Bonum Certa Men Certa

Guest Article: A Tale of Possible Surveillance



Article by figosdev

Nuclear power plant



Mark Kennedy spy



Summary: "If people subconsciously hire private investigators the same way they hire lawyers, that would explain a lot."

Usually, "A PI" stands for something else.



I've heavily considered not writing this, but I thought it would make a nice follow-up to this post and yes, I have considered the slight possibility that by doing so, I am contributing to my own surveillance.

Having considered that, I'll now tell you what happened.

As I said in that article, I am aware that activists sometimes end up under surveillance. It's far less of a leap these days -- though while you would (having read history) expect it for someone like Malcolm X or Martin Luther King, I wouldn't normally assume Roy or I were "important" enough. But I don't claim to be an expert on the subject anyway.

"And it's known that no less than 2/3 of people (probably far more) in the country are under surveillance, it's just a matter how much."Still, it's known that people involved with Occupy (I was) were under surveillance, it's just a matter of how much. It's known that people involved with more recent protests are under surveillance -- it's just a matter of how much.

And it's known that no less than 2/3 of people (probably far more) in the country are under surveillance, it's just a matter how much. Though you never know exactly what will trigger that bracket of importance -- like that kid who rode past an area on his bicycle where a crime was taking place -- because of his GPS.

I still don't know if this person was actually following or interviewing me, or if they were just weird. But having done a lot of volunteering and activism over the years, I've met loads of weird people. I've even dated some -- to be certain, at one point I married one (but she was very nice, and I honestly wish her the very best.)

Having met lots of weird people, I can also say what stood out to me about this particular individual -- it's all relative, really.

I will leave out many details here, though she was (or appeared and claimed to be) older, I've dated just one person with grey hair (before I was married) and I used to know someone who went grey early. Her face was younger-looking, but I've known plenty of people who aged well enough that this was plausible. I still think it's worth mentioning.

Despite what my intuition tells me (correctly or otherwise), I can honestly say I found her charming. When we started talking, I did not assume her intentions were romantic. Though most of the people I've had lunch with who acted similarly revealed romantic intentions eventually.

"When I say that she established rapport, I would almost compare it to the day I met my first wife."Many efforts were made to establish rapport -- that's not necessarily significant by itself, that's what people do as they become friends. When you meet a person who is narcissistic and/or a compulsive liar and/or they're trying to take advantage of you, there are certain signs to watch out for although covert narcissists are different. I've dealt with both, I've certainly dated a narcissist before. They make up enough of the population that it's possible many of us have.

I'm not by any means claiming to be the horse-whisperer of narcissists -- they're tricky, experience doesn't make you completely immune to their tricks. I had chicken pox when I was a kid, someday that will likely show up again as shingles. But despite my experience, this person seemed to be going out of their way to establish rapport (more than an average person does) and I started wondering if they were going to reveal their intentions. [Editor's note: I've seen similar things before (somebody else) and have solid reasons to believe I too was targeted; the presumed spy admitted to know Mark Kennedy, shown at the top of this article, and later admitted to me that he had been infiltrating groups]

As to why I continued to meet this person, I already said they were charming enough as company (my intentions were not romantic either, although she was attractive and pleasant to talk to) and I was not immediately suspicious anyway. We would keep bumping into each other, though there are reasons this was not (by itself) suspicious either. I'm leaving the reasons out, because I don't wish to say more than needs to be said.

All in all, I would not find it shocking if a year from now, I discover that this person was really just a slightly awkward person who thought it would be nice to have lunch with some company. We only scheduled a single meeting -- in the interim, we met a handful of times.

We went for a walk in a very public and very populated (well lit is an understatement, it was a sunny day during a heat wave -- I had a LOT of water, with and without electrolytes) area. We wore masks and social-distanced as well; this is the most exposure I've had to other people in months.

When I say that she established rapport, I would almost compare it to the day I met my first wife. The difference is that by the end of the day (when I met my first wife) I was in love, while with this person I simply thought she was interesting. She was cute, but a lot of people are cute. I talk to people with nice smiles (when you can see them at least) and pleasant personalities almost every day -- and this in a place I consider to be very stuck up and snobby on average.

We did talk about politics, but (being a big nerd) I mostly limited my talk of politics to the articles of the Constitution, which she either found interesting or feigned interest in. I'm heavily inspired by Lawrence Lessig, and I can speak about certain aspects of the topic as passionately as I can write about them -- and I did exactly that.

"Although a few people who do are in fact lying, and don’t really care what you look like at all because that’s not why you interest them."We talked about loads of personal subjects, but mostly mundane things (this would still happen during surveillance of course) and while I don't deny being a bit of an open book, I don't think I revealed all that much you couldn't get from tapping my communications anyway. Which of course, people most likely already do.

After our second or third meeting, when it started to remind me a little too much of when I met my first wife (the first time we met, I wasn't even sure I would bump into her again, and we had never had lunch or anything) I pointed out that this would have to be a "friends" thing, that I was not trying to date her.

She acknowledged the same, citing her own previous but partly unresolved relationship issues. We both acknowledged that the other was attractive, which I honestly found flattering enough -- IMO it's always nice when an attractive person admits they find you attractive. Although a few people who do are in fact lying, and don't really care what you look like at all because that's not why you interest them. I had no trouble taking the compliment however. I'm a dork, and even if I was as attractive as Roy for example, I would still be flattered by people who thought so.

Why do I find this person suspicious then, to the point where I make it into an article about surveillance? I've met literally hundreds of odd people, and nobody else I've met (including people who do surveillance for a living!) have ever inspired me to do so.

So here's what stood out for me, among all of those people -- this one person:

* Seemed to work as hard as any compulsive liar I've met, just to establish rapport.

* Most people who do that are more casual/informal, or more obvious about their intentions, even if they are hidden. There were broad and notable efforts to be "informal" and friendly, but I couldn't shake the feeling of a professional tinge to the whole thing -- despite there being zero cause for one.

I've met people from New York, DC, Numerous people who have met the POTUS (Including one I lived with) and I've met Buzz Aldrin at an event where I could have met both Hillary and Obama -- but I didn't care about them (only Buzz, he's awesome!) And all of these people have a more casual vibe than I got from this person, who was very clearly being casual and saying casual things.

"Why do I find this person suspicious then, to the point where I make it into an article about surveillance? I've met literally hundreds of odd people, and nobody else I've met (including people who do surveillance for a living!) have ever inspired me to do so."I just couldn't shake the feeling that it was professional, even though it was clearly not intended to feel that way.

* They did say a couple of things that I just swear are NOT TRUE. This is what made me think "compulsive liar?" for a day or so.

* I've met a lot of compulsive liars, including ones who are very slow to reveal their intentions. But with this person, the rapport (which was heavily pronounced) simply WENT NO-WHERE.

By "went nowhere" I mean no matter how slowly someone lets you know what they really want from you, it still MOVES. They work their way up, however slowly, to what they want.

This didn't move. It moved when I met my first wife. It moved with narcissists I dated. It moved with another friend or two who were narcissists or just selfish people. This person didn't WANT anything -- ANYTHING.

But they worked overly hard to get it -- like someone does if they want something from you. But they didn't want anything.

"The complete lack of interest in ANYTHING specific, paired with the sheer lack of professionalism and the STRONG sense of being professional, made me think this was just a fishing expedition."So I didn't seriously think this was a government agent (Really? Moi?) but I did toy with the idea. They did SO LITTLE probing though. And while they seemed too professional to be a friend, they seemed too much like a genuinely odd person to be an agent. I'm NO expert, and if it wasn't for HBO dramas I would know even less. But whatever.

The complete lack of interest in ANYTHING specific, paired with the sheer lack of professionalism and the STRONG sense of being professional, made me think this was just a fishing expedition. Okay. But even for a fishing expedition, it seemed a bit contrived and even pointless.

So if they're not a run of the mill compulsive / eccentric / dork / person like me, and they're not federal (I suppose it's possible but this is about my own impressions, and that's not what I'm sensing) what else could it be?

Are they corporate? I know that some cults have hired private investigators to get information on people before, but I'm not going after any cults at the moment -- maybe I pissed one off but I don't think so.

"All to establish rapport, all to get absolutely nothing but lunch with me, with no interest in either romance or friendship?"One of the things that tipped me off in the first place was that they had a few things in common with me that I just don't believe are truly part of who they are -- right down to a country I've lived in that they are supposedly from originally.

Yeah, I don't believe that at all, actually. I've lived with people from those countries, we met simply by chance that we had both lived there -- but when this person said it (repeatedly) it was the most suspicious thing they said. But not the only thing like it.

So, maybe a P.I., but someone who knows a handful of things about me (some of which are trivial to get for a fee, others are slightly more personal and less likely to be on file -- could be cold-reading or a lucky guess though?)

All to establish rapport, all to get absolutely nothing but lunch with me, with no interest in either romance or friendship?

Hmm...

Oh, did I mention they showed up out of nowhere very recently, and took IMMEDIATE interest in me? I'm not saying this to flatter myself -- I mean I'd never seen them ever before, then one day they were chatting with me, then a couple days later I bumped into them again, then we were having lunch -- going for walks, having lunch again--

"She claims to be from around here, though I really don't think she is."And then after our (only) scheduled meeting, which honestly seemed to go just as nicely as the others, they promptly disappeared?

She claims to be from around here, though I really don't think she is. I would probably know people that know her -- at the very least, she's newer than she claims. (Perhaps just a recluse -- but not for little old me.)

And IMO she acts in every way like a P.I., but doesn't seem to be interested in ANYTHING in particular about me (I realise that's an ideal impression for a P.I. or other investigator to give off.)

I do have one theory, that I consider pretty reasonable.

I come from a VERY controlling family. We have minimal contact now, and I'm glad they're not in my life. They have always showed some level of interest, even when we aren't speaking. When I've had relationships -- any level -- marriage, girlfriend, friends -- they've meddled. I've all but cut them off.

I looked into what this sort of venture would cost them. Sadly, it's well within their means (even if they were simply bored or curious.) Would they stoop that low? I don't know, it's the most reasonable (least nutty) explanation, IF this person is a professional. The other guesses are still possible, but I'm trying to put together the most reasonable explanation. That's what sane people do (I don't know, I read it on a matchbook.)

When you're going through a divorce or similar issues, your ex will often hire someone they subconsciously feel is the most like they are, personality-wise. This is particularly unpleasant if your ex was aggressive and manipulative, and they want to subject you to more of the same in the divorce proceedings. My divorce was unpleasant, but it wasn't as bad as that. I've seen a lot worse.

If people subconsciously hire private investigators the same way they hire lawyers, that would explain a lot. It would also explain why this person is so familiar with me. Sure, they could also get a lot of that from observing me from afar for long enough -- or perhaps tapping my communications. But this feels a little more like family. That would really explain basically every odd thing about this, including the "why bother?" part.

If that's what it turns out to be, I will be certain to distance myself https://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3637 even further from them. On the other hand, if it somehow turns out to be something far more sinister... CHEERS! It's been fun.

Family is overrated sometimes. Also sort of priceless in general... but not this one!

Long live rms (and me, if possible) and happy hacking.

Licence: Creative Commons CC0 1.0 (public domain)

Recent Techrights' Posts

SLAPP Censorship - Part 148 Out of 200: The Manosphere
Those people don't just threaten our national sovereignty, press, democracy etc. They also endanger women everywhere.
GNU/Linux Reaches 10% "Market Share" in statCounter
As of this morning
Voluntary' Layoffs and 'Proper' Layoffs at IBM This Year
When will IBM management confess that 15% of staff is already marked for potential removal?
The Register MS Has Just Published Slop Spam for NVIDIA and HP, It Says "AI" 43 Times
As usual, The Register MS ought to be ashamed of itself for participating in it
The Slop Debt (Trillions of Dollars, Money That Does Not Exist) is Causing the Collapse of GAFAM et al
This slop hype will end up like "metaverse", except "metaverse" never ended up justifying trillions of dollars in "investment"
Social Control Media is the Opposite of Information
That says a lot about social control media
 
Why Support Daniel Pocock
Our readers who come from IBM and the EPO are certainly familiar with the tactics of censorship and what that sort of censorship leads to
Gemini Links 13/08/2026: Health, Partial Eclipse Sketches, and Guilelessness
Links for the day
15% of IBM Marked for Potential Termination, PIPs are the "New Layoffs" (or RAs) at IBM
IBM is a dying company, but it does not want the press to say this or for people to understand that
Links 13/08/2026: "The Rise of the Measles-Industrial Complex" and Spotify Curbs Slop
Links for the day
Daniel Pocock on Australia's 9News (Nine Entertainment)
This gives visibility to software and technology issues
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, August 12, 2026
IRC logs for Wednesday, August 12, 2026
Gemini Links 12/08/2026: Losing a Child, "The OpenWeb Needs Diversity", and Gmail Woes
Links for the day
Links 12/08/2026: Trouble in Proprietary Chaffbot Company 'Open' 'AI' and Slop "Investors Are Suddenly Quaking in Their Boots"
Links for the day
Daniel Pocock in National News in Australia the Day of the Election
"Posted 20m ago" (Thursday in Australia), it's timed nicely to help illuminate Pocock and give him last-minute exposure
Simpler Means More Reliable
The simple old way of local storage and local backups is still the best
Clownflare and statCounter See GNU/Linux at ~8% in Norway
Norway has long championed GNU/Linux compared to the rest of Europe
Clacton manifesto: Reform UK hacking, leaks, raw sewage & 8GB Swiss Archive
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
statCounter Today: ChromeOS + GNU/Linux Measured at 10.98% Globally (Desktops and Laptops)
Clownflare does not quite refute this
The Register MS Has Just Published Fake Article About Replacing Linux With Proprietary Google System, "Sponsored by ASUS."
All of those things are proprietary GAFAMware
Links 12/08/2026: "X’s Advertising Business Continues to Tank", "Stop Feeding the Billionaires"
Links for the day
Lack of Empathy Rampant in the Sector
Sociopaths are sociopaths. They cannot help themselves
Before the "Big Tech" (That Almost Everybody is Forced to Use) Was Controlled by Men Who Hate Women
Such rejection and even hatred of women qualifies/enshrines oneself as an "incel"- a dangerous and violent online cult
In Defence of Hoarding CDs, More So When Digital Restrictions (DRM) Come to More 'Content' and Even Offline/Physical Media Won't Work When Some Remote Server Says "No" (or Goes Offline)
made to serve and entertain owners, not to allow companies like Sony and Microsoft subjugate owners
Clownflare: In Finland, Birthplace of Linux Kernel, GNU/Linux Now Bigger Than Apple's MacOS
It's not just in Finland where we see such trends
More Mass Layoffs Due to Monumental Debt Excused as "Investment" (in Slop)
They're maxing up the private debt and their country is already insolvent
METRO Interviews Daniel Pocock a Day Before Election
The article is behind a wall that blocks people who block ads
Enshittification More Than a Century Ago
Is enshittification more than a century old?
GNU in 1991 (35 Years Ago): Compiler and Lots More Ready, Linux Now Becoming 'Vibe Heap' (Slop Replaces Real Code)
Without curbs in place, many Linux developers will flee
Company-Wide 'Reorg' ('Redundancies') at IBM, Mark October 1st 2026 in the Calendar
Is Oct 1 the new Apr 1?
SLAPP Censorship - Part 147 Out of 200: The SLAPP Series is 'Slow' Because Timing Matters
It is important to stress that after this series is finished there will be many more series, with some of them showing raw evidence of what we've been illuminating and telling
Even ZDNet Accepts That "Market Share" of GNU/Linux May Have Doubled on Desktops and Laptops
GNU/Linux is definitely growing, and quite quickly in fact
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, August 11, 2026
IRC logs for Tuesday, August 11, 2026
Microsoft Layoffs and Shutdowns Continue This August, Morale Low, Employees Set Up Giant Inflatable Rat to Protest Against CEO
nothing demonstrates their anger better than what they did to the CEO
Gemini Links 12/08/2026: Sophomore Slump, Mandatory Phone Addiction, and Vintage Web Game Gallery
Links for the day
Summer Layoffs and 'Redundancies' (Cost-Cutting) at Microsoft and IBM
IBM is merely buying its revenue - an unsustainable strategy that aims to hide the company's rapid decline
Links 11/08/2026: Tensions South of China and Stingy "YouTube Doubles the Eligibility Requirements" (to Get Paid)
Links for the day
The Independent (UK) Today: "Independent candidate Daniel Pocock is concerned about media issues."
Let's see what results say around Friday
Gemini Links 11/08/2026: Stargate, Stargazer, Air-gapped Environments, and SystemVerilog Simulator
Links for the day
The Slop ('Linux') Foundation Celebrates 35 'Linux' Years a Week After GNU/Linux Turns 43
they'll keep on trying to change history
Keumars Afifi-Sabet Produces Useful, Informative Coverage Regarding Privacy
And it's good for Richard Stallman
Confirmed: Microsoft Layoffs in August 2026, Entire Operations Shut Down Too
Microsoft is just bleeding
Paying With Cash in 2026
Cash isn't going away. Not any time soon.
Blocking Tor Is Not a Solution, It's Paranoia
Tor is not a crime
Oligarchs and Their Footsoldiers Are Most Enthusiastically Loud About the Things They're Attacking
Like "Microsoft loves Linux"
FOSSY (SFC) Platforming GAFAM, Sells Endorsement
Houston, we have a problem here
Not Allowing Misogyny and Misogynists to Run the World
We stand with (and for) equality, justice, and freedom
"SPONSORED EXPLAINER" at The Register MS is Just More SPAM "Sponsored by HPE."
This is a great example of crap 'journalism'
IBM Won't Hire (or Hardly Hire) This Year
IBM is bluffing with buzzwords while shrinking out of existence and reducing salaries
SLAPP Censorship - Part 146 Out of 200: An Industry of Plagiarism, 'Normalised'
they pursue personal enrichment by stealing from Free software developers
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, August 10, 2026
IRC logs for Monday, August 10, 2026
5.1k Capsules Known to Lupa, Gemini Protocol Crawler
If no limits (e.g. 10k max per capsule) were imposed on crawling, there would likely be millions of pages in the database
Gemini Links 11/08/2026: Waking Up Earlier, Whining About LLMs as Destructive Plagiarism
Links for the day
Links 11/08/2026: "The Enemy Is the Platform" and 'Vibe' 'Coding' Shown to be Little But Plagiarism
Links for the day