Microsoft Secure Boot Removes Users' Choice
From Julian Andres Klode (yesterday):
He routinely puts Microsoftisms [sic] inside Debian
Do you want your GNU/Linux machine to boot without permission from Microsoft?
Good.
Well, IBM Red Hat does not agree.
See, choice is for "losers".
We need one single way for everything, including systemd, just like in Windows.
What we see above is "Microsoft Canonical," as an associate puts it, "a wholly owned subsidiary of Microsoft".
"UEFI is itself a massive security risk and should be rolled back in place," he has just said.
It's not about security, it's about Microsoft (sponsor of Donald Cheeto) controlling every machine remotely. In other words, it's a major national security threat. Has Greenland banned Microsoft and 'secure' boot yet? Has Denmark done so? Has the EU? Has Europe? █