07.18.19
Gemini version available ♊︎Index: G 2/19 (Enlarged Board of Appeal, EPO)
PART 3 AND PART 4 (links below) of this series concern the case which previous parts, namely 1 and 2, explained in some more detail (Wikipedia has an article about it as well). Today we concluded this series, at least for now, and we’ve decided that we shall post a more complete series-like index at the end, hopefully before a decision is reached (the outcome seems predictable). This index will be updated as additional posts on the subject are published. This page is thus a dynamic (to be updated) index. █
Part 1: EPO Looney Tunes – Part 1: Is D-Day Approaching for Battistelli’s “Difficult Legacy”?
Part 2: EPO Looney Tunes – Part 2: The “Difficult Legacy” and Its Dark Historical Shadow
Part 3: EPO Looney Tunes – Part 3: The Legal Line-up for G 2/19
Part 4: EPO Looney Tunes – Part 4: G 2/19 – Faites Vos Jeux…
Also of relevance:
- EPO Noise Machine Turned On as Haar Hearing Kicks Off, Patrick Corcoran Defamed Again
- Media Not Interested in G 2/19, Which Demonstrates Patent Justice is Nowadays Impossible at the EPO
- 2 Days Later (Case in Progress) and Still Media Silence About G 2/19
Outcome:
- Greenwashing to Distract From the EPO Breaking the Law, Rigging Justice and Its Own Courts
- IP Kat Used to Blast the EPO for Profound Lack of Justice. Now It’s Just Meowing With the EPO’s Management.
- The EPO and the European Media Continue to Ignore or Cover Up the Haar Case
Decision (written):
- EPO Releases Decision Regarding G 2/19 (the ‘Haar Question’) in a Language Only About 10% of Member States Speak
- The EPO’s Universal Patent Injustice Concealed With Polyglottic Tricks
ᶃ Gemini Space
This post is also available in 
Content is available under CC-BY-SA