, IAM, is also promoting software patents under the guise of “AI” [1, 2] (copied into Lexology) — a pattern we’ve noted at the start.

At the end of the day it all boils down to one thing: Quite extrajudicially software patents are being enforced in Europe by the likes of Sisvel and MPEG-LA, who in Germany act as fronts for Philips and Fraunhofer.

The latest post from Florian Müller in Germany shows that Germany is coming to grips with the fact that a lot of patent trolls have come: [via]

As a cross-jurisdictional patent litigation watcher I can tell that injunctive relief is what attracts plaintiffs to Germany more than anything else. That’s why they tend to play the lottery: they assert a bunch of patents, most of which tend to be weak, just in hopes of securing an injunction that allows them to settle an entire dispute on their preferred terms. Until the Court of Justice of the EU handed down its Huawei v. ZTE opinion, it was hard to avoid injunctive relief in Germany even over standard-essential patents (SEPs).

This may change, and I’m one of those who hope it will. Last week I attended a really great conference entitled “Enforcing Patents Smoothly–From Automatic Injunctions to Proportionate Remedies” that was organized and hosted by the Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, where academics, practitioners, and a Mannheim judge (Presiding Judge Dr. Peter Tochtermann) discussed this subject. I wish to thank Professor Franz Hofmann for chairing this conference, and the ip2innovate industry body for supporting it. It clearly exceeded my expectations. At that conference I learned about a legislative initiative in Germany that appears to be in its embryonic stages.

Meanwhile I’ve obtained official confirmation from the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection of Germany that an “expert talk” will take place on May 20, 2019, for the stated purpose of preparing a legislative initiative in the area of intellectual property policy. Industyr groups, academics and judges will discuss one of the potential elements of said initiative: a potential reform of the legal framework governing patent injunctions, particularly in connection with SEPs and, more generally, complex products.

All of the presentations at the Erlangen conference were great, and most of them would actually deserve to be discussed in greater detail, which I may do at a different point in time. What I do wish to share here is the impression that those advocating a more eBay-like approach in Germany, which would require some proportionality principle to be enshrined in statutory law, likely have far more political clout than those opposing it. And they have EU law on their side: the IP enforcement directive comes with a proportionality paragraph, just that Germany transposed it into national law only in connection with other types of intellectual property rights than patents.

[...]

Professor Christian Osterrieth, one of the name partners of the Reimann Osterrieth Köhler Haft (ROKH) firm that is now part of Hoyng Rokh Monegier, explained how eye-opening it was for him to see a case in which a single patent covering a secondary aspect of a technology could have had disruptive impact on Germany’s highway toll collection system. The way Professor Osterrieth described the problem was reminiscent of Justice Kennedy’s famous and influential eBay concurrence.

Professor Hofmann made a more theoretical argument for greater flexibility. Professor Thomas Cotter (University of Minnesota, and author of the Comparative Patent Remedies blog that I’ve recommended on various occasions) focused on the economics of patent injunctions. Simply put, injunctive relief creates a situation in which the parties will negotiate a price, and a court-determined ongoing royalty would be another, so the key question is which approach results in a more reasonable valuation. It’s about avoiding overcompensation as well as undercompensation.

So they merely try to ameliorate things; instead, maybe they should take a hard look at what goes on at the EPO in Munich, having systematically stonewalled and disregarded complaints from EPO staff.
____
* According to Dutch media, a key supporter of SUEPO is also suffering, so it may be part of a broader trend. [via]

The biggest Dutch trade union federation FNV is poised to cut its workforce by almost 20% or 400 full and part-time jobs, the Volkskrant said on Friday.

Membership numbers are declining and this is forcing the union to make cuts totalling €16m a year, the paper said. It bases its claim on the plan to reorganise the union’s operations.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 18/10/2019: More KDE Events and OpenBSD 6.6

    Links for the day



  2. We Don't Know Who Will Run the Free Software Foundation, But We Know Who Will Run the GNU Project

    Software Freedom is under a heavy and perhaps unprecedented attack; some people out there are paid by the attackers to celebrate this attack and defame people (cheering for corporate takeover under the blanket of “Open Source”), but the founder of the Free software movement remains alive, well, and very much active



  3. New EPO Meme: Who Wants to Make Billions From a 'Public' Monopoly?

    What was supposed to be a cash-balanced patent office became a money-making monster that fakes ‘crises’ to attack hard-working examiners



  4. EmacsConf Without Richard Stallman

    Now that emacs is being 'rebranded' this kind of meme seems apt



  5. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 17, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, October 17, 2019



  6. Guest Article: In the Absence of Richard Stallman OEM Source Software ('Open Source') is Trying to Hijack Even Emacs

    "Now they have to create some fictional history. No need to worry."



  7. Guest Article: Techies Should Not Dictate the Free Software Movement

    "We should start a second phase of the Free software movement that's making good software and putting users at the center."



  8. Links 17/10/2019: Ubuntu Turns 15, New Codename Revealed, Ubuntu 19.10 is Out

    Links for the day



  9. Free as in Free Speech (Restrictions May Apply)

    When limits of speech are not safety-related rules but political correctness or conformism



  10. There Won't be Patent Justice Until Patent Trolling Becomes Completely and Totally Extinct

    SLAPP-like behaviour and extortion/blackmail tactics using patent monopolies are a stain on the patent system; it's time to adopt measures to stop these things once and for all, bearing in mind they're inherently antithetical to the goal/s of the patent system and therefore discourage public support for this whole system



  11. EPO Staff Union and Staff Representatives Ought to Demand EPO Stops Bullying Publishers and Censoring Their Sites

    An often neglected if not forgotten aspect of EPO tyranny is the war on information itself; EPO management continues to show hostility towards journalism and disdain for true information



  12. Bribes, Lies, Fundamental Violations of the Law and Cover-Up: This is Today's European Patent Office

    It has gotten extremely difficult to hold the conspirators accountable for turning Europe’s patent office into a ‘printing machine’ of the litigation industry and amassing vast amounts of money (to be passed to private, for-profit companies)



  13. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Lost Almost Half (3 Out of 8) Board Members in Only One Month

    As the old saying goes, a picture (or screenshot) is worth a thousand words



  14. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 16, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 16, 2019



  15. Startpage and System1 Abuse Your Privacy Under the Guise of 'Privacy One Group'

    Startpage has sold out and may have also sold data it retained about its users to a privacy-hostile company whose entire business model is surveillance



  16. Links 16/10/2019: Halo Privacy, Ubuntu Release Imminent

    Links for the day



  17. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 15, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 15, 2019



  18. No, Microsoft is Not an 'Open Source Company' But a Lying Company

    The world’s biggest proprietary software companies want to be seen as “open”; what else is new?



  19. Meme: Setting the Record Straight

    Stallman never defended Epstein. He had called him “Serial Rapist”. It’s Bill Gates who defended Epstein and possibly participated in the same acts.



  20. EPO Staff Resolution Against Neoliberal Policies of António Campinos

    “After Campinos announced 17 financial measures,” a source told us, “staff gathered at multiple sites last week for general assemblies. The meeting halls were crowded. The resolution was passed unanimously and without abstentions.”



  21. Satya Nadella is a Distraction From Microsoft's Real Leadership and Abuses

    "I’m merely wondering if his image and accolades that we’re incessantly bombarded with by the press actually reflect his accomplishments or if they’re being aggrandized."



  22. Raw: EPO Comes Under Fire for Lowering Patent Quality Under the Orwellian Guise of “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI)

    Stephen Rowan, the President’s (António Campinos) chosen VP who promotes the notorious “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI) initiative/pilot, faces heat from the CSC, the Central Staff Committee of the EPO



  23. Making The Most of The Fourth Age of Free Software

    "For better or for worse, we can be certain the Free Software Foundation will never be the same."



  24. FSF is Not for Free Speech Anymore

    The FSF gave orders to silence people



  25. Links 16/10/2019: Plasma 5.17.0, Project Trident Moves to GNU/Linux, NuTyX 11.2

    Links for the day



  26. ...So This GNU/Linux User Goes to a Pub With Swapnil and Jim

    It's hard to promote GNU/Linux when you don't even use it



  27. How to THRIVE, in Uncertain Times for Free Software

    "The guidelines are barely about conduct anyway, they are more about process guidelines for "what to do with your autonomy" in the context of a larger group where participation is completely voluntary and each individual consents to participate."



  28. When They Run Out of Things to Patent They'll Patent Nature Itself...

    The absolutely ridiculous patent bar (ridiculously low) at today’s EPO means that legal certainty associated with European Patents is at an all-time low; patents get granted for the sake of granting more patents each year



  29. EPO Boards of Appeal Need Courage and Structural Disruption to Halt Software Patents in Europe

    Forces or lobbyists for software patents try to come up with tricks and lies by which to cheat the EPC and enshrine illegal software patents; sadly, moreover, EPO judges lack the necessary independence by which to shape caselaw against such practices



  30. Professor Dr. Maximilian Haedicke on Lack of Separation of Powers at the EPO (Which Dooms UPC)

    Team UPC (“empire of lies”) is catching up with reality; no matter how hard media has attempted to not cover EPO scandals (after the EPO paid and threatened many publishers that tried), it remains very much apparent that EPOnia is like a theocracy that cannot be trusted with anything


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts