Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO's Patent Invalidity and Low Patent Quality Issues Get the Attention of Christian Wichard (Deputy Director General at Germany's Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection)

J. Christian Wichard, Deputy Director General at Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection

Summary: Thomas Magenheim, who has been writing about the EPO for about a decade already (also earlier this summer), publishes a new article which reveals that the Ministry of Justice in Germany gets involved as António Campinos refuses to talk about quality/validity issues as discussed by IPQC; loads of fake (invalid, bunk) European Patents are being granted

THE culture of overt corruption and terror at the EPO began with Benoît Battistelli, a white-collar criminal and despot who basically "arranged" the job of his successor, a man who refers to himself as "the f***ing president". These people are definitely not qualified to run the Office, yet they steal and then occupy top positions, even in the EU (EUIPO has just been seized by another member of their clique after intense interference).



Today's EPO grants European software patents using buzzwords and worse means. The only thing it judges is money, even if unlawfully obtained. It is a notorious process of financialisation. It leads to ruin.

There's a new article this month and the staff union uploaded an automated translation. We reproduce it below as HTML/plain text/GemText, noting deficiencies like examiners becoming "auditors".

EPO RND article: „Die Kasse muss stimmen“: Warum das Europäische Patentamt in der Kritik steht



Here is a translation:

Two examiners unpack

RND: "The cash register must be right": Why the European Patent Office under criticism



The European Patent Office has been criticised for quality problems. Now two examiners have come clean and confirmed deficiencies. The Office is stonewalling - and the Ministry of Justice is calling for dialogue.

Thomas Magenheim

Munich. The man presents his official identity card for the European Patent Office (EPO), which identifies him as a patent examiner. Like a colleague, he wants to remain anonymous because, according to internal regulations, examiners are not allowed to make public statements if that could damage the reputation of the office. What the duo has to say is quite capable of doing that. "The seeds are sown," says one of them. He is referring to the consequences of a new appraisal and promotion system introduced in 2015 that encourages examiners to work through as many cases as possible. Cases are patent applications. Those who process many applications get many assessment points. The more of these points an examiner manages, the faster he rises and receives more salary. "Our quality problem is structural", emphasises one of the two auditor.

His colleague confirms this, and with it criticism of the IPQC. This is an initiative of major industrial applicants at the patent office, with Siemens leading the way on the German side. Bayer, Nokia and Roche are also involved. IPQC complains that the office is having patent applications examined ever more quickly and thus more negligently. The result i s that patents contested in court are less and less likely to b e upheld, which can cost alleged patent holders a lot of money. The office itself has not yet publicly commented on the criticism.

It has always denied quality problems to IPQC until recently, say industry representatives.

In contrast, the IPQC's criticism has been registered without surprise among its own auditors. "This was to be expected," says one of the two auditors. It was only a matter of time before quality problems began to show through, since the audit time has been getting tighter and tighter for years. "The money has to be right," adds the other examiner. However, the office collects fees mainly when patents are recognised. Revenues per grant therefore have priority.

Auditors had already feared the resulting quality problem eight years ago and addressed it internally. "The management doesn't see it that way and sees us more as a nest-destroyer," says an auditor who has been working for a good 20 years and has a lot of experience.

The office is also stonewalling the IPQC. Since February, it has refused to provide data requested by the initiative on patent granting practices. It has also refused invitations to a round table or a public discussion at the Osnabrück Patent Days this May, where all the problems could have been discussed. All this can be seen in a letter from the IPQC to Epa head Antonio Campinos from the end of June. It also shows that the leadership no longer wants to talk to IPQC, as confirmed by those involved.

The office and its critics

The European Patent Office, with its headquarters in Munich, is not an EU authority, but a supranational organisation to which 39 European states have joined. Each of them is represented in the Administrative Council with one vote, regardless of the patent volume of their countries. San Marino has one vote, as does Germany. Patent fees also benefit these 39 states proportionately. For many smaller ones, they represent an important budget item. They are interested in many patent grants. The IPQC industry initiative provides facts for criticism. From 2018 to 2022, the number of patent applications increased by a tenth, but the number of examiners fell by 8 per cent. The rate of accepted patent applications grew from 61 to 71 per cent from 2015 to 2021, while the processing time per patent application was halved. By comparison, major applicant Siemens needed a good third more time to formulate a patent application. Well over half of the contested patents were recently withdrawn in whole or in part.

No one is served by mass instead of class

In the meantime, the dispute has also reached the Epa Administrative Council as the supervisory body of the office. The German representative on the board is Assistant Secretary Christian Wichard from the Federal Ministry of Justice. "The IPQC is known to the ministry," it writes in response to a question. It is important, he says, to grant a patent that will last as far as possible if it is legally challenged. "No one is served by a merely quantitative approach that prioritises the number of patents granted," the Ministry of Justice emphasises.

The Administrative Council is very aware that the quality of patent granting is of great importance and that quality deficiencies would be very problematic for Europe as a location for innovation, it continues, and urges constructive dialogue with the IPQC. The commitment of the industry initiative is to welcome.

With its attitude of refusal, the office obviously sees things quite differently. From now on, alleged quality problems will only be discussed within Epa and in the Standing Advisory Committee, which is made up of representatives of the notifying industry. The Office refuses to discuss the matter separately with the IPQC, according to people familiar with the matter.

However, the critical major notifiers do not want to let up, and have now also sought contact with the German Epa Board of Directors, Wichard, and thus political support. Judging by the statements of the Federal Ministry of Justice, there is. Germany has always emphasised the importance of patent quality in the Administrative Council and suggested that the Office and IPQC try to find solutions in dialogue, it explains. It is important that the Office and users "remain in serious dialogue and that no hardened fronts emerge". But that is exactly what it looks like at the moment.


The Office has long cared more about how it's perceived rather than the legality what it is doing. Germany, in general, takes the back seat. The German government benefits from the EPO being located mostly in Germany, so it's not likely to uphold the law. In fact, as we showed years ago, the Ministry of Justice in Germany went out of its way to promote the illegal and unconstitutional Unified Patent Court, which really said a lot about its attitude towards "justice".

The German government must understand that this nonchalance means tolerance of crime. It means erosion of trust in the German government and -- by extension -- in the EU. This is good for nobody, not even for Germans. Who benefits from all this? Probably the far right.

Recent Techrights' Posts

They're Very Jealous of Richard Stallman and His Freedom (or Simple Lifestyle)
Jealousy is toxic because it can cause rational people to act irrationally and even severely harm themselves
Akira Urushibata on GNU coreutils
new message
There's Nothing Funny About Lawbreaking
There's plenty of room in society for humour, but "hacking" the state by breaking laws isn't cool or hip
Gemini Links 26/05/2025: Intangible Stuff and Slop Issues
Links for the day
 
Microsofters Have, in Effect, Attempted Extrajudicial Action Against Us
Courts and Judges (or Masters) don't exist to facilitate this kind of "bro" culture
UK High Court Masters Are Not Your Jesters, Microsoft
Judges aren't there for "funny" spectacles, they're there to act as arbiters in critical cases, not SLAPPs
Links 27/05/2025: Mass Layoffs at Volvo and More Evidence of 'AI' (Slop) Being a Passing Fad
Links for the day
The Code of Conduct (CoC) Gaslighting Phenomenon
There are still many people and projects foolish enough to outsource their labour to Microsoft via GitHub
Anouk Rozestraten (Deputy Director) Appears to Have Left the Free Software Foundation
Let's hope Rozestraten is still using and promoting Free software
More Mass Layoffs Coming Soon to Microsoft, Just a Question of When and How Many
Numbers from Washington were close to 5% and judging by prior rumours, it would be 5% + 5% (total 10%) at a later month
Links 27/05/2025: Bikes, Ideal Computers, and BYO
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 26, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, May 26, 2025
Richard Stallman's Milan Talk (Public Presentation) Was Packed, Video Available Soon
Looks like they even ran out of seats
The Openwashing Shills Initiative (OSI) - Part I: Complaints to IRS or USDOJ Needed
If enough people do it, this will be more effective, more so if people who are based in the US do it
Open Source Initiative (OSI) Lobbying and the OSI's Status at Stake
At the end we plan to summarise all the issues in one very long article
Breaking Into Other People's Devices Without Authorisation Isn't "Funny" or "Research"
“Chaos was the law of nature; order was the dream of man.”
The Issue Isn't the Internet, the Issue is How People Are Taught to Use or Misuse It
The Web is circling down the drain. The Internet is not.
A Healed Reputation of a Movement's Leader and His Robust Message
The more aggressively you push against resistors, the more credibility they will gain
Links 26/05/2025: Deletions from Microsoft's GitHub, Telegram Blocked in Vietnam
Links for the day
Linux Released Last Night and There's Already LLM Slop With Slop Images
BetaNoise does not seem to mind this anymore
Links 26/05/2025: Walmart Layoffs and DRM Dumpster Fire ('Old' Fire TV Devices Lose Netflix Access)
Links for the day
Gemini Links 26/05/2025: USB Camera Viewer and Fantasy Life
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 25, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, May 25, 2025
Links 25/05/2025: 15 Years of UK Legal Aid Applicant Data Grabbed and 2 Billion Discord Messages Leaked Online
Links for the day
Gemini Links 25/05/2025: Farming and OpenBSD 7.7 on Acer Aspire ES 15
Links for the day
Fighting for Freedom is Much Better Than Fighting for Money
If life is about accumulation of money, then people will be "busy making money" till they die prematurely (with nothing to do with this money)
The Microsoft SLAPP Dossiers
A rather likely outcome is, they'll lose their licence to operate
Links 25/05/2025: Harvard’s Troubles and New Openwashing Examples
Links for the day
Gemini Links 25/05/2025: Whales and Battery Replacement
Links for the day
Links 25/05/2025: Climate Action Ridiculed and "Tesla Executive Admits That Self-Driving Is Going Nowhere Fast"
Links for the day
The Next Two Phases of Our Open Source Initiative (OSI) Series
Whatever people used to think about the OSI is no longer applicable and its current acronym is a misleading misnomer
Richard Stallman Has Barely Changed
Collecting "estate" "assets"? That's not "success" in the eyes of Dr. Stallman
Public Talk by Richard Stallman (RMS) Tomorrow
Still advertised
Gemini Links 25/05/2025: Konsole Layout Changes and Capitulation to Surveillance World
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 24, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, May 24, 2025