EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.16.08

Embrace, Extend, and Apache

Posted in Free/Libre Software, Microsoft, Servers, Windows at 10:42 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“It’s part of a continuing behavior pattern by Microsoft that I think it’s fair to call “dirty fighting.” GoDaddy was using Apache (I assume on Linux) because it was a great technical solution. They didn’t switch to IIS on Windows Server 2003 for any technical reason. The switch was accompanied by a press release by GoDaddy, containing Microsoft promotional language. Now, I’ve changed many servers from one thing to another, but I’ve never made a press release about it. GoDaddy wouldn’t be doing that unless Microsoft had offered them something valuable in return. There has been talk in the domain business that Microsoft has been offering the large domain registries a wad of cash to switch their parked sites. There is no other reason to do this than to influence the Netcraft figures.”

Bruce Perens

APACHE HAS BEEN GAINING at the expense of IIS for several consecutive months now, despite dirty tricks from Microsoft. It’s an important ongoing discussion because Apache is a FOSS poster child. Microsoft just can’t stop this project, so it may be opting for a different strategy.

Just as Microsoft tried to gain control over ODF (blame all the luring, it seems to be have just approached and obtained partial control of Apache now that it’s cleared to commit code to it.

Few will have noticed, but Microsoft’s Jim Kellerman just announced that he and a Microsoft colleague have “been cleared to contribute patches again” to Apache, and specifically to the Hadoop project.

Microsoft is desperate to intervene with Apache’s direction [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. Why is that? Might they be trying to earn the privilege to add Windows-only/Microsoft-oriented extensions, just as they contributed patches for SQL Server around the time of their Apache announcement (payment for a free pass)?

“They merely isolate competing projects from their other competitors.”To Apache, “GNU/Linux vs. Windows” is not an important debate. It’s clear enough that Microsoft, being another reckless for-profit business, will attempt to increase installations of Apache atop Windows Server. So, is this really good news, as Matt Asay tries to put it?

Microsoft engineers are not foolish. They merely isolate competing projects from their other competitors. They divide their rivals (divide and conquer). Without the neutrality of GNU/Linux, which enjoys a so-called ‘Switzerland status’, projects are left at the mercy of Windows, i.e. Microsoft.

“I once preached peaceful coexistence with Windows. You may laugh at my expense — I deserve it.”

Be’s CEO Jean-Louis Gassée

“Microsoft has had clear competitors in the past. It’s a good thing we have museums to document that.”

Bill Gates

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

21 Comments

  1. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 11:00 am

    Gravatar

    You seem to be confused. Hadoop != HTTPD.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 11:03 am

    Gravatar

    I did not speak about HTTPD.

  3. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 11:09 am

    Gravatar

    No, but you talk of “Apache” when you mean “httpd” when it’s convenient to your argument. You said:

    APACHE HAS BEEN GAINING at the expense of IIS for several consecutive months now, despite dirty tricks from Microsoft. It’s an important ongoing discussion because Apache is a FOSS poster child. Microsoft just can’t stop this project, so it may be opting for a different strategy.

    Just as Microsoft tried to gain control over ODF (blame all the luring, it seems to be have just approached and obtained partial control of Apache now that it’s cleared to commit code to it.

    The Apache in the first paragraph is not the same Apache as the second paragraph, and a casual reader will not realise this is FUD.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    Gravatar

    Give them time and you’ll see them moving onwards.

    Remember POI, for example:

    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/26/microsoft-buys-moox-support/
    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/20/ooxml-deception-pr/
    http://boycottnovell.com/2008/07/25/dividing-with-osp-oem/

  5. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    Gravatar

    You can’t prevent people from writing free software nor is it wrong to accept free software from Microsoft.

    The beauty of free software is that it doesn’t matter where you get it from; your freedoms are already in the license.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 2:38 pm

    Gravatar

    There remain some loopholes such as platform discrimination and software patents.

  7. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 2:46 pm

    Gravatar

    Platform discrimination is in the eye of the submitter. Go ask the BSD people about GNU/Linux sometime :)

    Apache is protected from software patents with the v2 license in basically the same way as GPLv3. That is why those licenses are now compatible.

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    Gravatar

    This was a reference to a broader set of projects, not just Apache.

  9. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 3:06 pm

    Gravatar

    “Not just Apache” is incorrect; you mean “Not including Apache”.

    You’re trying to scare people into believing there is some problem with the Apache project; there is none.

    You may as well just state on the front page that you will never give Microsoft any credit for doing anything. Here they’re contributing free software – which you claim to support – to a prominent free software project, and all in Java, not .net, and with a license that includes a software patent protection clause. And Hadoop doesn’t even support Windows as a production platform.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 3:20 pm

    Gravatar

    Perhaps that’s something they would like to change. Seen the news today?

    Microsoft-Yahoo Deal Still Makes Sense, Ballmer Says
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aK6VdgpZiLvI&refer=home

    Remember who owns Hadoop.

  11. AlexH said,

    October 16, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    Gravatar

    Who “owns” Hadoop, in your opinion? :D

    This is just FUD; silly scare-mongering FUD about another good free software project. If this is going to be your standard tactic for any project which takes contributions from Microsoft, I’m afraid you’re going to be left with very little software.

  12. Betto said,

    October 16, 2008 at 5:05 pm

    Gravatar

    Are people supposed to take Perens’ claim at face value, or are you planning to also paste a link to some sort of proof?

    You know, proof.

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 5:09 pm

    Gravatar

    I’ve personally heard from Web hosts who were approached by Microsoft, which offered discounts and even hardware subsidies

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_pricing

  14. twitter said,

    October 16, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    Gravatar

    M$ is indeed interested in subverting Apache.

    http://apache.slashdot.org/apache/08/07/25/2135202.shtml

  15. Betto said,

    October 16, 2008 at 6:24 pm

    Gravatar

    Oh, twitter from Slashdot is also here. Everyone should read this page, just in case:

    http://slashdot.org/~SockDisclosure/journal/

    @Roy,

    Another one of those “private communications” I gather? One of those “oh if only I could publish what I know but my life is in danger” situations? Like the mostly out of context quotes you paste on to your whack jobs, linking to some Wikipedia article is useless. But what the heck, here are some links of my own:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealot
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_exhaustion
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_verbosity
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shill
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalomania

    Enjoy :)

  16. Jose_X said,

    October 16, 2008 at 6:29 pm

    Gravatar

    Betto, I am not going to offer you proof.

    Microsoft has plenty of money and access to users to inflate numbers if they wanted to do so. Other companies can do the same. It does make sense, if you are after marketing points, to go after the biggest bang for buck and that would be with domains that were parked.

    In fact, Microsoft is proud of their cost-saving move:
    http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/mar06/03-21GoDaddyPR.mspx

    “Go Daddy to transition all its parked domains from Linux to Microsoft.”.. straight from the horses mouth, if you will.

    I guess that was proof. Sorry. I didn’t think it would be that easy.

    boycottnovell is not meant to be the alpha and omega. They post leads and discussion that many find useful.

  17. Betto said,

    October 16, 2008 at 6:49 pm

    Gravatar

    I’m sorry, I must have missed the part where that became evil, or somehow supports what Bruce “buy my FOSS patent insurance” Perens said. Can you clarify?

  18. Jose_X said,

    October 16, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    Gravatar

    The numbers and that move in particular are sold by some as indicative of the tech quality of linux vs windows server platforms.

    BPerens is saying that the reasons were for a business deal and not for tech reasons. What part of what he says bothers you so I can maybe look at that part closer?

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 16, 2008 at 7:23 pm

    Gravatar

    Betto, have you consideeds asking Perens himself?

  20. Betto said,

    October 16, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    Gravatar

    Ask Perens? Why, exactly? You’re the one using that quote to support your (bogus) argument.

  21. Betto said,

    October 16, 2008 at 8:51 pm

    Gravatar

    Why would something Perens said bother me? He stopped “bothering” me the day he started selling patent insurance.

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/6/2019: Linux Mint Vs Vista 10, Qt 5.13 Released

    Links for the day



  2. The Linux Foundation's Business Model

    The Linux Foundation's plan, illustrated



  3. Links 18/6/2019: i386 Abandoned by Canonical and a New osquery 'Community'

    Links for the day



  4. Indifference or Even Hostility Towards Patent Quality Results in Grave Injustice

    The patent extravaganza in Europe harms small businesses the most (they complain about it), but administrative staff at patent offices only cares about the views of prolific applicants rather than the interests of citizens in respective countries



  5. Links 18/6/2019: CentOS 8 Coming Soon, DragonFly BSD 5.6 Released

    Links for the day



  6. 'AI Taskforce' is Actually a Taskforce for Software Patents

    The mainstream media has been calling just about everything "HEY HI!" (AI), but what it typically refers to is a family of old algorithms being applied in possibly new areas; patent maximalists in eastern Asia and the West hope that this mainstream media's obsession can be leveraged to justify new kinds of patents on code



  7. Patent Maximalism is Dead in the United States

    Last-ditch efforts, or a desperate final attempt to water down 35 U.S.C. § 101, isn't succeeding; stacked panels are seen for what they really are and 35 U.S.C. § 101 isn't expected to change



  8. Links 18/6/2019: Linux 5.2 RC5 and OpenMandriva Lx 4

    Links for the day



  9. Weaponising Russophobia Against One's Critics

    Response to smears and various whispering campaigns whose sole purpose is to deplete the support base for particular causes and people; these sorts of things have gotten out of control in recent years



  10. When the EPO is Run by Politicians It's Expected to Be Aggressive and Corrupt Like Purely Political Establishments

    António 'Photo Op' Campinos will have marked his one-year anniversary in July; he has failed to demonstrate morality, respect for the law, understanding of the sciences, leadership by example and even the most basic honesty (he lies a lot)



  11. Links 16/6/2019: Tmax OS and New Features for KDE.org

    Links for the day



  12. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  13. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  14. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  15. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  16. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  17. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  18. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  19. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  20. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  21. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  22. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  23. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  24. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  25. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  26. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  27. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  28. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  29. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”



  30. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts