THE RECENT REMARK from Hernán Rincón (insulting "Open Source" [1, 2, 3], which gets adopted widely where he works for Microsoft around Brazil) have helped a lot of people see that Microsoft it no friend of "Open Source", but this does not prevent Microsoft from carrying on with this PR charade. Microsoft's booster Marius Oiaga is helping them right now:
Microsoft, once the anti-open source poster child, says that the company has evolved as the world changed and that it is now committed to openness.
Microsoft made a critical move in 2006, when it inked a Windows and Linux interoperability alliance with open source vendor Novell.
Since then, both Microsoft and Novell have made investments into making sure that Windows Server and SUSE Linux can play nice together for customers that need to run both platforms in their heterogeneous environments.
The people quoted in the spot against OpenOffice:
James Fleming, Infrastructure and Support Manager, Speedy Hire Jeff Cimmerer, Director of Technology for the Pittsford School District David Sterling, ICT Manager, Central Scotland Police Bülent Türker, Product Manager, Scarves Department, SARAR Group Eugene Mariotto, ICT Director, Cobra Automotive Technologies Eros Borgogelli, Information Systems Coordinator, Ciar Randall C Kennedy, InfoWorld Tisome Nugent, Educator, Orange County Public Schools Sergey Sakharov, Business Process Optimization Manager, Art of Transport Logistics Darek Muraszko, Information Systems Admninistrator, Kaczmarski Inkasso Igor Gentosh, Head of System Integration Department, Kredobank JSC Tiziano Battilana, Information Systems Coordinator, Euromobil Group Joerg Lenze, System Administrator, Heinrich Berndes Haushaltstechnik GmbH & Co. KG Leonid Medvediev, Head of IT Department, CJSC SPC, BorschagivskiyChemical and Pharmaceutical Plant Bailey Mitchell, Chief Information Officer, Forsyth County Schools
I am in the process of checking the quotes and I have noticed they are effectively taken from quite old "success" stories, here some examples:
David Sterling, ICT Manager, Central Scotland Police Source of the quotes:
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Microsoft-Office-2003/Central-Scotland-Police/Central-Scotland-Police-Cuts-Maintenance-Costs-30-Percent-By-Replacing-Linux-Desktop/49609
This is a "success" story of 2006 about a migration to Office 2003/Windows 2003. Linux desktops in 2003 and OpenOffice in 2003 are ancient IMHO, not really a good way to convince customers NOW :-)
You can find more, for example:
Tisome Nugent, Educator, Orange County Public Schools
http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?casestudyid=4000005095
Joerg Lenze, System Administrator, Heinrich Berndes Haushaltstechnik GmbH & Co. KG
http://65.55.21.250/caseStudies/Case_Study_Detail.aspx?casestudyid=4000006523
Etc. etc.
All you will find are arguments on how the lock-in of Microsoft Office makes sure noone can switch to alternatives.
Decide for yourself :-)
Microsoft has a long-established practice of disarming competition by not acknowledging it, because acknowledging the competition gives it power. Well, the Redmond giant has changed stance when it comes to OpenOffice and launched a video attack on the free alternative to the Office software suite.
A few hours after this story was published, Microsoft set the video as "private," meaning it can no longer be viewed by the public. We found it hosted on Microsoft.com, however, so if you have Silverlight, go watch it there.
Educational organizations get locked-in and so do students. What happens if a student goes to work at a place that uses OpenOffice.org on GNU/Linux? Are they doomed? Nonsense. It’s a GUI and they point, click and type. For a school district to spend $millions annually on software they can do without should be a crime or at least a breach of fiduciary responsibility to use the tax payers’ money wisely. What does it teach a kid that his school spends more on software that they don’t need when the system has to be cut back somewhere else because the premise of the whole situation was that the budget was tight? Do you think they might have to cut something that does educate students, Homer?
Oh! The Horror! The Horror of educational systems that cannot do the maths. There are thousands of systems that have deployed OpenOffice.org and GNU/Linux with no problems except what to do with the savings.
In due course, more details emerged of how Mindcraft had been able to draw directly on support from Microsoft when tuning the system, but had not involved Red Hat, whose distribution was being used for the tests, in the same way. This meant that several important tweaks that would have improved the latter's performance were lacking. Indeed, it later turned out that the tests had actually been conducted in a Microsoft laboratory.
[...]
It seems that Microsoft has forgotten this important lesson. For it has put together a three-minute video of customers explaining why they switched from OpenOffice.org to Microsoft Office.
The criticisms made in the video are not really the point - they are mostly about OpenOffice.org not being a 100% clone of Microsoft Office, and compatibility problems with Microsoft's proprietary formats. The key issue is the exactly the same as it was for the Mindcraft benchmarks. You don't compare a rival's product with your own if it is not comparable. And you don't make this kind of attack video unless you are really, really worried about the growing success of a competitor.
Just as it did in 1999 for GNU/Linux, Apache and Samba, the company has now clearly announced that OpenOffice.org is a serious rival to Microsoft Office, and should be seriously considered by anyone using the latter.
Thanks Microsoft.
OpenOffice
The most popular open source office solution is OpenOffice, original released as an office suite for Linux but later released for Windows.
OpenOffice features the Writer, Calc, Impress and Base applications for word processing, spreadsheets, presentations and database management, all free, while technical support is provided in the form of help documents on the website and a directory of consultants, although this last option is intended only for businesses. OpenOffice is available from download.openoffice.org.
Note that in the near future, OpenOffice will be available as LibreOffice.
Oracle Open Office
If Open Office appeals to you but you require online support, then Oracle Open Office might be your best choice. Offering the same functionality as OpenOffice, Oracle Open Office is available to purchase from www.oracle.com as an enterprise-class office suite based on the same open standards as OpenOffice.
Oracle is spinning its participation in a forthcoming Open Document Format (ODF) event as proof of its continued commitment to the OpenOffice.org community.
Comments
NotZed
2010-10-14 12:41:49
Word processors are the worst offenders though. There's simply no reason to ever use a word processor. Anything fewer than 5 pages long may as well be text and anything longer should be type-set. But no, people like the illusion of 'control' by being a slave to a machine, telling it every little detail and usually doing a piss-poor job of it ...
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2010-10-14 12:51:36
twitter
2010-10-14 13:06:59
Wherever these issues arise, free software word processors are more than up to the task. Kword is my favorite for quick reports on paper, but Open Office is fine and others swear by Abiword. Thanks to ODF and Open Office, you can use any of these and coolaborate with the few dinosaurs that insist on Microsoft Word.
twitter
2010-10-14 12:45:24
Compatibility with their own file formats, which they needlessly changed to their phoney open XML, is also a sore spot. Very few people actually use OOXML and when Microsoft does force it on people, they get a lot of pushback. People expect information to come from the web, where standards rule, and won't cooperate if it means they have to pay $400 for an office suite. It's easier, they will rightly tell you, to use Google Docs, Open Office, or plain old text if you are not swift enough to run a wiki. Office file format wars are ancient history because people routed around this damage a decade ago.
Microsoft is also FUDing up Java, according to Groklaw's news picks. There is so much spin, it goes in different directions and none of it is worth much attention. The nastiest quote also attacks the FSF and comes from someone who was recently hired by Microsoft.
All of it goes to prove that Microsoft is still fighting rivals from the mid 90s that no one cares about anymore. Free implementations of Java provided by GNU are safe and Open Office is more than adequate for escaping the Office trap. Once you get your old Docs to ODF, you really do have choices about what software you can use. Microsoft is lost in the past and can be safely ignored.
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2010-10-14 12:49:14
Can you please add some links/quotes to this?
twitter
2010-10-14 13:22:30
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2010-10-14 13:26:29
twitter
2010-10-14 20:27:10
Stephen O'Grady, RedMonk Simon Phipps, Wild Webmink Stephen Colebourne's Weblog Mike Milinkovich, Life at Eclipse Gianugo Rabellino, Boldly Open Mike Milinkovich, Life at Eclipse (yes, two times) James Governor's Monkchips, RedMonk
Anyone can look these up if they want to but probably should not because there is no real issue for users of GNU code. Add PJ's news picks to their favorite feed client. My point was that there's a lot of FUD out there as the Microsoft friendly people take advantage of Oracle's ill considered move against Google to FUD their mid 90s rival and promote Mono. I like PJ's advice,
but don't see doom, gloom or "sharecroppers".
Agent_Smith
2010-10-14 20:08:48
twitter
2010-10-15 02:55:02