Patents Roundup: ACTA Xenophobia, Motorola Wants Embargo with Patents
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2010-01-24 12:37:23 UTC
- Modified: 2010-01-24 12:37:23 UTC
Summary: Patent news of interest
●
Activist ejected from 'public' meeting on secret copyright treaty for tweeting
The latest round of negotiations over the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA -- a secret treaty that contains provisions requiring nations to wiretap the Internet, force ISPs to spy on users, search laptops at the border, and disconnect whole households from the net on the basis of mere accusation of copyright infringement) is just kicking off in Mexico, and activists from around Mexico and the world have converged on the meeting to demand transparent, public negotiations of this critical treaty.
●
'Public' Consultation Over ACTA In Mexico Almost Required NDAs, Blogger Removed For Tweeting
The room, then, was mostly industry people, who were apparently concerned as to why everyday citizens were in attendance, and they even booed a lawyer who questioned the human rights angle. As for Geraldine, she tried twittering the event, and the industry folks demanded she leave (and had a guard escort her out). It's almost like they're trying to make themselves into a caricature of businesses plotting to harm the public.
●
Motorola asks ITC to ban BlackBerry imports
Patent litigation between Motorola and Research In Motion is heating up, with Motorola filing a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission.
In the complaint, filed Friday, Motorola alleges that RIM engages in unfair trade practices by importing and selling products that infringe five Motorola patents. The patents cover technologies related to Wi-Fi access, application management, user interface and power management, Motorola said.
●
Motorola Asks ITC To Ban BlackBerry Imports
●
Motorola files case against Blackberry owners, RIM
Motorola has asked US regulators to ban Research in Motion (RIM), the Canadian firm behind the Blackberry, from importing its products into the US.
●
Beltway Issues Poised to Hurt Digital Innovators
Patent reform - Patent trolls are reshaping the patent landscape; their litigation of broad, vague software patents is amounting to a "tax" on innovation.
●
Petition to Stop Software Patents in Europe
The petition aims to unify the voices of concerned Europeans, associations and companies, and calls on our politicians in Europe to stop patents on software with legislative clarifications.
Recent Techrights' Posts
- Speed of GNU/Linux
- The media seldom speaks of the dangers of "proprietary software"
- Proprietary Windows Versus "Linux" News (Trying to Keep People on Windows, Never Exploring GNU/Linux)
- Good editors know better how to recognise threats and not give them lip service
- Ensuring That Every Computer User Anywhere in the World Can Take Control of All His or Her Computers
- We must fight the people who attack general-purpose computing, in particular those who push this agenda very aggressively inside Linux
- Gemini Links 28/04/2025: Autism and Structural Navigation
- Links for the day
- What Happened to the Open Source Initiative (OSI) Elections: The Purge, the Cover-up, and the Witch-hunts
- OSI has gone "full Microsoft"
-
- No, IBM is Not Investing $150 Billion in the US and It Doesn't Even Have That Kind of Money
- Here we go again... media as a vehicle of lobbying and misinformation
- Leak: The EPO's General Consultative Committee (GCC) Does Not Consult Staff on Crucial Matters and Bypasses the Administrative Council (AC) to Do Illegal Things
- violations against the EPO's very staff
- New Leaks Coming Soon, We Maintain 100% Record of Successful Resistance to Censorship
- We won't be told what we can and cannot say (especially when it's true)
- Central African Republic (CAR): Vista 11 is Only ~0.2% Market Share
- 99.8% to go!
- BSD and GNU/Linux Replaced Microsoft in Secure Servers, All Microsoft Has Left is LLM Slop for Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)
- the FUD machine never rests
- Gemini Links 28/04/2025: A Simple Task Tracking and Auto-Prioritization Tool and Other Programs
- Links for the day
- Links 28/04/2025: Canada's Election, Pakistan-India Conflict
- Links for the day
- Glue Inside Your Pizza (or Why People Will Get Fed Up With Slop)
- People are given "answers" from non-intelligence word dumpsters
- Links 28/04/2025: Cyberattacks Happening, Chatbots Disappointing, and "Free Speech Under Fire"
- Links for the day
- Phone Adoption Very Low in Vatican, Windows Usage Fell Nonetheless
- Even in places where people still use desktops/laptops most of the time (and have access to these) Windows is gradually losing ground
- GNU/Linux 9% in Cuba, Vista 11 Waning, Android Dominant
- Microsoft has pretty much lost Cuba
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 27, 2025
- IRC logs for Sunday, April 27, 2025
- In 24 Countries Observed by statCounter Vista 11 is Still Less Than a Quarter of Windows Users Despite All Other Versions Being 'Expired'
- They ought to move to GNU/Linux
- Links 27/04/2025: Pope Goodbyes, "Politics of Fear", Slop Redux and More Google Shutdowns (Google Debt Had Grown This Year)
- Links for the day
- Links 27/04/2025: Serenity Dialectics, Hockey Jersey Ethics, and More
- Links for the day
- Links 27/04/2025: Death of Nest Thermostats, Death of Metaverse
- Links for the day
- Links 27/04/2025: Projects Workflow and Discovering Technology
- Links for the day
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 26, 2025
- IRC logs for Saturday, April 26, 2025
- Microsoft Isn't on the Map in USSR
- To them, it's either Google or Yandex
- In Central America Windows Became a Small Force
- These are countries where Windows used to have well over 95% of the "market"
- What's Very Vexing to GAFAM, EPO and Others Is That It's Incredibly Hard to Censor Us (and Nobody Ever Successfully Did That Before)
- resist, do not capitulate
- Site May be Even Faster Now
- It basically takes less than a tenth of a second to serve the page
- Receiving SLAPPs and Collecting Them Like Trophies (the SLAPPs Always Fail)
- People who file lawsuits bring even more attention to themselves (or to embarrassing statements about them)
- Year of GNU/Linux on the Laptop?
- It's not happening only in Lenovo
- What People Must Understand About the Open Source Initiative (OSI)
- some facts about the Open Source Initiative (OSI)
- Many of the Scandals Are Interconnected (Overlapping People and Corporations)
- We're only getting started
- More Copyright Lawsuits Against LLM Slop Providers and Suppliers of LLM Slopfarms Would Benefit Society
- It's not just bad for the Web and for society; it's also legally dangerous
- Links 26/04/2025: General Assassinated in the Town of Balashikha, US Promoting Seafloor Mining
- Links for the day
- Links 26/04/2025: Facebook Layoffs Again, Remembering What's Real, and Say No to Mass Surveillance
- Links for the day
- Links 26/04/2025: NOAA Budget Cuts and "Dog Days Ahead"
- Links for the day
- In defence of JD Vance, death of Pope Francis
- Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
- Three Years in Prison for Disney Employee’s ‘Menu Hacking’: The Economic Fallout of Digital Menus
- Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 25, 2025
- IRC logs for Friday, April 25, 2025
Comments
Jose_X
2010-01-25 05:16:29
Subj: Patent system useful to slow fast progress -- quick, export our laws!
If enough more people understood how vague and broad most patents are and how much damage some of these patents do to progress, there would be a quick overhaul of the US patent system.
The larger company has the leverage over the smaller company because they have much more money and many more incentives to file vague patents faster so as to overload and stop new and smaller competitors. Ironically, the small company that doesn't produce any products at all has the ultimate leverage because their products don't exist so they can't be stopped.
Patents should only be allowed in industries that have very few competitors (boring industries). Otherwise, each 20 year patent monopoly aggregates in large numbers to stifle the heck out of the industry. No one is fast enough or wealthy enough to write down all their ideas and file expensive patent applications for each one before other competitors grab most of these and other ideas.
Other dirty laundry of the patent system include: (a) frequently, ideas patented have not only occurred to many people before, but are accepted as behinds the scenes standard practice; (b) sometimes ideas get "rediscovered" decades later; (c) the bar for patentability, being "novel and nonobvious", is mockingly low -- if you had to think about the idea for more than a few weeks or sometimes for more than a few minutes, it's "nonobvious"; (d) the monopoly period of 20 years of preventing others from using the invention is an insult to humanity -- most human's lifespan means they aren't even that productive for much more than 20 years; (e) some inventions are remarkably cheap to manufacture, modify, distribute, etc, and are even interesting and fun to invent -- these absolutely need no monopoly incentive whatsoever and monopolies most definitely stifle advance; (f) there is a fundamental disconnection between what really promote progress, collaboration, and a monopoly grant, defined to suppress collaboration completely; (g) monopolists, having no competition, tend to get very lazy and misuse resources for a full 20 year period; (h) inventors that were working on the same inventions and theories for years have their work go down the drain if they didn't file many patents and someone else later did; (i) almost any successful product can be stopped from many future improvements by a series of hostile patent filings by competitors; (j) supposedly "open" standards can be patented, so that in order to participate in the market place, you necessarily have to infringe on patents; (k) the cost of patents means it's a club for the wealthy, and major existing patent players actually want to make it even more expensive so that they have much less competition from other patent filers; (l) you can patent something that you have little clue of how it actually works -- this is a failure in the whole concept of the patent system since it allows those with broad general ideas to stop those with specific ideas and detailed knowledge; (m) ....
We all lose with our current patent system, and the more competitive the industry (like software and business methods), the more damage patents do to it. On the other hand, the US wants to spread our foolish patent laws to other countries. This means everyone else will also be as handicapped as us, so we will be able to compete a little bit better against them. This partly makes up for the fact we will have a lot fewer interesting inventions and will need to get permission and pay a fee to some "Einstein" in order to do a lot more things.