EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.28.19

The GNU/Linux Community Feels Increasingly Isolated, Homeless and Orphaned in a New Age of Corporate Takeovers

Posted in FSF, GNU/Linux, GPL, IBM, Microsoft, Red Hat at 3:50 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Microsoft loves Linux, I don't think so

Summary: The corporate slogans and lies that are tossed about by corporate media remain as unconvincing as ever (no matter their repetition’s frequency); GNU/Linux is being raided

I HAVE BEEN USING GNU/Linux since I was a teenager. The last Windows version I had was Windows 98. When I ‘joined’ the ‘Linux’ community and developed software with GTK it was a job to me. The software was GPL-licensed. It was made available to all on my Web site and on SourceForge. 18 years later there’s hardly a SourceForge (it’s a shadow of its former self), a lot of Free software is controlled by Microsoft because it bought the largest Git repository, and as we noted in the previous post about the Linux Foundation (LF), Microsoft and IBM “Linux” is gradually becoming something else. The FSF is no longer RMS (albeit RMS insists he’s still in charge of the GNU project) and Torvalds doesn’t seem to be in charge of Linux.

“To put it simply if not bluntly, Linux is now owned and controlled by few large corporations.”What on Earth is going on? My job is still technical and some clients compel us to put code under a Microsoft site (GitHub). All their systems use systemd, which from a technical point of view appears to offer little or no advantage (except Red Hat IBM control over copyrights and development).

To put it simply if not bluntly, Linux is now owned and controlled by few large corporations. The fight to do the same to GNU is still ongoing. So what have we all worked and campaigned for? Is our work being ‘stolen’ by billionaires, who try to strip off or weaken the GPL?

We sure live in confusing times.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. Canta said,

    September 28, 2019 at 12:46 pm

    Gravatar

    Exactly my feelings.

    A few days ago I was thinking about it. I believe there are two main tricks corporate people do to hijack our values and principles. It’s hard to explain it in few words, and I’ll do it badly (it requires a proper conceptualization), but I guess it kinda goes this way:

    1) “Freedom” may mean a lot of different things, many of them contrary to FSF and the GNU project principles. Different people joins the movement, but with different interpretations of “freedom”. Then there’s a fracture, an it’s a juicy wound for bloodsucker parasites. Happens all the time, with every single concept around everywhere. Suddenly, a few years passed, and you see lots of folks throwing shit to each others like mad apes, all of them screaming “freedom”. They realize what’s going on, if ever, only when all is full of shit everywhere already, and now part of the job of defending and promoting “freedom” is clearing up that mess: which happens to annoy all the people who actually likes their shit and the place as it is right now, so their “freedom” feels attacked, and the wheel starts to spin again. Add “I have to pay the bills” to that, and you have the perfect ecosystem for a disease like Microsoft to grow and live happily ever after.

    2) We had some principles as tools on the fight against the likes of Microsoft. I’d like to focus in one particular example: Internet Explorer. Microsoft won a few browser battles, but eventually lost that war. The web now belongs to Google and a few others. The tool that made Internet Explorer dissapear was a strong bias from the web community towards innovation (and not freedom): there was activism and organized groups pushing the web technologies agenda, and that agenda was TO CHANGE. Mozilla may had been an angel of Free Software in that front, but as innovation was the stronger principle in the web community other corporate members as Apple, Google, or Netflix were able to install their own crap. And the trick is: they did it with cheers from the people. Because they were actually pushing innovation, and web people loved innovation. Microsoft’s conservaturism on Internet Explorer, and its long lasting strategy of broken and non portable APIs, was a disaster for it as soon as Windows shifted to second, third, or even maybe fourth place in terms of operating system usage (because of the mobile paradigm). But innovation is not freedom. And so innovation, which may have helped defeat Microsoft in that particular front, is now the tool of the enemy of freedom, and also Microsoft’s tool. Today we need to defend against things like systemd, which are “free”: but it changes things constantly, and so we are very far away from free on our day to day choices, as we are forced to follow its changes in order to keep understanding the jargon and the common issues in our field. Of course, that is a simple and very brief example: there are a myriad of tiny bits of information here and there that forces us to be constantly focusing on “what’s going on” in order to keep in touch with the reality of our field. So, we basically dance to their rhythm and not ours, wich may be a very clear definition of “non-free”. And is a non-freedom that was possible through the high-valued principle of innovation. I myself entered the GNU/Linux world running away from Microsoft: but not because of the political view (I was ignorant of it back then), but because MS was constantly changing the rules of how to do stuff with .NET, and trying to push new Windows versions through my throat, which even required for me to change my computer in order to be up-to-date; and here in Argentina computers aren’t cheap, and then we have to deal with new versions and old versions, and so on, and so on, and so on. “Innovation” was a cancer already in 2008.

    Outside the IT field, I can think of at least one defense against all this. It’s called “rights”.
    We in LATAM are very cautious on the use of the F word (freedom). Because here it usually means “free market”, which means a primarization of our economies, and therefore the turning of our countries into colonies through economics. LATAM is in constant resistance against certain acceptions of the concept of “freedom”. Right-wing economists will always tell us around here about how we should deffend our “freedom”, and that we should have “equal oportunities”, and that we should abhor the idea of the state regulating stuff and putting taxes in things because that hurts the market. I always answer them the same thing: “I don’t have freedoms, I have rights: I don’t have the OPPORTUNITY to eat, and to have a house to live, and to go to the hospital or the school, but the RIGHT for those things. The warrant of those rights is the state. And even when the state is a poor warrant of rights, it’s light years above the market, wich is the warrant of nothing but profit for some.”

    I have no idea how, but I’m guessing we need to develop some entities that operates as warrants of rights in our fields of knowledge and human praxis. Maybe the states, maybe something else. What I’m sure is that the community ecosystem we were living so far is too fragile to subsist beyond one or two generations without falling into corporate traps. And, from this point of view, I can say RMS was always right when endorsing Free Software principles into the Human Rights field.

What Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 15, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 15, 2019



  2. No, Microsoft is Not an 'Open Source Company' But a Lying Company

    The world’s biggest proprietary software companies want to be seen as “open”; what else is new?



  3. Meme: Setting the Record Straight

    Stallman never defended Epstein. He had called him “Serial Rapist”. It’s Bill Gates who defended Epstein and possibly participated in the same acts.



  4. EPO Staff Resolution Against Neoliberal Policies of António Campinos

    “After Campinos announced 17 financial measures,” a source told us, “staff gathered at multiple sites last week for general assemblies. The meeting halls were crowded. The resolution was passed unanimously and without abstentions.”



  5. Satya Nadella is a Distraction From Microsoft's Real Leadership and Abuses

    "I’m merely wondering if his image and accolades that we’re incessantly bombarded with by the press actually reflect his accomplishments or if they’re being aggrandized."



  6. Raw: EPO Comes Under Fire for Lowering Patent Quality Under the Orwellian Guise of “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI)

    Stephen Rowan, the President’s (António Campinos) chosen VP who promotes the notorious “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI) initiative/pilot, faces heat from the CSC, the Central Staff Committee of the EPO



  7. Making The Most of The Fourth Age of Free Software

    "For better or for worse, we can be certain the Free Software Foundation will never be the same."



  8. FSF is Not for Free Speech Anymore

    The FSF gave orders to silence people



  9. Links 16/10/2019: Plasma 5.17.0, Project Trident Moves to GNU/Linux, NuTyX 11.2

    Links for the day



  10. ...So This GNU/Linux User Goes to a Pub With Swapnil and Jim

    It's hard to promote GNU/Linux when you don't even use it



  11. How to THRIVE, in Uncertain Times for Free Software

    "The guidelines are barely about conduct anyway, they are more about process guidelines for "what to do with your autonomy" in the context of a larger group where participation is completely voluntary and each individual consents to participate."



  12. When They Run Out of Things to Patent They'll Patent Nature Itself...

    The absolutely ridiculous patent bar (ridiculously low) at today’s EPO means that legal certainty associated with European Patents is at an all-time low; patents get granted for the sake of granting more patents each year



  13. EPO Boards of Appeal Need Courage and Structural Disruption to Halt Software Patents in Europe

    Forces or lobbyists for software patents try to come up with tricks and lies by which to cheat the EPC and enshrine illegal software patents; sadly, moreover, EPO judges lack the necessary independence by which to shape caselaw against such practices



  14. Professor Dr. Maximilian Haedicke on Lack of Separation of Powers at the EPO (Which Dooms UPC)

    Team UPC (“empire of lies”) is catching up with reality; no matter how hard media has attempted to not cover EPO scandals (after the EPO paid and threatened many publishers that tried), it remains very much apparent that EPOnia is like a theocracy that cannot be trusted with anything



  15. As Expected, the Bill Gates Propaganda Machine is Trying to Throw/Put Everyone off the Scent of Jeffery Epstein's 'Incestuous' Ties With Gates

    Media ownership up on display; it's amplifying false claims for a whole month, whereas truth/correct information gets buried before a weekend is over



  16. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 14, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, October 14, 2019



  17. [ES] El Kernel de Linux está introduciendo Open Source Privative Software

    Linux, el kernel, continúa su trayectoria o el camino hacia convertirse en software propietario de código abierto (OSPS).



  18. Linux Foundation Board Meeting

    More sponsored keynotes and tweets — like more sponsored articles (or “media partners”) — aren’t what the Linux Foundation really needs



  19. Links 14/10/2019: Linux 5.4 RC3, POCL 1.4, Python 3.8.0

    Links for the day



  20. This Week Techrights Crosses 26,000 Posts Milestone, 3 Weeks Before Turning 13 (2,000+ Posts/Year)

    A self-congratulatory post about another year that's passed (without breaks from publishing) and another milestone associated with posting volume



  21. No Calls to "Remove Gates" From the Board (Over a Real Scandal/Crime), Only to "Remove Stallman" (Over Phony Distraction From the Former)

    Jeffrey Epstein's connections to Bill Gates extend well beyond Gates himself; other people inside Microsoft are closely involved as well, so Microsoft might want to cut ties with its co-founder before it becomes a very major mess



  22. “The Stupidest [Patent/Tax] Policy Ever”

    It’s pretty clear that today’s European patent system has been tilted grossly in favour of super-rich monopolists and their facilitators (overzealous law firms and ‘creative’ accountants) as opposed to scientists



  23. Meme: Software Patents at the EPO

    The evolution of “technical effect” nonsense at the EPO



  24. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 13, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 13, 2019



  25. Firm of Microsoft's Former Litigation Chief Uses Microsoft-Connected Patent Lawsuit Against GNU/Linux (GNOME Foundation) for New Breed of FUD Campaigns

    The patent troll of Bill Gates and Nathan Myhrvold has fed a patent troll that's attacking GNU/Linux and a firm owned by Microsoft's former litigation chief says it proves "Open Source Software Remains a Target"



  26. "Widespread Adoption" (Did You Mean: Takeover by Monopolies?)

    "Quite a few of them are people that would rather replace David with Goliath, just because he's bigger. Quite a few are already taking money from Goliath."



  27. Links 13/10/2019: Red Hat CFO Fired and KDE Plasma 5.17 Preparations

    Links for the day



  28. Bill's Media Strategy Amid GatesGate

    There are many ways by which to game the media’s news cycle — an art mastered by the groper in chief



  29. Hard-Core Micro-Soft

    The word "core" is increasingly being (mis)used to portray user-hostile proprietary software as something more benign if not "open"



  30. Free Software Timeline and Federation: When Free Software Advocacy/Support is a Monopoly Expansion Becomes Necessary

    Support for Software Freedom — like support for Free software (think Red Hat/IBM and systemd) — should be decentralised and compartmentalised to make the movement stronger and adaptable


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts