EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.11.07

Rebuttal to: “Eight Years Later, Is Microsoft Still a Monopoly?“ (PCWorld)

Posted in America, Antitrust, Bill Gates, Courtroom, Dell, Europe, GNU/Linux, Law, Microsoft at 12:05 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Monopoly has money

A misinformed article from PCWorld seems to insinuate that Microsoft may no longer be a monopoly that requires government oversight. In other words, it’s an indication that Microsoft has changed its way, which it clearly has not. It only hides its anti-competitive actions slightly more effectively. From the article:

But whether because of the antitrust suits or because of other market factors, Microsoft doesn’t seem to be using its power to muscle competitors off the desktop. The very fact that Dell is selling Linux machines at all is one example. And when I recently bought a Dell desktop for home use, it came preloaded with products from two of Microsoft’s most formidable competitors–Google’s desktop search service and Mozilla’s Firefox.

This is of course escaping all the main issues. Come to discover what Microsoft has been doing to Dell since the previous ruling (and during its probation period). Behind the scenes, Microsoft sabotaged Dell's attempts to sell GNU/Linux.

As we pointed out some weeks ago, the Department of Justice is still in Microsoft's pocket (surprise, surprise! The government is not truly honest). A couple of days ago came this article:

US Justice Department objects to states’ effort to extend Microsoft oversight to 2012

“There is no basis for the court to order a five-year extension of the final judgments,” the Justice Department said in a court filing Friday, citing a lack of evidence provided by the states that such oversight is justified.

To avoid repetition, you are urged to read our previous post on this topic and learn more about the DoJ-Microsoft link. It sheds light on the issues that misinform articles such as the one from PCWorld.

Of course Microsoft still abusing and bullying the market. Need one go further than the Mandriva story that was mentioned yesterday? Even the Managing Editor of LinuxToday called it bribery.

So, even as Microsoft claims superior quality over Linux, they act as if they don’t even buy their own FUD. If they really believed that Windows was superior to Linux, they wouldn’t have to bribe people with “marketing help” to get them to choose Windows.

Speaking of Microsoft ‘bribery’, you’ll find more examples in the following recent stories:

  1. Green Party slams Microsoft OLPC involvement
  2. Bribing Bloggers
  3. Microsoft Hires Programmer to edit Wikipedia Entry For OOXML
  4. Interview with Dr Andrew S Tanenbaum (mind the “book story”)

These are just 4 among many more examples.

The government (and DoJ especially) chooses to turn a blind eye to some real issues. It wasn’t long ago that the following story, which involves the FTC, grabbed a lot of attention.

Microsoft trying to derail Google/DoubleClick deal by lobbying congress

Microsoft has hired lobbying firm Patton Boggs LLC to do work on “competitive issues surrounding Google/DoubleClick [sic] merger.”

That is monopoly abuse. Plain and simple. Microsoft was willing to pay twice as much for DoubleClick, but apparently the company’s stakeholders rejected Microsoft (they leaned from history). It is just one among a very long series of articles about Microsoft’s lobbying in American and Europe. This time, Google is the victim, not GNU/Linux. If we go a little further back, then we also find this:

Gates blackmailed Danish government

Microsoft boss Bill Gates threatened to kill 800 Danish jobs if Denmark opposed the European Computer Implemented Inventions Directive, reports today’s Danish financial daily Børsen, quoted by NoSoftwarePatents.com.

That fits nicely with our coverage on software patents and the lobbying (manipulation and sometimes bullying, bribery, extortion, and blackmail) that is used to change the law in Europe.

Not much was said specifically about the PCWorld article, but don’t the stories above answer its headline? Judge for yourselves…

Eight Years Later, Is Microsoft Still a[n abusive] Monopoly?

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

3 Comments

  1. Jim Powers said,

    November 11, 2007 at 11:31 am

    Gravatar

    It is true that MS is still an abusive monopoly, no doubts there. Because of many voices around the world, you folks included, more and more are willing to stand up to this bullying and are becoming aware that freedom translates to economic opportunity much more than the alternative.

    Economically, eliminating MS does not maintain economic status quo: some will lose their jobs, companies will fail, that’s life. The needs that these companies satisfy will be filled by those who can, and we encourage those seeking software for their needs to choose FLOSS as it not only benefits them and others, as well as adding to the overall shared bank of human knowledge, but is a really cheap insurance policy against lock-in and single-vendor-related risks.

    Microsoft will eventually fall (or, more likely be transformed into a TRUE FLOSS company, I simply cannot believe that with the brain-trust that MS employs that they would choose business suicide over adapting to market demands), but the question is how much damage they will do during their fall: this fall/transformation is still probably a decade away. Alas, the vast brainwashed herds of the public awaken slowly, and FUD works.

  2. Jim Powers said,

    November 11, 2007 at 11:36 am

    Gravatar

    On another note: Have you guys seen this:

    http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9810024-39.html

    Based on the whole Office-Lockin XML format fiasco I cannot help but feel that this is another “bad thing” in the works. I’m all for new image standards, but not patent-encumbered ones. My guess is that there is a whole minefield of them here.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 11, 2007 at 8:39 pm

    Gravatar

    See this discussion about HD from last week. Stephane Rodriguez says it’s not harmful although I still have my doubt.

What Else is New


  1. Links 12/11/2019: Plasma 5.17.3, More Intel Defects, Bytecode Alliance

    Links for the day



  2. You've Gotta Go When You've Gotta Go

    How most staff of the European Patent Office (EPO) feels these days



  3. Teaser: Thierry Breton and His Disquieting Past

    "The company attracted notoriety and loathing in the UK for its role in assessing disability benefit eligibility."



  4. EPO and EU: People Behind the Faces

    It’s no secret that the EPO breaks the law and European officials have taken no concrete steps to intervene; to make matters worse, potentially new EPO allies may soon be put in charge of the EU Commission



  5. Maintaining the 'Delete Github' page

    "This list really is a starting point, which can hopefully increase awareness about the issue of concern."



  6. Linux Foundation Picking Money

    The dating standards of the Linux Foundation



  7. Microsoft 'Borrows' the Linux Brand

    With help from the likes of the Linux Foundation Microsoft continues to misuse and ‘dilute’ the Linux brand (and registered trademark)



  8. EPO Corruption Compared to Cocaine Scandals in Antwerp

    Days after the Dutch protest discussion is sort of 'uncorked' regarding EPO corruption (published, as usual, in the form of anonymous comments)



  9. SUEPO Showed That the Media Won't Cover EPO Corruption Until Half the Workers March in the Streets

    What ought to have been a central (if not 'the' central) issue of debate in Europe is still being treated as borderline irrelevant or marginal



  10. Meanwhile in California

    News from California is being spun by Microsoft this week, owing to weak journalism that's more like PR than journalism



  11. Privacy-Centric Services and Even Drupal/Acquia Defect to the Camp of Mass Surveillance

    In search of money [pun intended] companies and services that are supposed to respect their customers and users turn out to be doing the opposite; this merits research and public discussions



  12. IRC Proceedings: Monday, November 11, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, November 11, 2019



  13. Links 12/11/2019: Sparky 2019.11 Special Editions and Twisted 19.10.0 Released

    Links for the day



  14. Microsoft's Abduction of the Voice of Its Opposition Highlights the Urgency of the Movement/Campaign to Delete GitHub

    Microsoft understands that by entrapping FOSS and GNU/Linux inside proprietary software platforms like GitHub and Azure it can utilise the false perception that it somehow speaks on behalf of both (whilst attacking both)



  15. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, November 10, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, November 10, 2019



  16. SUEPO Protests Against Management of the European Patent Office Brought Back Discussions About Corruption

    The atmosphere at the second-largest institution in Europe has long been toxic; now it is becoming a lot more visible again and comments highlight the reasons for the cover-up (gross misuse of billions of euros)



  17. Links 11/11/2019: Linux 5.4 RC7, HandBrake 1.3.0 and Analysis of XFCE

    Links for the day



  18. Links 10/11/2019: digiKam 6.4.0, OpenMandriva Lx 4.1 Alpha and OpenZFS Plans

    Links for the day



  19. Video: Dutch Media on EPO Protest

    The new video added by SUEPO on Saturday in order to show Dutch media coverage of last week's protest in The Hague



  20. Politics in the Workplace Are Not Paradoxical and Outside the Workplace They Are Free Speech

    The safest space is one in which no other human (or creature) exists, but in reality we must make compromises and accept that not everyone will agree with us 100% of the time (so we must learn to live with that)



  21. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, November 09, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, November 09, 2019



  22. Thick Skin Makes Strong Communities

    Learning to coexist with people who don't agree on everything is a strength and successful societies encourage that (the alternative is blind conformity on all matters)



  23. Training (Proprietary Software) Versus Teaching (Free Software)

    Education necessitates software freedom — a fact that companies like Adobe, Apple and Microsoft try hard to distract from



  24. The Linux Foundation Brought as Keynote Speakers People Vastly Worse Than Those Whom It Now 'Cancels' for Purely Political Reasons

    A lot of people are very upset about the Linux Foundation's alleged 'witch-hunt' and even press coverage has caught up with the outrage; but our position is that it distracts from vastly bigger Linux Foundation scandals



  25. An Open Letter to Richard Stallman

    "It's past the time for the official cornerstones of the Free software movement to return to their full operational capacity, and to take the gear out of neutral."



  26. Links 9/11/2019: Linux Journal Goes Dark (Offline), KStars 3.3.7, OpenSUSE Name Change Aborted

    Links for the day



  27. Think Tanks, Bristows, 'Simmons' and 'Birds' Can Only Ever Lie to Us About the Dead Unified Patent Court (UPC)

    The UPC is a dead bird, but lobbyists of the litigation giants would have us believe otherwise, in “In-depth Analysis” which is anything but (it's just propaganda with the veneer of officialism)



  28. The EPO's Management is Trying Really Hard to Distract the Media From EPO Unrest (and It Has Been Partly Successful)

    We take a look at the profoundly bad situation at the EPO (examiners unable to do their job properly because of rogue leadership); we also reexamine how media covered — or rather refused to cover — this urgent issue



  29. Microsoft's 'Safe Spaces'

    The 'new' and 'ethical' Microsoft that offers us all a 'safe space'



  30. 'Artificial Intelligence' (AI) Will Only Doom Patent Offices If It's Used to Stamp Millions of Invalid Patents (IPs)

    The Artificial Intelligence (AI) craze is being used as an excuse or as a pretext for granting loads of patents on mathematics and statistics (maths and stats aren't permissible or eligible for patent coverage); by calling just about everything "Artificial Intelligence" (or AI, or "hey hi!") they hope to mislead examiners, who are also being presented with new guidelines full of these buzzwords


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts