Bonum Certa Men Certa

"Modern" Wikipedia is GAFAM and Billionaires (Follow the Money)

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Dec 29, 2023,
updated Dec 29, 2023

THE new year (2024) is almost here and Wikipedia begs for money again.

Does Wikipedia really need your money?

No.

It's drowning in money, especially money from rich people.

Wikipedia is powered by rich families and GAFAM; Also takes major funding with direct ties to Nazi-connected families while insisting that it preaches for tolerance.

According to Wikipedia itself (it's hard to find more recent transparency reports):

Proprietary software and major Wikipedia benefactors

We recently wrote about who's funding Wikipedia (yes, strings attached, as they can stop paying unless Wikipedia meets some implicit demands or "modest proposals" or "polite suggestions"). If you donate to Wikipedia, why not also donate to Bill Gates' 'charitable' foundation? Wikipedia keeps telling you that it needs money, but it is already taking a lot of money from Bill Gates and other oligarchs. Should you chip in? Whose cause would that advance? Yours or theirs [1, 2]? Wikipedia is serving millions of hagiographies per day.

Incidentally, last night I caught up with Lunduke's blog. Last month he wrote: "A significant portion of donations -- solicited for the stated purpose of the running of Wikipedia -- are being spent furthering political goals. Not on running Wikipedia. All while Wikipedia is claiming to be barely surviving."

It also said there (at the top): "The Wikimedia Foundation (the organization which runs and controls Wikipedia) has just published their annual financial report for the current year -- and they made a mountain of money."

Prior to that he examined the IRS filings and concluded: "They made $50+ million in profit."

So they are in it for money, just like the Linux Foundation and today's EFF [1, 2], which has some of the same "benefactors" as Wikipedia. They control debates and perceptions this way, under the guise of "grassroots", "community", "neutrality", and "activism".

Lunduke also said: "Is it strange that Wikipedia donations are being sent, by the Millions, to be handled by a political organization? Yes. That is, most definitely, strange. Considering Wikipedia has repeatedly stated the importance of neutrality... incredibly so."

Here's one example: "Neither Wikimedia nor The Tides Foundation publish details about how those funds are being used. It appears to be a secret. But, considering what The Tides Foundation does, it is something political. And only on one side of the political spectrum. Not neutral, like Wikipedia says they must be. [...] Whatever your thoughts around any of those statements, it should be noted that Wikimedia is spending $4.5 Million dollars worth of Wikipedia donations to further those goals. Money that is not being spent on running Wikipedia. [...] In fact... it is worth noting that the dollar figure being allocated towards this "Knowledge Equity Fund" is twice the size of the yearly Server Hosting costs for all of Wikipedia. [...]" (some typos corrected)

Wikimedia's Wikipedia: The Web site every oligarch can pay to change (directly or indirectly -- there's a whole industry to do the latter, e.g. Microsoft by another name/proxy [1, 2], also polluting minds on behalf of oil companies).

Wikimedia's Wikipedia should no longer be regarded as authoritative, just the authority's (rich people's) voice. At the end, after those notorious "edit wars", Wikipedia will gravitate towards those who pay the high salaries (Wikipedia calls them "benefactors" - a positive-sounding slant* on people who give bribes). They might even 'reciprocate the gesture' by increasing their so-called 'donations' the following year.

To be clear, those who are paid in Wikipedia are staff and PR firms like the ones named above (Microsoft edits Wikipedia via these firms). Everyone else, usually an unpaid volunteer or university professor, is just sharecropping.

____

* Consider the origin of that term. They say bene as in "well, in the right way, honorably, properly..." (same for "philanthropist" as a euphemism for people who hoard capital at others' expense)

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Slopwatch: Fake Articles About "Linux", Slop Images in VentureBeat, Linux Foundation Spam Made With LLM Slop and Slop Images
The only relief or upside - if any exists - is that the pace of slop was down a bit this week
Richard Stallman (RMS) Talk in Ethereum Cypherpunk Congress Will be Remote
This past week RMS received lots of accolades online
Links 28/08/2025: Chatbots Distorting/Fabricating History and Also Driving Suicide
Links for the day
 
In Many Places in the World Vista 11 "Market Share" is Going Down, Not Up
In some countries Windows is already down to third place or lower
More Microsoft-Connected Layoffs, at Least Third Time This Month! (Also Another Death on Campus)
Microsoft as a "gaming" company is where studios, projects, games, and even developers come to die
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, August 28, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, August 28, 2025
Gemini Links 29/08/2025: Poems, Games, and Java 25 Performance
Links for the day
Links 28/08/2025: Greenland 'Interferences' by US and Skinnerboxes to Get Banned in Korean Schools
Links for the day
The Register MS (Run by Microsoft Operatives): Free Software is Putin, Hence Evil and Dangerous
The current editor in chief is an American Microsofter, the previous one went to work for Google (US)
Gemini Links 28/08/2025: Back in Japan and Why "Hacker News" Sucks
Links for the day
A Much-Needed Wake-up Call to Users of Wordpress.com, Blogspot, Substack and All Those Other Outsourced (and Centralised) Platforms
There are several lessons in there
The UEFI 9/11 - Part II - Campaign of Censorship and Defamation Against Critics
In dictatorships, humour serves an important role. It's tragic.
Open Source Initiative (OSI) Resists Software Freedom, Even by Attacking Its Own
The OSI is compromised
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, August 27, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, August 27, 2025
Slopwatch: linuxsecurity.com, Slopfarms in Google News, and More
Some readers of ours end up sending us links that are from slopfarms, not realising those are slopfarms
Gemini Links 27/08/2025: Katrina Memories and Google Versus Software Freedom
Links for the day
Links 27/08/2025: Police Against Media Freedom in the UK, Energy-Hungry Countries Targeted by China
Links for the day
Microsoft Windows Fell to All-Time Lows in Egypt This Summer, Vista 11 Adoption Decreases While GNU/Linux Increases
Vista 11 is going down rather than up
Links 27/08/2025: Microsoft Demoralises Staff With Slop Demands, Leaving Mastodon Explained
Links for the day
12 Hours Ago The Register MS Published a Fake (Paid-for) Article, But This One for a Change Did Not Promote a Ponzi Scheme
There are also Free software alternatives, but they don't pay The Register MS for "synthetic" so-called 'journalism'
More People Need to Call Out and Put a Stop to Serial Sloppers
Unless slopfarms are stopped, people will read and share Microsoft propaganda made by chatbots
Gemini Links 27/08/2025: Headphones and Tartarus
Links for the day
Morale at Microsoft is Terrible (Proprietary Plagiarism Machines Have No Future, LLM Slop is a Bubble)
The slop sceptics/critics are going to have lots of "told you so" moments
GNOME "governance issues, staff reduction, etc." amidst Albanian whistleblowing and women trafficking
Notice the connection to Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) and GNOME
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, August 26, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, August 26, 2025