EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

04.23.08

SpeC#ulation: Tipping Point for GNOME?

Posted in GNOME, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Mono, Patents at 7:20 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

MS-GNOME.NET, anybody?

Two completely independent warning shots were sent to us an hour ago by folks whose name shall remain undisclosed. The first is a pointer to this GNOME announcement stating “not sure what ‘special rules’ means, but I thought you might find it interesting.” It seems to be about dbus, which we wrote about before [1, 2, 3, 4]. The second, which refers to a more recent observation, bears the subject line “Munchkins invading GTK+.” It says: “The GTK+ start page no longer mentions the major development tool, Java, now that it is open source, instead pushing a proprietary substitute…”

      http://www.gtk.org/

      http://www.gtk.org/language-bindings.html

Regarding Debian GNU/Linux, which this reader uses, he adds: “it is important to find out [if more evidence exist]. I hope it does not mean that Debian is breaking its famous Debian Social Contract to allow mono and mono-carrying developers to infect Debian projects. The social contract is one of Debian’s great strengths.

“As the Microsoft barge sinks the bailers are not just bailing their own boat, but tipping the water into other people’s boats. de Icaza and other Microsoft reps are working as fast as they can to contaminate as many projects as they can with Microsoft technologies. On the technical side, it will make the distros more bloated, inefficient and cumbersome. On the legal side, it will make easy pickings for Microsoft lawyers in the trade zones where software patents apply.”

Looking at the cache as supporting evidence, our reader adds: “I looked at archive.org, but it’s next most recent version is from August 2007. Java is, as you point out, listed in last week’s Google cache, but not on the start page. Instead Microsoft C# is being promoted.”

Can anybody shed light on this? Will GNOME promote Microsoft technologies at the expense of open source Java and C++?

Mono is the devil

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

24 Comments

  1. Alex H. said,

    April 23, 2008 at 8:32 am

    Gravatar

    Given that the gtk website is controlled in SVN, why not check out exactly when and where Java was “removed” from the front page?

    This history is here:

    http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk-web/trunk/index.html?view=log

    I couldn’t find any mention of Java on the front page though.. ?

  2. CoolGuy said,

    April 23, 2008 at 8:34 am

    Gravatar

    I was learning Py GTk and due to Gnome infestation I have changed my goals and now using Java. I will change over to KDE or xfce soon .. !!

    Gnome is no longer the “free” desktop that it used to be. It has been polluted by Novell – curse them. Novell is now aiming for infesting the KDE soon.

    I have left gnome after many years of using it. Best of luck to Gnome community – hope this turns out good for them.

  3. Merlin the Great said,

    April 23, 2008 at 9:41 am

    Gravatar

    Nonsense-schmonsens; as usual standards of this so-called ‘website’ (read: slander-speculation-FUD-factory).

  4. Kuba said,

    April 23, 2008 at 9:52 am

    Gravatar

    Merlin, do you have anything to say to back up what you just said?

  5. Merlin the Great said,

    April 23, 2008 at 9:56 am

    Gravatar

    Nah; those of us who know, and visit this website only for the cheap laughs, understand it… As for you other folks – you’re part of the amusement and trying to explain it to you would only spoil the fun.

  6. Kuba said,

    April 23, 2008 at 10:52 am

    Gravatar

    So, basically you claim that anyone who agrees with a point arguments and facts that you don’t like to even hear about is laughable and not even worthy to be presented with any reasonable points concerning the subject at hand… Ah, truly! Now I see the errors of my ways!
    BTW. Are you new here, or are you another “incarnation” of eet? You sure do sound like it.

    And the serious part of post- Roy, check this : http://slated.org/mono_mysterious_special_rules .What the hell is that about? I’d sure like to know.

  7. Alex H. said,

    April 23, 2008 at 11:11 am

    Gravatar

    A small amount of research again would go a long way.

    1. The special rules regarding mono:

    http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleRequirements

    Mono is treated less favourably than C++ and Python, as modules within the Desktop set are not allowed to gain Mono dependencies without approval first.

    2. The front page of gtk.org.

    There’s no evidence Java was ever on the front page of this site, and I’d love to see someone try to prove it – gtk-web is stored in GNOME’s svn, so you don’t need a cache, the full history is there.

    C++, Python and C# are mentioned there. They also are the allowed dependencies in the GNOME desktop set, whereas Java is not.

  8. max stirner said,

    April 23, 2008 at 12:01 pm

    Gravatar

    this is depressing. ive enjoyed gnome ever since i switched to ubuntu from suse upon breezy launch. oh well.

    luckily there are plenty of excellent window managers around that are not developed by MS shills. so one may have to switch there.

    i am much more concerned about the mono online hedging bit really..

    MS is a sinking ship, just like rome back in the day or the US today, there will be turmoil!

  9. Victor Soliz said,

    April 23, 2008 at 1:02 pm

    Gravatar

    I’d say this is rather a shame, the home page is full of C#, C# and C# and the bindings page lists C# before Java, python, perl , ruby and so many FOSS alternatives.

    The good news is that it doesn’t look like the home page has deliberately removed Java references, but the bad news is that it looks like they never had any reference of that sort and just had C# bias altogether.

    Mono is treated less favourably than C++ and Python, as modules within the Desktop set are not allowed to gain Mono dependencies without approval first.

    Why allow or encourage MONO dependency at all in gnome? It sounds detrimental for a cross platform project as gnome which primarily used to focus on Linux in the past to suddenly decide it is all right to depend on a whole platform such as gnome as long as it is approved by “the community”.

  10. Victor Soliz said,

    April 23, 2008 at 1:03 pm

    Gravatar

    Merlin the Great: Yah I got you, you are such a superior human being, I guess ad hominem is the superior man’s weapon of choice…

  11. Alex H. said,

    April 23, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    Gravatar

    Victor – with regards the mentioning of C#, that’s really pretty natural. Gtk# is as good as the C++ binding (gtkmm) and the Python one, and the Java one simply isn’t as good.

    I’m not sure why C# automatically means Mono dependency for you, because that’s not what it means. For one, it’s just a language. Mono is one implementation, but there’s also the GNU Portable.net:

    http://www.gnu.org/projects/dotgnu/pnet.html

    Given that GNOME is a free software GNU project, and so is dotgnu, that seems a fairly natural relationship to me and you don’t have to touch any mono.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 23, 2008 at 3:56 pm

    Gravatar

    Kuba,

    I don’t know if ‘Merlin the Great’ is ‘eet’, but both share the same E-mail domain (gmx.net).

    Merlin the Great,

    Please explain where the sources are wrong.

  13. Victor Soliz said,

    April 23, 2008 at 6:30 pm

    Gravatar

    Alex: I hope you are right and they mean dotgnu altogether. In that case though they probably need to be more specific.

  14. stevetheFLY said,

    April 24, 2008 at 9:46 am

    Gravatar

    I hope that this Roy-guy here apologizes, soon! I hate people who soil our own free-software community by false accusations!!! Traitor!!!!!!!!!!!

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

    stevetheFLY: 80.132.128.196

    eet: 80.132.139.19

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 24, 2008 at 9:54 am

    Gravatar

    These were not false accusations.

  16. stevetheFLY said,

    April 24, 2008 at 9:58 am

    Gravatar

    They were!!! Stop shitting on your co-Linux-workers, man! We’re all in the same boat, but some are working on code and some are shitting on the others, like you!

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

    stevetheFLY: 80.132.128.196

    eet: 80.132.139.19

  17. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 24, 2008 at 10:07 am

    Gravatar

    The exclamations marks don’t make you more correct. I know why I flagged ‘eet’ who, as we stressed before, abused readers and editors with bad language.

  18. cojii said,

    April 24, 2008 at 10:42 am

    Gravatar

    Hi there,

    I just wanted to say a HUGE thx to you roy for taking the time you’ve had to to make sure this important information gets out there to unsuspecting users. I was a longtime user of gnome, not wanting to abide within the ranks of the non lgpl qt toolkit, but now I see that I can no longer be ‘safe’ in gnome I will probably seek refuse in E17, that or fork gnome altogther.

    Your articles have been very enlightening and what it means for me ultimately is steering CLEAR of any distro that adopts mono, which means ubuntu, fedora , freespire ( due to ubuntu base ) and mandriva. I am not sure if that is an exhaustive list but there it is.

    Oh what fun…

    cu
    COJ

  19. stevetheFLY said,

    April 24, 2008 at 10:53 am

    Gravatar

    I have found just the right Linux-version for you:
    http://tinyurl.com/5u7uv9

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

    stevetheFLY: 80.132.128.196

    eet: 80.132.139.19

  20. stevetheFLY said,

    April 24, 2008 at 10:54 am

    Gravatar

    For a detailed explanation see: http://tinyurl.com/no2yg

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

    stevetheFLY: 80.132.128.196

    eet: 80.132.139.19

  21. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 24, 2008 at 5:00 pm

    Gravatar

    Does that distro have a patent royalties deal with Microsoft?

  22. Dan O'Brian said,

    April 27, 2008 at 10:11 pm

    Gravatar

    What’s so wrong about C# bindings being mentioned on the gtk.org site?

    The bindings aren’t being “promoted” as you try to claim they are, they are simply listed as part of a complete list of usable bindings for the GNOME platform for any developer who visits the site to find out what bindings are available.

    I don’t see any text anywhere saying “we prefer you use C# bindings over Python, Java or C++”. So where is this “promoting” of which you speak?

    This is why you are a lying sack of shit, Roy.

    You are constantly making false accusations in order to try and ruin GNOME’s good image. For someone who claims to be bringing the truth to everyone’s attention, you’ve done a pretty piss poor job of it. You aren’t trying to make people aware of the truth, you are trying to make people see your own warped view of the free software community. You play yourself off as some morally superior, “fighting FUD” to save users from themselves yet you use FUD yourself in order to convey your message – talk about hypocrisy.

  23. Roy Schestowitz said,

    April 27, 2008 at 11:16 pm

    Gravatar

    Microsoft is actively trying to destroy Java (always has) and I merely point out here that GNOME is used by it to achieve this goal. I receive some E-mails I can’t share in public, but it’s clear what games Microsoft is up to.

  24. True_Friend said,

    September 19, 2008 at 7:04 pm

    Gravatar

    Thanks for C# and Mono, I am now using Gnome instead of KDE. Love in it. Great language and great DE.

What Else is New


  1. Links 18/7/2018: System76's Manufacturing Facility, Microsoft-Led Lobby for Antitrust Against Android

    Links for the day



  2. What Patent Lawyers Aren't Saying: Most Patent Litigation Has Become Too Risky to be Worth It

    The lawyers' key to the castle is lost or misplaced; they can't quite find/obtain leverage in courts, but they don't want their clients to know that



  3. Software Patents Royalty (Tax) Campaign by IBM, a Serial Patent Bully, and the EPO's Participation in All This

    The agenda of US-based patent maximalists, including patent trolls and notorious bullies from the United States, is still being served by the 'European' Patent Office, which has already outsourced some of its work (e.g. translations, PR, surveillance) to the US



  4. The European Council Needs to Check Battistelli's Back Room Deals/Back Door/Backchannel With Respect to Christian Archambeau

    Worries persist that Archambeau is about to become an unworthy beneficiary (nepotism) after a Battistelli setup that put Campinos in power, supported by the Belgian delegation which is connected to Archambeau, a national/citizen of Belgium



  5. PTAB and § 101 (Section 101) Have Locked the Patent Parasites Out of the Patent System

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) have contributed a great deal to patent quality and have reduced the number of frivolous patent lawsuits; this means that firms which profit from patent applications and litigation hate it with a passion and still lobby to weaken if not scuttle PTAB



  6. Patents on Computer Software and Plants in the United States Indicative of Systemic Error

    The never-ending expansion of patent scope has meant that patent law firms generally got their way at the patent office; can the courts react fast enough (before confidence in patents and/or public support for patents is altogether shattered)?



  7. Yesterday's Misleading News From Team UPC and Its Aspiring Management of the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) enthusiasts — i.e. those looking to financially gain from it — continue to wrestle with logic, manipulate words and misrepresent the law; yesterday we saw many law firms trying to make it sound as though the UPC is coming to the UK even though this isn’t possible and UPC as a whole is likely already dead



  8. Time for the European Commission to Investigate EPO Corruption Because It May be Partly or Indirectly Connected to EU-IPO, an EU Agency

    The passage of the top role at the EU-IPO from António Campinos to Christian Archambeau would damage confidence in the moral integrity of the European Council; back room deals are alleged to have occurred, implicating corrupt Battistelli



  9. Links 17/7/2018: Catfish 1.4.6 Released, ReactOS 0.4.9, Red Hat's GPL Compliance Group Grows

    Links for the day



  10. Links 16/7/2018: Linux 4.18 RC5, Latte Dock v0.8, Windows Back Doors Resurface

    Links for the day



  11. Alliance for US Startups and Inventors for Jobs (USIJ) Misleads the US Government, Pretending to Speak for Startups While Spreading Lies for the Patent Microcosm

    In the United States, which nowadays strives to raise the patent bar, the House Small Business Committee heard from technology firms but it also heard from some questionable front groups which claim to support "startups" and "jobs" (but in reality support just patents on the face of it)



  12. 'Blockchain', 'Cloud' and Whatever Else Gets Exploited to Work Around 35 U.S.C. § 101 (or the EPC) and Patent Algorithms/Software

    Looking for a quick buck or some low-quality patents (which courts would almost certainly reject), opportunists carry on with their gold rush, aided by buzzwords and hype over pretty meaningless things



  13. PTAB Defended by the EFF, the R Street Institute and CCIA as the Number of Petitions (IPRs) Continues to Grow

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) come to the rescue when patently-bogus patents are used, covering totally abstract concepts (like software patents do); IPRs continue to increase in number and opponents of PTAB, who conveniently cherry-pick Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions, can't quite stop that



  14. IAM/Joff Wild May Have Become a de Facto Media Partner of the Patent Troll iPEL

    Invitation to trolls in China, courtesy of the patent trolls' lobby called "IAM"; this shows no signs of stopping and has become rather blatant



  15. Cautionary Tale: ILO Administrative Tribunal Cases (Appeals) 'Intercepted' Under António Campinos

    The ILO Administrative Tribunal (ILO-AT) is advertised by the EPO's management as access to justice, but it's still being undermined quite severely to the detriment of aggrieved staff



  16. Asking the USPTO to Comply With 35 U.S.C. § 101 is Like Asking Pentagon Officials to Pursue Real, Persistent Peace

    Some profit from selling weapons, whereas others profit from patent grants and litigation; what's really needed right now is patent sanity and adherence to the public interest as well as the law itself, e.g. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions



  17. BT and Sonos Are Still Patent Bullies, Seeing Patents as a Backup Plan

    The companies seeking to complement their business (or make up for their demise) using patents are still suing rivals while calling that litigation "research and development" (the same old euphemism)



  18. Jim Skippen, a Longtime Patent Troll, Admits That the Trolling Sector is Collapsing

    Canada's biggest patent troll (WiLAN) bar BlackBerry doesn't seem to be doing too well as its CEO leaves the domain altogether



  19. From East Asia to the Eastern District of Texas: XYZ Printing, Maxell, and X2Y Attenuators

    The patent aggression, which relies on improper litigation venues, harms innocent parties a great deal; only their lawyers benefit from all this mess



  20. Links 14/7/2018: Mesa 18.1.4, Elisa 0.2.1, More on Python's Guido van Rossum

    Links for the day



  21. Number of Oppositions to Grants/Awards of European Patents at the EPO Has Skyrocketed, Based on Internal Data

    The number of challenged patents continues to soar and staff of the EPO (examiners already over-encumbered by far too much work, due to unrealistic targets) would struggle to cope or simply be compelled to not properly deal with oppositions



  22. 'Transaction' Complete: Former EPO Executive From Belgium Takes the Seat of António Campinos at EU-IPO

    Rumours that Belgium made a back room deal with Battistelli may be further substantiated with the just-confirmed appointment of Archambeau



  23. EPO Abuses Against People With Disabilities Followed by Legal Bullying?

    The new President of the EPO is not (at least not yet) obeying court rulings from ILO; The above move seems like an attempt to derail ongoing cases at the ILO’s Administrative Tribunal (ILO-AT), i.e. yet more strong-arming



  24. Weeks Later António Campinos Still in Noncompliance With the Courts (ILO's Tribunal)

    'report card' for the ever-so-intransparent (or nontransparent) new President of the EPO, who does not even bother obeying court rulings



  25. Links 13/7/2018: Kube 0.7.0, Trisquel 8.0 LTS Reviewed

    Links for the day



  26. Constitutionality and CJEU as Barriers, the UPC Agreement (UPCA) is Already Moot in the United Kingdom

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) isn't going anywhere and the UK merely "explores" what to do about it; for Team UPC, however, this means that the UK "confirms intention to remain in Unitary Patent system after Brexit" (clearly a case of deliberate misinformation)



  27. It's Not About EPO 'Backlog' But About Faking 'Production' by Lowering Standards

    Remarks on the EPO dropping all pretenses of genuine care for patent quality; it's all about speed now, never mind if wrongly-granted patents can cause billions in damages across Europe (a lot of that money flows towards patent law firms)



  28. Links 12/7/2018: GTK+ 4.0 Plans, OpenBSD Gains Wi-Fi “Auto-Join”

    Links for the day



  29. The Anti-35 U.S.C. § 101 Lobby Pushes Old News Into the Headlines in an Effort to Resurrect/Protect Software Patents

    The software patenting proponents (law firms for the most part) are still doing anything they can -- stretching even months into the past -- in an effort to modify the law in defiance of Supreme Court (SCOTUS) rulings



  30. Thomas Massie and Marcy Kaptur Are Promoting the Interests of Patent Trolls and Patent Lawyers While Calling That “Innovation”

    Remarks on the ongoing effort to promote patent trolls’ interests under the guise of “helping small businesses” — a very misleading propaganda pattern that we have been finding in Unified Patent Court (UPC) lobbying at the EPO


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts