Gemini version available ♊︎

Inside the EPO During Corona: “We All Should be Creative and Open” Was the Excuse to Break the Rules and Violate Laws/Constitutions at the EPO (European Patent Office)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:26 pm by Guest Editorial Team

António Campinos and Merkel

Summary: Looking back at Office documents, we’re seeing the sociopaths at work, crushing Office staff while refusing to even show basic common courtesy to staff that retires after more than 35 years of service

“Consultation on the social democracy framework provides poor results,” the Central Staff Committee of the EPO noted, citing the talk with the Benoît Battistelli-appointed António Campinos (another case of nepotism). The Central Staff Committee outlined the situation as follows:

Munich, 26.03.2020
sc20052cp – 0.2.1/6.2.1

Report on the meeting of the General Consultative Committee (GCC) of 2 March 2020

The only official item on the agenda was GCC/DOC 01/2020 (CA/17/20) titled “Amendments to the Articles of the ServRegs related to the statutory staff representation”. The proposal is the “result” of a 16-month consultation with the same management representatives of the previous administration who had put the social democracy framework in place.

Other topics were discussed including the first preventive measures against the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and the capping of the future salary adjustments.

GCC/DOC 01/2020 – Amendment to the Articles of the ServRegs related to the statutory staff representation (for consultation)

On 13 February 2020 the Central Staff Committee (CSC) had submitted a proposal that had been further amended to comprise the absolute minimum we deem necessary as a compromise to start a proper review of the social democracy framework. In a letter of 25 February 2020, the CSC pressingly reiterated its long-standing request to be able to nominate experts to the Appeals Committee (ApC) instead of being restricted to the pool of elected staff representatives. The chairpersons of the ApC, too, generally accept that elected nominees have an inherent conflict of interest because of their political mandate. The proposed amendment would have provided a fast and easy measure for enhancing staff’s acceptance of the ApC and addressed the concerns of the chairs.

In the meeting, the CSC members of the GCC insisted that the matter needed to be clarified before the call for candidates for the next SR elections, i.e. before May 2020. Colleagues considering to stand for election should know if they might be nominated to the ApC to consider their affinity and competency for that role. The CSC members of the GCC explained that they would vote in favour of the document if this requested amendment was introduced.

Mr Campinos rejected this request and argued that this change would require further consultation requiring legal checks, re-assessment of time resources for the staff representation and possibly some limitation (e.g. no repetitive appellants). This, according to him, would be possible at the earliest for the June Administration Council (AC) meeting. In view of the activities of a Working Group that saw its activities stalled for more than 10 months by a reticent and obstructive management we find these arguments to be disingenuous.

On some minor aspects, the President considered our requests and amended the document accordingly.

Since the introduction of the social democracy framework, the GCC members shall express their opinion by voting at the meeting (by show of hands) for or against a proposal or abstaining. It no longer foresees the submitting of opinions after careful consideration, allowing for qualifying a negative vote and appreciating positive elements. Such opinions – possibly by both sides of the table – could subsequently complement/complete the minutes. The CSC members of the GCC unanimously voted against the document and noted again the lack of flexibility of the social democracy framework forcing us into this kind of “all-or- nothing” situation.

As the functioning of the ApC is of utmost importance for the smooth running of the Office, the CSC remains open to continue the discussions with management representatives on this issue.

Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2

Mr Campinos issued a series of Communiqués and mass-emails concerning preventive measures against the spread of the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. The GCC meeting was the first, and so far only, meeting the staff representation had with Mr Campinos on this topic. Many staff members were concerned with the introduction of mandatory home-working, which is not foreseen in the Service Regulations. During the meeting, Mr Campinos said that “we all should be creative and open”.

He explained that the various departments and DGs were already working on the topic. Staff representatives would receive some information, but would not be involved. He mentioned some sort of “new agreement” between line managers and individual staff members for the period of mandatory homework. VP 1 added that if examiners could not take home their search files, they could work on examination files and classification.

Already at that time, we addressed the situation of colleagues who would be forced to stay at home and to take care of their children at the same time. Mr Campinos said that each staff member should find an agreement with their line manager.

We have since seen examples of such management discretion in the form of recommending the taking of annual or parental leave if staff were not able to cope, further distressing colleagues who are already struggling to combine family and work duties in difficult times.

Review of the salary adjustment procedure

Based on the flawed Financial Study of Oliver Wyman and Mercer, Mr Campinos now intends to introduce a cap on future salary adjustments which will cause an irreversible loss of purchasing power for all active staff and pensioners. This development is all the more worrying as it adds to the long-term damages caused by the New Career System (NCS).

The CSC made several counter-proposals for a salary adjustment procedure to include a moderation clause and an exception clause adapted to the economic situation of the Base-2 scenario chosen by Mr Campinos. The consultants of Mercer, at the time of the GCC meeting, had not provided their feedback on the effect of application of this counter-proposal to their scenario. We repeated our request for this information.

Mr Campinos explained that the limitation of the global salary mass was the aim and that it was not negotiable. In his view, the proposal of the staff representation was far from closing the gap and that would be demonstrated in the coming technical meetings.

Farewell statement to retiring staff representative Alain Rosé

At the end of the meeting, Mr Campinos made a farewell statement to Mr Alain Rosé, who will retire end of March 2020 after more than 35 years of service at the EPO with an impressive track-record as a staff representative, as evidenced by the applause of all persons present– with the noticeable exception of PD4.3.

Your Central Staff Committee

PD4.3 is the cruel and merciless Elodie Bergot. Remember her reaction after a member of staff committed suicide. Office management is sadly still populated with sociopaths. They attract one another like magnets.

“Office management is sadly still populated with sociopaths.”At around the same time they also published a fourth draft proposal [PDF] regarding the salary adjustment procedure (SAP), which we mentioned here before and will mention again in the future.

In the words of the Central Staff Committee:

The Central Staff Committee submitted a fourth draft proposal for a salary adjustment procedure to the President. This proposal has an immediate effect on long-term liabilities, it strictly respects the equality of purchasing power, it does not entail legal risk as it treats all groups of staff equally, it follows economic cycles under the base 2 scenario and it preserves the essence of the current salary adjustment procedure. It is therefore fir for purpose.

Please find here our open letter to the President, to which we attached our proposal. This open letter addresses as well the fundamentally flawed mechanism proposed by the Office. The President is urged to have his and our proposal tested by expert statisticians, be they from Eurostat or the International Service for Remunerations and Pensions (ISRP), or even by the Advisory Group on Remuneration (the Wise Men).

There are prior drafts too, but this more recent one supersedes them. We don’t know how many documents are worth reproducing at this point, but we’re constantly assessing the sensitivity associated with release. The European public deserves to know what goes on inside the patent office that grants loads of illegal patents, including software patents. It got a lot worse during the pandemic, which EPO management is exploiting. The turmoil provides cover.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New

  1. [Meme] False Choices and False Dichotomy Designed for Self-Harm

    The self-serving EPO surveys, which Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos design to justify their own policies, have severe flaws in them

  2. Links 27/10/2021: XOrg Server 21.1 and Makulu Shift Ubuntu Variant Released

    Links for the day

  3. Links 27/10/2021: Murena for /e/ and Red Hat Condemned for Its Nationalism/Racism

    Links for the day

  4. [Meme] EPO Presidential Surveys

    The 'social democracy' of Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos as demonstrated by a controlled survey (controlled by the subject of the survey, EPO governance)

  5. 'Shaping the New Normal' Survey at the EPO Got 5,554 EPO Staff to Participate, But It Was Controlled by Liars With an Agenda

    Last year’s EPO ‘study’ (hogwash about “quality” and other unscientific junk) was likely biased by virtue of autocrats controlling it and exploiting it for nefarious agenda and brainwashing of national delegates. The Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) has a new survey in the making.

  6. Many of the National Delegations (or Delegates) in the EPO's Administrative Council Have No Understanding of What They Vote on

    One must consider the possibility that ignorance or gullibility (which lack of qualifications may entail) possibly became a contributing factor — malice and bribery aside — in systemic failure of the EPO’s governance

  7. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXV: The Balkan League - Fresh Blood or Same Old, Same Old?

    We take stock of "captured states" that voted in favour of unlawful "Strike Regulations"

  8. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 26, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 26, 2021

  9. Beatriz Busaniche Speaks Up in Defense of Richard Stallman

    Beatriz Busaniche sent us this comment in July 2021. She wrote it originally in Spanish. Here are both the original text and our translation to English.

  10. Links 26/10/2021: SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 and Multi-Distro Benchmarks

    Links for the day

  11. Links 26/10/2021: Vulkan 1.1 Conformance for Raspberry Pi 4 and Tor Browser 10.5.10

    Links for the day

  12. [Meme] Sounds Legit

    When not cheating on the wife, the EPO‘s “doyen” cheats in the exams and makes it into the epi Council, in effect working “[t]owards a common understanding [sic] of quality” with “patent attorneys nominated as “assessors” by the EPO, epi and BusinessEurope” (notorious lobbyists for dictators, litigation, and monopolies, neither business nor science)

  13. [Meme] Mayoral Patent Office Chief

    As it turns out, political 'double-dipping' isn't just a thing in North Macedonia, Austria, and EPOnia

  14. Romania's Patent Office (OSIM): Nine Different Chiefs in Just Eight Years

    The Romanian State Office for Inventions and Trademarks (OSIM), being the equivalent of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in the sense that it covers both patents and trademarks, is a very flaky institution with no shortage of scandals; for our English-reading audiences we now have a summary of a decade’s worth of blunders and leadership changes

  15. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXIV: The Balkan League - Romania

    Romania’s patent office has been in flux this past decade, occasionally led by people with no relevant experience, but rather political connections (like EPO President António Campinos) and sometimes forged documents and fake degrees

  16. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 25, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, October 25, 2021

  17. [Meme] “Social Democracy” at the EPO

    Some comments on the current situation at the European Patent Office from Goran Gerasimovski, the new EPO Administrative Council delegate for North Macedonia and Social Democratic candidate for mayor of Centar (a municipality of Skopje)

  18. [Meme] António Campinos Visits the OSIM

    António Campinos visits OSIM Director-General Ionel Muscalu in February 2014

  19. [Meme] [Teaser] Meet the President

    Later today we shall see what Romania did for Battistelli

  20. Links 26/10/2021: Latte Dock 0.10.3 and Linux 5.15 RC7

    Links for the day

  21. Gemini Protocol's Originator: “I Continue to Care About This Project and I Care About the Community That Has Formed Around It.”

    'Solderpunk' is back from a long hiatus; this bodes well for Geminispace, which grew fast in spite of the conspicuous absence

  22. Bulgarian Like Bavarian Serfdom

    Bulgarian politics seem to have played a big role in selecting chiefs and delegates who backed Benoît Battistelli‘s unlawful proposals, which treat workers almost like slaves and ordinary citizens as disposable ‘collaterals’

  23. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXIII: The Balkan League - Bulgaria

    Today we examine the role of Bulgaria in Benoît Battistelli‘s liberticidal regime at the EPO (as well as under António Campinos, from 2018 to present) with particular focus on political machinations

  24. Links 25/10/2021: New Slackware64-current and a Look at Ubuntu Budgie

    Links for the day

  25. Links 25/10/2021: pg_statement_rollback 1.3 and Lots of Patent Catchup

    Links for the day

  26. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part III — A Story of Plagiarism and Likely Securities Fraud

    Today we tread slowly and take another step ahead, revealing the nature of only some among many problems that GitHub and Microsoft are hiding from the general public (to the point of spiking media reports)

  27. [Meme] [Teaser] Oligarchs-Controlled Patent Offices With Media Connections That Cover Up Corruption

    As we shall see later today, the ‘underworld’ in Bulgaria played a role or pulled the strings of politically-appointed administrators who guarded Benoît Battistelli‘s liberticidal regime at the EPO

  28. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 24, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 24, 2021

  29. Links 25/10/2021: EasyOS 3.1 and Bareflank 3.0

    Links for the day

  30. The Demolition of the EPO Was Made Possible With Assistance From Countries That Barely Have European Patents

    The legal basis of today's EPO has been crushed; a lot of this was made possible by countries with barely any stakes in the outcome

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts