EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.22.08

Novell’s Michael Meeks Gets Software Patent from the UK

Posted in Europe, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Novell, Office Suites, OpenOffice, Patents, SUN at 1:18 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Software patents are a huge potential threat to the ability of people to work together on open source.”

Linus Torvalds

IT IS worth re-emphasising that while Novell purports to be an advocate of open source software (not Free software), its mixed-source claims [1, 2, 3, 4] take such ambition to task and Novell’s business is still overwhelmingly reliant on proprietary software. Moreover, Novell is not against software patents. In fact, it’s actively obtaining quite a few.

In recent days we have been writing about Symbian’s destruction of a saner legal system in the UK [1, 2, 3]. It is therefore interesting to find that Novell’s Michael Meeks, despite being based in the UK, is pursuing software patents in the USPTO, for Novell’s benefit and on their very own behalf.

Optimized decompression using annotated back buffer, patent No. 7,439,882, invented by Michael Meeks of Newmarket, U.K., assigned to Novell Inc. of Provo.

It’s a software patent. Bad stuff. Anyway, here is this new patent’s abstract:

A system and method for decompression optimization employing a data input and a dedicated back buffer and data parser. The system and method also relate to accelerating the parsing process during decompression of a block of data by taking advantage of those naturally occurring redundancies within the block of data identified at compression time. The system of the invention includes a parser and an annotated back buffer which operate collectively to optimize the parsing process during decompression.

Meeks is not alone, however. There is also this new patent:

System and method of associating objects in search results, patent No. 7,440,948, invented by Jon Eric Trowbridge of Chicago, Ill., and Nathaniel Dourif Friedman of Boston, Mass., assigned to Novell Inc. of Provo.

As suggested and later reported to us by a reader with inside information, Novell's patent portfolio by all mean matters. Speaking of Meeks, Novell is still trying to grab control of the 'Open Office' from Sun Microsystems (Novell already has its own fork). Thus far, it hasn't worked out too well for Novell, perhaps with the exception of GNU/LInux distributions.

Microsoft’s and Novell’s patents should not be ignored. They do matter because the companies might intend to use them, especially amidst difficult times. In response to apathy from Matt Asay, our own Shane Coyle wrote:

Wow, it’s been a while since anyone has tried to paint Novell as the party of advantage in their MS deal. My question is, if Novell’s patent portfolio is so great, how come there is no ongoing royalty from MS to Novell, as their certainly is on open source software shipped under the agreement by Novell?

The same type of unjustified apathy was noted by wallclimber, a respected lady in the Digg community), who wrote:

This really puzzles me. Matt Asay says he likes and respects Gutierrez and thinks he really does understand the issues. Yet, if that’s true, how can he justify respect for someone that still, apparently willingly (willfully?), grants an interview for the main purpose of spewing Microsoft’s insidious patent and IP FUD to the world?

I think Mr. Asay is being much too kind in assuming that an IP lawyer, employed by Microsoft, actually has a heart to begin with, much less knows where “the right place” is to put it.

Software patents are horrible. Yet it’s impossible to pretend they do not exist. Pretending alone does not make them go away. Protesting is more effective.

“I’m always happy when I’m protesting.”

Richard Stallman

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

15 Comments

  1. OO said,

    October 22, 2008 at 2:21 pm

    Gravatar

    All big software companies have software patent portfolios, not just Novell. Red Hat has several software patents and also has pending applications. For instance, Red Hat has this patent on atomic file look-ups: http://www.google.com/patents?id=wfAVAAAAEBAJ and this one on debugger tracepoints: http://www.google.com/patents?id=1osSAAAAEBAJ Novell and Red Hat have also both given some patents to the Open Invention Network so that those patents can be used to defend Linux from patent litigation.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 22, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    Gravatar

    I’m aware of this. This does not make it OK.

  3. colin said,

    October 22, 2008 at 2:45 pm

    Gravatar

    …and this doesn’t make it OK to single out a hard-working individual developer and try to spill dirt on his good name in your filthy blog!

    Bah.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 22, 2008 at 2:48 pm

    Gravatar

    I thought about omitting the name (I omitted it the last time), but that would not lead into the discussion about OOo.

  5. Dan O'Brian said,

    October 22, 2008 at 6:44 pm

    Gravatar

    If you actually read his blog, he notes:

    1. it won’t be used for anything other than defensive purposes
    2. he actively combats software patents

    Obtaining patents is not a sign that he is pro-Software Patents, it is simply a smart thing to do.

    Better that a responsible Free Software developer like Michael Meeks apply for the patent than someone who would be likely to use it for offensive purposes.

  6. Dan O'Brian said,

    October 22, 2008 at 6:47 pm

    Gravatar

    Wow, it’s been a while since anyone has tried to paint Novell as the party of advantage in their MS deal. My question is, if Novell’s patent portfolio is so great, how come there is no ongoing royalty from MS to Novell, as their certainly is on open source software shipped under the agreement by Novell?

    This quote just shows Shane’s ignorance. The massive quantities of money going from Microsoft to Novell is precisely because Microsoft is paying royalties to Novell. This fact is well documented for those willing to research.

  7. Dan O'Brian said,

    October 22, 2008 at 6:48 pm

    Gravatar

    Forgot to link to Michael Meeks’ blog earlier: http://www.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2008-10-22.html

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 22, 2008 at 6:57 pm

    Gravatar

    You can’t fight software patents by obtaining some. It’s nice to know he used to lobby against them though.

  9. Dan O'Brian said,

    October 22, 2008 at 8:02 pm

    Gravatar

    Actually, having patents helps when fighting against them. If you have no patents and complain about patents, it sounds like you are just a whiner. But if you have lots of patents and are sitting in a position of being able to nuke people off the face of the earth with your patent arsenal, and then lobby against patents – you are taken a lot more seriously because you actually have something to lose by getting rid of patents. If you have nothing to lose by getting rid of patents, but everything to gain – it just seems like you are fighting patents because you are in a position of weakness.

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 22, 2008 at 8:24 pm

    Gravatar

    I don’t really subscribe to this position. It’s like saying you are “just a little pregnant” and want an abortion.

  11. Dan O'Brian said,

    October 22, 2008 at 8:38 pm

    Gravatar

    No, it’s not. It’s called “arguing from a position of power” and it is one of the most effective means of arguing for something.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 22, 2008 at 8:43 pm

    Gravatar

    Microsoft is said to have about 10,000 USPTO-stamped pieces of paper. Should Novell try to match this and then “argue from a position of power?”

    Don’t fight fire with fire. Or fight a bonfire with a matchstick.. and a teaspoon.

  13. Dan O'Brian said,

    October 22, 2008 at 8:54 pm

    Gravatar

    It’s going to take more than just Novell to fight the patent system, hence why I’d also encourage Red Hat and other FLOSS companies to file for as many patents as they can.

    Another advantage of doing that is that they can more easily protect themselves and/or FLOSS itself from patent (or other) attacks from proprietary software companies. Granted, this will not help defend against patent troll companies, but it’s still a lot better than nothing.

    Patent trolls are also not the most dangerous sources of patent attacks, they usually only demand a small amount of cash (well, small for a company to pay) – the idea is that they want an out-of-court settlement because they know that if it goes to court, they stand a good chance of losing. By demanding less than what it’d cost a company to defend themselves in a court battle, they hope that their target will simply pay it. “Easy money”.

    Patent trolls are the most annoying, but they are unlikely to ever be able destroy any company.

    (I do agree with you, though, that patent trolling should be illegal and are a clear indication that the current patent system is broken).

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    October 22, 2008 at 9:04 pm

    Gravatar

    I’m glad that we agree on something, except for the earlier part (about embracing more patents rather than actually developing software).

    I believe we are at a crossroad now, particularly amid the economic collapse. The patent system too is almost imploding and patent literature online is clearly worried. To push the system over the cliff at these fragile times should not be as hard as you imagine. Just watch how EPO _STAFF_ took it to the streets against their own employers, accusing them — essentially — of corruption.

  15. Dan O'Brian said,

    October 22, 2008 at 10:46 pm

    Gravatar

    Let’s hope it is easier than I fear to get rid of software patents (and possibly patents in other fields as well).

What Else is New


  1. Microsoft and Its Patent Trolls Continue Their Patent War, Including the War on Linux

    Microsoft is still preying on GNU/Linux using patents, notably software patents; it wants billions of dollars served on a silver platter in spite of claims that it reached a “truce” by joining the Open Invention Network and joining the LOT Network



  2. Director Iancu Generally Viewed as a Lapdog of Patent Trolls

    As Director of the Office, Mr. Iancu, a Trump appointee, not only fails to curb patent trolls; he actively defends them and he lowers barriers in order to better equip them with bogus patents that courts would reject (if the targets of extortion could afford a day in court)



  3. Links 17/3/2019: Google Console and IBM-Red Hat Merger Delay?

    Links for the day



  4. To Team UPC the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Has Become a Joke and the European Patent Office (EPO) Never Mentions It Anymore

    The EPO's frantic rally to the very bottom of patent quality may be celebrated by obedient media and patent law firms; to people who actually produce innovative things, however, this should be a worrisome trend and thankfully courts are getting in the way of this nefarious agenda; one of these courts is the FCC in Germany



  5. Links 16/3/2019: Knoppix Release and SUSE Independence

    Links for the day



  6. Stopping António Campinos and His Software Patents Agenda (Not Legal in Europe) Would Require Independent Courts

    Software patents continue to be granted (new tricks, loopholes and buzzwords) and judges who can put an end to that are being actively assaulted by those who aren't supposed to have any authority whatsoever over them (for decisions to be impartially delivered)



  7. The Linux Foundation Needs to Speak Out Against Microsoft's Ongoing (Continued) Patent Shakedown of OEMs That Ship Linux

    Zemlin actively thanks Microsoft while taking Microsoft money; he meanwhile ignores how Microsoft viciously attacks Linux using patents, revealing the degree to which his foundation, the “Linux Foundation” (not about Linux anymore, better described as Zemlin’s PAC), has been compromised



  8. Links 15/3/2019: Linux 5.0.2, Sublime Text 3.2

    Links for the day



  9. The EPO and the USPTO Are Granting Fake Patents on Software, Knowing That Courts Would Reject These

    Office management encourages applicants to send over patent applications that are laughable while depriving examiners the freedom and the time they need to reject these; it means that loads of bogus patents are being granted, enshrined as weapons that trolls can use to extort small companies outside the courtroom



  10. CommunityBridge is a Cynical Microsoft-Funded Effort to Show Zemlin Works for 'Community', Not Microsoft

    After disbanding community participation in the Board (but there are Microsoft staff on the Board now) the "Linux Foundation" (or Zemlin PAC) continues to take Microsoft money and polishes or launders that as "community"



  11. Links 14/3/2019: GNOME 3.32 and Mesa 19.0.0 Released

    Links for the day



  12. EPO 'Results' Are, As Usual, Not Measured Correctly

    The supranational monopoly, a monopoly-granting authority, is being used by António Campinos to grant an insane amount of monopolies whose merit is dubious and whose impact on Europe will be a net negative



  13. Good News Everyone! UPC Ready to Go... in 2015!

    Benoît Battistelli is no longer in Office and his fantasy (patent lawyers' fantasy) is as elusive as ever; Team UPC is trying to associate opposition to UPC with the far right (AfD) once again



  14. Links 13/3/2019: Plasma 5.15.3,Chrome 73 and Many LF Press Releases

    Links for the day



  15. In the Age of Trumpism EFF Needs to Repeatedly Remind Director Iancu That He is Not a Judge and He Cannot Ignore the Courts

    The nonchalance and carelessness seen in Iancu's decision to just cherry-pick decisions/outcomes (basically ignoring caselaw) concerns technologists, who rightly view him as a 'mole' of the litigation 'industry' (which he came from)



  16. Links 12/3/2019: Sway 1.0 Released, Debian Feuds Carry On

    Links for the day



  17. Microsoft is Complaining About Android and Chrome OS (GNU/Linux) Vendor Not Paying for Microsoft Patents (Updated)

    Microsoft, which nowadays does the patent shakedown against GNU/Linux by proxy, is still moaning about companies that don’t pay ‘protection’ money (grounds for antitrust action or racketeering investigation)



  18. Watchtroll Has Redefined "Trolls" to Mean Those Who Oppose Software Patents (and Oppose Trolls), Not Those Who Leverage These for Blackmail Alone

    The controversial change to 35 U.S.C. § 101 guidance is being opposed by the public (US citizens who oppose American software patents), so patent maximalists like Janal Kalis (“PatentBuddy”) and extremists like Gene Quinn (Watchtroll) want us to believe that the public is just “EFF” and cannot think for itself



  19. EPO's Latest 'Results' Show That António Campinos Has Already Given Up on Patent Quality and is Just Another Battistelli

    The patent-granting machine that the EPO has become reports granting growth of unrealistic scale (unless no proper examination is actually carried out)



  20. Links 11/3/2019: Linux 5.0.1, Audacity 2.3.1, GNU Coreutils 8.31

    Links for the day



  21. US Patent Law Currently Not Changing Much and Software Patents Are Still in Limbo

    Surveying the news, as we still meticulously do (even if we don't write about it), it seems clear that American courts hardly tolerate software patents and proponents of such patents are losing their voice (or morale)



  22. EPO Examiner: “I Have Been Against Software Patents and Eventually 3/4 of My Job is Examining Software Patent Applications.”

    Overworked examiners aren't being given the time, the tools and the freedom to reject patents, based on prior art, patent scope and so on; it is beginning to resemble a rubber-stamping operation, not an examining authority



  23. Europe Will Pay a High Price for Software Patents Advocacy by António Campinos in Europe's Patent-Granting Authority

    EPO President António Campinos — like Iancu at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) — is still promoting software patents in Europe even though such patents are clearly detrimental to Europe’s interests



  24. António Campinos -- Like His Father -- Lacks Support From Colleagues, Endorsed Only From the Top

    History lessons from Wikileaks



  25. Links 10/3/2019: GNU and GNOME Releases

    Links for the day



  26. Koch Brothers' Oil Money is Poisoning Academia and Distorting Scholarly Work/Research on Patents

    Meddling in patent law by the Kochs, the oil tycoons who can be seen everywhere Conservative think tanks are, shows no signs of abatement



  27. From Patents on Chewing Gum to Toothpaste Patents: How the EPO Came to Focus on Speed and Volume, Not Quality

    There’s still no proper quality control in place for European Patents — a severe problem which will only further exacerbate the legal uncertainty associated with all European Patents



  28. European Patent Office Press Releases (Two in Two Days) Are Disguised as 'News' and Tell the Opposite of the Truth

    The Office under the 'new' and 'improved' leadership of António Campinos seems to be repeating the mistakes of Battistelli by discrediting anything it says; its press releases, characteristically dubbed "news" for some reason, bear no resemblance to reality and are detached from facts EPO insiders have long known



  29. Links 9/3/2019: International Women’s Day, QtLottie

    Links for the day



  30. António Campinos Will Not Tackle Any of the Lingering Issues at the European Patent Office

    A man of his war (or his master's war) rather than his word, Mr. Campinos makes it abundantly clear that patent quality issues are off the agenda and corruption persists without it ever being tackled


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts