Bonum Certa Men Certa

Mozilla Has Turned Firefox Into OSPS Consistent With "Attestation" Objectives

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Apr 14, 2024

OSPS is Open Source Proprietary Software (Proprietary in 'Open' Clothing)

Halloween image of witch silhouetted flying in front of full moon with evil pumpkins at base

PART of running this Web site and Gemini capsule involves development and rapid improvement of custom-made software that suits our needs and meets some basic standards. A lot of it is coded in Perl, Python, and Bash. Recently, however, JavaScript too (tr-copy-title-url.xpi).

In the process of doing that we discovered just how locked down Firefox (and its derivatives too) had become. If one develops an extension to Firefox it "has to be installed as a 'temporary extension' because it is not signed at all," as an insider explains. "In Firefox," one must go to "about:debugging#/runtime/this-firefox" and then "Load Temporary Add-on..."

This needs to be done again and again every time Firefox gets (re)started. "The downside to it being unsigned," the insider emphasises, "is that it needs to be reloaded each time the browser is restarted."

This wasn't like that when I developed Firefox extensions nearly 20 years ago. Something has changed, we're not sure when it changed, and this change was likely gradual.

I installed the extension using the steps above and it required the same to be done in LibreWolf, so the artificial restrictions got inherited by the "Libre" 'version'. Great, eh?

So people need to 'sideload' ("sideloading" is a misnomer) their own work, even repeatedly. It cannot be done without so many steps. The insider explains that "restarting Firefox clears the plug-in out of memory, so figuring out how to sign it properly would help with that."

There's an issue with that though. As the insider soon realised, based on the official pages [1, 2], self-signing is forbidden. "As usual for nowadays," the insider says, "self-signing is not allowed. The tedious manual process given initially is the only real option" (for those who update the code frequently and want it to still work).

If one signs or self-signs one's own work, what is the problem? That it might crash everything? There are various ways to undo or remove extensions and "signing" does not in any way assure quality; it makes sense to allow self-signing in many circumstances.

We've attempted to find a workaround, we tried to think more of ways to install the extension fast (without all those laborious steps). We still wonder when these tight restrictions were added and why it happened (or how Mozilla tried to justify/rationalise it).

Mozilla just wants to be in control of everything, even whatever extension the user adds, even if the user himself or herself developed the extension for personal use. This can facilitate censorship of software by Mozilla, as in, you can only do in Firefox what we've approved.

Attestation much? Is this where Mozilla is going? It's a stepping stone towards DRM or at least Tivoisation.

Where was this decision debated? "Gradual steps [were taken] so that the public goes along without complaining," our insider says. As LibreWolf is the same, we can really see how the restrictions get inherited by freer alternatives. Apparently LibreWolf is so secure that the user is wrong to add the user's own code. Or, as the insider puts it: "It's not your computer any more. It's Microsoft via Mozilla via Google. The three collude and conspire to ensure that they have control of the system and not the ostensible owner. Don't look at the DRM hard- coded into Apple's M2, M3, and M4 chips."

I've estimated that it would take ~60 minutes/month (or 12 hours a year) if we need to re-load our extension every time Firefox (or LibreWolf) is restarted. The insider thinks "reloading is an intentional PITA by Mozilla."

"About the only other option would be to make it an official plug-in and downloadable via Mozilla's site. Updating it would be a horrible experience and require lots of time, each update."

Imagine trying to update one's own software and resubmit to Mozilla every small changes for re-signing. Where's the logic in that? What if the code (or extension) isn't of much use to the general public? Or Mozilla turns the coder down? This isn't being done for "security", it's all about control by Mozilla and its masters (GAFAM). One can bet that, like in Windows XP (and later), Mozilla also keeps lists of everything you put in Firefox every time you use it (under the guise of "telemetry" to 'improve' your experience or something).

We've seen similar issues in UEFI 'secure' boot and Certificate Authorities. These facilitate censorship of code or restrictions on site access (i.e. attacks on Freedom of Expression).

The way things work at the moment "is a waste of time," the insider opines. "It is not about "security" as you or I or anyone else thinks of it. It is about control of the machine and wresting that away from the public, without their complaints."

So just remember that Mozilla has turned Firefox into OSPS that refuses to trust you, the user, or obey your will. The word "Firefox" has two Fs, but Mozilla doesn't give a F about your Freedom.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Datamation, Where I Used to Publish Articles, Appears to Have Been Sold to TechnologyAdvice Only to Become a Slopfarm
I'd prefer to not associate with that site anymore
 
FSF Turns 40
We'll be focusing on patent-related topics this weekend
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 03, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, October 03, 2025
Gemini Links 04/10/2025: Distro Hopping and "Part Time"
Links for the day
How Software Patents Were Viewed or Their General Status Changed Over Time
A rough summary
We Are Turning 19 in One Month, FSF Turns 40 in 3 Hours (CET)
For our anniversary next month we still have no concrete plans
Patent Docs (or PatentDocs) Learned the Wrong Lessons From the Death of TypePad
Had they gone ahead with an SSG, they'd become a lot more future-proof
USPTO Patent Bubble Already Imploding, After Decades of Artificial Inflation, Entire Offices Close for Good
we can deduce that financial pressures (lack of "demand" for monopolies) play a role
TikTok is Not Harmless (Being CheeTok in the US Will Advance Orange Agenda)
Social control media isn't "fun and games"; it's a digital weapon that lets hostile groups or nations infiltrate others, then turn them against themselves
Andy Farnell and Helen Plews Explain What "Modern" Tech Does to Old People
Imposing terrible tech "religion" on people is not helping them
Tomorrow the Free Software Foundation (FSF) Turns 40 and Its Web Site is Still Slow Due to DDoS by LLM Slop Bots
For an advocacy group, uptime is important (for its message to remain accessible)
Slopwatch: Google News as a Firehose of LLM Slop About "Linux"
Google News is really bad
Links 03/10/2025: "NPR’s Economics Lessons Come With Neoliberal Spin" and Canada Post at Risk
Links for the day
Gemini Links 03/10/2025: Panic Attacks and Food Adulteration
Links for the day
Links 03/10/2025: Lawyers Caught Using LLM Slop Explain Why They Did It, LibreSSL 4.1.1 and 4.0.1 Released
Links for the day
FSF Board Grew 50% Since Last Year, Has New President, Turns 40 in Two Days
It's a good move for the FSF and - by extension - for software freedom
Links 03/10/2025: Conflicts, Death of TypePad, and TikTok/CheeTok Gives a Boost to Far Right Groups in Europe
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 02, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, October 02, 2025
Slopwatch: Linux Journal, Google News, and LinuxSecurity
They carry on polluting the Web with fake articles
Gemini Links 02/10/2025: Kubernetes With FreeBSD and robots.txt
Links for the day
Links 02/10/2025: 'Open' 'AI' Resorting to Gimmicks and Fake Funding, Europe’s ‘Drone Wall’ Discussed
Links for the day
Links 02/10/2025: Brave Passes 100M Users Milestone, Kodak Selling Its Own Film Again
Links for the day
Michael “Monty” Widenius: It Started in 1983 With Richard Stallman (RMS)
The other co-founder of MySQL is a bit notorious for confronting RMS rather viciously
For the Second Time in a Few Weeks Microsoft Lunduke Makes False Accusations Against Senior Red Hat Staff to Incite a Despicable 'Troll Army'
Nothing that Microsoft Lunduke claims of says can be trusted
su lisa && rm -rf /home/ibm/power
Novell was ruined by another person from IBM, Ronald Hovsepian
A Record Demand at Microsoft: Demand to Cancel
What we're witnessing is a very ungraceful destruction of XBox
Microsoft is Losing Europe
Hence all the "support" and "discount" offers that are limited to Europe
The Free Software Foundation Starts Fund-raising for 40th Anniversary
New pop-up 2-3 days ahead of the 40th anniversary event
Systemd Breaks Networking in Debian and Microsoft Staff Rushes to Make Face-Saving Excuses in LWN
Microsoft's bluca is already there in the comments, his Microsoft money pays for LWN to let him leave comments early
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 01, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, October 01, 2025
What the End of XBox Will Look Like: a Fiery Crash
XBox is the next Skype. It won't last much longer. Expect many more layoffs.
Richard Stallman is Going to Finland to Give a Talk Next Thursday
A day later he speaks in Sweden
Gemini Links 02/10/2025: SMTP Pipelining and End of ROOPHLOCH 2025
Links for the day