Its probably just a stupid decision to hard code the Microsoft Operating System tag as they only expected to include those but now Ubuntu is popular and they are supporting it , they have probably forgotten about their hard coded program. Or maybe it is too hard to change the coding until the next revision.
Roy Schestowitz
2009-05-13 12:02:23
Indeed. But that would be as tactless as a restaurant putting beverages under the "Coca Cola drinks:" heading.
Doug
2009-05-13 12:04:07
> Its probably just a stupid decision to hard code the Microsoft Operating System tag
I doubt it's a mistake, given the history of MS and its relentless attempt to totally own mindshare. Similarly with Microsoft 'open source' and them turning up at Open Source conferences to 'explain' what 'open source' should be :)
Google results 1 - 10 of about 385,000 for "microsoft open source"
zelrik
2009-05-13 13:54:15
I think you guys think too hard. It might just be Dell being fucking idiots, which wouldnt surprise me at all. By the way there are much better OEM's for Linux as shown here : http://wiki.club-ubuntu.org/index.php/Category:Linux_Computers
In an age when ~1,000 simultaneous layoffs aren't enough to receive any media coverage, what can we expect remaining publishers to tell us about Microsoft layoffs in 2026?
Is the "era of AI" an era when none of the media will mention over 800 layoffs? [...] There's a lesson here about the state of the contemporary media, not just IBM and bluewashing
Comments
Kitkat
2009-05-13 11:53:31
Roy Schestowitz
2009-05-13 12:02:23
Doug
2009-05-13 12:04:07
I doubt it's a mistake, given the history of MS and its relentless attempt to totally own mindshare. Similarly with Microsoft 'open source' and them turning up at Open Source conferences to 'explain' what 'open source' should be :)
Google results 1 - 10 of about 385,000 for "microsoft open source"
zelrik
2009-05-13 13:54:15
Roy Schestowitz
2009-05-13 14:10:35
Gentoo User
2009-05-13 16:23:14
Heh, quite the opposite actually. Obviously.
XfX
2009-05-27 12:40:23