Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO is Like a Patent Litigation (Without Actual Trial) Office, Not a Patent Examination Office

It's already acting like the UPC (with judges controlled by the office), giving way/rise to litigation or shakedown irrespective of the merit of underlying patents

Examination and litigation
Examination fast-tracked for litigation if not blackmail purposes (putting the burden of proof on the accused). See "Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office".



Summary: Examination of patent applications isn't taken seriously by an office whose entire existence was supposed to be about examination; bureaucracy at the top of this office has apparently decided that the sole goal is to create more demand (i.e. lawsuits) for the litigation 'industry'

THE EPO is weaponising its monopoly powers and arming patent aggressors; it gives "weapons" to firms that leverage totally bogus patents against rivals (we'll use Qualcomm as a new example in our next post).



The EPO no longer cares about quality of patents; the only "quality" it seems to understand is speed of granting. It's a rubber-stamping operation, which the EPO increasingly puts in the hands of proprietary machines rather than humans (examiners). It's like another INPI. Yesterday the EPO persisted with the usual number of tweets in favour of software patents (same old 'script'); it has gotten so bad that we see no point even pointing this out anymore; it would be almost spurious because it has become so banal and repetitive. The EPO has no remorse about blatantly and openly pushing software patents in Europe. Any patent will do; just apply. Apply today! Apply now!

"The EPO no longer cares about quality of patents; the only "quality" it seems to understand is speed of granting."Some firms are looking to exploit these declining standards with self-promotional announcements, seminars, events, brochures and so on. Just before the weekend we saw some in Business Wire (press release) at least a couple of times, the Associated Press wire several times and PR Newswire (press release). They just try to shove lots of patents into the EPO, knowing perhaps that it has gotten a lot easier to have them accepted (even if courts later invalidate these).

What has the EPO become? Who will benefit from this?

We have meanwhile noticed that Liz Cohen from Bristows LLP is writing from the distant past again (27 September 2016). Their CMS is eternally broken and they don't even know how to use it. So many errors. Maybe she just updated a post of hers from 2 years ago after she had published this little piece and promoted it from an account that they've described as "Keeping you up to date with the latest Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patent news and developments" (it's actually a stream of jingoism and lies, sometimes fabrications).

"Wrongly-granted patents need not even go to/on trial; threat of litigation -- or blackmail -- is often enough."Cohen desperately uses as evidence of UPC "confidence" (don't laugh) a litigation 'industry' lobby doing a PR charade. This is laughable beyond belief, but this is the sort of propaganda we've become accustomed to seeing at Bristows LLP. The EPLIT (European Patent Litigators Association) is cited as "proof" of UPC "confidence" and Cohen says "content of these three courses corresponds to the curriculum for the European Patent Litigation Certificate (EPLC), set out in Rule 3 of the draft EPLC Rules."

But there's no UPC; they are promoting a lie. Remember that CIPA lied along with Battistelli about UPC in the UK; that was before the Max Planck Institute issued an almost 200-page-long paper disputing it (recall Bristows' appalling response to it several days ago). Thankfully, if not very much belatedly, English-speaking sites talk about it. IPPro Patents wrote the following yesterday:

The continued participation of the UK in the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and unitary patent will “not be possible” post-Brexit, according to Matthias Lamping and Hanns Ullrich of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition. Lamping and Planck made the comments in a paper covering “the impact of Brexit on unitary patent protection and its court”.

In the paper, Lamping and Planck argued that the unitary patent system rests on two legally different but interconnected pillars.

These are EU Reg 1257/2012, on the implementation of enhanced cooperation by the creation of unitary patent protection, and the Agreement between the Member States of the EU on the establishment of the UPC.

The UPC will have exclusive jurisdiction over invalidation and infringement actions concerning the European patent with unitary effect and/or the classic European (bundle) patent.

However, as Lamping and Planck commented, the link between unitary protection of European patents and the UPC Agreement is not only one of jurisdiction, but also one of “substantive law”.


According to World Intellectual Property Review, which wrote about it yesterday:

Two researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition have argued that the UK will not be able to remain in the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement after leaving the EU.

Matthias Lamping and Hanns Ullrich jointly published two studies in a paper called “The Impact of Brexit on Unitary Patent Protection and its Court”, where they argued that the inclusion of a post-Brexit UK in the Agreement will run contrary to the EU’s core values.

They said unitary patent protection cannot be dissociated from the “general legal order of the EU’s internal market” and be extended to the UK once it has left the EU.


The UPC will likely never happen, but the EPO's abusive behaviour already facilitates the arrival of many patent trolls -- a fact that Bristows staff try to deny in vain. Facts do not seem to exist (or are dismissed as invalid) when Team UPC does not like these facts.

BoingBoing has meanwhile caught up with an old paper which is summarised in yesterday's headline, "Research shows that patent examiners are more likely to grant patents to companies they later work for" -- a subject we wrote about back in May. In BoingBoing's words:

In their National Bureau of Economic Research working paper From Revolving Doors to Regulatory Capture? Evidence from Patent Examiners (Sci-Hub Mirror), Business School profs Haris Tabakovic (Harvard) and Thomas Wollmann (Chicago) show that patent examiners are more likely to grant patents for companies that they subequently go to work for; they also go easier on patents applied for by companies associated with their alma maters (where they have more connections and will find it easier to get a job after their turn in government service).



Appointments in this fashion aren't limited to the USPTO; as we showed in our previous post, there are similar and rather profound issues at the management level of the EPO. There's also the rumour that Battistelli is still trying to head the UPC (if such a thing ever exists), having laid the ground for poor patent quality and thus a lot of frivolous lawsuits.

Does the EPO work for UPC? Is the EPO itself becoming de facto UPC? Wrongly-granted patents need not even go to/on trial; threat of litigation -- or blackmail -- is often enough.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Microsoft Starts 2025 Like 2024: Mass Layoffs Every Month!
It's a company in tailspin
Beta'News' Still a Spamfarm Run by Bots
It's a source of Web pollution
 
[Meme] Microsoft's Scam Altman, Bigger Scammer Than 'Crypto' 'Currency' 'Exchanges'
More pollution, too
Interest in Microsoft Waning, Company Deep in Debt and Mass Layoffs Implemented Every Month Since 2023
As fewer people still use Windows (over time many move to Android or whatever) that site, microsoft.com, will likely languish some more
Microsoft Says Scale of Layoffs in January 2025 is Several Thousands
Microsoft is the first of GAFAM to announce layoffs in 2025
Microsoft Windows Continues to Sink in India
The consistent and almost linear decrease will continue because Microsoft has nothing in store other than vapourware and mass layoffs
statCounter Has Outdated and Unfit-for-Purpose User-Agent Parsers
poor recognition or parsing or classification of User-Agent strings
[Meme] GAFAM Buying Shares in NYSE:EFF
To the ordinary person, today's EFF isn't a go-to protector, it's just meant to look like one
Sometimes the EFF Prefers to Talk About Sex, Not Tech (or Unnecessarily Conflate the Two Things)
The old name (or brand) remains; the goals? Not so much...
Links 09/01/2025: Software Patents Squashed, Meta Becomes "MAGA" Booster
Links for the day
Gemini Links 09/01/2025: Chants of Sennaar and Security Theater
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 08, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, January 08, 2025
Gemini Links 08/01/2025: Minimalism and Efficiency With Gemini Protocol and tilde.cafe "May be Shutting Down"
Links for the day
There Used to be an Actual Community in SUSE (OpenSUSE is Dying)
Volunteers with programming skills don't want to become slaves of Microsoft resellers
[Meme] Blindly Trust Rust
First, you need to get it from a proprietary platform
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) is a Far Bigger Problem Than Some Unintentional Bugs (Not Back Doors) in Software
What's a "memory safe programing [sic] language"? Rust has holes in itself, never mind programs made using Rust.
Amid Mass Layoffs at Microsoft (2025) Executives Flock to Google
The managers and executives typically know ahead of time what's coming
Links 08/01/2025: HMPV Concerns and UK Deaths Soared in 2024
Links for the day
IBMers Question IBM's Decision to Send Money to "Chinese Military Companies" in Spite of US Sanctions
Some people bring this up now
[Meme] Real Money and Fake (Speculative, Fictional) Money
"Looking for the next $400,000,000,000 in 'investment'"
Microsoft LinkedIn Going 'the Way of the Epstein'
LinkedIn is going downhill
Will 2025 Bring Recovery of News Sites or Just More LLM Slop? Probably the Latter.
The Web is deteriorating. Geminispace does not have LLM trash (yet).
Engagement in Microsoft GitHub Falls, Expect More Layoffs and Office Closures
Maybe it'll become an "open secret" if some rebellious whistleblower contacts us
Why Government Data on "Job Openings" is Typically a Lie (Perpetrated in Part by Corporations)
Millions (yes, millions!) of fake "openings" exist in the US alone, based on a survey done last year
[Meme] Microsoft's January 6th
Most Microsoft employees want to leave the company
Links 08/01/2025: Arrest of Yoon Suk Yeol Still Due, Prime Minister of Canada Stepped Down
Links for the day
Gemini Links 08/01/2025: Why Mastodon Sucks and Fake Code Generated by Scanning Real Code
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 07, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, January 07, 2025
All the Latest 'Articles' in This Fake 'News' Site Are SPAM, LLM Slop, or Both (to Googlebomb CES)
These people destroy the Web
Microsoft Has a Google Problem (and GNU/Linux Problem) in Sweden
Sweden likes Chromebooks, Web access data suggests
Less Than a Tenth of a Second
Look ma, static pages!
[Meme] The LLM Salesperson
LLMs are net liability (loss)
LLMs Destroy the Web Not Just by Filling It With Cruft and Chaff (Slop)
It'll destroy many sites or increase the cost of running them
Who Says Microsoft Is Actually Succeeding as a Business? (It's Faking a Lot)
Microsoft has been cooking the books for a long time
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Turns 40 This Year, Now It Shows Possible Logos for the Special Event That Celebrates Sharing
FSF's options in a nutshell
Links 06/01/2025: 10 Years Since Terrorism Against Satire in France
Links for the day
Gemini Links 07/01/2025: Praise of E-mail and App Store 'Invention'
Links for the day
[Meme] Removing Correct Information
publish what's true
President Biden Has Less Than a Fortnight Left to Pardon Julian Assange (Donald Trump's Regime Plotted to Assassinate Assange)
Don't try to lecture/explain/preach to people that exposing corruption, resisting corruption, and merely covering corruption is "bad" because crime "is everywhere"
From 92% to Less Than 25%: How Microsoft Lost Norway (and Still Loses What's Left)
just like in most countries
Matt Birchler: "This is why it’s important for people to own their presence on the web, especially when it comes to government agencies that need to communicate with people."
hours ago
Microsoft Continues to Attack Users' Choice
We're being herded into uniformity
Diversity of Views, Diversity of Sources
We want diversity, not monopoly
With 10 Days Left the Free Software Foundation (FSF) Looks to Raise Just Over $50,000 More
More than 10 days in Boston (eastern coast)
In Europe, Russia's Yandex About to Become Bigger Than Microsoft's Bing, Google Search Estimated to Have Grown Since the LLM Hype Began
Remember that Bing had many layoffs in the past 2 years, the corporate media barely reported on those
The Google Exodus That Wasn't
Search engines exist to serve their masters, not their users
Google (Blogger) is Already Disintegrating and It's a Reminder of the Great Dangers of Outsourcing Blogs to Companies (Including Automattic or WordPress.com)
Plus, Phoronix admits that using PHP - and not static pages - causes the Web site to be DDOSed, sort of
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 06, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, January 06, 2025