EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.21.09

If You Care About Freedom, Don’t Support Apple

Posted in Apple, DRM, GNU/Linux, Kernel, Microsoft, Steve Ballmer at 10:23 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

DRM trap
Picture contributed by twitter

“IF you want freedom don’t follow Linus Torvalds,” Stallman was sort of quoted as arguing in a rather sensationalist headline from an IDG interview a year and a half ago. But Torvalds is hardly the problem at all. His views may not be as ‘strong’ as Stallman’s, but Torvalds is not the enemy.

Ideally, as Stallman might put it, we must not remain “helpless and divided” because imposition of such constraints is the condition on which crowd control is hinged, where one dissenter is un/able to attract followers and turn consensus upside down. In pursuing morality, it’s important to collaborate with those who do not view freedom as hostile. The Linux Foundation and the OSI, for example, are not adverse to Freedom, they just emphasise it less.

“Steve was daemonising freedom at the time, turning it into an argument of cost.”It therefore becomes important to identify the real ferocious forces which disseminate tools that separate people. They restrict collaboration/sharing and in some circumstances stir up infighting [1, 2, 3].

So who are these people or forces which compare collaboration to evilness? In reference to “Linux” (meaning GNU/Linux in this context), Steve Ballmer once said that “it had, you know, the characteristics of communism that people love so very, very much about it. That is, it’s free.” Steve was daemonising freedom at the time, turning it into an argument of cost. Another Steve, Steve Wozniak, was claimed to have slammed Free software last year. A third Steve, Steve Jobs, has never shown much affinity for Free software either, with the exception of use (BSD) where freedom is defined differently. In fact, iPhone engineers wanted to pick Linux for the iPhone but it was Jobs who resisted it* and intercepted the idea because Linux is free as in Freedom (GPL) — the same licence that Gates insists “we disagree with”.

Further to this post from two days ago and the many supportive references, it is essential to remember that Apple is now ruining Linux-based gadgets using patents. In regards to Apple’s behaviour in general, opines one blogger:

These moves suggest to me that Apples fears competition, and I’m wondering why.

Another writer, Sam Varghese, remarked about “The ugly side of Apple.”

Apple Computer has a beautiful side to its operations. That’s the side which comes out with some of the sexiest design in the tech world, the side which crafts those breathtaking interfaces, the side which gives you those applications that a five-year-old finds easy to master in the course of a morning’s exploration.

[...]

The argument runs thus: if I’m doing something that doesn’t cut into my profits, I must be doing the right thing.

But even Apple should realise that people will ultimately come to the conclusion that golden handcuffs are also a means of restricting choice.

The author refers to a couple of new examples where Apple takes away not only its own customers’ freedom; it harms the freedoms of others too, casting them “irrelevant”.

A month ago we explained how Apple had helped Microsoft's OOXML and looking at some newer evidence, as stated in one of the comments about Apple’s office suite, “Whereas the OpenDocument standards are well-documented, xml-based, platform-independent and reasonably mature. So, I’m not sure why Apple wants to reinvent the wheel with their own proprietary document formats (though I have a theory, see below). [...] My personal theory is that Microsoft slipped some kind of document-format stipulation into a contract with Apple, forbidding them from using or promoting OpenDocument. (If you’ve done any reading on the kinds of behind-the-scenes shenanigans Microsoft has pulled over the years, this will sound very plausible.) This would also explain Apple’s otherwise inexplicable support for OOXML during its ISO standardization debacle (where no doubt a lot of other behind-the-scenes shenanigans were going on).

Remember ThinkFree?
___
* This is a revelation that came through the grapevine about a year ago.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

10 Comments

  1. max stirner said,

    February 21, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    Gravatar

    +1 :)

  2. Bob said,

    February 21, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    Gravatar

    I agree with the ultimate sentiment that is, don’t support Apple if you care for freedom. My nitpick would be your claim about liberal free software licences (such as the BSD licences) having a different definition of freedom. Liberal licences are equally as free as copyleft licences. The difference is that recipients of liberally licensed free software are not compelled to grant freedom to downstream recipients. The intent of copyleft licences is to ensure that all downstream recipients will maintain their freedom. To do this, they compel the downstream distributors to grant freedom to the downstream recipients.

  3. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 21, 2009 at 6:55 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, here is a good post on the subject.

  4. Bob said,

    February 21, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    Gravatar

    Thanks for the link, Roy. After reading that, I want to state this for the sake of accuracy: liberally licensed free software is more free than copyleft software by the virtue of dictating fewer rules.

    In other words, I do agree with your initial assertion that liberally licensed free software has a different definition to copyleft free software – one has a laissez-faire approach to freedom while the other has a rule-by-law approach to freedom.

  5. Shane Coyle said,

    February 21, 2009 at 9:31 pm

    Gravatar

    The other day, Bruce (Perens) had posted a bit re: BSD code being GPL’ed, and how – in his view (I happen to agree, but who the hell am I?) it’s somewhat unethical for BSD’ers to complain that their code is ‘hijacked’ into a gpl’ed project, but (since they never can be sure) have no reaction to their code being proprietized, since it’s so ‘free’.

    I’m not trying to pick a fight, just adding to the discussion….

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    February 21, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, that one’s a classic!

    Maybe they are jealous or afraid of GNU/GPL whereas Apple does not intimidate them.

  7. Shane Coyle said,

    February 21, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    Gravatar

    I think it’s usually a genuine, visceral, reaction to seeing their code being further restricted than the license under which they originally released it, just the point is – when a proprietary company adopts and modifies it (assuming they even do that), you can’t necessarily tell so it’s not as noticeable, cuz it’s hidden in a binary release…

  8. Shane Coyle said,

    February 21, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    Gravatar

    I guess, what I’m trying to say is, that yes – GPL is more restrictive than BSD in terms of downstream licensees, but in a well-intentioned way (note I’m not saying a "good" way – since that is mostly subjective).

    Some developers have faith in the goodness of human nature, the rest use the GPL (or worse). ;^ )

  9. Yuhong Bao said,

    May 5, 2009 at 1:55 am

    Gravatar

    Yep, Apple and Macs has many advantages, but freedom is certainly not one of them.

  10. Yuhong Bao said,

    May 5, 2009 at 2:01 am

    Gravatar

    In fact, it would be interesting to watch the politics inside Apple relating to open source. For example, the quest to prevent Mac OS X from running on non-Apple hardware, and Apple’s copy of Vista’s protected processes called PT_DENY_ATTACH (often mentioned in context of but not limited to DTrace) and the fact that since XNU is open source anyone can patch it out. Also on Apple’s troubles with the GPLv3 caused by the iPhone.
    “In fact, iPhone engineers wanted to pick Linux for the iPhone but it was Jobs who resisted it* and intercepted the idea because Linux is free as in Freedom (GPL) — the same licence that Gates insists “we disagree with”. ”
    I don’t think this is true however. As I remember, Linux was not Apple’s own OS.

What Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 07, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, April 07, 2020



  2. GitHug - A Guest Article by Thomas Grzybowski

    "Now, if Azure revenue has increased 72%, but the gross revenue in this category has only increased 25%, that means that the other components, primary GitHub, are actually a substantial negative."



  3. Links 7/4/2020: Firefox 75, Python 2.7.1 RC1

    Links for the day



  4. The Fall of the UPC - Part XIV: Media Owned and Controlled by Law Firms Did Not Properly Cover the Decision of the German Constitutional Court (FCC)

    We take another look at the shallow if not deliberately misleading coverage in sites that are literally owned and run by law firms, for the benefit of law firms rather than informing the public



  5. The Media Paints Bill Gates as the Man Who Will Save the World While Seattle's Police Department Obstructs Access to Documents About Pedophilia Arrest at His Home

    We're still unable to receive even one single page of the police report about arrest for pedophilia at the home of Bill and Melinda Gates; the media says nothing about this and instead it paints Gates as a national or international hero



  6. IRC Proceedings: Monday, April 06, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, April 06, 2020



  7. Software Patents Remain Junk Patents in the United States (Not Enforceable), Whereas the EPO Keeps Granting Them and Promoting Them

    We take note of the positive outcomes in the US, where courts continue to reject software patents, but in Europe the largest patent office, which sought to replace all the courts, still acts as if patent law does not exist and patents can be endlessly printed irrespective of their merit (or validity as judged by actual courts)



  8. The Fall of the UPC - Part XIII: A Death Worth Celebrating and Many Lies Worth Debunking

    We take stock of positive responses to the decision made by the German constitutional court (FCC) 2.5 weeks ago; we also explain why it has taken so long to piece together firm-by-firm scoresheet for UPC lies



  9. GitHub is Moving the Free Software Movement Into “Check”

    GitHub's growing levels of control over Free software projects (GitHub itself is proprietary and Microsoft-controlled) ought to alarm the community; it's a lot worse than most people care to acknowledge, based on weeks of detailed analysis of GNU/Linux distros



  10. Links 6/4/2020: New Red Hat CEO, elementary OS Hera Updates

    Links for the day



  11. When the Decision is OK and the Judge's Motivations Are Also OK

    Justice Huber made the right call; but the bullies and charlatans who conspired to undermine laws and constitutions will never be satisfied



  12. The Fall of the UPC - Part XII: Doing the Unthinkable by Blaming the Judge's (Justice's) Wife?

    Team UPC and its media partners never cease to amaze us; anybody who stands in their way is either portrayed as a Russian stooge or too ignorant to be worth talking to



  13. The Fall of the UPC - Part XI: Lies Told by Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI) in Süddeutsche Zeitung

    Today we look at misleading claims (or lies) published by Süddeutsche Zeitung after the Germans' constitutional court (FCC) had pointed out the obvious, namely that UPC ratification would be in violation of the German constitution



  14. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 05, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, April 05, 2020



  15. Links 5/4/2020: MindSpore, Covid-19 Projects and More

    Links for the day



  16. EPO is Just Like Some Cruel Political Party and Not a Patent Office

    The "cabal" which runs today's EPO (even the word "Mafia" seems suitable here) isn't acting -- not even remotely -- like a patent office; it's a patent-printing operation ("protection money" as income) that uses shallow political stunts to manufacture consent with the EU's 'generous' assistance



  17. Digitalisation and Digital Technologies as a Ploy to Justify Illegal Software Patents

    Say "hello" to the next weasel word/s; from the "hey hi" hype wave we've now moved to something "digital" (which can mean just about anything, including algorithms of all sorts)



  18. The Fall of the UPC - Part X: How We Shall Catalogue UPC Lies

    The cult that Team UPC became (one member lying to another member, maintaining a false version of reality) will be judged based on underlying facts, not lying about facts; we start with a token of contempt for IP Kat and Bristows LLP (there are overlaps)



  19. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 04, 2020



  20. Major Revelation: Microsoft Blackmail Against LAMP (GNU/Linux and Free Stacks for Servers) Goes At Least 16 Years Back, Predating the Novell Patent Deal

    (Techno-)Anthropological analyses of Microsoft's patent war on Free/libre software must take into account what Microsoft did to MySQL, a Swedish company at the time



  21. Links 4/4/2020: Sparky 5.11, Firefox 74.0.1, POCL 1.5

    Links for the day



  22. IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, April 03, 2020



  23. Links 3/4/2020: Ubuntu Beta, GNOME 3.36.1, ExTiX LXQt Mini, NetBSD 8.2 Released

    Links for the day



  24. Digital Communication, Digitalisation and Videogaming Among the EPO's Latest Smokescreens for Illegal and Abstract Patents on Algorithms

    The EPO keeps liaising with the EU to promote patents which EU officials have themselves said were illegal; to make matters worse, the EPO's violations of its own laws inspire the United States to do the same



  25. Emotional Blackmail for Illegal Software Patents

    Semantic tactics the European Patent Office (EPO) uses to promote software patents in Europe and may theoretically use in the future (satire)



  26. Clear Linux is to GNU/Linux What Clearly Defined is to Open Source

    The idea that we need Intel to take GNU/Linux ‘mainstream’ is ludicrous; as OSDL co-founder (now succeeded in the flesh of the Corporate Linux Foundation), Intel is more about Linux (with DRM, “secure boot” and everything that lets it be remotely controlled) than about GNU and it’s not too keen on GPL (copyleft), either



  27. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, April 02, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, April 02, 2020



  28. Links 2/4/2020: Linux 5.6.2, Qt Creator 4.11.2, LineageOS ROM Based on Android 10

    Links for the day



  29. OIN in 2020 Resembles Linux Foundation in 2020 (Corporate Front Group Piggybacking the Linux Brand)

    We regret to say that the Open Invention Network seems not to care at all about Software Freedom; to make matters worse, it is a proponent of software patents and a voice for companies like IBM and Microsoft, not the "Community" it fancies misrepresenting



  30. Inside the Free Software Foundation (FSF) - Part IX: Semi-Happy Ending

    Richard Stallman is here to stay and the FSF will let him stay (as chief of GNU); we want to close the series on a positive note


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts