Why BBC is Microsoft Media (Video)
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2008-06-25 09:52:49 UTC
- Modified: 2008-06-25 09:52:49 UTC
Recent Techrights' Posts
- Red Hat QA Team "Had Shrunk by Half Over the Past Year." (After IBM Divestment)
- If Red Hat's workforce is being moved to the East, then RHEL can become a national security problem
- Preparations for Our 19th Anniversary Have Already Begun
- When we get back we'll probably sort out some balloons and venue for the next party
- Pleased After 2 Years With team.blue
- Moving from a Content Management System (CMS, dynamic) to a Static Site Generator (SSG) was a wise decision that made life so much easier
- The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is Being Attacked by Organisations Jealous of Its Principled Stance and Longevity
- Nobody is perfect, but imperfection does not instantaneously imply sinister intent
-
- Activists Can Win, But Keep an Eye on the Ball and on the Trophy
- GitHub is dying, it was a loss-making trap, not free hosting
- Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Katrina Remembered, Distracted Driving, and Virtual Economics
- Links for the day
- At This Point It's No Longer Matthew Garrett But People Who Fund Matthew Garrett (or Companies That Fund His SLAPPs Against My Wife and I)
- The only thing worse than misogynists are misogynists who fail to respect other people's right to go on holiday
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, September 03, 2025
- IRC logs for Wednesday, September 03, 2025
- The UEFI 9/11 - Part VI - This Serious Harm Was Planned for Over a Decade, Not an Accident or Merely Some Misfortune
- The term "Serious Harm" is legally meaningful here
- GNOME Unfit for Diversity and Inclusion
- GNOME's leadership is using "bad words"
- Brodie Robertson Addressing the Recently-Discovered Comments
- Most people probably knew nothing about this until he wrote a response
- Slopwatch: "Open Source" and "Linux" News Faked, Made by Bots and Entered Into Google News
- Spam combined with slop about "Linux" has entered Google News
- Links 03/09/2025: Microsoft Causes Mass Layoffs Outside Microsoft Also, "Google Can Keep Paying for Firefox Search Deal"
- Links for the day
- Gemini Links 03/09/2025: calendar.txt, Alhena 5.3.1, and ROOPHLOCH
- Links for the day
- The Theory That the Man From McKinsey, Whom Red Hat Took From Microsoft a Month Ago as Executive, Wants 'Efficiency' (Lower Salaries)
- So far... no "official" word
- When Your Site's Articles Are Being 'Cheapened' by Slop as Feature Images
- Dr. Farnell should become an advisor to The Register MS
- Certificate Authority Let's Encrypt Drops to Only Half a Dozen Capsules and 0.2% of the Whole in Geminispace, Self-Signed is the Way to Go
- It used to have hundreds, according to Lupa
- Doing to Red Hat What They Already Did (and Still Do) to IBM
- there seems to be a drive to hire cheaper staff, and it may be led by somebody Red Hat hired from Microsoft
- Links 03/09/2025: Salesforce's Latest Mass Layoffs, 93% in Large Poll at The Register MS Say UK Government Should Dump Microsoft
- Links for the day
- If You Reject the Google Verdict in the US, Then You Should Also Reject the "Modern" Web (Do Something About It)
- Gemini Protocol is still open; it cannot be hijacked or subverted because it's frozen by design and by intention
- Open Source Initiative IRS Filing: Almost All the Money is Corporate, Stefano Maffuli (Executive Director) Takes About a Quarter of That Money for Openwashing of "AI" Ponzi Scheme
- OSI is currently little but a PR/marketing agency of Microsoft
- Many People Are "Leaving" Red Hat, Even High-Level Managers
- Something is definitely going on at Red Hat
- Techrights Has Been Subjected to Calls of Violence (and Death Threats), It Never Condoned Violence
- I have no sympathy for people who call violence "free speech" and then get in trouble
- Condoning Violent Behaviour and "Free Speech"
- perhaps Microsoft Lunduke lost touch with what constitutes violence
- Takeaway From the Google Verdict: GAFAM Has Too Much Control (Even Over the US Government and Courts With Government Appointees)
- Many people feel disappointed but hardly surprised by the verdict
- The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Turns 40 in One Month
- As noted a few days ago, several times in fact, many people now recognise the importance of the FSF's mission, even if most people don't know what the FSF is
- Many Microsoft "Assets" Are Fabricated Baloney (to Game the Numbers)
- At times it seems like what we deal with are many weak patents (on algorithms), valuations or speculations based on hype ("hey hi"), and stocks held by Microsoft and its own staff
- "Voluntary" Layoffs at Microsoft (to Game the Numbers, Sugar-Coating a Crisis)
- "Employees interested have until the end of October to volunteer."
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, September 02, 2025
- IRC logs for Tuesday, September 02, 2025
- Links 02/09/2025: Oligarch Tech and Text Encoding Concerns in Ada
- Links for the day
- "Internal Changes at Red Hat / IBM"
- It seems like quite a few people are leaving
- Confirmed in French Media: Mass Layoffs (10% Culled) in Microsoft France
- Now some reports in French
- "People on LinkedIn Saying That They've Left Red Hat."
- We already saw signs of it a month ago and named some of the people
- Gone With the BRICs (or BRICS): "Linux 8" in Cuba
- GAFAM must be worried
- Telecompaper Reports Microsoft to Reduce the Workforce by Another 10% (in France)
- Imagine what this will do to staff's morale
- Microsoft in Freefall in Finland
- Can Finland eradicate Windows from all its infrastructure, including core operations that are sensitive to sabotage by cracking?
- Google's Chrome Passes 70% and Web Standards Are Dying
- The Web is quickly becoming devoid of any standards
- India is Back to Windows 8 (Market Share Down to 8%) as Android Soars to a New Record High
- For Microsoft, India is a runaway market
- Slopwatch: Plagiarism and Ponzi Scheme, Bubble About to Burst Entirely, Admits Goldman Sachs
- the hype that Google News and The Register MS actively participate and profit from
- Links 02/09/2025: SCO Summit and Russia Suspected Of Jamming GPS
- Links for the day
- Gemini Links 02/09/2025: Mediterranean Marriage and Staying Connected at 35,000 Feet
- Links for the day
- The Register MS Says "AI Web Crawlers Are Destroying Websites", So Why Does The Register MS Help 'AI' Companies? (Spoiler: Money)
- People need to call out The Register MS on its hypocrisy
- Slopfarms Already Peaked, They Will Die When Slop Companies Run Out of Money to Borrow
- slopfarms will lack an actual "engine"
- Links 02/09/2025: Attacks on Unions, Microsoft TCO, and DDoSing a Growing Problem
- Links for the day
- Why We Publish Information About the SLAPPs (But Not About the Legal Process), an Abuse of Process by Americans Trying to Silence Critics of Their Employer, Microsoft
- It doesn't take thousands of pages to explain something simple
- Internet Relay Chat Didn't Fall Off a Cliff
- IRC will turn 40 in less than 3 years from now
- The UEFI 9/11 - Part V - This is Not a Drill (Disable "SecureBoot" Now)
- A "9/11" Coming
- There's No Obligation to Speak to Anybody
- The very fact that "bkuhn" is till spending time in social control media says a lot about his poor judgment
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Monday, September 01, 2025
- IRC logs for Monday, September 01, 2025
- Microsoft Trying to Force People to Resign (Amid Mass Layoffs) a Strategy That Takes Its Toll
- Microsoft seems to be circling down the drain and the "final flush" will be the moment the "hey hi" (AI) bubble implodes completely
- Google Simply Cannot Be Trusted
- Only fools would trust GAFAM
- Admission That a Third Party (or Parties) Funds the SLAPPs Against Techrights
- This can end up costing them over a million dollars
- Modifying and Writing One's Own Computer Programs is Not a Crime (or: Google Proves That Stallman Was Right)
- We're generally gratified to see so many positive mentions of him
- Why We Stopped Publishing Videos (for Now)
- We'll probably get back to videos one day, but it's hard to say when or to what extent
- What Animal Rights Activism Teaches Us About Sympathy and Focus
- It's possible to believe that the planet is warming, that we must do something about it, and still eat eggs and butter
Comments
Faemir
2008-06-25 21:25:35
In fact I wouldn't be surprised if they swapped to using dirac for the iplayer, atleast optionally at some point.
This is almost as bad as MS FUD.
Ben
2008-06-26 07:44:14
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-26 07:59:36
As for DIRAC, that's the 'Old BBC'. The new BBC (media division) is managed by Microsoft folks, some of whom came from Microsoft.
Ben
2008-06-26 10:33:44
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-26 14:18:21
This post contains only a video (showing you a hearing at the Parliament) and 4 links. Where are accusations made? If you challenge previous posts, then be specific and I'll gladly provide evidence. Don't rush and shoot the messenger.
RyanT
2008-06-26 17:19:14
Some of the links are pretty suspicious too - one, still being links to your own site, and 2, the fact that BBC made a documentary on Bill (a series called the Money Programme about history of many of todays biggest businesses) and while it focused more on his retirement, still had time to bring up some criticism including "talking head" sections from his critics. While it wasn't comprehensive, it seemed to be something a little more lighter anyway rather than a hard case expose.
Then, as already mentioned, the investment in Dirac.
There's been a spotty past, but even so they've tried, and are mostly tied by what is currently popular (flash, and at one point using Realmedia/WMP based players, which they realised they had to move away from and did).
RyanT
2008-06-26 17:45:50
Watchnig that video, there is so much stuff said in the text that makes us out as no worse than the people we're accusing of FUD. First of all:
It's easy to be a smart arse when you're not under interview pressure and have google to hand to check the figures, while she, being a human being, is not a perfect human being, and even so did remember the rough estimate (as noted during the interview, excuses staff payment, so I don't really see how the figure mentioned in the text is debunking or showing anything - it was clear to all it seemed that this was excusing that, and if it wasn't, it was mentioned by her anyway).
Unfounded claims of Silverlight wrapper (despite it's linux based back end and the fact it uses flash, and works fine for streaming on all systems), and while downloading is a bitch to not have, you have to remember is copyrighted original works, therefore has to be protected, making it harder to get around the Linux/open source side of things, and even if they did they'd probably complain because they wouldn't release the source of something that is meant to seal off/protect the content entirely (Firefox can get away with it because a lot of exploits are down to bugs and such, not that it has to protect copyrighted works from piracy of course - that's down the content of the page, not the browser).
Then the incredibly presumptive text in general that doesn't bring up anything - it just spins and suggests FUD to make the interviewees sound suspicious when for the most part they haven't said anything deserving of that, except for the interoperability part being on all platforms, which considering the confusion they seemed to have over what they meant, could've been an honest mistake or a slip of the tongue. The clip itself sadly only shows a very specific part too, not the whole thing, which would be better.
Ben
2008-06-27 12:26:24
During the video, the subtitles were serious accusations but no evidence to back it up. Some examples:
at 0:43 : "In fact, the IPlayer cost more than 130 Million! (See Grocklaw.net)." Your accusing the BBC of giving dodgy figures yet no direct links to any evidence, asking viewers to search through a huge site or take our word for it. (And for the record I did find the interview, 130 Million was the cost of modernising the entire BBC from tape based to digital based, Iplayer itself was about 4.5 Million.) And a real citation ;) http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171 look for [14:49]
at 3:25: "Because his pals at Microsoft Told him to". That's a serious allegation against both the BBC and Microsoft. And without any evidence its pure FUD.
at 3:54: "No its a monopoly tool created by Microsoft". Well firstly that makes no sense given the context. MP "Why did you build Iplayer, why not use BitTorrent or BTVision" BBC Director "Actually Iplayer isn't an internal BBC creation* we did use external tools" * Subtitle appears here
at 3:13: "By Microsoft...", He doesn't actually name the various components (and why should he, it wouldn't answer the question). And the strong implication is that using Microsoft technology is bad, probably is but unless you say why (and it has to be a good reason), or specifically link to someone who says why, its nothing but FUD.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-27 12:46:50
BBC iPlayer protest report
"We have 1500 fliers to distribute, that focus on the key issue with the iPlayer, and why $130 Million and 4 years of development don't get you much when you choose Microsoft DRM."
http://www.defectivebydesign.org/blog/iPlayerProtestReport
re: second point
Bear in mind that I didn't edit or produce the video, but just to bear in mind: Erik Huggers, group controller at BBC Future Media & Technology at the time, is a former Microsoft high-level employee who also attended antitrust proceedings in Europe (over Windows Media Player abuses, IIRC).
re: third point
Why would the BBC exclude the #1 rival of its new media partner then?
Feeling the heat at Microsoft
[CNET]: If I ask you who is Microsoft's biggest competitor now, who would it be?
[Ballmer:] Open...Linux. I don't want to say open source. Linux, certainly have to go with that.
http://www.news.com/Feeling-the-heat-at-Microsoft/2008-1012_3-6232458.html?tag=ne.fd.mnbc
re: fourth and last point
Microsoft has a proven track record of abuse and delivery of shoddy software which, by design, does not play nice with competitors. The iPlayer and its constituent parts are a brilliant example of this.
Mark Kent
2008-06-27 13:01:08
The BBC DG (the top bod, responding to a parliament questioning) could only admit to "more than €£20 millions", which indicates quite clearly that it's a lot more, and they were not going to say quite how much. Suggesting that the BBC's DG and his advisers would be so incompetent as to be unable to answer "what does it cost" to a parliamentary committee specifically set up to investigate the iPlayer is ludicruous. If he's really that incompetent, he should find another job, along with his advisers.
The Dirac codec was developed years before the Microsoft iPlayer disaster came along, which was the result of some ex-Microsoft people joining the BBC in their new "media" section, and doing a deal back with Microsoft. There has never been any real intention to support Linux, and it will never happen. This would not be in Microsoft's interests.
The successful iPlayer, the one built in a few weeks on the Adobe platform, after the humiliating failure of spending up to €£120 millions with Microsoft for something which is so locked to a specific version of windows that hardly anyone can use it, cost a tiny fraction of the Microsoft version, and has been very succesful.
The BBC's main argument *for* the Microsoft solution was "DRM", amazingly, this argument was forgotten in moments when the flash solution was pushed out. Clearly, the DRM line had been a Microsoft one.
The key party in the BBC eventually lost his job over the whole fiasco, and rightly so in my view. I was disgusted, and remain disgusted, at the amount of my own money (licence-fee) wasted on this ill-advised proprietary junk from Microsoft.
Ta,
Mark
Ben
2008-06-28 07:39:46
"Bear in mind that I didn’t edit or produce the video," Dosn't matter. Posting it on your blog without commentary is a full endorsement, if you do that you have to take responsibility for any inacuracies.
I have no idea why they said >€£20 Million to parliament, but that's a guestimate, if you want accurate figures read the interview where he actually had them on hand. http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171
"Erik Huggers, group controller at BBC Future Media & Technology at the time, is a former Microsoft high-level employee" If he's part of an evil plot to take over the BBC from within then take him down. But unless you have actual evidence he's deliberately doing evil its pure FUD to claim he's part of a sinister plan.
"Why would the BBC exclude the #1 rival of its new media partner then?" Technical reasons, prioritising by user count, maybe they wanted to get the public response and make changes before they started porting. Who knows? But jumping to the worst conclusion without evidence is FUD. Besides the online verison is cross platform and it was worth a little teathing troubles to get hold of.
"Microsoft has a proven track record of abuse and delivery of shoddy software which, by design, does not play nice with competitors. The iPlayer and its constituent parts are a brilliant example of this." Nope, Iplayer's online Flash version is compliant with internet de-facto standards (and its not like there is an official standard to use anyway), cross platform and pretty high quality. I don't know if there's any web 2.0 features people are missing but if you want to watch some BBC TV online, its great.
The Downloadable client according to the digital grapevine (I never used it) shoddy and tied to Microsoft. But that dosn't prove anything. You can say the same about any badly written peace of Windows software in existence.
"There has never been any real intention to support Linux, and it will never happen. This would not be in Microsoft’s interests." Iplayer has an online flash version. Its far more popular than the downloadable version (even with Windows users) and fully supports Linux. I use it and I have no complaints.
"The BBC’s main argument *for* the Microsoft solution was “DRM”, amazingly, this argument was forgotten in moments when the flash solution was pushed out. Clearly, the DRM line had been a Microsoft one." The BBC isn't pro-DRM, if you read what they actually said http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171 its that DRM was a nessacary evil, not because of pirates, but because they needed to convince the copyright holders to allow Iplayer to allow their shows online, DRM convinced them. If they can convince them to allow their shows on the Flash version of Iplayer without DRM, nice work BBC!
"The successful iPlayer, the one built in a few weeks on the Adobe platform, after the humiliating failure of spending up to €£120 millions" IPlayer itself did not cost €£120 million, the €£120 million was spent restructureing the BBC without witch the Flash Iplayer could not have been built. I agree the downloadable Iplayer was a waste of time and money, I just don't see an evil intent, but please, get your figures right.