Bonum Certa Men Certa

Microsoft's GitHub is Losing Traffic, Based on an Extensive Web Survey, and Its Future is Uncertain

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Oct 14, 2024,
updated Oct 14, 2024

This latest snapshot shows a lot of red: (is Microsoft scaring away its "slaves"?)

github.com Website Analysis for September 2024

SOMEBODY TOLD us over the weekend that GitHub has (and was having) issues. It's not hard to tell. Heck, the offices of GitHub were permanently shut down (not all of them) and many technical workers got laid off in several waves (they were pressured to sign NDAs about these layoffs, according to media reports we saw). Considering voluntary departures and people's retirement - not to mention workers whose "contract" (temporary) work simply reached its "expiry" (a loophole exploited a lot since 2020) - it's difficult to tell just how much smaller GitHub became in recent years. Did it reduce headcount by 20%? Did it reduce payable hours by 20%? Maybe more? Who knows...

Remember that Microsoft keeps close to its chest the operations and finances of GitHub (because it's embarrassing!), so we must rely on leaks and/or whistleblowers.

Almost exactly 2 years ago TechCrunch wrote about GitHub: "Four years after being acquired by Microsoft, GitHub keeps doing its thing" (this was the headline and principal supposition).

It is losing money, yes! Definitely! Lots of money lost! That's basically what GitHub always did. There's no real business model and "doing its thing" means deepening Microsoft growing debt (to fake some "growth"+), which exceeded 100 billion dollars. 6 years ago the MBAs' outlet tried to explain "Why Microsoft Is Willing to Pay So Much for GitHub" (which merely loses money; it's like Elon Musk offering to buy Twitter, which was very deep in debt and constantly losing money; the company is now worth less than its debt).

Someone reminded me that "[i]t's nearing the anniversary of the loss of GitHub to MSFT or was that in June of 2018? Either way, six years have gone since the exodus from GitHub. Revisiting stats on the exodus would be useful. Friedman was involved there. The finances are very suspect..."

As we already showed, citing Microsoft's very own statistics, a year after GitHub was bought many projects left and fewer projects than before were added to GitHub. Microsoft accidentally admitted this when it attempted to show off (about the pandemic's impact).

GitHub does not have a future, not a long-term future anyway. Microsoft now tries to "monetise" it with plagiarism-as-a-service (disguised as "AI") and it's instead getting sued, hence creating another crisis (e.g. causing GitHub's operational costs to increase even further).

GitHub (as a site and company) has not been around for many years, unlike UNIX. GitHub just lost lots and lots and lots of money, so many people rode the "free" hosting (allured by the false perception of cost-savings through outsourcing). Git will continue to exist and can prevail until something better arrives. Gitlab is deep in debt and is reportedly looking for an "exit" (a buyer*), so the business model certainly isn't there. The plan is to exercise control over developers and projects gullible enough to think the losses will continue and the companies are some kind of "charities". They're not. There was one rude awakening a few years ago when Gitlab said it would remove all "inactive" projects to save money (resulting in massive backlash and temporary reversal).

_____

+ Measured in highly misleading terms in order to justify managers' bonuses. For instance, IBM uses its profit to buy new companies for their profits, giving the illusion of growing profits. Of course this is how IBM ends up over 60 billion dollars in debt, but nobody pays attention to that; just watch the profits that IBM is buying, dear Wall Street. This is a form of financial engineering.

* It's not merely the subject of speculation. Lots of media reported about it in recent months. There were active negotiations behind closed doors.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Throwing Money at Lawyers Can't Stop Us (It Never Did)
Even just trying to censor things can result in the opposite of the desired outcome
BetaNews Has More or Less Died After Experiments With LLM Slop, Is Linuxsecurity Next?
It doesn't seem like BetaNews knows what it's doing, let alone what it talks about
 
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, June 14, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, June 14, 2025
Links 14/06/2025: FDA Changes Priorities, Cassette Data Storage From The 1970s
Links for the day
Gemini Links 14/06/2025: Steam Next Fest and Thoughts on Gemini
Links for the day
Site/Datacentre Maintenance Next Week
speed things up
Bulgaria: GNU/Linux Near 10%
The Bulgarian market seems to be changing
I Never Spoke to BetaNews. But BetaNews Wants to Ensure I Never Will, Either.
Sometimes just the reluctance to talk about it can say a great deal
Online Search or Large Search Engines Aren't Working Anymore
business models that directly compete with interests of Web users
Holidays and Breaks
I've hardly taken any long breaks since I got married
Danish OpenDocument Freedom
"year of Linux"
When Abusive Law Firms (Working for Microsofters Against Us) Assert That Someone Writing in Social Media About Himself is Confidential Information
There was no reason to throw "GDPR" into 2 SLAPPs; they know it, but the goal was to increase the cost of a Defence and lessen the incentive to challenge the SLAPPs
Links 14/06/2025: Wars and L.A. Distortion Effect
Links for the day
Gemini Links 14/06/2025: Historic Ada Design and GeminiSpace.Club to Expire
Links for the day
Links 14/06/2025: India Plane Crash and Middle-Eastern War
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 13, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, June 13, 2025
Gemini Links 13/06/2025: (Not)virtues and Project Yeet Broadband
Links for the day
Links 13/06/2025: Journalists Targeted by Cracking, China-Japan and Israel-Iran Tensions Grow
Links for the day
Links 13/06/2025: US Reduces Nonessential Staff at Baghdad Embassy Ahead of Strikes in Iran, Invasion of California Debated
Links for the day
X11 is Free Software
Whether you agree (e.g. on politics) with the person/s forking it doesn't matter
The More Time Passes, the Better Our Advice on Social Control Media Seems
At the end of the day, any platform you do not control yourself is working for someone else
Twitter (X) is Dying, Now It's Just Like a Mafia-Type Operation of the Man Who Does Nazi Salutes in Public
a form of extortion
UK High Court Blasts Brett Wilson LLP for Misusing "GDPR" After Failed Efforts to Censor Critics Using 'Libel' Claims
No wonder this firm is rapidly shrinking
Recent Blunders in Microsoft GitHub (e.g. Slop-Generated Bug Reports or GPL Violations 'as a Service') Taking Their Toll?
Put bluntly, if you still use Microsoft GitHub, then you're slave to Microsoft
American Imperialism and Microsoft Plagiarism
Techrights will therefore do what Microsoft does not want it to do: it'll write even more about Microsoft
When They Have Nothing Left to Help Advance Abusive Litigation for Microsoft People... Other Than Throwing ~500 Pages of Someone Else's Work Into a PDF
Microsoft is having a very tough year
The Price of Exposing Corruption in Poland (and Elsewhere)
It's easier to participate in corruption than to merely do the right thing and oppose it
Slopwatch and Yet More Holes in 'Secure Boot' (as Usual!), Promoted Inside Linux by the Man We Are Suing
Today's Slopwatch will be short
Gemini Links 13/06/2025: People You've Left Behind, Life Update and OS Changes
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 12, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, June 12, 2025