Bonum Certa Men Certa

The Patent Litigation 'Industry' Controls the European Patent Office (Vendor Capture) and Everyone Suffers, Even the European Union

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Dec 14, 2024

Objective setting 2025

Teasers can say stuff in a nutshell or in a few seconds. But what's the source or the substance? Well, the António Campinos "Mafia" (same Mafia that was started by Benoît Battistelli along with Campinos at EUIPO) seems incapable or respecting the law. Patent offices exist not to maximise the number of monopolies they hand out, but who cares, right? The EPO openly admits that its sole goal is money and it began calling applicants "customers", "clients" etc. No wonder they grant European software patents - i.e. patents which are both illegal and undesirable - and even patents on chewing gum. If the EPO doesn't sort itself out, it'll need to be altogether abolished (which is unlikely to happen when the political discourse is captured by large corporations).

Today we relay an EPO publications dated just 4 days ago (this past Tuesday).

Objective setting 2025

What you can do at the time of objective / target setting

The 2025 draft budget[1] announced a planned production of 413 000 SEO (Search Examination Opposition) products for 4 025 planned examiner posts. This is a 7% increase from the 2024 plan. It does not come as much of a surprise seeing the now 10-year-old trend of target increases, which coincides with the lifetime of the new career system.

2025 draft budget

Still, during a recent meeting of the LSCTH with VP1, the question was raised as to why such a steep increase was requested from DG1 staff when the financial study[2] foresees an increase in productivity of 2.1% per annum. His reply was that the financial study is the touchstone of the yearly planning, that the 2,1% increase will not necessarily be implemented linearly, and that the increased targets recover from the dip[3] in productivity of recent years – see also orange line on the graph above.

Why is this a problem?

Apart from the period of 2020-2022, DG1 staff seems to have been meeting the challenge of these increased targets – see graph above – and is catching up with the maximum production per examiner of 2019.

However, SP2028[4] has one goal: sustainability. The financial sustainability of the EPO seems to be on the right track: the “gap” announced by the 2019 financial study has already been filled, the independent actuaries estimate that the pension liabilities are adequately covered, and the EPO – a public service organisation not supposed to make benefits - has regularly been producing surpluses of nearly €400m[5].
But we doubt very much that the productivity increases of the order of 30% in 10 years are sustainable.
We also fear for our colleagues’ health[6] and the quality of the final products[7], and invite higher management to put in practise the statements of SP2028: “putting the wellbeing of our people first” (p.17) and “The EPO aims for a complete and accurate search covering all aspects of the invention and a thorough written opinion.”, (p.42).

Some of you have informed us that your teams will be receiving double digit increases in targets for 2025. Others, that individual time capacity is completely disregarded, and all colleagues will receive the same targets irrespective of how much time they will have available to reach them. Or that the files allocated to team members on long term (sick) leave will be redistributed to the rest of the team.
This is once again at odds with the SP2028: “It is about providing a framework for a flexible and healthy work-life balance, putting the wellbeing of our people first and nurturing a community that, through diversity and inclusion, brings fresh perspectives and innovative thinking to the table” (p.17).

We have informed VP1 of such practices, who seemed to say they should not occur. We reiterate the message here.

What you can do about it

On unreasonable target increases:
The intranet announcement “Performance cycle 2025”[8] states: “Staff and managers are invited to engage in collaborative discussions as the basis for well-written goals that serve as a reliable guide for the coming year”. We therefore encourage you to re-negotiate your targets and if that is not possible at least to communicate your doubts on the objectives setting with your line management, possibly collectively (i.e. as a whole team or even directorate), and possibly using the template in Annex below as a guide.

It is important that you be conservative and realistic and avoid committing to unattainable objectives for which you alone will be deemed to be responsible and will have to bear the consequences, in 2025 and beyond.

On health:
Work should not make you sick: if your work is having negative effects on your health (exhaustion, stress, sleeping problems, headaches, trouble disconnecting…), we advise to take sick leave, consult your doctor and report it to your line manager and to OHS.

On quality:
We advise to ask for written instructions of how to perform your tasks such as to reach the targets – see also template below. This is to avoid that the responsibility for the quality of your work and the consequences thereof be placed on your shoulders.

Discussing objectives is reasonable, but committing to a target imposed on you is not. We therefore recommend informing your direct line manager in writing – possibly using the template below. Your email should then be appended to your 2025 performance appraisal in the successfactors tool. We would appreciate if you could then forward your email to redacted@suepo.org or redacted@epo.org.

Don’t hesitate to contact us or your local staff committee The Hague.

Related publications:

 
Kind regards,
Your SUEPO TH committee – M18B10 and De Bruyn Kopsstraat, 15, Rijswijk

[...]

 


[1] See CA/50/24, p.6 and p.100

[2] Financial Study 2023

[3] The productivity dip of 2020-2022 seems to be due to covid, wave of retirements, "low-hanging fruits” already picked, DG1 staff used as testers for the Minimum Viable Product tools, IT system disruptions, etc.

[4] Strategic Plan 2028

[5] See slide 7 of the January 2024 LSCTH GA presentation on objective setting and SUEPO’s comment on the President’s announcement.

[6] During the COHSEC of 22.02.2024, OHS physicians voiced that also highly productive staff – mainly examiners and including some team managers -  work overtime, come to their limits and start to suffer from work related stress causing them to contact OHS with health issues. They mentioned that the 12% increase in stress related symptoms between 2022 and 2023 might be only the tip of the iceberg. See also agenda points by members nominated by the CSC, p.3-4, and Key facts 2023, table 4.

[7] See also Industry Patent Quality Charter (IPQC), which is publicly critical about the substantive quality of EPO patents.

[8] See „Performance cycle 2025“, EPO Intranet, 20 November 2024.
 



 
ANNEX: template email to manager, please use only the parts which apply to you, delete and / or adapt the rest.    
 


 
Dear xxxx,
 
On [FILL IN DATE] my objectives were set at [FILL IN]. As in the past, I commit to working to the best of my abilities in 2025. However, the following points prevent me from presently committing to the objectives set for 2025:

 
Best regards
 

They quote the Office regarding “putting the wellbeing of our people first”; well, words are cheap. In practice, not only does the EPO destroy the minds of EPO workers; it equips aggressive corporate giants (typically based outside Europe but hiring European law firms) and patent trolls with lousy (but expensive to invalidate) patents they in turn use to destroy the wallbeing of Europeans.

Jolly Person

The EPO is a disgrace. If the EU cares about its reputation and long-term viability, then it must intervene ASAP. Its fate is tied to EPO's, not only through high-level corruption but also fake 'courts' which represent a rapid death to EU justice.

Guess who's laughing the last last here (profiting from this chaos).

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Linux and the Freedom Paradox
Linux is losing freedom if some external actors who only use Microsoft tools for development wrest control
Watch the FSF Party Live (via Livestream)
It's in WebM format, which is widely supported by now
Advocacy of Software Freedom Changed, LUGs Became Less Relevant
The way we see it, support groups like LUGs sort of outlived their usefulness when it became easier to install GNU/Linux
For the Second Time in a Few Weeks Microsoft Lunduke Makes False Accusations Against Senior Red Hat Staff to Incite a Despicable 'Troll Army'
Nothing that Microsoft Lunduke claims or says can be trusted
Compromised by NVIDIA Proprietary Library
Meanwhile in Boston there are "[r]oundtable talk with FSF volunteers (both in-person and online)"
How Software Patents Were Viewed or Their General Status Changed Over Time
A rough summary
 
The Free Software Foundation's Livestream Has Ended, Video/s Might be Online Next
I've asked whether they'll upload video of some of the event; I still wait for an answer
The Register MS Does Not Know the Difference Between Microsoft GitHub and GitLab
At the time of writing (October 5) the article from "Thu 2 Oct 2025" remains uncorrected
"Bullshit Generators" (What RMS Calls LLMs) and Fake Images Already Target the FSF
Why does Google News promote fake articles about the FSF while omitting all the real ones?
Software Patents as a Bubble
Don't invest resources in hype; if you detect a bubble, run away from it
Links 05/10/2025: Political Leftovers, Climate Change, and Security Incidents
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 04, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, October 04, 2025
When Microsoft "Integrates" Something With "AI" It Means It's Losing Money and Is Generally Hopeless
how did Bing fare after 36 months of LLM slop being hyped up as "replacement" for search?
Most Certificates Don't Improve Security, They Mostly Increase Downtime (for No Good Reason)
The 'Gemini sites' (capsules) are a growing force
The statCounter Site Has Data Integrity Problems
Maybe we'll get back to statCounter when its data becomes more "stable" again
10 Ways to Combat Software Patents
software patents are loathed also by proprietary software developers
"Just a Little Bit of Meat..."
Free software "absolutism" is not a radical stance, more so if the only "radical" belief the user possesses is that he or she must be in control of his or her software, and by extension his or her computer
Red Hat is Ignoring the Free Software Community, It's a "Fortune 1000" Vendor
Red Hat's blog also participates a lot in promoting of Wall Street's latest pump-and-dump "AI" scheme
Free Software Foundation Party Has Begun
We shall be focusing a lot on software patents today
Former Head of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Lina Khan Knows Whatever Microsoft Touches Will Die
Just like Skype (as recently as months ago) [...] When Microsoft grabs things, or when it buys things, it almost never ends well
Slopwatch: Fake Articles About LibreOffice in Austria and Wine 10.16
very short
Links 04/10/2025: "attempted Coup" Noted in Facebook, Russia Kills Journalists via Drones
Links for the day
Gemini Links 04/10/2025: Anesthesia and Baudpunk
Links for the day
Links 04/10/2025: "Privacy Harm Is Harm", Criticism Outlawed in US
Links for the day
Garmin Uses Linux for Some of the Garmin Products, Now It's Sued by Strava Using Software Patents
Software patents should never have been granted in the first place
Richard Stallman Will Give a Talk in Sweden in 6 Days
Dr. Stallman, despite his battle with cancer is still alive and mentally sharp
FSF Turns 40
We'll be focusing on patent-related topics this weekend
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 03, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, October 03, 2025
Gemini Links 04/10/2025: Distro Hopping and "Part Time"
Links for the day
We Are Turning 19 in One Month, FSF Turns 40 in 3 Hours (CET)
For our anniversary next month we still have no concrete plans
Patent Docs (or PatentDocs) Learned the Wrong Lessons From the Death of TypePad
Had they gone ahead with an SSG, they'd become a lot more future-proof
USPTO Patent Bubble Already Imploding, After Decades of Artificial Inflation, Entire Offices Close for Good
we can deduce that financial pressures (lack of "demand" for monopolies) play a role
TikTok is Not Harmless (Being CheeTok in the US Will Advance Orange Agenda)
Social control media isn't "fun and games"; it's a digital weapon that lets hostile groups or nations infiltrate others, then turn them against themselves
Andy Farnell and Helen Plews Explain What "Modern" Tech Does to Old People
Imposing terrible tech "religion" on people is not helping them
Tomorrow the Free Software Foundation (FSF) Turns 40 and Its Web Site is Still Slow Due to DDoS by LLM Slop Bots
For an advocacy group, uptime is important (for its message to remain accessible)
Slopwatch: Google News as a Firehose of LLM Slop About "Linux"
Google News is really bad
Datamation, Where I Used to Publish Articles, Appears to Have Been Sold to TechnologyAdvice Only to Become a Slopfarm
I'd prefer to not associate with that site anymore
Links 03/10/2025: "NPR’s Economics Lessons Come With Neoliberal Spin" and Canada Post at Risk
Links for the day
Gemini Links 03/10/2025: Panic Attacks and Food Adulteration
Links for the day
Links 03/10/2025: Lawyers Caught Using LLM Slop Explain Why They Did It, LibreSSL 4.1.1 and 4.0.1 Released
Links for the day
FSF Board Grew 50% Since Last Year, Has New President, Turns 40 in Two Days
It's a good move for the FSF and - by extension - for software freedom
Links 03/10/2025: Conflicts, Death of TypePad, and TikTok/CheeTok Gives a Boost to Far Right Groups in Europe
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 02, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, October 02, 2025
Slopwatch: Linux Journal, Google News, and LinuxSecurity
They carry on polluting the Web with fake articles
Gemini Links 02/10/2025: Kubernetes With FreeBSD and robots.txt
Links for the day