Image found in Reddit

Summary: Microsoft continues to dominate the "desktop" and GNU/Linux is made more expensive than Windows at Dell

THE 'bug' which Canonical won't fix still needs squashing. Now that Dell is dominated by Microsoft (see our newly-organised Wiki page about Dell) it is not shocking that Dell makes GNU/Linux more expensive than Windows, as before. Microsoft is paid for Ubuntu-based Dell PCs (Dell joined the Microsoft/Novell patent deal) and Pogson helps show the outcome using screenshots, too. He asks, "why does Dell promote “7″ by charging $20 less than GNU/Linux on identical hardware?"

He adds: "I suppose we should be happy that they offer GNU/Linux but that’s just the first step in liberating retail shelves. Price is still a barrier. The price of a licence for GNU/Linux is ~$0 so the product should be ~$50 less with GNU/Linux. At least be honest, Dell, and tip the teeter-totter in the right direction. Your customers would be glad to take GNU/Linux for $25 less."

“No escape from Vista 8 on this machine, it's still there even if you get Linux.”
      --iophkThis is why we should not take as a given Canonical's claim of pseudo victory and neglect of the community (the latest spin from Mr. Bacon is announcement of a subdomain, community.ubuntu.com).

Canonical wants to claim victory when GNU/Linux is taxed (Novell style). Linux is winning, but not on the desktop, which Ubuntu was all about. "No escape from Vista 8 on this machine," writes iophk about this new article from the MSBBC, "it's still there even if you get Linux." A common phrase of wisdom is, do not declare victory prematurely. It may only help your enemy and lower morale in the long term. If people cannot get an OS-free machine from Dell, then by buying it with GNU/Linux (Ubuntu only) they help reinforce a Microsoft 'Linux tax'. So much for choice, eh? Either way Microsoft is extorting the customer, irrespective of the 'choice'. ⬆