MS-GNOME.NET, anybody?
Two completely independent warning shots were sent to us an hour ago by folks whose name shall remain undisclosed. The first is a pointer to this
GNOME announcement stating "not sure what 'special rules' means, but I thought you might find it interesting." It seems to be about
dbus, which we wrote about before [
1,
2,
3,
4]. The second, which refers to a more recent observation, bears the subject line "Munchkins invading GTK+." It says: "The GTK+ start page no longer mentions the major development tool, Java, now that it is open source, instead pushing a proprietary substitute..."
http://www.gtk.org/
http://www.gtk.org/language-bindings.html
Regarding Debian GNU/Linux, which this reader uses, he adds: "it is important to find out [if more evidence exist]. I hope it does not mean that Debian is breaking its famous Debian Social Contract to allow mono and mono-carrying developers to infect Debian projects. The social contract is one of Debian's great strengths.
"As the Microsoft barge sinks the bailers are not just bailing their own boat, but tipping the water into other people's boats. de Icaza and other Microsoft reps are working as fast as they can to contaminate as many projects as they can with Microsoft technologies. On the technical side, it will make the distros more bloated, inefficient and cumbersome. On the legal side, it will make easy pickings for Microsoft lawyers in the trade zones where software patents apply."
Looking at
the cache as supporting evidence, our reader adds: "I looked at archive.org, but it's next most recent version is from August 2007. Java is, as you point out, listed in last week's Google cache, but not on the start page. Instead Microsoft C# is being promoted."
Can anybody shed light on this? Will GNOME promote Microsoft technologies at the expense of open source Java and C++?
⬆
Comments
Alex H.
2008-04-23 13:32:49
This history is here:
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk-web/trunk/index.html?view=log
I couldn't find any mention of Java on the front page though.. ?
CoolGuy
2008-04-23 13:34:24
Gnome is no longer the "free" desktop that it used to be. It has been polluted by Novell - curse them. Novell is now aiming for infesting the KDE soon.
I have left gnome after many years of using it. Best of luck to Gnome community - hope this turns out good for them.
Merlin the Great
2008-04-23 14:41:40
Kuba
2008-04-23 14:52:10
Merlin the Great
2008-04-23 14:56:10
Kuba
2008-04-23 15:52:46
And the serious part of post- Roy, check this : http://slated.org/mono_mysterious_special_rules .What the hell is that about? I'd sure like to know.
Alex H.
2008-04-23 16:11:08
1. The special rules regarding mono:
http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleRequirements
Mono is treated less favourably than C++ and Python, as modules within the Desktop set are not allowed to gain Mono dependencies without approval first.
2. The front page of gtk.org.
There's no evidence Java was ever on the front page of this site, and I'd love to see someone try to prove it - gtk-web is stored in GNOME's svn, so you don't need a cache, the full history is there.
C++, Python and C# are mentioned there. They also are the allowed dependencies in the GNOME desktop set, whereas Java is not.
max stirner
2008-04-23 17:01:30
luckily there are plenty of excellent window managers around that are not developed by MS shills. so one may have to switch there.
i am much more concerned about the mono online hedging bit really..
MS is a sinking ship, just like rome back in the day or the US today, there will be turmoil!
Victor Soliz
2008-04-23 18:02:00
The good news is that it doesn't look like the home page has deliberately removed Java references, but the bad news is that it looks like they never had any reference of that sort and just had C# bias altogether.
Why allow or encourage MONO dependency at all in gnome? It sounds detrimental for a cross platform project as gnome which primarily used to focus on Linux in the past to suddenly decide it is all right to depend on a whole platform such as gnome as long as it is approved by "the community".
Victor Soliz
2008-04-23 18:03:57
Alex H.
2008-04-23 19:58:29
I'm not sure why C# automatically means Mono dependency for you, because that's not what it means. For one, it's just a language. Mono is one implementation, but there's also the GNU Portable.net:
http://www.gnu.org/projects/dotgnu/pnet.html
Given that GNOME is a free software GNU project, and so is dotgnu, that seems a fairly natural relationship to me and you don't have to touch any mono.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-04-23 20:56:54
I don't know if 'Merlin the Great' is 'eet', but both share the same E-mail domain (gmx.net).
Merlin the Great,
Please explain where the sources are wrong.
Victor Soliz
2008-04-23 23:30:14
stevetheFLY
2008-04-24 14:46:26
Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.
stevetheFLY: 80.132.128.196
eet: 80.132.139.19
Roy Schestowitz
2008-04-24 14:54:29
stevetheFLY
2008-04-24 14:58:21
Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.
stevetheFLY: 80.132.128.196
eet: 80.132.139.19
Roy Schestowitz
2008-04-24 15:07:04
cojii
2008-04-24 15:42:45
I just wanted to say a HUGE thx to you roy for taking the time you've had to to make sure this important information gets out there to unsuspecting users. I was a longtime user of gnome, not wanting to abide within the ranks of the non lgpl qt toolkit, but now I see that I can no longer be 'safe' in gnome I will probably seek refuse in E17, that or fork gnome altogther.
Your articles have been very enlightening and what it means for me ultimately is steering CLEAR of any distro that adopts mono, which means ubuntu, fedora , freespire ( due to ubuntu base ) and mandriva. I am not sure if that is an exhaustive list but there it is.
Oh what fun...
cu COJ
stevetheFLY
2008-04-24 15:53:35
Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.
stevetheFLY: 80.132.128.196
eet: 80.132.139.19
stevetheFLY
2008-04-24 15:54:28
Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.
stevetheFLY: 80.132.128.196
eet: 80.132.139.19
Roy Schestowitz
2008-04-24 22:00:45
Dan O'Brian
2008-04-28 03:11:03
The bindings aren't being "promoted" as you try to claim they are, they are simply listed as part of a complete list of usable bindings for the GNOME platform for any developer who visits the site to find out what bindings are available.
I don't see any text anywhere saying "we prefer you use C# bindings over Python, Java or C++". So where is this "promoting" of which you speak?
This is why you are a lying sack of shit, Roy.
You are constantly making false accusations in order to try and ruin GNOME's good image. For someone who claims to be bringing the truth to everyone's attention, you've done a pretty piss poor job of it. You aren't trying to make people aware of the truth, you are trying to make people see your own warped view of the free software community. You play yourself off as some morally superior, "fighting FUD" to save users from themselves yet you use FUD yourself in order to convey your message - talk about hypocrisy.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-04-28 04:16:32
True_Friend
2008-09-20 00:04:14