Bonum Certa Men Certa

The Patent Litigation 'Industry' Controls the European Patent Office (Vendor Capture) and Everyone Suffers, Even the European Union

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Dec 14, 2024

Objective setting 2025

Teasers can say stuff in a nutshell or in a few seconds. But what's the source or the substance? Well, the António Campinos "Mafia" (same Mafia that was started by Benoît Battistelli along with Campinos at EUIPO) seems incapable or respecting the law. Patent offices exist not to maximise the number of monopolies they hand out, but who cares, right? The EPO openly admits that its sole goal is money and it began calling applicants "customers", "clients" etc. No wonder they grant European software patents - i.e. patents which are both illegal and undesirable - and even patents on chewing gum. If the EPO doesn't sort itself out, it'll need to be altogether abolished (which is unlikely to happen when the political discourse is captured by large corporations).

Today we relay an EPO publications dated just 4 days ago (this past Tuesday).

Objective setting 2025

What you can do at the time of objective / target setting

The 2025 draft budget[1] announced a planned production of 413 000 SEO (Search Examination Opposition) products for 4 025 planned examiner posts. This is a 7% increase from the 2024 plan. It does not come as much of a surprise seeing the now 10-year-old trend of target increases, which coincides with the lifetime of the new career system.

2025 draft budget

Still, during a recent meeting of the LSCTH with VP1, the question was raised as to why such a steep increase was requested from DG1 staff when the financial study[2] foresees an increase in productivity of 2.1% per annum. His reply was that the financial study is the touchstone of the yearly planning, that the 2,1% increase will not necessarily be implemented linearly, and that the increased targets recover from the dip[3] in productivity of recent years – see also orange line on the graph above.

Why is this a problem?

Apart from the period of 2020-2022, DG1 staff seems to have been meeting the challenge of these increased targets – see graph above – and is catching up with the maximum production per examiner of 2019.

However, SP2028[4] has one goal: sustainability. The financial sustainability of the EPO seems to be on the right track: the “gap” announced by the 2019 financial study has already been filled, the independent actuaries estimate that the pension liabilities are adequately covered, and the EPO – a public service organisation not supposed to make benefits - has regularly been producing surpluses of nearly €400m[5].
But we doubt very much that the productivity increases of the order of 30% in 10 years are sustainable.
We also fear for our colleagues’ health[6] and the quality of the final products[7], and invite higher management to put in practise the statements of SP2028: “putting the wellbeing of our people first” (p.17) and “The EPO aims for a complete and accurate search covering all aspects of the invention and a thorough written opinion.”, (p.42).

Some of you have informed us that your teams will be receiving double digit increases in targets for 2025. Others, that individual time capacity is completely disregarded, and all colleagues will receive the same targets irrespective of how much time they will have available to reach them. Or that the files allocated to team members on long term (sick) leave will be redistributed to the rest of the team.
This is once again at odds with the SP2028: “It is about providing a framework for a flexible and healthy work-life balance, putting the wellbeing of our people first and nurturing a community that, through diversity and inclusion, brings fresh perspectives and innovative thinking to the table” (p.17).

We have informed VP1 of such practices, who seemed to say they should not occur. We reiterate the message here.

What you can do about it

On unreasonable target increases:
The intranet announcement “Performance cycle 2025”[8] states: “Staff and managers are invited to engage in collaborative discussions as the basis for well-written goals that serve as a reliable guide for the coming year”. We therefore encourage you to re-negotiate your targets and if that is not possible at least to communicate your doubts on the objectives setting with your line management, possibly collectively (i.e. as a whole team or even directorate), and possibly using the template in Annex below as a guide.

It is important that you be conservative and realistic and avoid committing to unattainable objectives for which you alone will be deemed to be responsible and will have to bear the consequences, in 2025 and beyond.

On health:
Work should not make you sick: if your work is having negative effects on your health (exhaustion, stress, sleeping problems, headaches, trouble disconnecting…), we advise to take sick leave, consult your doctor and report it to your line manager and to OHS.

On quality:
We advise to ask for written instructions of how to perform your tasks such as to reach the targets – see also template below. This is to avoid that the responsibility for the quality of your work and the consequences thereof be placed on your shoulders.

Discussing objectives is reasonable, but committing to a target imposed on you is not. We therefore recommend informing your direct line manager in writing – possibly using the template below. Your email should then be appended to your 2025 performance appraisal in the successfactors tool. We would appreciate if you could then forward your email to redacted@suepo.org or redacted@epo.org.

Don’t hesitate to contact us or your local staff committee The Hague.

Related publications:

 
Kind regards,
Your SUEPO TH committee – M18B10 and De Bruyn Kopsstraat, 15, Rijswijk

[...]

 


[1] See CA/50/24, p.6 and p.100

[2] Financial Study 2023

[3] The productivity dip of 2020-2022 seems to be due to covid, wave of retirements, "low-hanging fruits” already picked, DG1 staff used as testers for the Minimum Viable Product tools, IT system disruptions, etc.

[4] Strategic Plan 2028

[5] See slide 7 of the January 2024 LSCTH GA presentation on objective setting and SUEPO’s comment on the President’s announcement.

[6] During the COHSEC of 22.02.2024, OHS physicians voiced that also highly productive staff – mainly examiners and including some team managers -  work overtime, come to their limits and start to suffer from work related stress causing them to contact OHS with health issues. They mentioned that the 12% increase in stress related symptoms between 2022 and 2023 might be only the tip of the iceberg. See also agenda points by members nominated by the CSC, p.3-4, and Key facts 2023, table 4.

[7] See also Industry Patent Quality Charter (IPQC), which is publicly critical about the substantive quality of EPO patents.

[8] See „Performance cycle 2025“, EPO Intranet, 20 November 2024.
 



 
ANNEX: template email to manager, please use only the parts which apply to you, delete and / or adapt the rest.    
 


 
Dear xxxx,
 
On [FILL IN DATE] my objectives were set at [FILL IN]. As in the past, I commit to working to the best of my abilities in 2025. However, the following points prevent me from presently committing to the objectives set for 2025:

 
Best regards
 

They quote the Office regarding “putting the wellbeing of our people first”; well, words are cheap. In practice, not only does the EPO destroy the minds of EPO workers; it equips aggressive corporate giants (typically based outside Europe but hiring European law firms) and patent trolls with lousy (but expensive to invalidate) patents they in turn use to destroy the wallbeing of Europeans.

Jolly Person

The EPO is a disgrace. If the EU cares about its reputation and long-term viability, then it must intervene ASAP. Its fate is tied to EPO's, not only through high-level corruption but also fake 'courts' which represent a rapid death to EU justice.

Guess who's laughing the last last here (profiting from this chaos).

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Report About February Mass Layoffs at Microsoft (Third Wave of Microsoft Layoffs in 2025) Comes Back From the Dead
Yesterday we wrote about an article in CRN (reporting Microsoft layoffs) being removed without any reasons specified
Links 21/02/2025: Myanmar Scam Centre and Disruptions at USPTO
Links for the day
gbhackers.com is Not Hackers, It's LLM Slop Outputs (Fake 'Articles') That Attack 'True Hackers'
A site called linuxsecurity.com keeps doing this and now we see the slopfarm gbhackers.com doing the same
linuxsecurity.com Continues to Spread Lies or Machine-Generated FUD (Microsoft LLMs Likely the Source) About OpenSSH and Linux
this LLM problem is global
 
Links 21/02/2025: TikTok Layoffs, WebOS Software Patents in Bad Hands
Links for the day
Gemini Links 21/02/2025: Web Browsers, Mechanical Shortcuts, and Internet Hygiene
Links for the day
Richard Stallman 'Only' Founded the FSF
there's no reason to be upset at the FSF for keeping their founder in the Board
Techrights Disconnected From the United States Two Years Ago
Did people really need to wait for the US government to become this hostile towards the media before recognising the threat?
Before Trying Censorship by Extortion the Serial Strangler From Microsoft Literally Begged Us to Delete Pages
This is very clearly just a broad campaign of intimidation
Hype Watch: Weeks After Microsoft Disappointed Investors With "Hey Hi" It's Trying Some "Quantum" Hype (Adding Impractical Vapourware to Accompany This Hype and Even LLM Slop in 'News' Clothing)
Remember "metaverse"? What happened to media hype about "blockchain" and "IoT"?
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 20, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, February 20, 2025
Gemini Links 20/02/2025: Law of Warming and Cooling, Health, and Devlog
Links for the day
Links 20/02/2025: Microsoft Infosys Layoffs and IRS Layoffs (Good News for Rich Tax Evaders)
Links for the day
IBM Layoffs in Europe Already Happening or Underway (UK and Spain). They Try Not to Call These "Layoffs".
"CIO" in particular was repeatedly mentioned lately, as was Consulting
People Who Came From Microsoft Demanding Removal of Articles About Them, About Microsoft, and About Microsoft GitHub is "Generous" (According to Them)
Imagine choosing a law firm that borrows money in the same year just to avoid overdraft in the bank!
Possibly a Third Round of Mass Layoffs at Microsoft in 2025 ("Cloud Solution Architects, Customer Roles"), Report Removed or Censored
This is literally the top story for "microsoft layoffs" right now
Instead of 'DoS Protection' Cloudflare is Allegedly Conducting 'DoS Attacks' on Users of Browsers Other Than Firefox and GAFAM's DRM Sandboxes (Chrome, Safari and Others)
If you value the Web, you will avoid Cloudflare
Mixing Real With Fake in One 'Article' (by "Director of Content, Help Net Security")
From what we can gather, he got machines to generate some slop for him
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 19, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, February 19, 2025
Gemini Links 19/02/2025: FreeDOS abd Botfloods
Links for the day
Microsoft Has "Made the Customer the Product."
it's very likely this comment was made by a Microsoft employee
GNU/Linux and Android Trump Microsoft in Saudi Arabia, Bing Down Since the LLM Hype/Hysteria Began
Microsoft leaves a lot of money on the table
The Interplay Between Free Software and Journalism Based on Truths, Suppressed Facts
Honest people can be transparent. Dishonest, rogue people rely on a lack of it.
FSF Talk: "Free Software Teaching Materials" by Dr. Miriam Bastian
Software Freedom is rooted in philosophy but it's about technical solutions
IBM's CEO Has Become a Stochastic Buzzword-Generating Machine
The current CEO is extremely unpopular
Chicago Transit Authority Has Dumped Twitter (X), As Did Many Others Without Announcing It (Due to Fear of Right-Wing Mobs)
If you don't have an account in Gab, then you probably should not have one in "X", either
How-To Geek Sort of Supersedes MakeUseOf (MUO) for GNU/Linux Coverage
some writers from MakeUseOf (MUO) have been migrated to a sister publication
New Year's Resolutions Scoreboard
The goal is to improve clarity, accessibility, speed, and accuracy
Sites Reporting Crimes and Getting Harassed for Reporting Crimes
you cannot just ignore those who constantly seek to harass
Links 19/02/2025: Science, Hardware, and Digital Restrictions (DRM) Striking Again at eBooks
Links for the day
Zizian, transgender, Google & Debian open source extremist cult phenomena
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 19/02/2025: The Forgotten USB Competitor and Pope's Bilateral Pneumonia
Links for the day
Gemini Links 19/02/2025: AuraRepo and Offpunk
Links for the day
Slopwatch: Wayne Williams is Making Up for His Workers' Slop Party, LinuxSecurity.com Still Publishes Fake Articles
We must identify and call out the culprits
“Open Source” Really Does Miss the Point, We Can Do Better Than That
We need to reject groups of people who promote Microsoft GitHub (proprietary) and call that "Open Source"
Red Hat's Bluewashing to be Further Completed This Year
Do not wait for some announcement from redhat.com - it's already covered by IBM
Links 19/02/2025: Organisations Quitting Social Control Media, Windows TCO Illustrated Some More
Links for the day
The Free Software Foundation is More Financially Independent From Large Corporations Right Now
Money that comes with strings attached to it is always problematic
The Free Software Foundation's Position on IBM Taking Red Hat Enterprise Linux 'Private' is Articulated Almost 2 Years Late
The Free Software Foundation finally spoke out about this issue
Techrights Publication Topics
One thing we'd like to do more of is Software Freedom advocacy
Springtime Layoffs at IBM (2025) and Statement From IBM European Works Council
It's about cost-cutting, even if such cuts doom the company
Microsoft Paying People Who Harass and SLAPP Techrights, Demanding Censorship
At this point the money trail leads directly to Microsoft
It's Not Even Hidden Anymore: Microsoft is Passing Bribes for Media to Publish Puff Pieces About Itself
GeekWire is paid by Microsoft to publish many puff pieces (even outright lies) about Microsoft
Dr. Andy Farnell on a Death to Efficiency and Cash
Cash is not the same as "digital cash", which isn't even remotely the same
Links 19/02/2025: Political Roundup and Halifax Wants to Dump Twitter ("X")
Links for the day
Gemini Links 18/02/2025: Beginning Meditation, Poison as Praxis, and Blogging
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, February 18, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, February 18, 2025