Bonum Certa Men Certa

Patent Trolls Are Moving to Asia and That's a Good Thing for Science and Technology in the West

China is becoming a "protection money" economy and other Asian countries risk a similar fate

Welcome to China. Please pay your patent toll to trolls and firms that claim toprotect from them



Summary: Now that patent trolls are flocking to China (with its trolls-friendly courts) we worry that Korea is being lured into a self-destructive path while Singapore and India too get indoctrinated by the patent 'industry'

COMING tomorrow we have about half a dozen articles about the USPTO, where there has been positive progress towards the end of software patents and containment of the patent trolls epidemic. Today, however, we wish to speak about the negative, which is China's SIPO (worse than even the EPO when it comes to patent assessment).



"IAM later bemoaned all this, noting that patent trolls are going to China because US courts no longer tolerate them quite as much."China's patent gold rush and bubble is a subject we have spoken about for quite a while and we correctly predicted a wave of patent trolls flocking to China. This isn't a positive development, certainly not for China.

Earlier this week the editor of IAM wrote about their patent maximalism event called IPBC Asia (day one and day two). It was one heck of an echo chamber and the editor of IAM said that the "US as a venue for patent litigation lawsuits has declined greatly" as if that's a bad thing. That is a very good thing. US companies can now focus on development rather than litigation and compliance by removal of products/product features.

"RPX received a special mention because it derives its business from a saturation/abundance of troll activity."IAM later bemoaned all this, noting that patent trolls are going to China because US courts no longer tolerate them quite as much. RPX received a special mention because it derives its business from a saturation/abundance of troll activity. It's like a massive protection racket, which IAM referred to as "sluggish US market" (as if protection rackets are a "market"). Here are some relevant bits:

Where exactly those resources might go is not clear. There is clearly increased interest from NPEs in bringing infringement lawsuits in China. Last year WiLAN brought a case against Sony in one of the first patent suits involving a foreign NPE, while Dominion Harbor and Longhorn IP have both formed partnerships with Beijing East IP as they seek to monetise assets in the country. But the degree to which there is appetite among local Chinese companies for a business offering protection against NPE lawsuits appears open to question - damages are low and there remain serious doubts as to whether domestic companies would ever prove to be fruitful NPE targets. Plus there is always the challenge of turning a profit in what remains a relatively embryonic IP market where businesses are not accustomed to paying for the kind of support services that have developed in the US.

[,,,[

This is not the first time that RPX has flagged its ambition to expand overseas. In 2015 former CEO John Amster told analysts that the company was keeping close tabs on Europe. At that time the prospect of NPE litigation shifting across the Atlantic, and to Germany in particular, appeared very real; and while that did happen to some extent, it has arguably not occurred at the kind of levels that some predicted. Plus Europe just doesn’t have the same volume of tech businesses that remain the core of RPX’s client base. But at a time when the traditional RPX business of reducing the risk its members face from NPE litigation in the US continues to slow, it is not surprising that the company is still looking overseas for growth.


So recognising that many trolls are moving to China, RPX is moving there too. Good riddance!

"So recognising that many trolls are moving to China, RPX is moving there too. Good riddance!"IAM has, additionally, spoken about Korea, citing old "valuation of just over $600 million" for nothing but a pile of patents. These are, suffice to say, made-up/imaginary numbers (accounting tricks and cost-free lies), putting a value on some firm in the peak of a bubble. Samsung is picking up a bunch of patents and IAM refers to these as "properties" (a ludicrous term). To quote:

With a valuation of just over $600 million, Quixey was not quite a unicorn, but it is one of the biggest Silicon Valley startups to go out of business thus far in 2017. The Mountain View-based developer of mobile search platforms and digital assistants folded in May after raising $165 million in venture money, with Chinese giant Alibaba as its single biggest backer. But according to USPTO records, it is not Alibaba but Samsung Electronics that is poised to come away with most of the company’s patent assets after a series of assignments in October.

Quixey made eight separate assignments to Samsung Electronics on 19th October, totalling 194 properties. An annex attached to each assignment shows that when including applications and non-US patent rights, the total number of assets changing hands is 487. While the large majority of the portfolio is US-based, it also contains PCT, Chinese and South Korean rights. All of the applications were made in 2012 or later.


They probably got these patents reassigned very cheaply. The numbers above are reckless nonsense. Korea has already accumulated a large number of patents which later turned out to be pretty worthless. This venture was known as Intellectual Discovery and IAM has just recalled that too, admitting that the patents are to be given away after a massive failure. Korea will hopefully not be reckless enough to give these patents to patent trolls which start a racket. To quote:

Korean patent fund Intellectual Discovery (ID) is seeking a buyer for its subsidiary ID Ventures, according to the company’s website. IAM understands the fund is weighing multiple offers already, and just one week remains before the bidding deadline closes on November 9th. What the potential sale means for the future of ID is unclear, but it comes as the fund continues to sell patents to third parties.


What a silly bubble and a waste of time/money. Surely the effort could be spent on something else. Nowadays we hear about Korean firms being dragged into Chinese courts over patent allegations, so we assume companies like Samsung strive to gather 'defensive' patents.

Last week we wrote about how the Singaporean High Court was putting patents before common sense -- a subject now tackled by Sheena Jacob of JurisAsia in Singapore. She says this:

In a ground-breaking decision, the Singapore High Court has ruled that it does not have original jurisdiction under the Singapore Patents Act to revoke a patent. Up until this decision, it has been common practice for defendants in patent infringement proceedings to challenge the validity of a patent by means of a counterclaim for revocation of the patent in question. Indeed, prior Court decisions have exercised such jurisdiction under the Singapore Patents Act to revoke granted patents. Thus, both the validity and infringement issues were determined in the same proceedings and heard before the same judge who would also revoke the patent.


Singapore's patent maximalism, as we noted many times earlier this year, has already attracted ruinous patent trolls to the country. If Singapore fails to learn from China's mistake, it too will be overrun by such patent worship, which causes nothing but trouble and enriches only the legal 'profession'.

"If Singapore fails to learn from China's mistake, it too will be overrun by such patent worship, which causes nothing but trouble and enriches only the legal 'profession'."Over in India, which isn't too far from Singapore (a country with many Malays, Chinese and Indians), software patents are banned and patent minimalism is notable worldwide. It's probably most stubborn in opposing US-led lobby groups that try to shame it into patent maximalism (especially in the area of medicine and software). But according to this new article from Outlook India, there's a real concern that the United States gains leverage, e.g. on patents. The article covers the issue of software patents. It says "[t]here is already an evidence prior to the establishment of WG that Indian Patents Office granted patents on isolated genes, the pharmaceutical substance in public domain and software, which is prohibited under the law."

"This is certainly something to keep an eye on, or else India might become another China, i.e. an attractive hotbed for patent trolls; the ramifications would be more severe in India because India has a more software-centric technology industry, whereas in China the focus is on hardware.""However," it adds, "some policymakers viewed that WG is an attempt to provide the way out to the US government to ease the domestic pressure from a coalition of industry associations lead by Pharmaceutical Research Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). Therefore the working group is only talking shop and would not lead to any adverse outcome for India's public interest-oriented Patents Act. After four meetings of WG since its establishment, there is ample signs accommodation of US demands at the cost of India’s socio-economic interest."

This is certainly something to keep an eye on, or else India might become another China, i.e. an attractive hotbed for patent trolls; the ramifications would be more severe in India because India has a more software-centric technology industry, whereas in China the focus is on hardware.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Microsoft Bankruptcy
"Microsoft unit in Russia to file for bankruptcy, database shows"
Techrights Does Not Compete With LLM Slop, It Exposes the Bastards, Plagiarists and Scammers Who Do That
People like Scam Altman, still facing a lawsuit from his own sister for sexual abuse against her
 
Links 01/06/2025: Windows TCO, Openwashing, "It's FOSS" Still Promoting Microsoft
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/06/2025: Simplification and Networks Everywhere
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 31, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, May 31, 2025
Google Bribes EFF. EFF Promotes LLM Slop as 'Fair Use'. To GAFAM It's a Low-Cost Lobby Hedge.
So the bribes pay off ("slush fund") and the word spreads
Slopwatch: Fake Text and Images, Financial Bubbles, and Scams in "Intelligent" Clothing
Sometimes what they mean by "AI" is just cheap labour somewhere else, as we discussed in IRC a few hours ago
Why Microsoft is Collapsing (Similar to What's Happening at IBM), As Insiders See It
IBM seems like one heck of a mess
Reliable Computing Means Free (Libre) Computing
Sites that want to promote security ought to deal with the biggest issues
Links 31/05/2025: US Court Orders Sides With RFE/RL, War Updates From Ukraine
Links for the day
Gemini Links 31/05/2025: ARM Server and power_supply Subsystem
Links for the day
Links 31/05/2025: Slop Stigmatised as Disinformation, Catalyst/Driver of "Death of Communication"
Links for the day
Common Sense 101: Do Not Write Blog Posts Saying You Want to Murder Colleagues (or Yourself)
Only crazy people would think stabbings are a joke
Links 31/05/2025: Microsoft-Connected Builder.ai is a Fraud and US is Purging Students Based on Race/Nationality
Links for the day
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Limmat, Doomscrollers, and Arguments Parsing
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 30, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, May 30, 2025
The "AI" (Slop) Bubble Already Popped, But It's Not an Overnight Collapse
where Microsoft put its money
No More Steven Astorino at IBM, Chatter About Weekly/Nonstop Layoffs at IBM
What happened? Good luck guessing.
Looking at Corruption in Europe, Going Beyond the EPO
Expect a new series to kick off very soon
Slopwatch: Security SPAM and LLM Slop for SEO and FUD Purposes, Perpetually Tarnishing the Perception of Linux and (Open)SSH Security
A lot of this Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt (FUD) comes from Microsoft and its LLMs
Links 30/05/2025: Google's LLM Slop Pushers Are Killing Journalism and Shira Perlmutter Fails to Stop Bribed Regime From Legalising Plagiarism (in "AI" Clothing)
Links for the day
Links 30/05/2025: Offline Arts and "Threshold of Patience"
Links for the day
Signing Off Serious Lies With a Statement of Truth is No Joking Matter
It's not hard to see what's happening here
Links 30/05/2025: LLM Slop Already Ingests and Vomits Its Own Garbage, Facebook Exec Admits Copyrights a Concern Too
Links for the day
Mass Layoffs at Microsoft Result in More Whistleblowers From Microsoft
Microsoft's predatory pricing is further
Slopwatch: Planet Ubuntu Became LLM Slop and Some People Fail to See the Immorality of Plagiarism
it lessens the incentive for people to publish real articles
EPO Poll: 68% Dissatisfied With Quality of Slop (Wrongly Framed as "AI") for Patent Classification
Slop does not work, it's just falsely advertised with extra hype (funded by slop pushers that sponsor the major media)
Big Crowds Gather to Learn About Software Freedom From the Man Who Started GNU/Linux in 1983
"It was a great success"
Microsoft Layoffs Again in Bay Area
Microsoft relies on people's false belief that being "in LinkedIn" will get you a job; well, seems like even working inside LinkedIn really sucks and you lose the job
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Fighting Against the Bad News, and Slop is Dehumanisation Disguised as "Intelligence"
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 29, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, May 29, 2025