Video download link | md5sum 182df25f7e3f079a3185e8bf7531c6ad Looking Below the Belly of Naked EPO Injustice Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0



Summary: Unjustified injustice at the EPO puts in grave doubt the EPO's capability of deciding on patentability and its credibility in patent cases at large; it seems clear, based on the EPO's internal tribunals and appeal boards, that the Office controls everything (Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos are stacking the deck to get their "desired" outcomes) and flagrantly breaks all the laws, even constitutions and conventions (EPC, Vienna Convention and so on)

THE internal documents from the EPO, combined with 'battle stories' (inside the courts and behind the scenes), will tell readers the true story of Europe's second-largest institution. Ironically enough, Battistelli ended up in a law school (albeit also UPC propaganda mill), though that doesn't mean he still enjoys diplomatic immunity.

Earlier today we published the story about Karoline Kerber-Zubrzycka, who is back at the EPO despite an appalling record (maybe a reward for this appalling record -- a record much desired by Battistelli) and tomorrow we'll publish a long part about a former judge of the European Court of Human Rights, Sir Paul Mahoney, who after half a decade decided that staff of the EPO still had freedom of expression.

"The video above gives more examples of Kafkaesque scenarios, e.g. tribunals illegal composed deciding on legality of things."What sort of justice is this? If "justice delayed is justice denied" (as the saying goes), then the EPO lacks any sense of justice. In fact, the EPO's own judges were illegally (in violation of the EPC) lodged in Haar for about half a decade. How Kafkaesque is that? The video above gives more examples of Kafkaesque scenarios, e.g. tribunals illegal composed deciding on legality of things. ⬆