03.22.21

Gemini version available ♊︎

EPO and Microsoft Collude to Break the Law — Summing Up: EPO Administrative Council Still Asleep at the Wheel

Posted in Deception, Europe, Microsoft, Patents at 4:24 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Previous parts:

EPO's council heads

Summary: AC chair Josef Kratochvíl (CZ) and deputy chair Borghildur Erlingsdóttir (IS) seem to be unperturbed by the sell-out of the EPO’s “digital sovereignty” taking place on their watch

For quite some time now it has been an open secret that the data protection framework at the EPO is not fit for purpose.

Back in the spring of 2014 the Bavarian Data Protection Commissioner, Dr Thomas Petri, carried out his own independent investigation into the matter following a complaint and he came to the conclusion that “nobody was really in charge”.

Together with his colleague the Federal German Data Protection Commissioner, Andrea Vosshoff, Dr Petri raised serious concerns about the state of data protection at the EPO. However, their urgent pleas for reform fell on deaf ears.

“So it’s difficult to see how such a manifestly deficient framework which hadn’t changed in the meantime could be considered meet the even more stringent standards imposed by GDPR in 2018.”When the EU GDPR came into effect in May 2018, Battistelli attempted to pull the wool over the eyes of the EPO’s stakeholders and the general public by issuing a self-serving communiqué (warning: epo.org link) proclaiming the EPO’s commitment to “ensuring the highest level of data protection” and announcing that “a recent audit report has confirmed a close alignment with the GDPR legal framework”.

The only problem here is that Dr Petri, a serious and well-regarded independent expert on data protection law found that the EPO’s data protection framework failed to measure up to pre-GDPR standards in 2014.

So it’s difficult to see how such a manifestly deficient framework which hadn’t changed in the meantime could be considered meet the even more stringent standards imposed by GDPR in 2018.

As a matter of fact, a report commissioned by the EPO staff union SUEPO from external legal experts in 2016 came to the conclusion that the EPO’s data protection framework was not compliant with EU data protection standards and was in urgent need of a radical overhaul.

It’s worth citing a few passages from that report for the record:

The European Union does, quite rightly, take data protection seriously. Yet the framework at the EPO gives rise to significant cause for concern, which has also been expressed by the national data protection authorities of the main host state – the Federal Republic of Germany.

The Guidelines for the Protection of Personal Data in the European Patent Office (‘EPO DataProtection Guidelines’ or ‘EPO DPG’), which were unilaterally adopted by the President and which entered into force on 1st April 2014. The current EPO DPG appear to fail to meet the standards of both EU data protection law and the national data protection laws of the Contracting States, in particular, the host countries of the EPO. As such, they do not provide a satisfactory framework for safeguarding the data protection rights of data subjects within the Office.

A key component of the EU data protection framework and which is reflected in the national data protection laws of all EU member states is the existence of an independent oversight body; yet this is conspicuously absent at the EPO. Indeed, the deficiencies in the existing system of data protection established by the EPO’s Data Protection Guidelines have come to the attention of the national data protection authorities in the host state of the EPO’s headquarters (Germany) and have even been the subject of a discussion in the Legal Affairs Committee of the German Federal Parliament (Bundestag).

In the meantime, very little has changed at the EPO apart from the arrival of a new Data Protection Officer via “the talent pipeline from the EUIPO in Alicante” in April 2020 as previously reported by Techrights.

“Unfortunately for all concerned, the Administrative Council appears to have completely abdicated its responsibilities in this regard.”When all is said and done, the task of ensuring that the EPO’s data protection framework is fit for purpose is a matter of fundamental legal and political significance which lies within the responsibility of the governing body of the organisation, namely the Administrative Council.

This is not something which can be simply delegated to the EPO management to deal with on its own initiative.

Unfortunately for all concerned, the Administrative Council appears to have completely abdicated its responsibilities in this regard.

The Council gives the distinct impression that it is “asleep at the wheel” as the senior management of the EPO proceeds to sell out the organisation’s “digital sovereignty” to a US multinational corporation behind its back.

EPO cruise
Once again, the EPO’s Administrative Council seems to be asleep at the wheel

Of course the Council has only got itself to blame for the precarious and potentially disastrous situation which has now developed.

After all they were the ones who permitted their sense of judgement to be corrupted by the former Council Chairman Battistelli and agreed to follow his proposal to disband the independent Audit Committee in 2011.

With the benefit of hindsight it is now apparent that, by acting as an accessory to Battistelli’s Machiavellian intrigues and acquiescing in the disbandment of the Audit Committee, the Council followed a misguided course of action which has had far-reaching and detrimental effects on the integrity of EPO governance.

It comes as no real surprise to see that – having deprived itself of any genuinely independent source of advice by means of an ignominious act of self-mutilation at the urging of Battistelli – the Council is now unable to react in an robust manner to defend the EPO’s “digital sovereignty” and to ensure that the organisation’s data protection framework is fit for purpose and truly GDPR-compliant.

These are matters of fundamental importance and legitimate concern not only to EPO staff but also to all other stakeholders, including the general public.

Unfortunately the current Council under the stewardship of its chair, Josef Kratochvíl (Czech Republic), and deputy chair, Borghildur Erlingsdóttir (Iceland), does not appear to appreciate the seriousness of the issues and stake and seems unlikely to take appropriate remedial action unless and until something dramatic happens to jolt it out of its complacent slumber.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] EPO Budget Tanking?

    While the EPO‘s António Campinos incites people (and politicians) to break the law he’s also attacking, robbing, and lying to his own staff; thankfully, his staff isn’t gullible enough and some MEPs are sympathetic; soon to follow is a video and publication about the EPO’s systematic plunder (ETA midnight GMT)



  2. EPO.org (Official EPO Site) Continues to Promote Illegal Agenda and Exploit Ukraine for PR Stunts That Help Unaccountable Crooks

    epo.org has been turned into a non-stop propaganda machine of Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos because the EPO routinely breaks the law; it’s rather tasteless that while Ukrainians are dying the EPO’s mob exploits Ukraine for PR purposes



  3. [Meme] EPO Applicants Unwittingly Fund the War on Ukraine

    As we’ve just shown, António Campinos is desperately trying to hide a massive EPO scandal



  4. EPO Virtue-Signalling on the Ukrainian Front

    António Campinos persists in attention-shifting dross and photo ops; none of that can change the verifiable facts about the EPO’s connections to Lukashenko’s 'science park' in Minsk



  5. Links 19/05/2022: PostgreSQL 15 Beta 1 and Plasma 5.25 Beta

    Links for the day



  6. A Libera.Chat Anniversary and Happy Birthday (Maybe the Last) to 'Leenode'

    What became known as the so-called ‘Leenode’ is a cautionary tale, but maybe it is also a blessing in disguise because IRC as a whole seem to have become a lot more decentralised (as everything should be)



  7. Links 19/05/2022: The Gradual Fall of Netflix/DRM

    Links for the day



  8. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 18, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 18, 2022



  9. Links 18/05/2022: Qt Company Loses Chief; OpenSUSE Leap Micro 5.2 and RHEL 9 Final

    Links for the day



  10. Jim Zemlin's Wife is Funded by Puppies (Microsoft)

    Jim Zemlin — like his wife — is bagging millions from Microsoft, but that’s clearly a conflict of interest for the Linux Foundation



  11. Links 18/05/2022: More Defections From WordPress to Gemini

    Links for the day



  12. Links 18/05/2022: PikaScript and cURL's Annual User Survey

    Links for the day



  13. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 17, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 17, 2022



  14. Phoronix: Microsoft and Phoronix Sponsor (and Close Microsoft Partner) AMD All Over the Place

    When you’re taking massive 'gifts' from AMD (and also some from Microsoft) maybe it’s not surprising that editorial decisions change somewhat…



  15. EPO Has No F-ing Oversight

    Earlier today SUEPO mentioned this new article demonstrating that EPO President António Campinos can very obviously and blatantly violate the Code of Conduct of the Office without facing any consequences; there are translations too, so the report is now available in four languages



  16. [Meme] Linux-Rejecting Foundation

    The Linux Foundation never really leads by example; by default, it uses proprietary software



  17. Linux Foundation Almost Never uses Open Source

    The Linux Foundation uses proprietary software (look where they hire and take money from) and be sure they're probably not even aware of it



  18. Links 17/05/2022: Many More Games on GNU/Linux, YaST Development Report

    Links for the day



  19. Links 17/05/2022: Rocky Linux 8.6 and Budgie Desktop in Fedora

    Links for the day



  20. Patent Examiners Rising Up Against EPO Abuse

    Unhappy with the law-breaking autocracy (the EPO‘s management breaks the law as a matter of routine), fast-deteriorating working conditions and rapidly-decreasing quality of work (or lack of compliance with the law), workers have escalated further, topping off strikes and industrial actions with a large-scale petition



  21. [Meme] What Managers (Really) Mean by Acting Professionally

    The myth of 'professionalism' needs to die along with the façade of conformity as prerequisite for employment (Linus Torvalds can work just fine in a bathrobe in his own home)



  22. Internal Poll: 93% of European Patent Office (EPO) Workers Are Unhappy With the EPO

    On top of strike/s and industrial action/s there are now also petitions; at the EPO, almost all staff is "disgruntled" because of utterly corrupt and defunct leadership



  23. Links 17/05/2022: OpenSUSE Leap 15.4 Release Candidate

    Links for the day



  24. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 16, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 16, 2022



  25. Links 16/05/2022: FreeBSD 13.1 and Inkscape 1.2 Released

    Links for the day



  26. Archiving Latest Posts in Geminispace (Like a Dated Web Directory But for Gemini)

    Earlier today we saw several more people crossing over from the World Wide Web to Gemini; we're trying to make a decent aggregator and archive for the rapidly-expanding Geminispace, which will soon have 2,500 capsules that are known to Lupa alone



  27. Microsoft Vidal Does Not Want to Listen (USPTO is Just for Megacorporations)

    Microsoft Vidal knows her real bosses. They’re international corporations (multinationals like Microsoft), not American people.



  28. Links 16/05/2022: China Advances on GNU/Linux and Maui 2.1.2 is Out

    Links for the day



  29. Jim Zemlin: Chief Revenue Officer in 'Linux' Seat-Selling Foundation

    Board seats in the Linux Foundation are basically a product on sale, based internal documents



  30. Reminder: Linux Foundation's Last IRS Filing is Very Old (Same Year the CFO Left)

    People really need to ask the Linux Foundation, directly, why its filings are years behind; this seems like a sensitive subject


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts