EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.28.08

Is Novell Attacking OpenOffice.org Again?

Posted in Fork, Free/Libre Software, Microsoft, Novell, Office Suites, Open XML, OpenDocument, SUN at 5:52 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Reuse of old trash

Novell or its lackeys might be spreading old posts from months ago at this very moment. Why else would such old ‘news’ reach the front page of Slashdot and Digg despite being a repetition and a duplicate? The modified headline is “Michael Meeks Says OO.o Project is “Profoundly Sick”.” What a nice Christmas gift from Novell to the company which did much of the heavy lifting.

We mentioned this yesterday and we wrote about it at the time when it was first published. A couple of months later, wrote Anivar Aravind: “Novell was mainly promoting their fork of OpenOffice 3.0 (after they implemented notorious OOXML support & forked it after OOO3 moved to to LGPLv3)& SUSE in their stall. Most of the participants in the Conference were newbies and Novell is the only GNU/Linux distro widely promoted in the exhibition. Our protest is not targeted at Organizers or Novell. It was just a way to spread awareness on Novell’s evil trends through the posters to protect new users being misguided.”

One of our readers points out that “Meeks isn’t even an OOo developer. He’s be working on a hostile fork. The fork has been used to inject Microsoft technology and to attack Sun. It’s time to point out publicly again that Meeks is not an OOo developer.”

We’ll write some more about it later. Microsoft hopes to eliminate competition such as Java — via gradual weakening of Sun — because lacking competition means that they can set the rules. Internet Explorer and Netscape are good examples of such battles. It’s worth remembering that Novell promotes Microsoft technologies (it supports ActiveX, Windows Vista, Internet Explorer, .NET, and even XAML).

Novell seems to be spending an awful lot of time attacking Red Hat and Sun/OpenOffice.org rather than Windows and Microsoft Office, respectively. That’s the price to pay for allowing Novell to become a Microsoft ally.

Novell gets 'bribed'

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

23 Comments

  1. AlexH said,

    December 28, 2008 at 6:29 pm

    Gravatar

    Perhaps it’s not reaching the front pages because the person submitting it is a “lackey” or somehow on the payroll. Perhaps people are genuinely concerned.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 6:34 pm

    Gravatar

    This is old ‘news’ and it may take gaming to push it into the front pages (Digg are Slashdot are train wrecks because admins told me yesterday that they get gamed by Microsoft and agencies it employs).

  3. AlexH said,

    December 28, 2008 at 6:40 pm

    Gravatar

    With absolutely no evidence that Novell or any of their “lackeys” are doing it, it seems a bit premature to me to be accusing them of it.

    But then, I’m a bit of a stickler when it comes to calling people names.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 6:46 pm

    Gravatar

    That’s why I wrote “might be”.

  5. AlexH said,

    December 28, 2008 at 6:48 pm

    Gravatar

    Prefacing an accusation, name call or insult with an uncertainty doesn’t make it ok. Generally people like to have at least inconclusive evidence.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 7:00 pm

    Gravatar

    A friend of mine is having a look at it.

  7. AlexH said,

    December 28, 2008 at 7:03 pm

    Gravatar

    Guilty until we’re unable to find any evidence?

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 7:09 pm

    Gravatar

    No, “might be” guilty.

  9. AlexH said,

    December 28, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    Gravatar

    Oh, that’s ok then! Might be guilty until proven innocent, much better :D

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 28, 2008 at 7:28 pm

    Gravatar

    Novell’s marketing history does not inspire much confidence.

  11. G. Michaels said,

    December 28, 2008 at 8:23 pm

    Gravatar

    Digg are Slashdot are train wrecks because admins told me yesterday that they get gamed by Microsoft and agencies it employs

    Do you have proof of this? Which admins? Of which site?

    Believe me, if you provide actual proof of this, my perception of your activities will certainly change, no question about it.

    Until then though, you’re just playing the poor saps who read your website and are ready and willing to believe anything negative you say about Microsoft. Just a lot of arm-waiving, chest-thumping and hot air, as it were.

    Or is this one of those emails you “can’t disclose” for mysterious reasons?

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  12. Goblin said,

    December 28, 2008 at 9:17 pm

    Gravatar

    Quote Mr Michaels “Until then though, you’re just playing the poor saps who read your website and are ready and willing to believe anything negative you say about Microsoft. Just a lot of arm-waiving, chest-thumping and hot air, as it were.”

    I presume you are refering to me.
    Funny you never made a comment on Roys post about the Microsoft Shill allegations.

    For the record, My personal negativity about MS stems from the allegations of its online tactics, the binary slug of Vista and the muscling in and IMO bullying of anything it sees which supports healthy alternative idealogy.

    Mr Michaels I do not agree with everything Roy says, for example our views on Joe Wilcox differ, thats ok though. Unlike you we can discuss our differences in a mature manner without resorting to petty statements and internet stalking.

    Im sorry Roy, I know you say we shouldnt feed em, but I did want to make that clear to him.

  13. Dan O'Brian said,

    December 28, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy accuses people left and right of being Microsoft shills, but never has any sort of evidence to back it up.

    Even Shane Coyle, the guy that started this site, has pointed out that Roy’s “Microsoft shill” accusations are baseless and because of the embarrassment that Roy’s posts are, has decided to abandon this site so as to avoid having his name associated with it (have you noticed he took down his image on the front page?)

  14. G. Michaels said,

    December 28, 2008 at 9:45 pm

    Gravatar

    @Goblin,

    No, that wouldn’t be you. It’s clear that you’ve already made up your mind in this particular matter, and as long as that perception is based on solid, factual evidence and does not involve fantasies, then I certainly respect it.

    The “poor saps” are the demographic to which this website pontificates with lies, fabrications, chicken little predictions of doom based on nothing more than personal agendas and attention-grabbing disingenuous headlines and personal attacks. Not to mention the clever lolcat creations.

    Disliking or criticizing an entity like a corporation is each person’s prerogative. Making shit up about them however, and engaging in the same sort of tactics you accuse them of using against you are another matter altogether. That’s when you start doing more damage than good, I think.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  15. Goblin said,

    December 28, 2008 at 9:56 pm

    Gravatar

    Quote Mr Michaels “Disliking or criticizing an entity like a corporation is each person’s prerogative. Making shit up about them however, and engaging in the same sort of tactics you accuse them of using against you are another matter altogether. That’s when you start doing more damage than good, I think”

    and Id entirely agree with you. Roy doesnt do that though. As Ive said before I believe myself a decent judge of character, on IRC once I used the term Anti-MS and Roy challenged it (and rightfully so) I dont believe there is any other motive than an honest held belief on behalf on Roy.

    I couldnt comment on why/if Shane left, I dont know and I hadnt noticed he had gone.

    Mr Michaels, if youre able Id like you to go over to MSwatch and see examples of people who insult, belittle and bring into question my sexuality simply because I have a different viewpoint. Id like you to see the poster who appears homophobic, and the poster who claims Im sexist, merely because I want to put a freedom of choice message over.

    Roy has knowledge of the inner workings of business way in advance of my own. I simply support the “freedom of choice” cause in my own little way by challenging inappropriate behaviour and downright false information.

  16. G. Michaels said,

    December 28, 2008 at 11:34 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy doesnt do that though. As Ive said before I believe myself a decent judge of character, on IRC once I used the term Anti-MS and Roy challenged it (and rightfully so)

    That’s because it’s detrimental to his “SLOG”, but that’s what he is. Notice the name of this website, and then tell me that the weekly post about the MSFT stock price is not simply “anti-MS”. And a hundred other examples.

    I couldnt comment on why/if Shane left, I dont know and I hadnt noticed he had gone.

    I don’t think you understand the significance of that. Shane registered the domain, he hosts the site on his dime, he invited Roy to post here. And then it was turned into a circus, because Roy can’t help himself.

    Mr Michaels, if youre able Id like you to go over to MSwatch and see examples of people who insult, belittle and bring into question my sexuality simply because I have a different viewpoint.

    I don’t doubt that. There are idiots on both sides of the fence. I saw that during the early .NET-Java wars in 2000-2003.

    Roy has knowledge of the inner workings of business way in advance of my own.

    No, he doesn’t. Roy is a kid in his mid-20s who has never had a meaningful job in IT, anywhere. Now that’s not a requirement to being a FOSS advocate, but when you get into why companies are allegedly dumping Novell because of a deal with Microsoft, you’re just putting yourself between a rock and a hard place. That’s just one of his problems.

    I simply support the “freedom of choice” cause in my own little way by challenging inappropriate behaviour and downright false information.

    If that’s the case, again, based on reality and facts, then more power to you. It’s not like Microsoft is some angelical entity that has never done any wrong.

    (OT, when Roy fires up WP to append his silly red text to this post, I’d like for him to read this post he made to Digg, which adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against people, on another website. Hypocrisy is fantastic!)

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  17. Goblin said,

    December 29, 2008 at 6:46 am

    Gravatar

    Quote Mr Michaels “…. the name of this website, and then tell me that the weekly post about the MSFT stock price is not simply “anti-MS”. ”

    But thats hardly on the same par as some of the tactics MS is alleged to have used. Its not like he’s making up the stock price or anything. We can all find up to the minute news on MS price if we want to.

    Quote Mr Michaels “No, he doesn’t. Roy is a kid in his mid-20s who has never had a meaningful job in IT, anywhere. Now that’s not a requirement to being a FOSS advocate, but when you get into why companies are allegedly dumping Novell because of a deal with Microsoft, you’re just putting yourself between a rock and a hard place. That’s just one of his problems.”

    If that was true then wouldnt the Linux press in general distance themselves from him? Wouldnt he just be known as a “mainstream joke”? What I see is many other sites holding Roy in high regard.
    I see other sites giving time to mention his work. When I met Roy on IRC, I didnt find him to be anything other than friendly and informed. I should not really be posting about him, as he is a modest individual, but it does get me cross when Roy is insulted merely for putting alot of work into something for which he has an honest held belief.

    Regardless of peoples opinions (and we all differ) the Boycott Novell site is certainly “food for thought” and interesting. Ive certainly been enlightened on certain subjects and understood a little more in regards to the inner working of business and in particular the IT industry.

  18. stevetheFLY said,

    December 29, 2008 at 7:18 am

    Gravatar

    Roy ‘in high regard’? Nobody with a name in FOSS would touch him with a six-inch-pole!

    He really is the craziest of all the tinfoil-hatters out there; that’s why not even his former associate wants Roy’s name next to his own anymore.

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  19. stevetheFLY said,

    December 29, 2008 at 7:20 am

    Gravatar

    BTW, search his archives a bit and you’ll find he accuses the GNOME project of following Microsoft’s directions and personally accused/abused high-ranking board-members of corruption! Now, that’s the kind of person you don’t want to be associated with FOSS!

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  20. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 9:08 am

    Gravatar

    Hey, “eet”. Are you somehow associated with Novell? You have been attacking Novell critics across the Web for a very long time, and not just in here.

  21. Victor Soliz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 11:59 am

    Gravatar

    Aw eet and dan, if those things you say were true, wouldn’t you quite be losing all your dignity with these posts that are so insistent to attack a guy that according to you has already no credibility? Why do you waste your life like this?

  22. Goblin said,

    December 29, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Gravatar

    Good point Victor. The only people who believe the rubbish that users like stevethefly spout are themselves.

    If as some say Roy is not respected, then this site would not get the hits it does nor would people feel the need to post and insult him. That in itself is a compliment and shows that the message Roy puts out has people worried and is hitting on some home truths.

  23. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 29, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    Gravatar

    The hecklers do their own embarrassment, but they can’t help it. They should know that the best way to fight information is to ignore it. SCO found this out the hard way when it began turning its back on Groklaw several years ago.

    A reader mailed me this some minutes ago:

    “I was amused to see G. Michaels’ post where he gloatingly points out a post you made to Digg which consists of a couple of URLs pointing back to BN. The subject is Rob Enderle and he thought he was making a point that you are stalking someone. I didn’t see how that link supports his argument. In fact, it’s an “own goal” in that it actually reinforces the point you make that there are shills out there. &ltsarcasm>Maybe you don’t need any supporters with “enemies” like that.&lt/sarcasm>”

    Message to “eet” et al: you’ll do yourself a favour by just leaving Web sites that you hate. The Internet is a big place, and it keeps growing.

What Else is New


  1. Stuffed/Stacked Panels Sent Back Packing After One-Sided Patent Hearings That Will Convince Nobody, Just Preach to the Choir

    Almost a week ago the 'world tour' of patent lobbyists in US Senate finally ended; it was an utterly ridiculous case study in panel stacking and bribery (attempts to buy laws)



  2. 2019 H1: American Software Patents Are as Worthless as They Were Last Year and Still Susceptible to Invalidation

    With a fortnight left before the second half of the year it seems evident that software patents aren't coming back; the courts have not changed their position at all



  3. As European Patent Office Management Covers up Collapse in Patent Quality Don't Expect UPC to Ever Kick Off

    It would be madness to allow EPO-granted patents to become 'unitary' (bypassing sovereignty of nations that actually still value patent quality); it seems clear that rogue EPO management has, in effect, not only doomed UPC ambitions but also European Patents (or their perceived legitimacy, presumption of validity)



  4. António Campinos -- Unlike His Father -- Engages in Imperialism (Using Invalid Patents)

    Despite some similarities to his father (not positive similarities), António Campinos is actively engaged in imperialistic agenda that defies even European law; the EPO not only illegally grants patents but also urges other patent offices to do the same



  5. António Campinos Takes EPO Waste and Corruption to Unprecedented Levels and Scale

    The “B” word (billions) is thrown around at Europe’s second-largest institution because a mischievous former EUIPO chief (not Archambeau) is ‘partying’ with about half of the EPO’s all-time savings, which are supposed to be reserved for pensions and other vital programmes, not presidential palaces and gambling



  6. Links 15/6/2019: Astra Linux in Russia, FreeBSD 11.3 RC

    Links for the day



  7. Code of Conduct Explained: Partial Transcript - August 10th, 2018 - Episode 80, The Truth About Southeast Linuxfest

    "Ask Noah" and the debate on how a 'Code of Conduct' is forcibly imposed on events



  8. Links 14/6/2019: Xfce-Related Releases, PHP 7.4.0 Alpha

    Links for the day



  9. The EPO is a Patent Troll's Wet Dream

    The makers of software and games in Europe will have to spend a lot of money just keeping patent trolls off their backs — a fact that seems to never bother EPO management because it profits from it



  10. EPO Spreading Patent Extremists' Ideology to the Whole World, Now to South Korea

    The EPO’s footprint around the world's patent systems is an exceptionally dangerous one; The EPO amplifies the most zealous voices of the patents and litigation ‘industry’ while totally ignoring the views and interests of the European public, rendering the EPO an ‘agent of corporate occupation’



  11. Guest Post: Notes on Free Speech, and a Line in the Sand

    We received this anonymous letter and have published it as a follow-up to "Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF"



  12. Links 13/6/2019: CERN Dumps Microsoft, GIMP 2.10.12 Released

    Links for the day



  13. Links 12/6/2019: Mesa 19.1.0, KDE neon 5.16, Endless OS 3.6.0 and BackBox Linux 6

    Links for the day



  14. Leaked Financial 'Study' Document Shows EPO Management and Mercer Engaging in an Elaborate “Hoax”

    How the European Patent Office (EPO) lies to its own staff to harm that staff; thankfully, the staff isn't easily fooled and this whole affair will merely obliterate any remnants of "benefit of the doubt" the President thus far enjoyed



  15. Measuring Patent Quality and Employer Quality in Europe

    Comparing the once-famous and respected EPO to today's joke of an office, which grants loads of bogus patents on just about anything including fruit and mathematics



  16. Granting More Fundamentally Wrong Patents Will Mean Reduced Certainty, Not Increased Certainty

    Law firms that are accustomed to making money from low-quality and abstract patents try to overcome barriers by bribing politicians; this will backfire because they show sheer disregard for the patent system's integrity and merely lower the legal certainty associated with granted (by greedy offices) patents



  17. Links 11/6/2019: Wine 4.10, Plasma 5.16

    Links for the day



  18. Chapter 10: Moving Forward -- Getting the Best Results From Open Source With Your Monopoly

    “the gradual shift in public consciousness from their branding towards our own, is the next best thing to owning them outright.”



  19. Chapter 9: Ownership Through Branding -- Change the Names, and Change the World

    The goal for those fighting against Open source, against the true openness (let's call it the yet unexploited opportunities) of Open source, has to be first to figuratively own the Linux brand, then literally own or destroy the brand, then to move the public awareness of the Linux brand to something like Azure, or whatever IBM is going to do with Red Hat.



  20. Links 10/6/2019: VLC 3.0.7, KDE Future Plans

    Links for the day



  21. Patent Quality Continues to Slip in Europe and We Know Who Will Profit From That (and Distract From It)

    The corporate media and large companies don't speak about it (like Red Hat did before entering a relationship with IBM), but Europe is being littered and saturated with a lot of bogus software patents -- abstract patents that European courts would almost certainly throw out; this utter failure of the media to do journalism gets exploited by the "big litigation" lobby and EPO management that's granting loads of invalid European Patents (whose invalidation goes underreported or unreported in the media)



  22. Corporate Front Groups Like OIN and the Linux Foundation Need to Combat Software Patents If They Really Care About Linux

    The absurdity of having groups that claim to defend Linux but in practice defend software patents, if not actively then passively (by refusing to comment on this matter)



  23. Links 9/6/2019: Arrest of Microsoft Peter, Linux 5.2 RC4, Ubuntu Touch Update

    Links for the day



  24. Chapter 8: A Foot in the Door -- How to Train Sympathetic Developers and Infiltrate Other Projects

    How to train sympathetic developers and infiltrate other projects



  25. Chapter 7: Patent War -- Use Low-Quality Patents to Prove That All Software Rips Off Your Company

    Patents in the United States last for 20 years from the time of filing. Prior to 1994, the patent term was 17 years from when the patent was issued.



  26. The Linux Foundation in 2019: Over 100 Million Dollars in Income, But Cannot Maintain Linux.com?

    Today’s Linux Foundation gets about 0.1 billion dollars per year (as explained in our previous post), so why can’t it spend about 0.1% of that money on people who write for and maintain a site that actually promotes GNU/Linux?



  27. Microsoft and Proprietary Software Vendors a Financial Boon for the Linux Foundation, But at What Cost?

    The Linux Foundation is thriving financially, but the sources of income are diversified to the point where the Linux Foundation is actually funded by foes of Linux, defeating the very purpose or direction of such a nonprofit foundation (led by self-serving millionaires who don't use GNU/Linux)



  28. The Linux Foundation as a Facilitator of Microsoft's Abduction of Developers (for GitHub, Azure, Visual Studio and Windows)

    There’s a profoundly disturbing pattern; in a rush for influence and money the Linux Foundation inadvertently (or worse — consciously and deliberately) paved the way to Microsoft’s more modern version of Embrace, Extend, Extinguish (EEE)



  29. Links 8/6/2019: FreeBSD 11.3 Beta 3, Git 2.22.0 and IPFire 2.23

    Links for the day



  30. Microsoft Peter is a Pedophile, Arrested Without Bail

    "Microsoft Peter" turns out to be a very sick man, much like people who apply for a job at Microsoft, knowing the company's dirty dealings and crimes


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts