EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.16.08

Embrace, Extend, and Apache

Posted in Free/Libre Software, Microsoft, Servers, Windows at 10:42 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“It’s part of a continuing behavior pattern by Microsoft that I think it’s fair to call “dirty fighting.” GoDaddy was using Apache (I assume on Linux) because it was a great technical solution. They didn’t switch to IIS on Windows Server 2003 for any technical reason. The switch was accompanied by a press release by GoDaddy, containing Microsoft promotional language. Now, I’ve changed many servers from one thing to another, but I’ve never made a press release about it. GoDaddy wouldn’t be doing that unless Microsoft had offered them something valuable in return. There has been talk in the domain business that Microsoft has been offering the large domain registries a wad of cash to switch their parked sites. There is no other reason to do this than to influence the Netcraft figures.”

Bruce Perens

APACHE HAS BEEN GAINING at the expense of IIS for several consecutive months now, despite dirty tricks from Microsoft. It’s an important ongoing discussion because Apache is a FOSS poster child. Microsoft just can’t stop this project, so it may be opting for a different strategy.

Just as Microsoft tried to gain control over ODF (blame all the luring, it seems to be have just approached and obtained partial control of Apache now that it’s cleared to commit code to it.

Few will have noticed, but Microsoft’s Jim Kellerman just announced that he and a Microsoft colleague have “been cleared to contribute patches again” to Apache, and specifically to the Hadoop project.

Microsoft is desperate to intervene with Apache’s direction [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Why is that? Might they be trying to earn the privilege to add Windows-only/Microsoft-oriented extensions, just as they contributed patches for SQL Server around the time of their Apache announcement (payment for a free pass)?

“They merely isolate competing projects from their other competitors.”To Apache, “GNU/Linux vs. Windows” is not an important debate. It’s clear enough that Microsoft, being another reckless for-profit business, will attempt to increase installations of Apache atop Windows Server. So, is this really good news, as Matt Asay tries to put it?

Microsoft engineers are not foolish. They merely isolate competing projects from their other competitors. They divide their rivals (divide and conquer). Without the neutrality of GNU/Linux, which enjoys a so-called ‘Switzerland status’, projects are left at the mercy of Windows, i.e. Microsoft.

“I once preached peaceful coexistence with Windows. You may laugh at my expense — I deserve it.”

Be’s CEO Jean-Louis Gassée

“Microsoft has had clear competitors in the past. It’s a good thing we have museums to document that.”

Bill Gates

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

21 Comments

  1. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 11:00 am

    Gravatar

    You seem to be confused. Hadoop != HTTPD.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 11:03 am

    Gravatar

    I did not speak about HTTPD.

  3. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 11:09 am

    Gravatar

    No, but you talk of “Apache” when you mean “httpd” when it’s convenient to your argument. You said:

    APACHE HAS BEEN GAINING at the expense of IIS for several consecutive months now, despite dirty tricks from Microsoft. It’s an important ongoing discussion because Apache is a FOSS poster child. Microsoft just can’t stop this project, so it may be opting for a different strategy.

    Just as Microsoft tried to gain control over ODF (blame all the luring, it seems to be have just approached and obtained partial control of Apache now that it’s cleared to commit code to it.

    The Apache in the first paragraph is not the same Apache as the second paragraph, and a casual reader will not realise this is FUD.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    Gravatar

    Give them time and you’ll see them moving onwards.

    Remember POI, for example:

    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/26/microsoft-buys-moox-support/
    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/20/ooxml-deception-pr/
    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/07/25/dividing-with-osp-oem/

  5. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    Gravatar

    You can’t prevent people from writing free software nor is it wrong to accept free software from Microsoft.

    The beauty of free software is that it doesn’t matter where you get it from; your freedoms are already in the license.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 2:38 pm

    Gravatar

    There remain some loopholes such as platform discrimination and software patents.

  7. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 2:46 pm

    Gravatar

    Platform discrimination is in the eye of the submitter. Go ask the BSD people about GNU/Linux sometime :)

    Apache is protected from software patents with the v2 license in basically the same way as GPLv3. That is why those licenses are now compatible.

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    Gravatar

    This was a reference to a broader set of projects, not just Apache.

  9. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    Gravatar

    “Not just Apache” is incorrect; you mean “Not including Apache”.

    You’re trying to scare people into believing there is some problem with the Apache project; there is none.

    You may as well just state on the front page that you will never give Microsoft any credit for doing anything. Here they’re contributing free software – which you claim to support – to a prominent free software project, and all in Java, not .net, and with a license that includes a software patent protection clause. And Hadoop doesn’t even support Windows as a production platform.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 3:20 pm

    Gravatar

    Perhaps that’s something they would like to change. Seen the news today?

    Microsoft-Yahoo Deal Still Makes Sense, Ballmer Says
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aK6VdgpZiLvI&refer=home

    Remember who owns Hadoop.

  11. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    Gravatar

    Who “owns” Hadoop, in your opinion? :D

    This is just FUD; silly scare-mongering FUD about another good free software project. If this is going to be your standard tactic for any project which takes contributions from Microsoft, I’m afraid you’re going to be left with very little software.

  12. Betto said,

    October 16, 2008 at 5:05 pm

    Gravatar

    Are people supposed to take Perens’ claim at face value, or are you planning to also paste a link to some sort of proof?

    You know, proof.

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 5:09 pm

    Gravatar

    I’ve personally heard from Web hosts who were approached by Microsoft, which offered discounts and even hardware subsidies

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_pricing

  14. twitter said,

    October 16, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    Gravatar

    M$ is indeed interested in subverting Apache.

    http://apache.slashdot.org/apache/08/07/25/2135202.shtml

  15. Betto said,

    October 16, 2008 at 6:24 pm

    Gravatar

    Oh, twitter from Slashdot is also here. Everyone should read this page, just in case:

    http://slashdot.org/~SockDisclosure/journal/

    @Roy,

    Another one of those “private communications” I gather? One of those “oh if only I could publish what I know but my life is in danger” situations? Like the mostly out of context quotes you paste on to your whack jobs, linking to some Wikipedia article is useless. But what the heck, here are some links of my own:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealot
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_exhaustion
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_verbosity
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalomania

    Enjoy :)

  16. Jose_X said,

    October 16, 2008 at 6:29 pm

    Gravatar

    Betto, I am not going to offer you proof.

    Microsoft has plenty of money and access to users to inflate numbers if they wanted to do so. Other companies can do the same. It does make sense, if you are after marketing points, to go after the biggest bang for buck and that would be with domains that were parked.

    In fact, Microsoft is proud of their cost-saving move:
    http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/mar06/03-21GoDaddyPR.mspx

    “Go Daddy to transition all its parked domains from Linux to Microsoft.”.. straight from the horses mouth, if you will.

    I guess that was proof. Sorry. I didn’t think it would be that easy.

    boycottnovell is not meant to be the alpha and omega. They post leads and discussion that many find useful.

  17. Betto said,

    October 16, 2008 at 6:49 pm

    Gravatar

    I’m sorry, I must have missed the part where that became evil, or somehow supports what Bruce “buy my FOSS patent insurance” Perens said. Can you clarify?

  18. Jose_X said,

    October 16, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    Gravatar

    The numbers and that move in particular are sold by some as indicative of the tech quality of linux vs windows server platforms.

    BPerens is saying that the reasons were for a business deal and not for tech reasons. What part of what he says bothers you so I can maybe look at that part closer?

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 7:23 pm

    Gravatar

    Betto, have you consideeds asking Perens himself?

  20. Betto said,

    October 16, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    Gravatar

    Ask Perens? Why, exactly? You’re the one using that quote to support your (bogus) argument.

  21. Betto said,

    October 16, 2008 at 8:51 pm

    Gravatar

    Why would something Perens said bother me? He stopped “bothering” me the day he started selling patent insurance.

What Else is New


  1. Links 17/2/2019: Compiz 0.9.14.0, Geary 0.13.0, GNU FreeDink 109.6, Debian 9.8, Texinfo 6.6

    Links for the day



  2. Amazon's Patent Policy Should be Enough of a Reason to Boycott Amazon and AWS

    There are many things to criticise Amazon and its founder for; but rarely does the mainstream media bring up the company's appalling patent policy



  3. Don't Use Cloudflare Because You Impose This on People Who Least Want It

    Reasons to stop making the World Wide Web so heavily dependent on some dubious companies like Cloudflare, which already has a worrisome track record



  4. How Many/Most EPO Examiners View 'President' António Campinos

    Based on what readers/insiders have told us, there’s a prevalent perception that António Campinos is afraid of (thus controlled/directed by) Bergot, who is still doing Battistelli’s biddings at the European Patent Office (EPO)



  5. Techrights' Priorities Over the Years

    An old priority of ours, eliminating software patents in the United States, is no longer quite so relevant because such patents are perishing in US courts, with or without outside intervention such as activism



  6. Courts in Disagreement: Warning on Wrongly-Granted European Patents and the Looming Collapse of All Software Patents in Europe

    By devaluing patents and reducing their perceived worth (as is happening in China and Europe) patent offices risk decreasing participation in the very system they fundamentally depend on



  7. Computing Will Not Necessarily Make the World a Better Place

    The vision of "happy world" (because each person has a so-called 'smart' 'phone') is a yuppie delusion that overlooks business models and corporate interests



  8. EPO Grants Fake European Patents -- Including Software Patents -- and European Courts Keep Rejecting These

    The demise of the legitimacy or perceived validity of European Patents is measurable and the system isn't the same anymore; the EPO makes no effort to change this for the better, either



  9. Nobody But Patent Trolls and Litigators Will Benefit From the Corruption of the European Patent Office

    IAM, EPO leadership, Iancu and the rest of these raiders are enabling corruption and facilitating or supporting a racket; that money they collect comes at the expense of future victims of their "clients" or "customers" (that's what they call applicants, to whom they grant dubious monopolies as a matter of urgency)



  10. WSL is a Misleading Acronym/Name Because There's No Linux in It, It's Just Windows

    When Microsoft says "Linux" (as in "Microsoft loves Linux") what it actually means is Windows and/or Azure



  11. Links 16/2/2019: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS, PyCharm 2019.1 EAP 4

    Links for the day



  12. Outline/Index of the Alexandre Benalla/Battistelli Scandal

    Our writings about the scandals implicating Benalla and the European Patent Office (EPO)



  13. Reading Techrights on a Mobile Device Running Android

    A new Android app for reading this site is being tested



  14. Links 14/2/2019: “I Love Free Software Day” and Mesa 19.0 RC4 Released

    Links for the day



  15. “EPO Lawlessness Again”

    Blackberry uses bogus European Patents (on software) for lawsuits; "all of them pure software patents. Patents on programs for computers as such," as Müller puts it



  16. Unitary Patent (UPC) is All About Imposing Patent Maximalists' Ideology of Greed and Self Interest on Courts in the Name of 'Unification' or 'Consistency' or 'Community'

    Pushers of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) are upset that they don’t always get their way when independent judges get to decide; as it turns out, many European Patents are just fake patents, more so under António Campinos



  17. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part V: Mediapart Explains the 'Raid' Attempt, Reporters Without Borders Involved

    Mediapart, an investigative site that unearths a lot of incriminating things about Battistelli's former bodyguard Alexandre Benalla, was the target of a raid attempt some weeks ago



  18. Links 13/2/2019: Tails 3.12.1, MongoDB Being Dumped

    Links for the day



  19. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part IV: Suspected Offenses of Forgery and Possible Falsification

    In a very underworld fashion, Benalla continues to break the law and create yet more scandals



  20. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part III: Mars, France Close Protection (Benalla's Family), and Russian Oligarchy

    An article which examines the business background of Benalla, the outrageous salaries, the severance indemnity pay, and contract with a Russian oligarch close to Vladimir Putin



  21. Links 13/2/2019: Plasma 5.15.0 and a Look at Linux Mint Debian Edition Cindy

    Links for the day



  22. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part II: Fishing Expedition for Sources in the Alexandre Benalla 'Underworld' Scandal

    An utter lack of respect for the privacy of the media and of its sources, in the name of protecting the privacy of those convicted of crimes, as seen in France just like the European Patent Office



  23. Innovating the Idea That Software Patents (Monopolies on Algorithms) Are Covering 'Artificial' 'Intelligence' (AI and ML as Loopholes)

    Patent law firms around the world love this new trick, which is framing software that makes decisions as "AI" (magically rendering it patent-eligible only in offices but not in courts, which the EPO hopes to replace/override anyway)



  24. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part I: Destruction of Evidence by Alexandre Benalla

    The Alexandre Benalla scandal carries on, deepening even further than before and causing raids of the media; will the EPO be implicated and held accountable too?



  25. Links 12/2/2019: PyPy 7.0.0, HHVM 4.0.0 and CVE-2019-5736

    Links for the day



  26. USPTO Director Iancu Works for Anti-SCOTUS (Against Section 101) Lobbyists

    The United States Patent and Trademark Office Director Andrei Iancu is becoming to the patent system what Ajit Pai is to the FCC or to the broadband industry; there appears to be intentional vandalism and total disregard for the rule of law



  27. Gross Violations of the EPC at the European Patent Office as Principal Priority Turns Against Science and Technology

    What good is the law if violation of the European Patent Convention (EPC) is so routine at today’s European Patent Office (EPO), which exploits its immunity to operate outside the rule of law and pursue nothing but cash (selling patents/monopolies that are invalid in courts)?



  28. European Patent Office's Exploitation of the 'AI' Catchphrase/Buzzword to Grant Patents on Algorithms in Defiance of the Rules, the Law, and Common Sense

    In clear violation of the EPC (i.e. more of the same from the EPO) software patents are being actively promoted and law being bypassed or worked around



  29. Microsoft's Patent Trolls Are Still Suing Microsoft's Rivals to Help Sell Microsoft

    The ‘new’ Microsoft boils down to the patent equivalent of the copyright case of SCO (funded by Microsoft)



  30. The American Software Patents Lobby Has Died

    Voices of US law firms (i.e. patent maximalists) have become quieter and rarer; applications for US patents have decreased in number, patent litigation numbers have collapsed entirely, and patent maximalists have moved on


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts