AS we've noted several times earlier this year, there are a lot of pro-patent maximalism blogs and blog posts in Forbes. Some of the bloggers are literal/classic patent trolls and some are directly responsible for blackmail (piggybacking wrongly-granted -- by the USPTO -- patents). The person who created IBM's and then Microsoft's patent aggression strategy has a whole blog there and so does the head of a large patent troll that's connected to Microsoft's. This is just typical Forbes and considering their ownership and funding sources it is difficult to not see why they do this; such corporate media, which habitually glorifies billionaires like Bill Gates, is a disease that feeds on the false perception that it's unbiased. Earlier this month the site celebrated Apple's 'watch' (watching you!). But it was even worse; it celebrated the patent on non-stop wearable surveillance that always watches/listens. An Apple patent reveals that they even want a monopoly on this. They pursue a patent on this. Memories return of Bill Gates' highly controversial suggestion that young pupils should wear wristbands to monitor them in the classroom. Amazon has since then patented something to that effect (but for workers, not pupils). It caused a stir some months back.