Quick Mention: Standards Expert Gives up on a Broken Standards System
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2007-11-22 04:06:40 UTC
- Modified: 2007-11-22 04:06:40 UTC
Who wouldn't?
At this stage, ECMA and the ISO may be broken beyond the point of being repairable. Some people recognise this, some are in the state of denial, and some have vested interests in the poor (and broken) state of the system. Regardless of the consequences, someone had to say something and somebody
gladly did.
...bridges such as this have proven to be imperfect, and susceptible to abuse. Currently, SC 34, an ISO/IEC JTC 1 committee, is grappling with DIS 29500 — an ECMA developed standard based upon Microsoft's OfficeOpen XML specification. Many harried participants in the review process have expressed the view that the "Fast Track" program being used to propel the submission through the adoption process from start to six months was inappropriate for a specification that weighs in at more than 6,000 pages. Moreover, there have been widespread reports of disinformation, vendor pressure, and (in one case) even offers of financial reimbursement to business partners as incentives to join National Bodies in order to vote for approval.
No matter how much
hype and disinformation overwhelms Average Joe, the two standards bodies involved ought to feel slightly ashamed. They could have revised the rules as soon as they saw how susceptible their system had become to misuse and gaming.
Whatever the outcome at the BRM and next year's meetings, one has to pause and wonder if ISO certification and that stamp of approval means much at all.
OOXML: when standards become a question of pricing, not quality.
Posts of interest:
OpenISO is definitely something to keep an eye on, but it appears to have been dormant for month.
⬆
