Perens said in a recent interview that the current system makes it too easy for patent trolls to sue, even when their patents may be bogus.
We need to restore justice to the patent system, and we also need to take a good look at the motivation for software patents, which many economists and others feel do more to hurt innovation than to promote it.
Software patents were not created by Congress, but by courts, at the same time as business method patents. These are often very broadly drawn, and holders use their power to tax real innovation.
The problem is patents. LLVM’s license allows more room for Apple to use software patents than the GCC’s licenses do. And Apple now has the opportunity to maneuver themselves into a place where through those patents they can dominate the software that can be run on their machines. Those bastards!
The sooner the world understands this patent trap it's irreversibly led to, the better. ⬆
Comments
Yuhong Bao
2008-11-01 05:27:21
On Apple and FOSS, that is another off-topic mess altogether dating back to when NeXT decided to develop a Obj-C front-end for GCC for the NeXTStep OS around 1990.
On Apple's tying of hardware with software, when I heard that Psystar was going to use that as a challenge to the Apple vs Psystar lawsuit, I posted this blog article:
http://yuhong386.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!57E2793D0C53276F!164.entry
Yuhong Bao
2008-11-01 05:28:38
BTW, here is an edit to one of the articles you quoted:
"EDIT 8-24-08: Commenter Owen (see below) points out that LLVM’s license actually stipulates better guarantees about the use of patents than i originally thought. It’s quite possible that I misunderstood the discussion on Saturday, or that somebody there was misinformed about the LLVM’s license."
If people can no longer acquire Computer Science education and real Computer Science experience, they will not know how to control their own digital destiny or emancipate the very same universities that now control the syllabus and instead of teaching Computer Science encourage the outsourcing of systems
"When mentioning the client side," opines an associate, "it is essential to recite the list of other markets where Microsoft is negligible or a no-show. It is repetitive to do so, but it needs saying -- often."
Comments
Yuhong Bao
2008-11-01 05:27:21
Yuhong Bao
2008-11-01 05:28:38