OSI Promoting GitHub (Microsoft, Proprietary), Courtesy of the Microsoft-Funded Person Who Took the OSI's Blog
Here comes Microsoft, speaking 'for' the competition whilst attacking it.
Entryism defined
For background:
The latest:
THE above oughtn't be so shocking. It has gone on for years already. Money corrupts. Microsoft bought 'majority stake' in the OSI and saw the co-founders of the OSI discarded.
Microsoft people now speak for the OSI and write the official OSI blog. Guess what they're promoting again... GPL violations, proprietary software, and Microsoft openwashing (ClearlyDefined is Microsoft [1, 2], and it exists to advocate outsourcing to Microsoft's proprietary traps).
Many people 'inside' the community work against it and work for Microsoft. Similarly, as seen in EFF, instead of crushing the offenders it is "working with them" [1, 2], then declares "VICTORY!" (when it is not). OSI and EFF are both actively hostile towards if not pedaling against their original mission, peddling monopolies.
A few people in OSI have become rich (in the SFC even millionaires) by helping Microsoft attack Open Source. It didn't cost Microsoft much to hire these people for sabotage. They're doing a fantastic job... for Microsoft. █