EARLIER TODAY we wrote about MonoDevelop coming to Windows. This is not a new problem. Our contributor ushimitsudoki now points to Miguel's latest blog post, which says: "On Windows for example, MonoDevelop runs on top of the .NET Framework and uses the .NET managed debugger instead of using Mono's runtime and Mono's debugger, so there is no dependency on Mono to be installed on the system."
“We would be better off getting the Windows codes hooked in python.”
--OiaohmOiaohm agrees and further argues that "MonoDevelop is still second rate to Visual Studio [VS] on Windows."
"Taking into account what my colleague said about VS, that would be pretty bad then," writes MinceR. Oiaohm added: "VS Express with the right alterations is the same program as Full VS."
"Exactly," exclaims ushimitsudoki, who continues: "If I was a windows developer, why the hell would I be using this second-rate s*** anyway? What serious Windows developer isn't running Visual Studio? and what wanna-be isn't running VS Express? I've never understood that whole "bringing Windows developers over to Linux" line of argument.
"Is there a group out there that cares LESS about Linux than Windows developers?"
"My problem is .NET programmers are more like the VB programmers of old," Oiaohm adds. "They create a few gems from time to time. But to make them usable you need to port them to a better language. I really don't see the interest in them. We would be better off getting the Windows codes hooked in python." ⬆
Comments
Yuhong Bao
2009-06-05 16:29:45
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-05 16:31:18
Yuhong Bao
2009-06-05 16:34:14
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-05 16:36:52
Sabayon User (YGUG)
2009-06-05 18:59:40
Which laws would those be?
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-05 19:01:52
Here are some places to start:
http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/On_closing_the_DEC_rat_holes_and_Borland_hacking_the_applause-o-meter http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/08/borland-international-lesson/
Sabayon User (YGUG)
2009-06-05 19:38:50
Of course I don't recall you ever accusing Google of "antitrust" when they poach Microsoft employees.
The second link shows absolutely nothing whatsoever related to antitrust. You probably searched your wiki for the first occurrence of "Borland" and pasted the URL.
Feel free to point out anything I might have missed, or offer some solid evidence to back up your claim. Here it is again:
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-05 19:42:45
http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/Development
Yuhong Bao
2009-06-05 19:55:04
Sabayon User (YGUG)
2009-06-05 20:22:15
After looking at those though, I have to conclude that you're either confused or deliberately telling half-truths. Since there is no direct mention of Borland anywhere there, or how they might have been affected by whatever perceived wrongdoings you are deriving from those emails, one would have to come to the conclusion that Microsoft somehow hobbled everyone who wrote applications for their platform, partners and competitors alike. Which is interesting, considering Borland - like any number of competitors and partners - has had access to the Windows source code as part of that "look but don't touch" licensing agreement Microsoft provides (which was the source of the NT4/2000 leak a few years ago). I can go on and on about all the fallacies with your argument: "Microsoft forgot to include two constants in windows.h, therefore Borland was crushed".
Please be specific and provide factual evidence of Microsoft braking a law (any law) in order to harm Borland. Here's your claim again:
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-05 20:35:22
Roy Bixler
2009-06-05 20:36:31
Sabayon User (YGUG)
2009-06-05 20:44:10
You have secret information that supports your arguments?
They did not, except in your mind. United States vs Microsoft was centered around the bundling of IE with Windows. I thought you were aware of this. But please direct me to evidence that supports what you're saying.
Related to formats and protocols. And bundling. But I fail to see how that has anything to do with Borland. Please don't nitpick like your supporters. Provide factual evidence that Microsoft violated a law, or laws - any laws - in order to harm Borland, Inc. Here's your claim again:
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-05 21:23:25
Open the PDFs. See how they are labeled and classified
See the Netscape section of this petition. Also, for example:
http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/Microsoft_to_Netscape:_try_our_800_number
See:
http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/1000/PX01413.pdf
Microsoft even mentions Borland when discussing APIs. Microsoft was found guilty for withholding API information.
Quit wasting time, please. You go by the name "Sabayon User" and all you ever do is troll this Web site.
Yuhong Bao
2009-06-06 06:31:29
Sabayon User (YGUG)
2009-06-05 22:10:20
Sorry, I don't see how this has any bearing on anything.
Ah, you don't really know what an API is, do you? Have you even read all this, or just snipped selective portions from it? You could have quoted the OWL/MFC part of that document about - wonder of wonders - Borland (in part II). The problem is that it would be irrelevant to your claim anyway, because as with everything else in that petition, it's just the argument from the plaintiffs. None of that is proof, they're just supporting arguments. Are you familiar with legal proceedings? For example, if I accuse you of libel, I have to rehash every negative word you've ever written about anyone, and then a jury has to decide whether or not that is true, assuming it's found to be relevant to the case. If you're rooting for the plaintiffs of course all of the supporting arguments will ring true, but that doesn't mean they are. It's a lawsuit, not a blog post. But hang on to your horsies...
Oh my god, you don't really even read any of this, do you? Here, I transcribed the relevant part of that PDF for you (I hereby irrevocably release this under the GFDL, so you can add it to your wiki if you want) and added two [notes]:
I mean, really? Do you seriously even read this stuff at all?? Do you realize what things like these do to what's left of your credibility? And if you did actually read and understand this, and someone else considered it "evidence" that Microsoft was being evil... what does that do to the credibility of the people who selected it as a supporting exhibit in the case?
I will ignore your cop-out ad hominem and implication that you have something other to do than tend to your blog, but I will assume that you have no proof of your claims beyond the easily disputable "hit 'em with the links" confusion you tried to use here. That means tat what you said is, for lack of a better term, nothing more than a lie.
Oh, and I switched to Sabayon a few weeks ago. Highly recommended. The comfort zone and familiarity of Gentoo without the sharp edges. I love it.
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-05 22:20:04
Sabayon User
2009-06-06 00:49:26
Was this before or after you made the connection between Sabayon and Gentoo, and the number of people who post comments to your blog as [Distro] Name? From the same IP address and using the same email address? Did the UG tag confuse you? No worries, I removed it.
...you do know what Sabayon Linux is, right?
We'll ignore your usual mommy-i-want-my-security-blanket cop-out where anyone who doesn't strike the right note is a full-time Microsoft employee, but
The irony of you linking to that smear you wrote defending your friend "twitter", the most famous nymshifter troll on Slashdot, is just slightly beyond incredible. Is "twitter" worth attention? I should think so, considering you quote him on your blog posts. I'll try to keep up with his two dozen accounts, although I'm afraid I'll run out of distros before I even come close.
Not everyone knows the twitter story, so here is the usual post. I guess there are nymshifters and then there are nymshifters and trolls, eh Roy?
Well, getting back to topic before you so skillfully shot the messenger (as you're keen on pointing out again and again is so often done to you), are you going to whip up some evidence that Microsoft broke the law to harm Borland? Here is your claim again:
Otherwise, we'll consider this conversation finished.
Yuhong Bao
2009-06-05 16:22:12
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-05 16:27:14
The Mad Hatter
2009-06-06 17:34:18
Beyond confirming it happened, I won't tell you who was involved. These guys depend on Microsoft for their market (Windows OS Computers), and if Microsoft knew who was talking, it would attack them.
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-06 18:58:05
"Microsoft retaliated against industry participants that supported DR-DOS. For example, when Z-Nix Inc. bundled DR-DOS 6.0 and Microsoft Windows 3.1, proclaiming no incompatibilities, Microsoft’s Brad Silverberg wrote: "look what znix is doing! cut those fuckers off." Within three weeks, Microsoft demanded an audit of Z-Nix’s entire business and then commenced a copyright and trademark infringement action. Z-Nix was forced to file for bankruptcy in or around 1995"
--Comes Petition
[PDF]
G. Michaels
2009-06-07 10:05:56
I also have secret emails that confirm the existence of the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot and Scott Baio. And the location of Jimmy Hofa. Alas again, they're all very secret so I cannot share them.
I have magic PDFs with REALLY IMPORTANT information written in magic digital ink that disappears when you try to read them. Because they're secret, you see. Just ask me - I have one for every occasion and topic. They're very mysterious.
And get this - whenever I talk about my secret information, I make sure I make clever allusions and use ominous language and professional-sounding acronyms and whatnot. That goes a long way towards convincing people that my secret information is in fact real and validates whatever argument I happen to be making at the time. Since it's secret, right? And I couldn't possibly show it to anyone. Because it's secret.
Let me ask you something, "The Mad Hatter". When you are outside of your comfort zone, you know, like websites where everyone thinks like you, talks like you, has the same belief system and set of values and so on, does this kind of weak babble actually work? I mean, here you get golf claps from the BoycottBoy gallery but elsewhere, can you use it without people simply going into a spasm of uncontrollable laughter? I'm just genuinely curious.
The Mad Hatter
2009-06-07 22:47:12
What I said is true. You don't have to believe it. It makes no difference to me.
Though I have to admit I'd love to check the one you have on Jimmy Hoffa, to see if it matches the cartoon in Mad Magazine which showed his body, in a garbage can, in orbit.
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-07 23:02:41
twitter
2009-06-09 05:20:10
What's really funny though, is how you persistently stalk this site and it's users, then say there is something wrong with people for noticing. There are few better examples of what M$ is all about than G.Michaels. Rot on, dude. Show everyone the real eXPerience.
Yuhong Bao
2009-06-09 05:22:27
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-09 05:28:23
Yuhong Bao
2009-06-09 06:14:20
Roy Schestowitz
2009-06-09 06:19:05
Needs Sunlight
2009-06-06 16:05:30
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/02/15/us/judge-rejects-us-antitrust-pact-with-microsoft.html
The Mad Hatter
2009-06-08 00:16:58