EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.16.09

EDGI Finale: Microsoft’s “Linux Compete Squad”

Posted in America, Antitrust, Asia, Deception, FUD, GNU/Linux, Microsoft at 2:02 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

EDGI slide

THIS IS likely to be the last post in this series which explores Microsoft’s initiative against GNU/Linux in government and education. Previous parts include:

Today we cover Comes vs Microsoft Exhibit px08592 (September 2002) [PDF]. It is included as text in the Appendix, but here are key observations.

Studies of GNU/Linux penetration in different countries are presented, based on some surveys. There are charts to show this, but the B&W (greyscale) scans make them impossible to read.

Then there are many talking points against Linux and other competitors. This includes FUD like:

Measurement (Linux + StarOffice) Result
Deployment Success 2/3 IT Pros Could Not Complete Installation
Deployment Time Avg. 57% More Time to Deploy than Windows
Document Compatibility 35.3% of Office Docs Opened in StarOffice Had Errors
Top 11 Office Tasks StarOffice Tasks Took 2.7 Times Longer

eTesting Labs, AIR

- Myth: Linux costs 2X-3X less than Windows

- Reality: Windows costs ~30% less per year

This firm, eTesting Labs, seems to be doing work for Microsoft.

We will soon show more exhibits where Microsoft negotiates with Gartner and/or IDC for the sponsored, slanted TCO study referred to in this exhibit. It was secretly linked to a desktop Windows price break deal. This would not be the last such case because in another court case Gartner is shown negotiating Vista coverage with Microsoft. IDC does the same sorts of things and it’s a typical routine which involves Microsoft.

IDG and Gartner are quoted in page 9 of this exhibit:

“Sun has not yet provided a compelling vision for how StarOffice will integrate into the Enterprise” – Giga

“Some of the concerns with Linux – such as staffing costs, a lack of in-house Linux expertise, and the difficulty of managing this operating system – will continue to be significant barriers to desktop adoption.”
-IDC

“For widespread desktop use, Linux faces hurdles. A new, albeit intuitive, user interface many be among the least of these …. Distribution, support, availability of peripherals and application readiness is a greater challenge. As with all uses of Linux, business customers need to look at vendor direction and support issues when considering Linux.” – Gartner

“[Linux] backers have faliled to produce the vital elements of a viable desktop operating environment: a good user interface and a suite of applications that users want and that create files compatible with the applications of most other users to whom they are connected” – IDC

Sooner or later we shall shed some more light on IDC and Gartner, both of which are corruptible and influenced by Microsoft. They occasionally attack Free software, unsurprisingly.

Additional market data was put into this presentation and “The Linux Desktop Playbook” has a reference to EDGI, which starts on page 10.

Pages 12-13 contain concrete field examples, EDGI “wins” with amounts of money committed/spent in Mexico, Malaysia, Egypt, and Tunisia; Jordan pending at the time.

India is obliquely referred to on page 14. “BRIC” stands for “Brazil-Russia-India-China”.

From the “Linux Desktop Playbook”:

Its important to engage with the proper BDMs on a business level discussion and not get caught up with technical folks in a religious discussion.

We saw lots of this in the OOXML fiasco. Microsoft did not want to talk about technical things, so it sent non-technical people.

Then they use IDC and Gartner as ammunition, along with EDGI:

A Linux costs less Just because the software license cost is free, doesn’t mean the cost of using Linux Is less than Windows When you consider both direct costs (additional deployment, management, support costs) and indirect costs (end user down time, loss of productivity, etc ) Linux costs more than Windows!

- Show customers existing TCO and business value data for Windows XP. There is a lot of data showing good ROI when moving from Win98 to Win XP. A Gartner audited TCO study completed in the City of Vassa, Finland (home country of Linux Torvalds) showed that moving to Windows XP/Office XP would save 31% per PC, per years compared to Red Hat and Open Office. If the customer still pushes back on costs, move to next step

-TCO challenge. The Windows Client PMG is offering to the field to fund 20 Gartner audited Linux desktop TCO studies in FY03 (5 per region. We will send in someone from MSC to perform a detailed cost analysis of Linux vs Windows XP using a Gartner approved TCO methodology. Since we will use the customer’s own data — there can be no arguing the results. Gartner will audit each study to approve the specific results from each company. If the customer still pushes back . .

- EDGI. This program is for Education and Government customers who face significant budget constraints. It is designed to allow relief to the customers when purchasing Windows. More details coming

This ‘bought’ study from Garner was conducted in the home of “Linux Torvalds”, according to Microsoft.

Another common fallacy/FUD then appears, regarding access to source code:

-Linux touts open source as a key advantage. The reality is that most customers would never work directly with the source code and compile the system themselves – that would be like taking on the role of system integrator or OS vendor themselves.

That’s a lie because one needs only to rely on other programmers or even forking with shared resources. Microsoft mentioned visibility of its code in special circumstance, but that totally misses the point.

Slide 11 mentions CompHot and EDGI again. According to Microsoft , CompHot is the emergency address to fight “Linux infestations”.

- Linux desktop virtual team
- CompHot escalations weekly review
  - EDGI request escalations
- Linux compete squad – billv
- International desktop OS tracker

“Linux compete squad,” it says…

Who is alias “billv”?

Here are details of what Microsoft did, as per slide 12. They target Linux migrations on just about anything, even points of sale and embedded.

Linux Desktop Field Escalations

36 Escalations, 18 Active, 14 De-escalated, 1 Loss, 3 Wins

- Linux and StarOffice – 5 Active, 1 Deescalated
   - Active Telstra, Bank of Ireland, First Community Bank, Indiana Web Academy, Standard Bank (South Africa)
- Linux OS – 3 Active, 2 De-escalated
   - Active. ABM Amro (Workstation), ETC (Columbian Telco) and SBC Communications
- Linux POS – 5 Active, 2 De-escalated
   - ChevronTexaco, Arrefour, Hollywood Video, CSK Auto, Waitrose Supermarkets
- Linux Embedded – 3 Active, 8 De-escalated, 1 Loss, 1 Win
   - Active: Accent/FireKing – security for Taco Bell and others – close to winning. Safeway – smart clients in shopping carts
   - Loss. VOPAK – Linux embedded on PC option – up to biz units to select
   - Win Royal Carribean Cruise Lines – IBM Linux on client and server
- EDGI – 1 Active, 2 Wins
   - Active. Jordan. Wins. Egypt, Tunisia
   - Mexico and Malaysia EDGI deals were not escalated via CompHot
- StarOffice on Windows – 1 Active
   - Dept of Homeland Security – 170,000 seats, McNealy involved
- OS/2 Migration to Linux – 1 De-escalated

So EDGI was used against Jordan, Egypt, Tunisia, Mexico and Malaysia.

The next slide gives a detailed breakdown:

Reactive EDGI Results To Date

- Mexico- $2.5MM ¢committed, adding $25MM to MS
   - Govt-financed PC purchase for home teacher use with Windows XP Home
   - 250K PCs from Acer, iBM, and HP
   - Govt was considering Linux and Win98 due to cost
   - EDGI distributed $10/PC to be used for teacher training
   - Additional purchase of $60/PC for Office, Encarta, and Encarta interactive
- Malaysia – $500K committed, waiting for govt decision
   - EDGI used as delivery mechanism for previous exec commitments
   - Funds used for rural schools, teacher training, non-bootable software
- Egypt – $355K committed, addl $500K to MS, $1 2M to MS over 2yrs
   - EDGI used as delivery mechanism for previous exec committees
   - Govt purchased 6250 PCs at full price, 4166 PCs w/ 100% Windows rebate
- Tunisia – $600K committed, addl $600K to MS
   - Wave 2 of govt-financed purchases of 15K home PCs. Wave 1 was Windows-only, but wave 2 offer includes Linux PCs for $60 per PC less to the end user
   - EDGI contributed $40/PC -$15 end user rebate. $20 sys builder joint mktg, and $5 end user mktg
- Jordan – Pending
   - Ministry of education purchase of 8K PCs, considering Linux
   - We are still working through operational logistics

According to this, they even use government funds to stick Windows into the homes of teachers. Later on we hear about students who complain about their non-Windows laptops. It’s inbred. Student are pushed into it whilst teachers impose it.


Appendix: Comes vs. Microsoft – exhibit px08592, as text


Linux Desktop Update and Brainstorm

Pat Fox
Alain Meeus
Manish Sharma
9/11/02

Plaintiff’s Exhibit

8592

Comes V. Microsoft

HS-CC-Sun 000001220079
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


OS share of installed base

[See figure in original PDF]

- Windows XP has low perpetration in all countries — greatest in Sorgs
- Windows 2000 still not dominant in any segment in any country
   -France is making headway
- Very high 9x use in India. Korea, Russia (where NT4 was not localized), Mexico and Japan
- NT4 dominates amongst Lergs and Morgs in France and Germany

Q1/Q5 What operating systems are running on your organization’s desktop/portable computers?
9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

- Note – NT4 was not localized in every market (China, Korea, Russia)

MS-CC-Sun 000001220080
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Intent to evaluate Linux

[See figure in original PDF]

-Sorg evaluation of WinXP generally trails M/Lorgs
-Poor ration (for Linux) of won’t deploy to will deploy
-Lorg
   - Low evaluation in Korea, India, US and Canada
   - High evaluation in Russia, China and Mexico
   - Poor ratios in UK, Mexico and Canada
-Morgs
   - Low evaluation in Korea, India, UK
   - High evaluation in Russia and US
   - Poor ratios in Germany and China
-Sorgs
   - Low evaluation in Korea
   - High evaluation in China dn Russia

Q56 Which of the following bets describes your company’s plans for Linux as a desktop operating system
9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220081
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Expect OS to change

[See figure in original PDF]

- Move io 2000 is equally or more popular than XP — Korea Is an exception

- Move to Linux of concem in lnslian Morgs- -20% of Morgs expecting to change plan to change to Linuc

- “Other’ ¢ategory is large in some places — these will be called out in country reports but mostly consist of earlier versions of Windows

Q15 Are you expecting some other OS to become your primary computer OS in the next 6-12 months?
Q16 Which operating system

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220082
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


MGB Winning Messages!

Windows is a better platform

Windows is a better value

Windows enables greatest choice

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidentiall

MS-CC-Sun 000001220083
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Desktop: Better Platform

-Better user experience
  -Familiar and consistent interface
  -Office: Shorter task completion times
  -Office: Proven compatibility
  -Office: Full support for XML and web services

-More powerful
  -Integrated and comprehensive mobility, digital media, collaboration technologies

-Safer bet for the future
  -Well defined roadmap & constant investment
  -Single point of accountability

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220084
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Desktop: Better Value

Measurement (Linux + StarOffice) Result
Deployment Success 2/3 IT Pros Could Not Complete Installation
Deployment Time Avg. 57% More Time to Deploy than Windows
Document Compatibility 35.3% of Office Docs Opened in StarOffice Had Errors
Top 11 Office Tasks StarOffice Tasks Took 2.7 Times Longer

eTesting Labs, AIR

- Myth: Linux costs 2X-3X less than Windows

- Reality: Windows costs ~30% less per year

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220085
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Desktop: Greatest Choice

- Largest number of applications

  - >4000 apps tested by Microsoft w~th Windows XP
  - Many, many more available

- Largest number of devices

  - 12,000+ device drivers on the XP CD

  - 41,000 devices submitted to WHQL

- Broader availability of services

  - >450,000 MCSE professionals world-wide

- More training options

  - Wide range of Microsoft certified training courses
  - Many Microsofl certified training providers

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220086
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Desktop: What The Analysts Say

“Sun has not yet provided a compelling vision for how StarOffice will integrate into the Enterprise” – Giga

“Some of the concerns with Linux – such as staffing costs, a lack of in-house Linux expertise, and the difficulty of managing this operating system – will continue to be significant barriers to desktop adoption.”
-IDC

“For widespread desktop use, Linux faces hurdles. A new, albeit intuitive, user interface many be among the least of these …. Distribution, support, availability of peripherals and application readiness is a greater challenge. As with all uses of Linux, business customers need to look at vendor direction and support issues when considering Linux.” – Gartner

“[Linux] backers have faliled to produce the vital elements of a viable desktop operating environment: a good user interface and a suite of applications that users want and that create files compatible with the applications of most other users to whom they are connected” – IDC

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220087
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


The Linux Desktop Playbook

1. Know the status of Linux in your accoutns
2. Sell Window’s strengths to BDMs
  - 3 desktop pillars
     > Better Platform
     > Better Value
     > Greater Choice
3.Sell solutions – better together with Office & Server
4. Debunk Linux myths
     > Linux costs less
      - TCO/Biz value data
      - Biz Value challenge
      - EDGI
     > Linux is “Good enough”
      - Compare w/GUI
      - TS client solution
     > Need Open source
      - MS shared source
5. Escalate!

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

This playbook outlines the progressive steps the field should take when selling against Linux on the desktop

1 Know the status of Linux your your accounts
   – Point out that each subsidiary should have a method to track Linux threats and that these should be reported back to Redmond.
2 Sell Windows strengths to BDMs
  - Its important to engage with the proper BDMs on a business level discussion and not get caught up with technical folks in a religious discussion.
  - See the hidden shale for more details on the 3 pillars or the Windows XP vs Linux positioning doc
3 Sell solutions – better together with Office and Server
   – We have a much more robust platform elevate the discussion beyond the OS if appropriate.
4 Debunk Linux myths
A Linux costs less Just because the software license cost is free, doesn’t mean the cost of using Linux Is less than Windows When you consider both direct costs (additional deployment, management, support costs) and indirect costs (end user down time, loss of productivity, etc ) Linux costs more than Windows!

- Show customers existing TCO and business value data for Windows XP. There is a lot of data showing good ROI when moving from Win98 to Win XP. A Gartner audited TCO study completed in the City of Vassa, Finland (home country of Linux Torvalds) showed that moving to Windows XP/Office XP would save 31% per PC, per years compared to Red Hat and Open Office. If the customer still pushes back on costs, move to next step

-TCO challenge. The Windows Client PMG is offering to the field to fund 20 Gartner audited Linux desktop TCO studies in FY03 (5 per region. We will send in someone from MSC to perform a detailed cost analysis of Linux vs Windows XP using a Gartner approved TCO methodology. Since we will use the customer’s own data — there can be no arguing the results. Gartner will audit each study to approve the specific results from each company. If the customer still pushes back . .

- EDGI. This program is for Education and Government customers who face significant budget constraints. It is designed to allow relief to the customers when purchasing Windows. More details coming

B Customer needs Open Source

-Linux touts open source as a key advantage. The reality is that most customers would never work directly with the source code and compile the system themselves – that would be like taking on the role of system integrator or OS vendor themselves. Microsoft has a variety of shared source programs for enterprise academic and government customers and system integrators. These programs allow customers to access Windows source code. These programs provide many benefits by allowing customers to facilitate security and privacy audits,
performance tune applications, and improve Internal support and troubleshooting capabilities of Windows systems

C Linux has lower hardware requirements

- There is a myth that Linux has much lower hardware requirements than Windows However, if you run Linux with a GUI, which all desktops would, they are quite comparable. Red Hat Linux 7.2 system reqs are: Pentium 200MHz + recommended, 64MB RAM min for GUl 96MB RAM recommended for GUI. Windows XP Professional system recs are Pentium 233MHz min

MS-CC-Sun 000001220088
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Processes in Place

- Linux desktop virtual team
- CompHot escalations weekly review
  - EDGI request escalations
- Linux compete squad – billv
- International desktop OS tracker

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220089
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Linux Desktop Field Escalations

36 Escalations, 18 Active, 14 De-escalated, 1 Loss, 3 Wins

- Linux and StarOffice – 5 Active, 1 Deescalated
   - Active Telstra, Bank of Ireland, First Community Bank, Indiana Web Academy, Standard Bank (South Africa)
- Linux OS – 3 Active, 2 De-escalated
   - Active. ABM Amro (Workstation), ETC (Columbian Telco) and SBC Communications
- Linux POS – 5 Active, 2 De-escalated
   - ChevronTexaco, Arrefour, Hollywood Video, CSK Auto, Waitrose Supermarkets
- Linux Embedded – 3 Active, 8 De-escalated, 1 Loss, 1 Win
   - Active: Accent/FireKing – security for Taco Bell and others – close to winning. Safeway – smart clients in shopping carts
   - Loss. VOPAK – Linux embedded on PC option – up to biz units to select
   - Win Royal Carribean Cruise Lines – IBM Linux on client and server
- EDGI – 1 Active, 2 Wins
   - Active. Jordan. Wins. Egypt, Tunisia
   - Mexico and Malaysia EDGI deals were not escalated via CompHot
- StarOffice on Windows – 1 Active
   - Dept of Homeland Security – 170,000 seats, McNealy involved
- OS/2 Migration to Linux – 1 De-escalated

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220090
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Reactive EDGI Results To Date

- Mexico- $2.5MM ¢committed, adding $25MM to MS
   - Govt-financed PC purchase for home teacher use with Windows XP Home
   - 250K PCs from Acer, iBM, and HP
   - Govt was considering Linux and Win98 due to cost
   - EDGI distributed $10/PC to be used for teacher training
   - Additional purchase of $60/PC for Office, Encarta, and Encarta interactive
- Malaysia – $500K committed, waiting for govt decision
   - EDGI used as delivery mechanism for previous exec commitments
   - Funds used for rural schools, teacher training, non-bootable software
- Egypt – $355K committed, addl $500K to MS, $1 2M to MS over 2yrs
   - EDGI used as delivery mechanism for previous exec committees
   - Govt purchased 6250 PCs at full price, 4166 PCs w/ 100% Windows rebate
- Tunisia – $600K committed, addl $600K to MS
   - Wave 2 of govt-financed purchases of 15K home PCs. Wave 1 was Windows-only, but wave 2 offer includes Linux PCs for $60 per PC less to the end user
   - EDGI contributed $40/PC -$15 end user rebate. $20 sys builder joint mktg, and $5 end user mktg
- Jordan – Pending
   - Ministry of education purchase of 8K PCs, considering Linux
   - We are still working through operational logistics

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220091
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Brainstorm/Work in Progress

- Biz Value Challenge – evidence
- Usability evidence
- Open MUI
- Proactive govt program
- Tools- more power tools and evidence
- Accessibility evidence
- OEM supportability
- Refurbished hw initiative
- Education
- HEWSf64-bit
- Customer visits
- Enthusiasts

Other

  - BRIClEmerging markets
  - GSLP
  - Project Jack

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220092

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Open MUI

- Requested by international Windows product managers, esp in emerging markets
- Allows localization where MS can’t justify expense
- Overcomes govt concerns about cultural preservation and mitigates arguments for Linux
- Potentially gives govt control over local dialects
- Enables govt to support local sw industry.
- Builds Windows ecosystem
- Is open-source-like w/o toss of Windows branding or look/feel
- Gives enthusiasts more flexibility to tweak Windows UI

9/10/02 Microsoft Confidential

MS-CC-Sun 000001220093
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL


Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

5 Comments

  1. saulgoode said,

    January 16, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    Gravatar

    - Show customers existing TCO and business value data for Windows XP. There is a lot of data showing good ROI when moving from Win98 to Win XP. A Gartner audited TCO study completed in the City of Vassa, Finland (home country of Linux Torvalds) showed that moving to Windows XP/Office XP would save 31% per PC, per years compared to Red Hat and Open Office. If the customer still pushes back on costs, move to next step

    I like this one. Microsoft basically compares upgrading the version of an operating system to the transition of one OS to a different one. I wondered if they mentioned that if/once GNU/Linux were the original OS, “switching” to Linux would not be nearly so costly :). I also wonder if they ignored not having to upgrade hardware to the same degree if GNU/Linux were being deployed.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 16, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    Gravatar

    Lies, damned lies, and statistics.

    Stay tuned as I have lots of antitrust material on IDC and Gartner.

  3. Victor Soliz said,

    January 16, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    Gravatar

    Truth is, most of the studies are actually right, however they are not showing the hidden costs of Linux, they are showing the hidden cost of the dependence IT grew on windows, I wonder if the next generations are going to overcome this problem, cause it is really big, we need actual competition in the OS side of things -Else everybody is screwed- and until this MS-addiction is cured that seems hard.

    35.3% of Office Docs Opened in StarOffice Had Errors

    Like diamonds, MS lock-in is forever.

    I wonder if MS is going to do this Open MUI stuff, it certainly aligns with all its actions that seemed to intend to make sure that ‘openish’ appears to be as good as truly open.

    - Mexico- $2.5MM ¢committed, adding $25MM to MS
    – Govt-financed PC purchase for home teacher use with Windows XP Home
    – 250K PCs from Acer, iBM, and HP
    – Govt was considering Linux and Win98 due to cost
    – EDGI distributed $10/PC to be used for teacher training
    – Additional purchase of $60/PC for Office, Encarta, and Encarta interactive

    Wonder what Miguel de Icaza has to say about his homeland selling out to MS, I also wonder what Mexican tax payers have to say about such massive sum ‘committed’ to MS.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 16, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    Gravatar

    I asked him about it, but he did not reply.

    He reads this Web site every day, so I hope he’ll remark on the issue.

  5. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 16, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    Gravatar

    Little update: billv is the alias of Bill Veghte

What Else is New


  1. Today's EPO is Not Compatible With the Law and It's Grossly Incompatible With Truth and Justice

    Today, once again, the EPO openly advocates software patents while media promotes loopholes (notably hype waves)



  2. Quick Mention: As Expected, the US Supreme Court Cements PTAB's Role With Trump-Appointed Gorsuch Dissenting

    Oil States has been decided and it's very good news for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB); even Conservatives-leaning Justices support PTAB



  3. Links 24/4/2018: Preview of Crostini, Introducing Heptio Gimbal, OPNsense 18.1.6

    Links for the day



  4. Patent Maximalists Step Things Up With Director Andrei Iancu and It's Time for Scientists to Fight Back

    Science and technology don't seem to matter as much as the whims of the patent (litigation) 'industry', at least judging by recent actions taken by Andrei Iancu (following a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee)



  5. Mythology About Patents in the East

    Misconceptions (or deliberate propaganda) about patent policy in the east poison the debate and derail a serious, facts-based discussion about it



  6. Patent Trolls Watch: Red River Innovations, Bradium Technologies/General Patent, and Wordlogic

    A quick look at some patent trolls that made the news this Monday; we are still seeing a powerful response to such trolls, whose momentum is slipping owing to the good work of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)



  7. Holding Benoît Battistelli Accountable After the EPO

    The many abuses and offenses committed by Mr. Battistelli whilst he enjoyed diplomatic immunity can and should be brought up as that immunity expires in two months; a good start would be contacting his colleagues, who might not be aware of the full spectrum of his abuses



  8. Links 23/4/2018: Second RC of Linux 4.17 and First RC of Mesa 18.1

    Links for the day



  9. The Good Work of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the Latest Attempts to Undermine It

    A week's roundup of news about PTAB, which is eliminating many bad (wrongly-granted) patents and is therefore becoming "enemy number one" to those who got accustomed to blackmailing real (productive) firms with their questionable patents



  10. District Courts' Patent Cases, Including the Eastern District of Texas (EDTX/TXED), in a Nutshell

    A roundup of patent cases in 'low courts' of the United States, where patents are being reasoned about or objected to while patent law firms make a lot of money



  11. The Federal Circuit's (CAFC) Decisions Are Being Twisted by Patent Propaganda Sites Which Merely Cherry-Pick Cases With Outcomes That Suit Them

    The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) continues to reject the vast majority of software patents, citing Section 101 in many such cases, but the likes of Managing IP, Patently-O, IAM and Watchtroll only selectively cover such cases (instead they’re ‘pulling a Berkheimer’ or some similar name-dropping)



  12. Patents Roundup: Metaswitch, GENBAND, Susman, Cisco, Konami, High 5 Games, HTC, and Nintendo

    A look at existing legal actions, the application of 35 U.S.C. § 101, and questionable patents that are being pursued on software (algorithms or "software infrastructure")



  13. In Maxon v Funai the High 'Patent Court' (CAFC) Reaffirms Disdain for Software Patents, Which Are Nowadays Harder to Get and Then Defend

    With the wealth of decisions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) wherein software patents get discarded (Funai being the latest example), the public needs to ask itself whether patent law firms are honest when they make claims about resurgence of software patents by 'pulling a Berkheimer' or coming up with terms like “Berkheimer Effect”



  14. Today's European Patent Office Works for Patent Extremists and for Team UPC Rather Than for Europe or for Innovation

    The International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI) and other patent maximalists who have nothing to do with Europe, helped by a malicious and rather clueless politician called Benoît Battistelli, are turning the EPO into a patent-printing machine rather than an examination office as envisioned by the EPC (founders) and member states



  15. The EPO is Dying and Those Who Have Killed It Are Becoming Very Rich in the Process

    Following the footsteps of Ron Hovsepian at Novell, Battistelli at the EPO (along with Team Battistelli) may mean the end of the EPO as we know it (or the end altogether); one manager and a cabal of confidants make themselves obscenely rich by basically sacrificing the very organisation they were entrusted to serve



  16. Short: Just Keep Repeating the Lie (“Quality”) Until People Might Believe It

    Battistelli’s patent-printing bureau (EPO without quality control) keeps lying about the quality of patents by repeating the word “quality” a lot of times, including no less than twice in the summary alone



  17. Shelston IP Keeps Pressuring IP Australia to Allow Software Patents and Harm Software Development

    Shelston IP wants exactly the opposite of what's good for Australia; it just wants what's good for itself, yet it habitually pretends to speak for a productive industry (nothing could be further from the truth)



  18. Is Andy Ramer's Departure the End of Cantor Fitzgerald's Patent Trolls-Feeding Operations and Ambitions?

    The managing director of the 'IP' group at Cantor Fitzgerald is leaving, but it does not yet mean that patent trolls will be starved/deprived access to patents



  19. EPO Hoards Billions of Euros (Taken From the Public), Decreases Quality to Get More Money, Reduces Payments to Staff

    The EPO continues to collect money from everyone, distributes bogus/dubious patents that usher patent trolls into Europe (to cost European businesses billions in the long run), and staff of the EPO faces more cuts while EPO management swims in cash and perks



  20. Short: Calling Battistelli's Town (Where He Works) “Force for Innovation” to Justify the Funneling of EPO Funds to It

    How the EPO‘s management ‘explained’ (or sought to rationalise) to staff its opaque decision to send a multi-million, one-day ceremony to Battistelli’s own theatre only weeks before he leaves



  21. Short: EPO Bribes the Media and Then Brags About the Paid-for Outcome to Staff

    The EPO‘s systematic corruption of the media at the expense of EPO stakeholders — not to mention hiring of lawyers to bully media which exposes EPO corruption — in the EPO’s own words (amended by us)



  22. Short: EPO's “Working Party for Quality” is to Quality What the “Democratic People's Republic of Korea” is to Democracy

    To maintain the perception (illusion) that the EPO still cares about patent quality — and in order to disseminate this lie to EPO staff — a puff piece with the above heading/photograph was distributed to thousands of examiners in glossy paper form



  23. Short: This Spring's Message From the EPO's President (Corrected)

    A corrected preface from the Liar in Chief, the EPO's notoriously crooked and dishonest President



  24. Short: Highly Misleading and Unscientific Graphics From the EPO for an Illusion of Growth

    A look at the brainwash that EPO management is distributing to staff and what's wrong with it



  25. Short: EPO Explains to Examiners Why They Should and Apparently Can Grant Software Patents (in Spite of EPC)

    Whether it calls it "CII" or "ICT" or "Industry 4.0" or "4IR", the EPO's management continues to grant software patents and attempts to justify this to itself (and to staff)



  26. Links 21/4/2018: Linux 4.9.95, FFmpeg 4.0, OpenBSD Foundation 2018 Fundraising Campaign

    Links for the day



  27. As USPTO Director, Andrei Iancu Gives Three Months for Public Comments on 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Software Patenting Impacted)

    Weeks after starting his job as head of the US patent office, to our regret but not to our surprise, Iancu asks whether to limit examiners' ability to reject abstract patent applications citing 35 U.S.C. § 101 (relates to Alice and Mayo)



  28. In Keith Raniere v Microsoft Both Sides Are Evil But for Different Reasons

    Billing for patent lawyers reveals an abusive strategy from Microsoft, which responded to abusive patent litigation (something which Microsoft too has done for well over a decade)



  29. Links 20/4/2018: Atom 1.26, MySQL 8.0

    Links for the day



  30. Links 19/4/2018: Mesa 17.3.9 and 18.0.1, Trisquel 8.0 LTS Flidas, Elections for openSUSE Board

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts