Bonum Certa Men Certa

Patents Roundup: Cisco and Arista, MP3 Liberated, and 'Phone (Patent) Tax' Estimated

Phone and USPTO



Summary: Some of the very latest reports about patents in the US and how these impact the market (costs, availability, and viability of Free/Libre Open Source software)

THE patent landscape in the US is changing. It's changing for the better (for inventors/creators, not for lawyers who prey on them). Today we'd like to share a few of the latest headlines, then go a little further back in time and document the improvements as noted so far this summer.



Cisco and Arista



CRN has just published this article about the latest twist in a case that was mentioned here the other day (we had been covering it for much longer than that [1, 2, 3, 4]).

When patents reduce the choice that exists for people to choose from in the supposedly free market, what does that tell us about those patents? We have long argued that this case demonstrates the pitfalls of the ITC and this article explains why:

The contentious legal battle between networking rivals Cisco and Arista Networks continues to rage on as the International Trade Commission (ITC) Thursday upheld its decision to ban the importation and sale of some of Arista's networking products into the United States.

Shares of Arista stock traded down more than 3 percent at $151.81 Friday afternoon after the ITC denied the vendor's request to lift the ban.

Cisco Senior Vice President, General Counsel Mark Chandler said the ITC send "a strong message to Arista that its corporate culture of copying" must stop.


So they exert financial control/pressure over smaller rivals. Using patents that still aren't fully tested (the ITC's scope of assessment is limited). See this financial report titled "Arista Sags: Q3 ‘Uncertainty’ Rises with ITC Setback, Says Wells Fargo" and think what would happen if Cisco's patents turn out to be invalid or inadequate for justifying such an embargo. Would there be compensation? No.

Consequences of giants like Cisco using patents to embargo their rivals' products may, in some people's mind, seem justified. But how about going through a proper process in a court, potentially with appeals, before applying such blanket bans? What is happening to due process in this age of ITC gun-jumping?

MPEG-LA Becoming More Obsolete as MP3 Gets Liberated



MPEG-LA is a subject we last tackled yesterday. Having run out of 'MP3 tax', MPEG-LA is currently trying to obtain rights to a tax on life (or genome). In the mean time, MP3's 'liberation' so to speak (from software patents) means that browsers add MP3 support as a matter of standard; even lesser-known browsers:

Chromium, the skeletal open-source browser at the core of Chrome, Opera, Vivaldi, Brave and a few other browsers will receive support for the automatic playback of MP3 files.

"We have approval from legal to go ahead and move mp3 into non-proprietary codecs list," said a project manager tasked with managing Chromium's multimedia components.

Until now, Chromium — and indirectly Chrome — has supported various audio formats such as OGG, FLAC, Opus, WAV, PCM, and others.



We previously criticised Mozilla for playing along with MPEG-LA; for video compression formats many of the same problems remain.

The 'Phone Tax'



According to ip.finance [found via Francisco Moreno/Keith Mallinson], "Apple is paying a total of between $12.50 and $25.00 per iPhone in fees for licensing from all cellular patent licensors. That is equal to between two percent and four percent of iPhone prices. Licensing fees as a percentage of consumers’ total cellular expenditures over a smartphone's approximate two-year service life, including operator service fees averaging around $40 per connection per month in the US, for example, are considerably lower."

No wonder such phones have become so grossly overpriced.

We rarely come across these numbers. Various figures from Qualcomm and BlackBerry (to be covered separately later today) shed light on how much patent tax is paid for the hardware alone; Another new report (published this morning) speaks of "when licensors come knocking" and there's a portion of it that deals with Motorola's Microsoft dispute as follows:

The issue of standard patent licensing has been litigated heavily in other sectors, with the most notorious case stemming from Microsoft's use of a Motorola-owned WiFi standard for use in the Xbox 360 gaming console. Motorola demanded Microsoft pay them 2.25 percent of the $399 retail price of the system, which translated to between $8 and $9 per console sold.

When the parties couldn't reach an agreement, Microsoft sued Motorola in 2010 for breach of contract tied to the patent under requirement that standard patent holders must negotiate with a fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory pricing for the license. Three years later, a federal judge ruled that Motorola violated the pricing requirement and determined Microsoft pay Motorola 3.471 cents per unit sold. Microsoft sold 84 million Xbox 360s, paying Motorola roughly $2.9 million for the WiFi license, as opposed to the nearly $700 million they would have owed under Motorola's initial demand. However, the litigation became so nasty, and international, that Microsoft ended up paying $400 million to move a manufacturing facility out of Germany.


We wrote a lot about that at the time. The main concern was, the supposedly reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) pricing made Free software inadequate a choice. RAND (or FRAND), unlike with a Z (for zero cost) would be inherently not compatible with the endless, cost-free distribution of software among peers. This is especially a problem when it comes to software because software, unlike hardware (device/gadget), need not involve manufacturing and shipping costs. Thankfully, however, software patents are on the demise in the US -- a subject we'll deal with in our next post.

Recent Techrights' Posts

The Myth of an Aging (or Dying) GNU/Linux Leadership
Self-fulfilling prophecies as a tactic?
There's Nothing "Funny" About Attacking Free Speech and Software Freedom
persistent focus on the principal issues is very important
GNU/Linux Adoption in Africa, a Passageway Towards Freedom From Neo-Colonialism
Digi(tal)-Colonialism and/or Techolonialism are a thing. Can Africa flee the trap?
 
Shooting the Messenger Using Bribes and Secrecy Bonds
We seem to live in a world where accountability for the rich and well-connected barely exists anymore
Links 06/12/2023: Many More December Layoffs
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 05, 2023
IRC logs for Tuesday, December 05, 2023
PipeWire 1.0: Linux audio comes of age
Once upon a time, serious audio users like musicians and audio engineers had real trouble with Linux
This is How 'Linux' Foundation Presents Linux to the World
Right now it even picks Windows over Linux in some cases
Links 05/12/2023: Microsoft's Chatbot as Health Hazard
Links for the day
Professor Eben Moglen Explained How Software Patent Threats Had Changed Around 2014 (Alice Case) and What Would Happen Till 2025
clip aged reasonably well
CNN Contributes to Demolition of the Open Web
Reprinted with permission from Ryan Farmer
Eben Moglen on Encryption and Anonymity
The alternate net we need, and how we can build it ourselves
Yet More Microsofters Inside the Board of Mozilla (Which Has Just Outsourced Firefox Development to Microsoft's Proprietary Prison)
Do you want a browser controlled (and spied on) by such a company?
IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 04, 2023
IRC logs for Monday, December 04, 2023
GNU/Linux Now Exceeds 3.6% Market Share on Desktops/Laptops, According to statCounter
things have changed for Windows in China
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news
Links 05/12/2023: Debt Brake in Germany and Layoffs at Condé Nast (Reddit, Wired, Ars Technica and More)
Links for the day
[Meme] Social Control Media Giants Shaping Debates on BSDs and GNU/Linux
listening to random people in Social Control Media
Reddit (Condé Nast), Which Has Another Round of Layoffs This Month, Incited People Against GNU/Linux Users (Divide and Rule, It's 2003 All Over Again!)
Does somebody (perhaps a third party) fan the flames?
Who Will Hold the Open Source Initiative (OSI) Accountable for Taking Bribes From Microsoft and Selling Out to Enable/Endorse Massive Copyright Infringement?
it does Microsoft advocacy
Using Gemini to Moan About Linux and Spread .NET
Toxic, acidic post in Gemini
Web Monopolist, Google, 'Pulls a Microsoft' by Hijacking/Overriding the Name of Competitor and Alternative to the Web
Gulag 'hijacking' 'Gemini'
Links 04/12/2023: Mass Layoffs at Spotify (Debt, Losses, Bubble) Once Again
Links for the day
ChatGPT Hype/Vapourware (and 'Bing') Has Failed, Google Maintains Dominance in Search
a growing mountain of debt and crises
[Meme] Every Real Paralegal Knows This
how copyright law works
Forging IRC Logs and Impersonating Professors: the Lengths to Which Anti-Free Software Militants Would Go
Impersonating people in IRC, too
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 03, 2023
IRC logs for Sunday, December 03, 2023
GNU/Linux Popularity Surging, So Why Did MakeUseOf Quit Covering It About 10 Days Ago?
It's particularly sad because some of the best articles about GNU/Linux came from that site, both technical articles and advocacy-centric pieces
Links 04/12/2023: COVID-19 Data Misused Again, Anti-Consumerism Activism
Links for the day