Bonum Certa Men Certa

Markets Without Fair Competition and Effective Regulation

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Oct 15, 2024

The Phoebus Cartel

ALMOST 30 years ago the computer (and particularly computer software) industry reached a point where not having Windows was "difficult" because everyone was expected to have Windows to run "standard" programs or get so-called "computer skills" (which schools and workplaces expected pupils/professionals to possess or have long trained for, either formally or by experience, i.e. prolonged use akin to 'addiction'). This more or less meant that in the early 2000s Microsoft was already grossly overcharging people. Microsoft did a lot of illegal stuff other than that.

No competition (or no viable alternatives for particular proprietary formats and precompiled binaries) means people will just pay a high price, typically tied very strictly to the price of a new physical computer. Microsoft was selling to OEMs, not people. It was gaming the channel to actively restrict choice.

There are many examples where a lack of true choice encourages cartels (like the OEMs above), higher prices, and price-fixing (ensuring prices artificially remain high; patents do this too).

Some people become very rich this way. But at whose expense and is this moral? Is this desirable? Antitrust laws exist for a reason.

AMD and Intel are a good example of this. Two sides of a similar coin. Intel is suffering because nowadays most computers don't use x86 processors and don't even have a keyboard. In the server room too alternatives computer architectures are explored. This means Intel does not command the price anymore. It lost that.

But outside the areas (domains) of microprocessors and software there are also several examples. Some were discussed today and yesterday in IRC.

Let me use the example of batteries (finger-sized, the "classic" stuff, notably AA and AAA sizes). It's very fresh in my mind. I spent the past 2 days doing lots of work... sort of researching this market, both online and offline. I checked stuff in my drawer (from the 1990s mostly), including the charger that's sturdy, over 30 years old, and still works. I also checked the state of very old rechargeable batteries, effectively chemicals inside a metal vessel/tube. What I generally found was, almost every shop around here stocks no rechargeable batteries (the small local shops anyway) and bigger shops either don't have them or sort of "hide" them, encouraging people to instead buy batteries over and over again, never reusing them. Most stores only stock the two famous brands, nothing else (I won't say the brands out loud). I checked Argos, Sainsbury's, Tesco (both Express and Online), Asda (physical megastore) and another place near us, even if only to make a point or study the situation in order to report it. Eventually I checked eBay, knowing that many physical markets don't stock rechargeable batteries (I already checked in prior months). I'll no longer explore the matter because I made a purchase this morning, but the main lessons are:

How did "the market" become this bad? How was choice narrowed down to the point where people can only choose between expensive and another expensive? (Unless they walk the extra mile)

If we value the planet (the only planet we have) and recognise the harms done by the metals and chemicals inside batteries, why aren't there campaigns to use rechargeable batteries by default or for shops to promote rechargeable batteries by default? Because less batteries would get sold?

Disposable, single-purpose junk seems to have become the norm/al, even for the chargers, which look like plastic toys, not appliances. How safe are these? How long will they last before becoming fire hazards?

There are precedents for it, e.g. the Phoebus cartel. Here are some articles about that:

The Phoebus cartel is now 100 years old. It'll officially turn 100 in about 70 days. To quote IEEE (second above): "On 23 December 1924, a group of leading international businessmen gathered in Geneva for a meeting that would alter the world for decades to come. Present were top representatives from all the major lightbulb manufacturers, including Germany’s Osram, the Netherlands’ Philips, France’s Compagnie des Lampes, and the United States’ General Electric. As revelers hung Christmas lights elsewhere in the city, the group founded the Phoebus cartel, a supervisory body that would carve up the worldwide incandescent lightbulb market, with each national and regional zone assigned its own manufacturers and production quotas. It was the first cartel in history to enjoy a truly global reach."

The world would destroy itself (or rather, mankind would destroy its habitat) if we put profits before people.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Despite Its Severe Financial Problems Gnome Foundation Inc Paid Rosanna Yuen Over 100,000 Dollars Last Year
maybe relocation should be considered
The "Left" and the Right"
It poisons everything
Mozilla and Rust Are Not Leftists
they're part of the mass consumerism machine
Disposable to Microsoft
There is an extensive set of people who got used by Microsoft, only to be thrown away a month later or a year later or a decade later
The UEFI 9/11 - Part VII - This Coming Week Many PCs Will Refuse to Boot "Linux" (Because of Microsoft's Expired Certificate)
The real solution is, disable "secure boot" or "SecureBoot" while it's still possible. [...] Just like submarine patents, a lot of this problem was "hibernating" for a while
The Thing Nobody in Red Hat Wants to Talk About Openly
There is a real sentiment or worry among Red Hatters, Europeans and Americans in particulars (because of higher salary expectations)
Slopwatch: Small Parade of Fake News About "Linux" and Scams Borrowing the Name (or Word) "Linux"
In practice, LLMs are a risk
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 05, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, September 05, 2025
Genini Links 05/09/2025: Community, ROOPHLOCH, and PITkit
Links for the day
Links 05/09/2025: Vaccine Sceptics Poison the Well, Two Exploited Vulnerabilities Patched in Android
Links for the day
Gemini Links 05/09/2025: Logitech Lift and DIY Gemini Servers
Links for the day
Links 05/09/2025: Sainsbury's Caught Spying on In-Store Shoppers and Microsoft "OpenAI is Using Legal Threats to Harass its Critics"
Links for the day
BASIC Predates Microsoft by Over a Decade, Microsoft-Controlled Sites Like The Register MS Don't Want You to Know This
The state of the media is really bad when it relies a lot on oligarchs' money and is appointing editors who are working for oligarchs
Analogies for "Memory Safety" in Rust
Don't worry, it's Rust! It can do anything!
Brian Kernighan, "Only Third to Dennis Richie and Ken Thompson" (UNIX), Agreed With Someone Who Said Rust Was Just Hype, Should Not Replace C
17 hours ago
Reminder: Microsoft's "Secure Boot" Certificate for "Linux" Will be Expired in One Week
Many PCs won't manage to 'rotate' to another certificate
"Many of the Red Hat Employees Are Still Looking for Work"
Shame on IBM's CEO
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 04, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 04, 2025
Microsoft Started With Code Literally From The Trash, Nothing Has Improved Since
The reality is, there are systems and code that are reliable. But they're not Microsoft's.
Hypothesis That New McKinsey/Microsoft Executive Inside Red Hat Will Outsource Research and Development Operations to India (Like They Do in IBM)
IBM is floundering
Slopwatch: Scams, Fake Articles About "Linux", Plagiarism, and Worse
Perhaps some time soon the LLMs or the "Big LLMs" will run out of money (to borrow) and go offline, leaving those slopfarms in a tough place
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Means of Production and Rusting Out
Links for the day
Links 04/09/2025: Science, Hardware, and Eyes on China
Links for the day
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Digital Minimalism and Social Control Media
Links for the day
IBM's GNU/Linux Divestment, Based on Hard But Anecdotal Evidence (IBM Fails to Recognise How Much Money It Made and Can Still Make From "Linux")
Love us or hate us, a lot of what we've been saying about Red Hat under IBM turns out to be rather accurate
Links 04/09/2025: Massive Microsoft Staff Cuts (Barely Reported), "Strange Conspiracy Theory Is Reportedly Spreading Inside OpenAI"
Links for the day
Activists Can Win, But Keep an Eye on the Ball and on the Trophy
GitHub is dying, it was a loss-making trap, not free hosting
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Katrina Remembered, Distracted Driving, and Virtual Economics
Links for the day
At This Point It's No Longer Matthew Garrett But People Who Fund Matthew Garrett (or Companies That Fund His SLAPPs Against My Wife and I)
The only thing worse than misogynists are misogynists who fail to respect other people's right to go on holiday
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, September 03, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, September 03, 2025
The UEFI 9/11 - Part VI - This Serious Harm Was Planned for Over a Decade, Not an Accident or Merely Some Misfortune
The term "Serious Harm" is legally meaningful here
GNOME Unfit for Diversity and Inclusion
GNOME's leadership is using "bad words"
Brodie Robertson Addressing the Recently-Discovered Comments
Most people probably knew nothing about this until he wrote a response
Red Hat QA Team "Had Shrunk by Half Over the Past Year." (After IBM Divestment)
If Red Hat's workforce is being moved to the East, then RHEL can become a national security problem
Slopwatch: "Open Source" and "Linux" News Faked, Made by Bots and Entered Into Google News
Spam combined with slop about "Linux" has entered Google News