09.29.20

IBM Fought for ‘Master Race’ and Now It’s Banning the Word ‘Master’

Posted in Deception, IBM at 7:53 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

We need to go back in time to understand why many people are so angry

GitHub to replace master with main starting in October: What developers need to do now

Summary: A lot of the current push to ban the word “master” came from Red Hat (soon IBM, helped by Intel and Microsoft for the most part); we take a hard look at IBM’s history to better understand the incredible double standards and what the real motivations might be

THE ‘international bullshit machine’ (IBM) is telling us that the world’s problems boil down to something like a Git branch being called “master”. That’s easily debunkable. We wrote about it many times before and we explained why it’s a pretty big deal.

“Political correctness is fascism pretending to be manners,” George Carlin once said. This whole abolition of master, slave terms (not practice) seems to have been started by Red Hat (soon IBM because of the imminent takeover), at least in this earlier case if not earliest (2 years ago). We’re not aware of the debate going further back than this and it was started by a Red Hat employee. “For diversity reasons,” he asserted, “it would be nice to try to avoid “master” and “slave” terminology which can be associated to slavery.” Notice the references there (GitHub, already Microsoft’s on paper).

IBM cardNow read the comments from fellow developers. We’ll quote a few (this is from 2 years ago, before people became reluctant/afraid to publicly object). “I’m a little surprised by this,” said an early comment (on the bug tracker). “It’s not like slavery was acceptable when these computer science terms were coined and it’s only comparatively recently that they’ve gone out of fashion. On the other hand, there are some areas in computer software where “master” and “slave” are the exact technical terms (e.g. IDE), and avoiding them would lead to confusion. Of the four citations you reference, one of them is a PR for Django, and three of them say “see the Django PR”. The Django PR is an unreadable infinitely-long page of miserable arguing. So the context doesn’t help much. Have there been any actual complaints? Or is this an attempt to solve a problem that doesn’t really exist?”

Early debates included also this: “As a counter-example: A quick grep finds 555 occurrences of the word “kill” in CPython master. Everybody knows killing is bad and using the term might upset certain people. Yet I would not support expunging the word “kill” from Python.”

Another one: “I’m not super-excited by the idea that Python has to change its behavior based on secret comments. Python has traditionally had a very open governance model where all discussions happen in public.”

This was weeks after the creator of Python surprisingly resigned. We cannot prove there’s a connection between those two events (resignation and controversy/commotion).

“To me,” said another person, “there is nothing wrong with the word ‘master’, as such. I mastered Python to become a master of Python. [...] Like Larry, I object to action based on hidden evidence.”

“The term “master” has so many positive connotations that I think it is misguided to effectively eliminate it from the current English language,” another developer noted.

“In fact,” said another developer, “in the BDSM subcultures, “master/slave” can have *positive* connotations. You want to support diversity, then why are you discriminating against that subculture?”

Another comment: “Talking about diversity: my wife is of a nationality that historically were often stolen to be slave [...] Both of us are angered by this attack on our linguistic culture. Stop trying to sanitize and infantalize language.”

Also note: “The discussion under GH PRs [Microsoft GitHub] is now censored. What will be the next level?”

That was after Microsoft bought GitHub, at least on paper. No discussion allowed. The debate was secret.

Wikipedia’s article on this very subject states upfront (at the top): “This article may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints.”

We know who’s good at gaming Wikipedia. Some people receive a salary to do it. Microsoft even got caught doing this, infuriating Wikipedia’s co-founder.

“IMO,” said another person, “the problem isn’t the master/slave terminology itself but the way how the changes were introduced (no discussion) and the justification (“diversity reasons”???)”

Notice this other ticket, also citing GitHub extensively:

It has come to my attention that CPython’s source code contains problematic ableist/saneist terms and/or pejoratives, namely

sanity check 144
silly 26
insane 13
crazy 13
stupid 6
lame 2
lunatic 1

Some of those slipped into the documentation. In an attempt to make Python community more inclusive and welcoming, we should clean up these usages and replace them with something neutral (where applicable). Unfortunately, to this day many developers deem such efforts as “trolling”, so please note that the precedent has already been set by many major projects. Here’re just a few:

https://github.com/unpkg/unpkg.com/pull/81

https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/pull/2335

https://github.com/rtfd/readthedocs.org/pull/3752

https://github.com/krzysztofzablocki/Sourcery/issues/2

https://github.com/google/xi-editor/pull/126

Other resources:

https://english.stackexchange.com/q/282282

http://isthisableism.tumblr.com/sluralternatives

The goal of this issue is not to stir up arguments, but to figure out the alternatives and ways to replace those problematic terms.

So they’re starting to take control of language further and further. Even a word like “crazy” (or “lame”) is going to become a Code of Conduct (CoC) violation of some kind? Where does this go? Where might it end?

“I find this nonsensical and I’m very disappointed that this ideological nonsense is infecting Python,” said another comment.

Guido van Rossum himself wrote (weeks earlier): “Now that PEP 572 is done, I don’t ever want to have to fight so hard for a PEP and find that so many people despise my decisions.”

To CoC antagonists he wrote: “your only option might be to leave this group voluntarily. Perhaps there are issues to decide like when should someone be kicked out (this could be banning people from python-dev or python-ideas too, since those are also covered by the CoC).”

This poses a potential danger to people like Linus Torvalds inside the Linux Foundation, for reasons we covered before [1, 2]. Language control is a slippery slope which overlooks or distracts from the vastly bigger problems.

I’ve always wondered about the timing of Guido van Rossum’s sudden resignation (unscheduled, unplanned, no succession in place), seeing pointless controversies being floated at the time. As Daniel Pocock put it quite recently: “It is permissible for leaders to write nasty things about volunteers but it is not permissible for volunteers to write things about the leaders.”

Now, going back to IBM, it was its initiative initially (or Red Hat’s). IBM keeps pushing this elimination of words, even by sending PR people to me, urging yours truly to suit their nonsensical narrative.

Well, IBM wants us to think that it’s against “masters”. But its history tells an entirely different story. Not only is IBM a deeply racist company; historically it profited a lot from the “master race” agenda, which involved not only discrimination but incarceration/incineration of people of the ‘wrong’ race.

From the full book which contradicts this hypocritical narrative, War Against The Weak:

IBM eugenics p34
page 34

IBM eugenics p36-37
pp. 36-37

IBM eugenics p54
page 54

IBM eugenics p803-807
pp. 803-807

IBM eugenics p852-856
pp. 852-856

IBM eugenics p927
page 927

IBM eugenics p1051-1052
pp. 1051-2

IBM eugenics p1172
page 1172

IBM eugenics p1613-1614
pp. 1613-14

So that’s IBM. How very tolerant a company. IBM knew exactly what it was doing all along. It only stopped when it became a PR embarrassment for Mr. Watson and his associates, after receiving a Nazi medal and meeting Mr. Hitler himself in person.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2020/09/29/banning-the-word-master/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 9/5/2021: KDE Frameworks 5.82.0 Release and Patents Related to COVID Subjected to Waivers

    Links for the day



  2. Act More 'Professional' to Appease Mobs

    We should all think alike, dress alike, and like everybody (especially the business overlords)



  3. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 08, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, May 08, 2021



  4. Some Background on the Free Speech Society at the University of Buckingham, Where Richard Stallman is Being 'Replatformed'

    A private British university, the University of Buckingham, will 'host' (virtually) the most-defamed person in the Free software world; the Free Speech Society is only two years old and rationality for its existence is explained by its co-founder James Oliver



  5. Web Sites or News Sites Perish When Their Arguments Are Weak and/or Invalid

    "Just be honest!" is a simple motto for any site; but some sites sell out in pursuit of money or grandiosity, unlike us (we turned 14.5 years old on Friday)



  6. GNU/Linux Turns 38 (in 4 Months From Now)

    Contrary to what the Linux Foundation wants you to think, the operating system turns 38 later this year



  7. Richard Stallman: Steve Jobs Did Some Very Bad Things

    Dr. Richard Stallman told me about Steve Jobs that he had helped digitally imprison computer users



  8. GNU/Linux Founder Richard Stallman to Give a Talk at the University of Buckingham Tomorrow (Live Stream)

    Tomorrow it will be possible to watch this new talk live using Free software



  9. Then We Take Berlin...

    Homage to EPO, based in Munich and Berlin (and defended by the government in Berlin)



  10. The Right to Assemble, Fundamental Rights of Ownership, and Many Other Rights Are Under Attack

    Techrights will be dealing a lot more with erosion of what people have come to assume were “rights” (real rights, such as human rights, labour rights, not copy “rights” or patent “rights”); when rights are reduced to rubble the long-term consequences are severe, shows history



  11. TechBytes Episode 91: End of Privacy and End of Windows 10X

    Tim and Roy produce their 2nd audiocast since TechBytes returned



  12. The Cancel Song

    People who work for (or receive funding from) Nazi-associated IBM are still trying to turn the work/legacy of Richard Stallman (RMS) into dust/ashes



  13. Pro-Software Freedom Advocates and Free/Libre Software Supporters Face Barriers Due to Domination of Communication Channels (Beyond the Media)

    A carefully-checked assessment of an overlooked aspect surrounding the 'cancel mob', which incites and brainwashes people based on lies; there's an attempt to control channels of communication (e.g. Open and Free Technology Community and Freenode) and to generally suppress people who support the founder of GNU/Linux



  14. Bashing Free Software and GNU/Linux is a Terrible Business Model for Publishers

    Contrary to unflattering portrayals by hostile media that's sponsored by foes of Free software, the usage of Free software grows, even if things such as DRM and surveillance stand in the way of software freedom (which was wrongly assumed to be ushered in by Free software, irrespective of malicious features like 'telemetry')



  15. Links 8/5/2021: GIMP 2.99.6, Wine 6.8 Released

    Links for the day



  16. IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 07, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, May 07, 2021



  17. [Meme] Outsourcing Audacity Development to Microsoft Proprietary Software and Then Copying Microsoft Tactics (and 'Telemetry')

    They've had the audacity to call it "telemetry" and pretend that surveillance companies (spying giants) cannot figure out who you are based on IP addresses



  18. Links 7/5/2021: IPFire 2.25 Core Update 156 and Diffoscope 174 Released

    Links for the day



  19. The New Microsoft? No, the New IBM.

    Microsoft GitHub and IBM: a strategic alliance between a monopolistic duo



  20. The Audacity Takeover by Muse Group is No Cause for Celebration

    Audacity is now part of an entity called Muse Group and if it doesn’t take or suck freedom out of Audacity, it will certainly deny users rather basic concepts (or anticipation) of privacy



  21. King of Linux

    If the entire operating system is being called "Linux", then we fall for a publicity or misattribution stunt



  22. The Biggest Troll is the Linux Foundation, Still Looking to Provoke and Defame Free Software Communities in Order to Help a Monopolistic Takeover and to Shoehorn Tyrants Into Leadership Positions

    Contrary to what the so-called ‘Linux’ Foundation is trying to say, the most toxic element is itself; it’s maligning the real community while protecting abusive and racist corporations that profit from war and tribalism-motivated hatred



  23. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 06, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, May 06, 2021



  24. “The Lolita Express” and Prince Bill

    “The Lolita Express” scandals return to haunt pool old Bill, as it turns out his wife was upset and it's quite likely the reason for their divorce



  25. Links 7/5/2021: GNU/Linux Preinstalled, Plamo 7.3, LibreOffice 7.1.3

    Links for the day



  26. The Latest Reports About Bill Gates Serve to Confirm or at Least Reaffirm Many People's Suspicions

    So, just as many people suspected, Melinda Gates did not appreciate her husband sneaking behind her back to meet someone who had trafficked thousands of underage girls for sexual exploitation and there are high-profile calls right now for greater transparency, seeing the impact on the world’s biggest tax evasion vehicle



  27. Disregard Web Sites That Call Themselves 'News' and Instead Promote Proprietary Software for Companies Like Microsoft

    Publishers like IDG have long been paid-for marketing in ‘article’ clothing, sometimes with the veneer of ‘reporting’ (as if they have some inside knowledge or insight, e.g. speaking with or for the company they secretly coordinate with or market for); but sadly we’ve been seeing some so-called ‘Linux’ sites doing the same thing, in effect acting like de facto Microsoft marketers



  28. [Meme] Who Needs Examination Anyway When There's 'Hey Hi' (AI)?

    The patent production line could do away with 'pesky' and 'opinionated' examiners who actually wish to scrutinise alleged 'inventions'



  29. Europe's Second-Largest Institution Corrupting the Media and Buying Expensive Puff Pieces

    As annual reports reveal, the EPO wastes an extraordinary amount of money on reputation laundering campaigns and it pollutes the signal by paying publishers; we examine this issue using the new 'reports' shown in the video above



  30. Links 6/5/2021: Fedora’s Compiler Policy and Celemony Software GmbH Adopting Free Software

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts