11.13.07

Gemini version available ♊︎

Attempts to ‘Infect’ Google’s Android with Microsoft IP Tax?

Posted in Google, Microsoft, Mono, Patents, Samsung at 8:51 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

[Thanks to TaQ for this headsup]

From Miguel de Icaza’s blog:

Once the source code for Android is released, it would be interesting to look into integrating Mono wiht it. It should already run on it, as its just Linux. What would be interesting is continuing to use C# to write code for it.

If you still don’t understand why Mono is dangerous to GNU/Linux, then do some reading [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. Also recall Samsung's patent deal with Microsoft. They do phones with Mono.

Nomo

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

13 Comments

  1. David Mohring (NZheretic) said,

    November 13, 2007 at 10:45 pm

    Gravatar

    It is highly unlikely that Google will take the bait give the effort it has gone to to avoid similar issues with Sun’s Java ME

    How Google routed around Sun’s IP-based licensing restrictions on Java ME
    http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 14, 2007 at 4:51 am

    Gravatar

    Thanks, David. You’re right…

    ‘Sun released their “free java” source code under the GPLv2 to both win the free software crowd and capture peripheral innovation and bug fixing from the community.’

    Then again, have a look at what I found just hours I had posted this quick one. The last thing one needs on these phones is a .NET-like framework that Microsoft deliberately excludes from its patent deals.

    I believe Microsoft has a plan and I wonder how it’s coordinated with Mono developers (if at all). Mind you, some of them still support OOXML and even help Microsoft address comments (on behalf on Microsoft). They are on the team that attacks ODF using a proprietary format, essentially.

  3. John Drinkwater said,

    November 14, 2007 at 8:04 am

    Gravatar

    Miguel has a serious case of “ooh, lets add that to Mono to make people use it!”,
    Whether it’s Andriod or Silverlight.

    I don’t think he understands. They already have a quick small VM (dalvik) for their phone. We already have a quick small VM (java) for our desktops. Lets not EEE and consume them all with Mono.

    TBH, I’m not happy with Google writing yet another VM, but if that’s what they need to avoid Sun royalties/quirks (to make phone companies less dependent on Sun control), then so be it.

  4. eet said,

    November 14, 2007 at 10:40 am

    Gravatar

    Again “infect”. Please get the Nazi-vocabulary out of your system, OK?

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  5. Victor said,

    November 14, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    Gravatar

    Have you noticed how google android looks like iPhone operational system?
    Compare the functions shown in the videos below:
    weshow.com/us/p/23362/google_android_demo
    weshow.com/us/p/18795/iphone_home_made_review
    What do you think? Will google bring iPhone power to everyone who can’t afford apple products? That would be great :D

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 14, 2007 at 5:08 pm

    Gravatar

    Again “infect”. Please get the Nazi-vocabulary out of your system, OK?

    Please stop bringing nationalist connotation to this. The words ‘infect’ (or ‘contaminate’) needn’t invoke Godwin’s Law. They are used elsewhere in the same context, so I merely borrow them.

  7. SundayRefugee said,

    November 15, 2007 at 2:25 am

    Gravatar

    eet, “infect” would be a biological or medical term. Not a Nazi term. That should be simple enough to understand ;-)

  8. eet said,

    November 15, 2007 at 1:03 pm

    Gravatar

    No, that is quite typical. Nazis (and racists in general) mis-use biological terms for social phenomena. They portrayed Jews as an ‘infection’ for the body of the German people and claimed to have traced their ‘tainting’ influence on the German race and culture everywhere. This whole ‘infection’/’tainting’-hysteria about Novell very, very strongly reflects a dangerous mindset.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    November 15, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    Gravatar

    Again, you turn a discussion about phones into something racial, which is isn’t. You’re bordering the slanderous.

  10. SundayRefugee said,

    November 15, 2007 at 3:53 pm

    Gravatar

    eet, that’s not the context it was used in, and you know it. It was used in a classic sense of biological infection. You’re sort of a bizzare reverse-Godwin’s Law. You make comments about “Conspiracy Theorists”, yet you voraciously attempt to find and insert vulgarity, hatred, and ulterior motives in Roy (and Shane’s?) posts that aren’t there, ala repeated attempts to link their commentaries with Nazism. This is classic CT behavior ;)

  11. eet said,

    November 16, 2007 at 5:22 am

    Gravatar

    The use of biological terms that compare people or ideas with illnesses is classic racist behavior; whether you like it or not. People without good arguments to make but with a lot of hatred tend to use harsh clinical terms. Be a man and get your mind (and language) out of the gutter.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an abusive Internet troll

  12. SundayRefugee said,

    November 16, 2007 at 7:35 am

    Gravatar

    “Be a man and get your mind (and language) out of the gutter.”

    You’d do well to take your own advice, mate. But regardless, this is the last time I acknowledge your trolling on this site ;-)

  13. BlackTiger said,

    October 1, 2008 at 6:50 am

    Gravatar

    Interesting… How “so much open” G will not allow to use Mono on Android?
    One more “evil empire” rising (or already here)?

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 26/01/2023: GNU poke 3.0 and PipeWire 0.3.65

    Links for the day



  2. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 25, 2023

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 25, 2023



  3. Companies Would Collapse Upon Abandoning Their Original Goals (That Attracted All the Productive Staff)

    Staff with technical skills won't stick around in companies that reject technical arguments and moreover move to proprietary software in a company that brands itself "Open Source"



  4. [Meme] Listen to Your Workers, Avert Disaster

    Companies that refuse to take input from staff are doomed to fail



  5. The ISO Delusion: When the Employer Doesn’t Understand the Company's Value Proposition (Building Systems) and Rejects Security

    Sirius ‘Open Source’ has failed to sell what it was actually good at; instead it hired unqualified people and outsourced almost everything



  6. Links 25/01/2023: NuTyX 23.01.1 and GNU Guile 3.0.9 Released

    Links for the day



  7. Links 25/01/2023: Stratis 3.5.0 and Many Political Links

    Links for the day



  8. New Record Low: Only One 'Linux' Article in ZDNet in More Than Two Weeks

    Only a few years ago ZDNet published about 3 “Linux” stories per day (mostly FUD pieces); now it’s a ghost town, painted in ‘alien green’; considering ZDNet’s agenda (and sponsors) maybe it’s better this way



  9. Links 25/01/2023: Pale Moon 32.0 and DXVK 2.1

    Links for the day



  10. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 24, 2023

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 24, 2023



  11. ISO Certification Hardly Tackles Any of the Real Issues

    The real-world threats faced by private companies or non-profit organisations aren't covered by the ISO certification mill; today we publish the last post on this topic before proceeding to some practical examples



  12. [Meme] Medical Data Sovereignty

    What happens when your medical records/data are accessible to a company based abroad after a mysterious NDA with the Gates Foundation? The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) does not mind.



  13. The ISO Delusion: Sirius Open Wash Ltd. and Medical Data/Projects at Risk/Peril

    Sirius ‘Open Source’ was good at gloating about “ISO” as in ISO certification (see our ISO wiki to understand what ISO truly is; ISO certification needs to be more widely condemned and exposed) while signing all sorts of dodgy deals and lying to clients (some, like the Gates Foundation, were never mentioned because of a mysterious NDA); security and privacy were systematically neglected and some qualified as criminal negligence (with fines/penalties likely an applicable liability if caught/reported)



  14. Links 24/01/2023: Wine 8.0 is Ready, FSF Bolsters Copyleft

    Links for the day



  15. Azure Has Layoffs Again, Microsoft Still Cutting

    Even supposed ‘growth’ areas at Microsoft are being culled (this growth is faked, it is a lie)



  16. Links 24/01/2023: Tails 5.9 and ArcoLinux v23.02

    Links for the day



  17. Links 24/01/2023: GStreamer 1.22 and Skrooge Gets New Site

    Links for the day



  18. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 23, 2023

    IRC logs for Monday, January 23, 2023



  19. The Inside(r) Story of ISO 'Certification' Mills

    Based on my experiences inside Sirius ‘Open Source’ — as I was there for nearly 12 years — I finally tell what I’ve witnessed about ISO certification processes (see ISO wiki for prior experiences)



  20. [Meme] ISO Selling 'Reputation' to Small Businesses (for a Large Fee)

    As we’re hoping to demonstrate throughout the week, ISO certification is, in practice, worse than worthless (just a waste of small businesses’ resources, much like patents); call it the ‘ISO tax’, an artificial barrier to entry that boils down to money



  21. [Meme] ISO Certification for Paying for Certificates on Time

    ISO is a phony authority; it makes business by issuing mostly worthless paperwork that wastes people’s time and accomplishes nothing (except making ISO in rich Switzerland even richer)



  22. The ISO Train Wreck at Sirius 'Open Source'

    Before we proceed to showing how Sirius ‘Open Source’ blatantly ignored security and privacy we wish to show how ISO (see ISO wiki) basically ‘sold’ a certificate to Sirius — this is like a “diploma mill” but something that’s for businesses, not individuals



  23. Sirius Lying About ISO to Justify Giving the Technical Staff Some Classic 'Bullshit Jobs' While Censoring/Covering Up Incompetence

    Sirius ‘Open Source’ has long used “ISO” — and sometimes “GDPR” — as catch-all excuses for all sorts of nonsensical policies; does ISO realise the degree to which it is being misused by incompetent 'box tickers'?



  24. Links 23/01/2023: mozilla.org's 25th Anniversary and IceWM 3.3.1 Released

    Links for the day



  25. Report: The So-called 'Linux' Foundation is Reducing Focus on Linux

    The so-called ‘Linux’ Foundation is reducing its focus on Linux and is instead busy promoting Microsoft, Facebook, and other interests that GNU/Linux users strongly dislike



  26. Links 23/01/2023: Fwupd 1.8.10

    Links for the day



  27. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 22, 2023

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 22, 2023



  28. Links 23/01/2023: Many Pgpool-II Releases, risiOS 37 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  29. [Meme] Sirius is Not Open Source and Thugs Took Over the Company

    Despite its name, Sirius ‘Open Source’ actively replaces Open Source with proprietary software, even for its very own infrastructure (while almost all the “managers” use proprietary software)



  30. [Meme] Truth is Not Defamation

    The rogue employers like to frame everything that’s not convenient as “false” or even libelous/defamatory/slanderous; what’s actually libelous/defamatory/slanderous is those employers making such accusations against staff that says the truth (verifiable facts) in an effort to discredit such staff


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts