08.11.22

Gemini version available ♊︎

Inside the Minds of Microsoft’s Media Operatives — Part V — In Deep Denial About One’s Harm

Posted in Deception, Marketing, Microsoft at 11:13 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Working behind the scenes to orchestrate “independent” praise of our technology, and damnation of the enemy’s, is a key evangelism function during the Slog. “Independent” analyst’s report should be issued, praising your technology and damning the competitors (or ignoring them). “Independent” consultants should write columns and articles, give conference presentations and moderate stacked panels, all on our behalf (and setting them up as experts in the new technology, available for just $200/hour). “Independent” academic sources should be cultivated and quoted (and research money granted). “Independent” courseware providers should start profiting from their early involvement in our technology. Every possible source of leverage should be sought and turned to our advantage.”

Microsoft, internal document [PDF]

Series parts:

  1. Inside the Minds of Microsoft’s Media Operatives — Part I — Bishops in Rooks
  2. Inside the Minds of Microsoft’s Media Operatives — Part II — Justifying a Career as a Microsoft Mouthpiece That Destroys Lives of People With Actual Facts
  3. Inside the Minds of Microsoft’s Media Operatives — Part III — Attacking Real Security, Promoting Lies and Fake ‘Security’
  4. Inside the Minds of Microsoft’s Media Operatives — Part IV — “Same Sort of Journalistic Bias Infecting Russia at the Moment”
  5. YOU ARE HERE ☞ In Deep Denial About One’s Harm

Summary: Source-burning Microsoft boosters, who vainly think of themselves as “journalists”, respond to allegations of bias and dissemination of Microsoft falsehoods

ABOUT a week ago we showed the typical excuses leveraged for and by Microsoft spinners inside “the media” — that sorts of spinners who constantly help Microsoft spread lies (e.g. about the layoffs covered here earlier this week).

How do they justify that to themselves? Do they think that being rewarded with “access” by Microsoft is a sign of them doing a good job? Or just a sign that Microsoft views them as media pawns? “Bummed that I didn’t hear back from you yesterday,” said the so-called ‘journalist’ who burned a Microsoft whistleblower. “The interview with Brad [Smith] went pretty well, will send you a link when it’s live.”

So being rewarded by Microsoft is a sign of good work? Is that what they say to themselves? Clickfraud Spamnil thinks that corporations getting PR services (and defrauded regarding the number of views) is “success”… but that’s hardly the way to measure merit.

We’d like to dissect his rather poor justification of what he deems to be journalism when in fact what he is doing (and have done for decades) is just classic churnalism. He helps spread lies, usually for Microsoft.

Our response is in-line below:

I understand your perspective. By chance, I am reading a book that gets into a lot of these issues. It’s called Losing the News, originally published in 2009. In many ways it’s timeless; in others, it’s outdated, Regardless, it’s a good read and a reminder of the power of journalism done right.

Reading a book about news does not qualify oneself; moreover, what he does on a daily basis causes people to lose the news. Instead of seeing the facts they just see lies from Microsoft being perpetuated. The recent layoffs are a good example of Microsoft interfering with the news, aided by its media “assets” who ‘plant’ false stories.

When you say “critical” in the context of news coverage, which definition are you using, #1 or #2?

1. Inclined to find fault or to judge with severity.
2. Skillful judgment as to truth, merit, etc.

Those are pretty much the same thing, but the Microsoft boosters look for ways to justify falsehoods. They relay lies, based on the assumption they cannot prove that Microsoft lies are, in fact, lies.

From the context of your various messages to me, I think you are using #1. Am I right? If so, I disagree that this is journalism. It’s biased in its own way, and bad for everyone involved, including readers, investors, democracy, etc.

When a criminal commits a crime, should we not call this spade a spade? Well, those who make a career of Microsoft apologism prefer to think Microsoft is always innocent. Then, they get rewarded by Microsoft. They perceive this as a badge of honour for “good work”…

Wait and watch.

I believe journalism is #2. The effect on the subject(s) of the story may be positive, negative, neutral, or a mix of these things. Doesn’t matter. That’s the point. We can’t rely on a journalist who finds fault by default, just as we can’t rely on a journalist who is positive by default.

This is laughable coming from this person. Fact-checking was never done; instead, it was a stream of puff pieces, guided and led by Microsoft. And now running to the perceived morality, saying he cannot “find fault by default” even when witnessing Microsoft’s long track record of crime.

I get it: you believe I am the latter. I hear you, and throughout these exchanges I’ve kept my mind open to your criticism, even if it has been more #1 than #2 at times.

It’s a lot worse. The ‘articles’ are usually Microsoft plants, i.e. ghostwritten or partly ghostwritten fluff handed over. So he’s basically responding to a straw man argument here.

However, I can tell you that favoring the subject of a story is never my intent. I can’t speak for the profession. All I can do is tell you how I approach things. I do my best to be clear-eyed, well-researched, thoughtful, tough, fair, objective and ethical, and I do as much as I can to help my [redacted] colleagues be the same. I can give you many examples. Do I also fall short? Absolutely. You and I agree on that. I need to improve. I want your help and tips on the subjects that I cover.

The subjects typically come from Microsoft. The slant too is Microsoft’s. Also, he has a history of taking money from Microsoft, so there’s that aspect too.

By the way, better terms commonly used in the industry for this type of coverage would be watchdog, investigative or explanatory journalism. The book does a good job of laying this out as part of what the author calls the “iron core” of news.

The author in question does none of the above. He does Public Relations wrapped up as “reporting” and in the process he ousts truth teller, causing them to suffer for the ‘crime’ of refuting lies told by Microsoft directly and through media “assets”.

Whatever term you use, I think calling this type of coverage “a thin veil of unbiased objectivity” is cynical.

No, it’s not. It’s just precisely what it is!

You’re entitled to your opinion.

But I will oust you and cause you to be fired if you say true things that expose the lies I tell for Microsoft.

But based on my first-hand observations, working in newsrooms since I was a teenager, these types of pieces are the pinnacle for most traditional journalists. It’s what most of us strive to do all the time. Again, speaking for myself, I don’t get there nearly as much as I should. But it is flawed to simply presume that failure in this regard amounts to bias or malicious intent.

He does not view himself as a malicious, malevolent actor, but he helps people who commit crimes and destroy people’s lives.

Dismissing good journalism as nothing but a mechanism by “compromised” outlets to create cover for favorable coverage is unfair to people who devote their lives and careers to trying to do this job in the right way.

What job? Microsoft PR? That’s hardly a job, it’s a disservice to the public.

Just so you know, independent of any of this, I asked for an interview with Brad Smith last week to ask questions about a variety of recent news from the company, and it looks like I’m going to be interviewing him today. You will see this as a sign of the machine at work. Again, you’re free to interpret the situation as you want. Personally, I think it’s a function of 20+ years doing my best to cover a difficult beat following the principles of #2. Maybe you would see it as a combination of the two: their machine outgunning my attempts to do good journalism.

The only reason Smith would speak to him is to reward him for the PR, expecting no hard questions. It’s a loyalty club.

At any rate, here’s my question for you: what would you ask Brad Smith that would get him to concede, acknowledge, or (better yet) reveal something meaningful? How would you phrase the questions? Keep in mind: they need to be tough, concise, and incisive (#2) but they can’t simply be biased or combative for the sake of it (#1). I’m happy to take your ideas into consideration.

Smith only speak to people he controls, such as media “assets”. So this question is rather meaningless.

I’m on a deadline to come up with my questions, so please respond this morning if you want me to consider your ideas. Regardless, you’ll be able to judge my questions for yourself. My work is out in the open for any type of criticism that you or anyone else would like to offer.

Looking forward to your thoughts.

Talking to these Microsoft boosters, hoping they’d realise the damage they’ve done, is rather pointless. They live in their own universe, convinced (maybe by affirmations from Microsoft) that what they do is journalism when in fact it’s low-grade propaganda. So it’s better to expose the compromised “work”, not try to convince them that their work is compromised. They’re in denial about the whole thing.

In the next part, the final part, we’ll show the response from the whistleblower burned by the above so-called ‘journalist’.

“A stacked panel, on the other hand, is like a stacked deck: it is packed with people who, on the face of things, should be neutral, but who are in fact strong supporters of our technology. The key to stacking a panel is being able to choose the moderator. Most conference organizers allow the moderator to select die panel, so if you can pick the moderator, you win. Since you can’t expect representatives of our competitors to speak on your behalf, you have to get the moderator to agree to having only “independent ISVs” on the panel. No one from Microsoft or any other formal backer of the competing technologies would be allowed -just ISVs who have to use this stuff in the “real world.” Sounds marvellously independent doesn’t it? In feet, it allows us to stack the panel with ISVs that back our cause. Thus, the “independent” panel ends up telling the audience that our technology beats the others hands down. Get the press to cover this panel, and you’ve got a major win on your hands.”

Microsoft, internal document [PDF]

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 04, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 04, 2022



  2. Links 05/10/2022: PL/Haskell 1.0 and RapidRows 1.0 Released

    Links for the day



  3. Links 04/10/2022: Introducing NVK, Kueue, Stellarium 1.0, WordPress 6.1 Beta 3, and OpenSSH 9.1

    Links for the day



  4. Linux Foundation Events Now 'Run' by Linux's Biggest Foe

    The Linux Foundation expresses gratitude, upfront, to only one company: Microsoft



  5. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 03, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, October 03, 2022



  6. Links 04/10/2022: Tor Project Board and Conflicts of Interest, More Politics

    Links for the day



  7. Microsoft Windows Sinks to Just 16% of the African Market

    As we noted yesterday, Windows is down sharply this month (27.1% market share worldwide) and the decreases are very significant in Africa, where Android (Linux-based) is spreading fast. Here’s a chart for Africa, showing Microsoft’s decrease to about 16%.



  8. IRC Widgets Working Again

    After turbulence and technical issues at KiwiIRC we've managed to get a semi-working solution or some workaround



  9. Trolled by Microsoft's Lennart Poettering and Bought by Wintel

    Last week’s public appearance by Torvalds seemed reluctant and a tad embarrassing (the media pointed out the awkwardness, too); whose idea was that, the Linux Foundation‘s?



  10. Links 03/10/2022: Git 2.38.0 and cinnabar 0.6.0rc1

    Links for the day



  11. Links 03/10/2022: OpenMandriva ROME Gold Candidate and IceWM 3.0.0

    Links for the day



  12. Members of the Administrative Council of the EPO Are Asked to Summon a Conference of Ministers of the Contracting States Due to Violations of the Law

    The EPO has turned into a farcical operation that laughs at the law, abuses its own staff, and lies to both staff and "customers" in the official Web site



  13. European School The Hague (ESH) Faces a Crisis and Families of EPO Workers Are Harmed Profoundly

    The European School The Hague (ESH) is not functioning like it’s supposed to; people who migrated (seeking a job) along with family members for an EPO position aren’t pleased (to say the least) and they request if not demand to speak with EPO management



  14. [Meme] Lowering the Bar With Nations That Barely Have Any European Patents (Close to Zero)

    The EPO has totally lost the plot; it completely neglected its mission in pursuit of money and optics



  15. Links 03/10/2022: GNU Linux-Libre 6.0

    Links for the day



  16. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 02, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 02, 2022



  17. Update on SeaMonkey 2.53.14 and NoScript Crashes/Palefills Not Working

    Reprinted with permission from Ryan



  18. Links 03/10/2022: Linux 6.0 is Out

    Links for the day



  19. GNU/Linux and the GPL in Particular Are Under Attack Because They Spread Fast (Like a 'Cancer')

    The good news is that GNU/Linux continues to expand (widespread usage); the bad news is, it has come under a sheer magnitude of attacks and the media barely bothers to mention the obvious



  20. Windows Majority in Asia Down to Just Three Countries, All-time Low for Windows Worldwide This Month

    The decline of Microsoft Windows continues; sooner or later Android (Linux inside) will be dominant in almost every country in terms of its market share or number of users



  21. Links 02/10/2022: Debian on Firmware Policy and PostgreSQL 15 RC 1

    Links for the day



  22. Links 02/10/2022: KStars 3.6.1 and DjangoCon Europe 2022

    Links for the day



  23. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 01, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, October 01, 2022



  24. Fedora 37 and SeaMonkey 2.53.14

    Reprinted with permission from Ryan



  25. 'Linux' Foundation, While Hoarding Over $200,000,000 Per Year, Calls Itself 'Non-Profit'

    This video (10:55-11:28 above), which was published a few weeks ago, gives insight into how much money the Linux Foundation and its proxies raise per year while paying Jim Zemlin [cref =164412 probably about $1.4 million per year already] (because it’s all so charitable)



  26. GNU/Linux Rises to Record Highs in Africa This Past September

    According to this map and these latest plots (based on data from about 3,000,000 Web sites), Windows majority is long lost in Africa and (‘proper’) GNU/Linux usage keeps rising (not just Android, which uses Linux)



  27. Ongoing Efforts to Convince OSI to Drop the Microsoft Funding (Which Comes With Strings, Such as the OSI Attacking the GPL)

    It's becoming increasingly clear that buzzwords and hype get misused to misframe and distract from abuses; we're meanwhile trying to convince the Open Source Initiative (OSI) to drop Microsoft because it pays the OSI for a disinformation campaign (portraying large-scale GPL violations as "AI")



  28. Richard Stallman on Libre Software

    Richard Stallman on Libre Software from LispNYC on Vimeo.



  29. IBM's Lobbying for (and Stockpiling of) Software Patents is Ruining Fedora and GNU/Linux in General

    Fedora suffers from software patents, hence it removes features while IBM lobbies for such patents and gives software patents to patent trolls (in patent sales)



  30. Microsoft Doesn't Like Open Source; It's Badmouthing, Stereotyping, Attacking It (to Shift Blame)

    This week I found out that a dear old friend lost all his money (about 150,000 pounds) due to a Microsoft LinkedIn scam; watch how Microsoft blames unpopular nation states, “open source”, the victims, and attackers (basically anyone but Microsoft), just as it does when defects in its software go unfixed for months


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts