Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO: Language of Conflict

posted by Roy Schestowitz on May 13, 2024,
updated May 14, 2024

Risks to interpreting services at the EPO

Central Staff Committee tables/charts

Some weeks ago interpretation services were reportedly crushed by EPO management. There's now a more detailed publication about it. It comes from the Central Staff Committee and it contains a lot of tables/charts.

The core of the message is, as per today's communication: "The EPO relies on freelance interpreters who are considered to be employees of the Office for the time they work for the Office. Their conditions of employment put in place since 2002 (CA/136/02) helped to build a pool of 160 highly qualified interpreters specialised in Patent Law.

"The Office is now proposing to abolish the conditions of employment of interpreters and requests the Budget and Finance Committee for their opinion on CA/35/24. The Office did not consult any of its interpreters before tabling the document in the General Consultative Committee (GCC) and does not provide the legal basis for the change. Upon learning of the proposal, the EPO interpreters expressed deep concern about the potential consequences.

"In this open letter to the delegations in the Budget and Finance Committee (BFC), the Central Staff Committee (CSC) explains the shortcomings of the reform and recommends that the delegations request to be presented with the document for information only, so that alternatives can be considered."

A letter about this has already been sent to António Campinos and Heads of Delegation in the Budget and Finance Committee (which historically had very profound conflict of interest [1, 2]). To quote the letter alone (no annexes except in the original):

European Patent Office
80298 Munich
Germany

Central Staff Committee
Comité central du personnel
Zentraler Personalausschuss

centralSTCOM@epo.org

Reference: sc24026cl

Date: 08/05/2024

European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY

To: Heads of Delegation in the Budget and
Finance Committee

Cc: Mr António Campinos
President of the EPO

By email:
council@epo.org
president@epo.org

OPEN LETTER

Risks to interpretation services at the EPO

Dear Heads of Delegations in the Budget and Finance Committee,

The EPO shall offer interpretation services during oral proceedings in opposition proceedings1 and in appeal proceedings2. Interpretation services are also provided to the delegations during meetings of the Administrative Council.

Presently, the EPO relies on freelance interpreters who are considered to be employees of the Office for the time they work for the Office. Their conditions of employment put in place since 2002 (CA/136/02) helped to build a pool of 160 highly qualified interpreters specialised in Patent Law.

The Office is now proposing to abolish the conditions of employment of interpreters and requests the BFC for their opinion on (CA/35/24). The Office did not consult any of its interpreters before tabling the document in the General Consultative Committee and does not provide the legal basis for the change. Upon learning of the proposal, the EPO interpreters expressed deep concern about the potential consequences.

The document states that the tax authorities in a member state consider that interpreters should be covered by the EPO’s social security scheme, and as long as this is not the case, interpreters are covered under the national social security scheme of the member state in question for which

_______

1 Rule 4(5) Impl Reg. to Part I of the EPC

2 Article 7 RoP of the BoA


employers are obliged to pay employee insurance premiums for the benefit of their employees. In the GCC, reference was made to problems in the Netherlands where only 6 interpreters reside. Abolishing the conditions of employment for all interpreters is hence disproportionate and leads to several issues explained in a document prepared by a group of interpreters3:

First, if interpreters work for the EPO without employee status, they bear the risk of being considered under false (bogus) self-employment by the country where they reside. Interpreters would have to reduce their availability for the EPO to mitigate this risk4.

Second, if EPO interpreters’ fees become subject to national income tax, interpreters who optimise their income vis-à-vis national thresholds might limit their availability to the EPO. The proposed increase by 40% of the interpreters’ daily rates– according to them, would be insufficient to compensate the taxation5.

Third, the EPO would have to pay VAT in non-EU countries such as in the United Kingdom and Switzerland where 25% of interpreters are residents6.

Fourth, Article 14 of the PPI would no longer apply to interpreters. Interpreters would for example no longer enjoy the inviolability for all their official papers and documents, including EPO documents.

Fifth, the EPO would not be competitive in comparison with other international organisations still using a hybrid model like the one currently in place at the EPO (EU, UN, WTO, CoE…)7. The benchmark8 shows that the newly proposed model based on “framework contracts” would even put the EPO at the lowest place in the benchmark.

The specimen framework contract is not available. The reform is clearly not described in its entirety. In addition, the vast number of comments from the interpreters show that neither the legal nor the fiscal issues seem to have been properly considered in the document.

International institutions are already competing for a limited pool of interpreters. The EPO cannot afford to jeopardize its pool of interpreters specialised in Patent Law. A shortage of interpreters with the requisite skill set would ultimately result in risks to business continuity and quality of interpretation services for the users of the patent system.

The EPO should re-consider the planned change of the conditions due to the aforementioned shortcomings and properly consult the interpreters and the staff representation.

_____________

3 „EPO Accredited Interpreters Statement and Supporting Annexes“, 24-04-2024 [Annex 1]

4 see [Annex 1], page 10

5 see [Annex 1], page 7

6 see [Annex 1], page 5

7 see [Annex 1], page 2

8 “International organisations: comparative table” [Annex 2]


We recommend that the delegations request to be presented with document CA/35/24 for information only, so that alternatives can be considered.

Sincerely yours

Derek Kelly
Chairman of the Central Staff Committee

Annex 1: “Communication from EPO-accredited interpreters to Staff Representation”, 14-04-2024
Annex 2: “International organisations: comparative table”

One can hope that if more people (in this field) see this, the more resistance can - or will - intensify. With the illegal kangaroo court (UPC) not squashed yet, the greater the tragedy of unconstitutionality, based on language and so much more.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Microsoft Uses LLM Slop to Defraud (or Rob) Shareholders
Microsoft is basically defrauding its shareholders by LLM slop
The "Davos Effect": Tarnishing the Reputation of Places Not by Overtourism But by Oligarch Infestation
The last Venice needs is an affiliation with Venetian oligarchs
 
Links 01/07/2025: "Independence Day in Taiwan", Bounties on Software Patents
Links for the day
What Happens When Your Law Firm is Preoccupied With Harassing and Trying to Extort a Humble Couple in Manchester, Even on Behalf of Violent Microsoft Staff From Another Continent
It's good to see that law firms which operate in bad faith are perishing
Lawyer X, Law Firm X and Elon Musk's X: scandals linked by Old Xaverian
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Gemini Links 01/07/2025: Distraction-Free Writing and Hytale Mismanagement
Links for the day
Links 01/07/2025: "Beauty of Blogging" and "Etiquette of Collapse"
Links for the day
The Web is a Dead End
We need to adopt alternatives
When Words Lose Their Intended Meaning
examples of words that, at least in the technical spheres, don't mean what they sound like
People Who Disagree With You on Technical Matters May or May Not Agree With You on Political Things (But Usually They Do)
What bothers me a great deal is seeing left-leaning people accusing other left-leaning people of being "nazis"
"Too Much Choice" and "Too Many Programming Languages"
What IBM and its apologists aim for was attempted in the 1930s and it failed
Microsoft Lost 400,000,000 Windows Users, According to Microsoft
more people adopt smaller computers and many people replace Windows with GNU/Linux, as they don't really need a new computer
Half a Year Gone, What's to Come Next
In the second half of 2025 we expect to be done with the Microsoft SLAPPs
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, June 30, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, June 30, 2025
People at the Very Top of Microsoft Know How Bad Things Really Are
There's no product that can replace the former profitability of Windows licensing and stuff that went on top of Windows
Gemini Links 01/07/2025: Mid Year and a Tour of Old Languages
Links for the day
EPO Presentation Bemoans Misuse of Slop in Decision-Making on Patents and in Classification (Which is Likely Illegal Too)
We habitually mention failed use cases of LLMs on the Web
Mass Layoffs at Microsoft Confirmed, "XBox Hardware Is Dead"
It's possible that over 20% of the staff will be laid off
Links 30/06/2025: Kyrgyzstan vs Media Freedom, Dalai Lama Succession
Links for the day
Gemini Links 30/06/2025: Backend Programs in Gemini and Dynamic Content Without The Scripting
Links for the day
Links 30/06/2025: Zuckerberg’s Tax-Evading Scheme Harms Kids, US Copyright Office Lacks Leadership
Links for the day
Microsoft Isn't Laying Off Tens of Thousands to 'Invest' in Slop ('Hey Hi'), It's Laying Off Tens of Thousands Because It's Running Out of Money (and Willing Lenders)
the layoffs are a sign of the business failing, not "hey hi" (whatever that is) replacing staff
Intel Lays Off 20% of Its Workforce, Microsoft is Doing the Same This Year
Like a yoyo, whatever goes up will come back down
Microsoft XBox Layoffs: Almost 2,000 Layoffs Became "Over 2,000"? (Over 20% of the Staff)
over 20% of staff will be let go, not counting staff that leaves voluntarily
GNU/Linux Rises to New Highs in Angola, Africa in General is Abandoning Windows
Western media barely covers Microsoft layoffs in Africa, but in recent years Microsoft culled the workforce and even shut down entire operations
Summer Plans in Techrights and Elsewhere
massive layoffs at Microsoft
Destination Geminispace (in the Age of LLM Slop and Slop Images That Infest the Web and Social Control Media)
Geminispace isn't vast, but at least it is - on average - a lot "cleaner"
GNU/Linux Growing in Sierra Leone This Year
Based on what statCounter is seeing, this year there are more and more people there who adopt GNU/Linux
Serial Sloppers Gonna Slop
More sites out there ought to call out the cheaters
Quartz (qz.com) is Spam and a Slopfarm
It used to be OK. Then they fired the staff.
Links 30/06/2025: US Economic Woes, Extreme Heat
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, June 29, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, June 29, 2025
Gemini Links 30/06/2025: "The AI Hype" and New AuraGem Ask
Links for the day
Our Desktops Are Not Your Experiments, X is Not an Experiment
Breaking what already worked
Microsoft's Big Lies Regarding This Week's Mass Layoffs Have Already Begun (and They're Already Being Spread by Slopfarms)
Microsoft is the "market leader" in slop
Explaining the Full Story of SLAPPs From Microsoft Staff
For every action there is a reaction, for every attack there will be proportionate consequences
The Openwashing Shills Initiative (OSI) - Part III: IRS and Status of OSI
"They lied to the US IRS and there’s a paper trail"
IBM Red Hat's Dogmatic Fanaticism Under a Thin Veil of "Modernism"
IBM now has the audacity to paint people who don't agree as "nazis"
Microsoft's Share in Guatemala Fell From 97% to 14%
Eventually Microsoft will get stuck in a loop of layoffs, layoffs, and more layoffs
They Made Technology Scary and Taught Us That It's Innocent, Friendly, Even "Social"
Rejection of all this "apps" and "gadgets" and "Smart" (whatever that means!) status quo isn't a rejection of society
The Media is Under Attacks Partly Because There's Little Other (Remaining) Press to Speak in Its Defence
The biggest danger here is that when there's very little press or no "opposition media" left it becomes even easier to crush critics because there aren't many people left to speak about the matter
If Your Web Site is Run by Bots, Eventually Nobody Will 'Read' It Except Bots (People Don't Want to Read Slop)
Eventually people learn from mistakes
Links 29/06/2025: Microsoft Releases False/Fake Benchmarks, "Google Wants You to Watch Ads or Take Surveys to Read Articles"
Links for the day
Links 29/06/2025: Data Breaches and Online Censorship
Links for the day
Gemini Links 29/06/2025: "The Price Of Eggs" and Gemini 3D Tic Tac Toe
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, June 28, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, June 28, 2025