EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.21.09

Microsoft Cheats and Bribes Again to Distort the Reality Regarding Vista 7

Posted in GNU/Linux, Marketing, Microsoft, Vista, Vista 7, Windows at 6:02 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Trying to win

Summary: For Vista 7 perception management Microsoft compensates journalists, pays ‘promoters’ handsomely, pays analysts, uses kids, Twitter and other forms of hypnosis — all in attempt to promote a product that CIOs already reject

THE reality behind Vista 7 is rather grim because it is just another Vista and it will fail to sell based on early surveys and predictions that we covered. Microsoft bets the entire farm on Vista 7 by deliberately ignoring Vista. In the past week, for instance, we found just two headlines about “Vista”, compared to 23 that are about “Windows 7″. This buzz gets generated organically by the business press, which in turn affects what people speak about in personal blogs, chat rooms, the office, etc. Today we will show how Microsoft is doing it, based on citations from the past week alone.

Earlier this week we wrote about Microsoft's subtle admission that Windows Vista had failed. Here is some more new coverage of that quotable incident:

Windows Vista ‘less good,’ Microsoft exec admits

[...]

Company executives’ private opinions of Vista were much more revealing, however. According to internal Microsoft e-mails disclosed in 2008 during a class-action lawsuit, senior executives and a board member griped about Vista shortly after it was released in early 2007, saying it was missing drivers and crippled their new PCs.

The reality is that Vista 7 continues to lack good driver support. Under the hood, Vista 7 is virtually identical to Vista. Three of our readers who tried Vista 7 reported exactly these types of issues which they encountered [1, 2, 3].

Mary Jo Foley and Paul Thurrott Get Paid to Promote Microsoft’s Vista 7

We often emphasise that those who hail Microsoft products are being compensated by Microsoft. This is especially true once prudent observers realise that gentle bribes come in all sorts of forms. Consider the Bing sponsorships for example; that $100,000,000 marketing budget does end up landing somewhere. That’s how people like Todd Bishop are paid. Likewise, Mary Jo Foley and Paul Thurrott present not just literature; they also get invited to Microsoft events and here they are invited to hype up Vista 7 (paid talks):

Microsoft in 2010: Is Windows 7 Enterprise Ready? What IT Managers Need to Know

[...]

Speakers to include:

* Mary Jo Foley (Keynote), Microsoft Author and Editor of the All About Microsoft blog (http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/)
* Paul Thurrott, Author of Paul Thurrott’s SuperSite for Windows blog (http://www.winsupersite.com)
* Ben Armstrong, Microsoft Program Manager (Virtualization) and Author, Virtual PC Guy’s Weblog (http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/)
* Andrew Hopkins, Microsoft veteran and Principal Consultant for Chrysalis BTS (http://www.chrysalisbts.com)

The author of “All About Microsoft” should maybe be assigned to run “All About Marketing”, as that’s what Vista 7 is all about. There are many of her colleagues out there in ZDNet who are on a similar boat (e.g. Bott, Ou) and even Microsoft employees. They get bribed by Microsoft to promote Vista 7 under the guise of “news” (ZDNet no longer does much news, just blogs, which get aggregated in news feeds nonetheless).

Vista 7 Stickers/Branding

How far would Microsoft go with marketing? Here is some more ‘fluff’ like “Compatible With Microsoft Windows 7 Logo” — selling people the impression that there is something unique about it. For a long time Microsoft has been trying to ‘stamp’ hardware components with its logo/s, giving the delusion that a keyboard gets designed for Windows (it has a key with the logo on it), that entire computers are designed or certified for Windows, and even monitors are somehow ‘approved’ for Windows. It’s all just an antiquated stunt and someone is paid or rewarded to play along with that stunt, which deceives average consumers and acts as an advertisement (fake endorsement) too.

More AstroTurfing

Microsoft rewards go a long way. Here you can see that Paul Thurrott advertises Vista 7. Mary Jo Foley currently pretends that Vista7WillFixEverythingTM, so she plays along with Ballmer's latest marketing delusion. If that’s not enough, Microsoft now recruits more shills for Vista 7:

Microsoft to pay Windows 7 promoter HK$7,777 a day

[..]

Microsoft Hong Kong is now recruiting Windows 7 promoters who will be paid HK$7,777 (US$1,004) each for a day’s work in late October when the software giant launches its new OS.

The vendor has created a group on Facebook to invite individuals aged 15 or above, speaking fluent Cantonese and English, and possessing basic computer knowledge to post their one-minute self-introduction videos on the Chinese-language page. As of 3:20pm Monday, there are only four videos uploaded.

This is covered also in NetworkWorld. Who is Microsoft kidding? For Mac fans to become Windows shills Microsoft offered to pay $15,000. This is the type of stuff that should be covered and pinned at the front page of the technology section at the BBC, New York Times, and other such high-profile publications. It’s truly a blunder, but the world does not pay attention simply because the business press conveniently ignores the facts. The BBC only advertises Vista 7 at the moment, just as it advertised Windows Vista and hailed it wholeheartedly back in 2006/7.

Crooked Research

Are paid shills not enough for Vista 7? Warped coverage also? Well, Microsoft is already busy paying a favourite pay-to-say agency, namely Forrester ‘Research’, to do its thing. Previously, Microsoft was paying Forrester to attack GNU/Linux [1, 2] and now it pays to help promote Vista 7.

A Microsoft-commissioned study by Forrester shows that worker mobility and office decentralization will become key issues for the enterprise and SMBs (small- to medium-sized businesses) in coming years, possibly creating substantial challenges for IT administrators. Microsoft is using the report as the basis for a promotional push for Windows 7, its upcoming operating system due for general release on Oct. 22.

A recent Microsoft-commissioned study also claimed that Internet Explorer was the most secure Web browser. Shouldn’t such practices of conducting ‘studies’ be banned or at least their outcomes embargoed? Professor Larry Lessig currently studies this type of corruption, especially where pharmaceuticals are concerned.

Shameless Marketing

On top of all the above, Microsoft resorted to shameless marketing which is now being slammed by the Los Angeles Times:

Windows 7 is reduced to rainbows and unicorns

It’s official. Microsoft has no shame. None. They should just stop paying rent on that storage unit where they keep their shame because they, as I said, have none.

The new TV ad campaign for Windows 7 (Crispin Porter & Bogusky) kicked off this week with a masterpiece of emotional manipulation that brings back Kylie, the precocious 4-year-old girl from the “I’m a PC” series. The slightly lispy Kylie — who pronounces the product as “Windows Theben” — is sitting at a table in front of a PC. “My name’s Kylie, and I found these happy words all over my dad’s computer. . . .” (Uh-oh, I hope dad’s been behaving himself with his PC.) The “happy words” are rave reviews for Windows 7 from tech magazines, which Kylie then puts into a slideshow with images of a unicorn, a kitten in marshmallows, a bunny in a straw hat. “Happy words need happy pictures.” Uh-huh. We can only assume as the campaign rolls out to the Windows 7 launch date of Oct. 22 that we’ll see baby penguins and water-skiing squirrels hawking for the Redmond, Wash., software giant.

[...]

This is advertising as hostage situation: Buy Windows 7 or the little kid gets it.

It is similar to what Microsoft does here in the UK, where Microsoft exploits toddlers (put in Windows TV adverts) to hide is real image of thugs who willfully break the law time after time because it pays more than abiding and obeying rules.

The PR industry, which thrives in superficial imagery and deception, hails the above as a success and uses the headline “Microsoft ‘Good News’”.

Kylie seems to know that cute goes a long way towards snagging viewers’ attention and kindling the warm fuzzy feelings only images of kittens, marshmallows, a bonnet-wearing bunny and a pint-sized pitch-gal can produce.

Microsoft PR agencies would see nothing wrong with it, either. They are in the business of deception and are often lacking a real sense of consciousness. They find justifications for what they are doing and viral videos are just business as usual to them. Then there is Microsoft AstroTurfing at Twitter, which we wrote about in:

The Wall Street Journal published this new article which has Microsoft’s senior marketing manager explain “Tweet Assignments”:

Marcus Schmidt uses one called Tweet Assignments for his job as a senior marketing manager at Microsoft Corp. He oversees two company Twitter pages where consumers post about 300 questions and comments a day. He says Tweet Assignments helps him generate swift responses from the appropriate Microsoft employees by allowing him to send consumers’ tweets to colleagues instantly, without having to copy them into email messages. The recipients can then respond directly to consumers with tweets of their own or send responses back to Mr. Schmidt.

At Twitter, Microsoft has a huge number of accounts for promotional purposes, with extra assistance coming from agencies that Microsoft hires. As we showed yesterday using a confidential memo from Microsoft, the company identified “constant indoctrination” as the way forward.

The Slog

“Windows Vista enjoyed the same type of hype ahead of its release.”Elsewhere in the news we find Microsoft pressuring businesses to move to Vista 7 (because CIOs reject it already). Here is Microsoft’s de facto PR person Ina Fried (disguised as reporter) slamming Microsoft’s competition, Linux included, probably on behalf of the company. It’s all in preparation for Vista 7 and it is clearly composed in this way.

The Vista 7 discount which we wrote about the other day is being promoted by other Microsoft de facto PR folks like Shane O'Neill, who are essentially embedding advertisements, turning discounts on products that do not exist into articles.

In summary, Vista 7 is a huge deception. People must not fall for the hype. Windows Vista enjoyed the same type of hype ahead of its release. There is quite a lot one can achieve with billions of dollars that are exclusively dedicated to imposed ignorance and mind shaping.

“I am currently testing the Beta of Win7 in a closed VM environment. I am considering deleting it. It’s actually worse than Vista. Multiple program crashes, refusal to install any software, naff looks and many other complaints.”

Moog

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

6 Comments

  1. David Gerard said,

    September 21, 2009 at 8:33 am

    Gravatar

    Microsoft has been payin graffiti artists to spray-paint advertising for Windows 7: http://twitpic.com/h5cqo In sight of the Wikimedia Foundation offices, no less: http://twitter.com/jansonw/status/3877626150

    I actually found the use case where Windows 7 is easier than XP: reinstalling Windows on a ‘l33t gamer rig from a few years ago. Windows 7 has all the weird-arse custom drivers included, XP you have to chase around the web looking for them. I was actually Googling on PCI IDs to find what some of this crap was. http://reddragdiva.dreamwidth.org/14460.html

    p.s.: MY FUCKING GOD I HATE WINDOWS AAAAAAAAGGGGHHH FUCK.

  2. Will said,

    September 21, 2009 at 9:04 am

    Gravatar

    For now, all this 7 hype exists only in a world awash with Redmond Kool-Aid. It means nothing until it hits the real world. Either way, there will likely be a sales spike initially from Microsoft fans, shills, and curious early adopters. After that, the marketing whitewash should wear off pretty quick. It didn’t take normal people very long to realize what a dog Vista was once it hit the streets. If 7 turns out to be not much better, it should be entertaining to watch the damage control and spin tactics from Microsoft once impressions from non-bribed users start getting out.

    Even so, over time people will still have to buy a new computer eventually, and the odds are good that that computer will come with Windows, so MS gets paid anyway. The key is to let people know that they have a choice not to use Windows on their PC if they aren’t satisfied by it, but also to make them aware of vendors that don’t include the Windows tax on their PCs.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Prepare for Microsoft to flaunt fake “sales figures” like it did with Vista for about a year (“we sold 100,000,000 copies” … 200,000,000 … etc etc … even if it’s an XP/PC sale, in which case it counts as 2 sales of Vista).

    David Gerard Reply:

    Yes. I don’t recall anyone in the press actually asking the big question: “Microsoft knows precisely how many copies of Vista are in use – it’s the number talking to the WGA servers. Microsoft, how many copies of Vista are in use?”

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    “Microsoft was not available for comment at the time of writing.”

What Else is New


  1. Software Patents Trickle in After § 101/Alice, But Courts Would Not Honour Them Anyway

    The dawn of § 101/Alice, which in principle eliminates almost every software patent, means that applicants find themselves having to utilise loopholes to fool examiners, but that's unlikely to impress judges (if they ever come to assessing these patents)



  2. In Aatrix v Green Shades the Court is Not Tolerating Software Patents But Merely Inquires/Wonders Whether the Patents at Hand Are Abstract

    Aatrix alleges patent infringement by Green Shades, but whether the patents at hand are abstract or not remains to be seen; this is not what patent maximalists claim it to be ("A Valentine for Software Patent Owners" or "valentine for patentee")



  3. An Indoctrinated Minority is Maintaining the Illusion That Patent Policy is to Blame for All or Most Problems of the United States

    The zealots who want to patent everything under the Sun and sue everyone under the Sun blame nations in the east (where the Sun rises) for all their misfortunes; this has reached somewhat ludicrous levels



  4. Berkheimer Decision is Still Being Spun by the Anti-Section 101/Alice Lobby

    12 days after Berkheimer v HP Inc. the patent maximalists continue to paint this decision as a game changer with regards to patent scope; the reality, however, is that this decision will soon be forgotten about and will have no substantial effect on either PTAB or Alice (because it's about neither of these)



  5. Academic Patent Immunity is Laughable and Academics Are Influenced by Corporate Money (for Steering Patent Agenda)

    Universities appear to have become battlegrounds in the war between practicing entities and a bunch of parasites who make a living out of litigation and patent bubbles



  6. UPC Optimism Languishes Even Among Paid UPC Propagandists Such as IAM

    Even voices which are attempting to give UPC momentum that it clearly lacks admit that things aren't looking well; the UK is not ratifying and Germany make take years to look into constitutional barriers



  7. Bejin Bieneman Props Up the Disgraced Randall Rader for Litigation Agenda

    Randall Rader keeps hanging out with the litigation 'industry' -- the very same 'industry' which he served in a closeted fashion when he was Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit (and vocal proponent of software patents, patent trolls and so on)



  8. With Stambler v Mastercard, Patent Maximalists Are Hoping to Prop Up Software Patents and Damage PTAB

    The patent 'industry' is hoping to persuade the highest US court to weaken the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), for PTAB is making patent lawsuits a lot harder and raises the threshold for patent eligibility



  9. Apple Discovers That Its Patent Disputes Are a Losing Battle Which Only Lawyers Win (Profit From)

    By pouring a lot of money and energy into the 'litigation card' Apple lost focus and it's also losing some key cases, as its patents are simply not strong enough



  10. The Patent Microcosm Takes Berkheimer v HP Out of Context to Pretend PTAB Disregards Fact-Finding Process

    In view or in light of a recent decision (excerpt above), patent maximalists who are afraid of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) try to paint it as inherently unjust and uncaring for facts



  11. Microsoft Has Left RPX, But RPX Now Pays a Microsoft Patent Troll, Intellectual Ventures

    The patent/litigation arms race keeps getting a little more complicated, as the 'arms' are being passed around to new and old entities that do nothing but shake-downs



  12. UPC Has Done Nothing for Europe Except Destruction of the EPO and Imminent Layoffs Due to Lack of Applications and Lowered Value of European Patents

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is merely a distant dream or a fantasy for litigators; to everyone else the UPC lobby has done nothing but damage, including potentially irreparable damage to the European Patent Office, which is declining very sharply



  13. Links 17/2/2018: Mesa 17.3.4, Wine 3.2, Go 1.10

    Links for the day



  14. Patent Trolls Are Thwarted by Judges, But Patent Lawyers View Them as a 'Business' Opportunity

    Patent lawyers are salivating over the idea that trolls may be coming to their state/s; owing to courts and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) other trolls' software patents get invalidated



  15. Microsoft's Patent Moves: Dominion Harbor, Intellectual Ventures, Intellectual Discovery, NEC and Uber

    A look at some of the latest moves and twists, as patents change hands and there are still signs of Microsoft's 'hidden hand'



  16. Links 15/2/2018: GNOME 3.28 Beta, Rust 1.24

    Links for the day



  17. Bavarian State Parliament Has Upcoming Debate About Issues Which Can Thwart UPC for Good

    An upcoming debate about Battistelli's attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal will open an old can of worms, which serves to show why UPC is a non-starter



  18. The EPO is Being Destroyed and There's Nothing Left to Replace It Except National Patent Offices

    It looks like Battistelli is setting up the European Patent Office (EPO) for mass layoffs; in fact, it looks as though he is so certain that the UPC will materialise that he obsesses over "validation" for mass litigation worldwide, departing from a "model office" that used to lead the world in terms of patent quality and workers' welfare/conditions



  19. IBM is Getting Desperate and Now Suing Microsoft Over Lost Staff, Not Just Suing Everyone Using Patents

    IBM's policy when it comes to patents, not to mention its alignment with patent extremists, gives room for thought if not deep concern; the company rapidly becomes more and more like a troll



  20. In Microsoft's Lawsuit Against Corel the Only Winner is the Lawyers

    The outcome of the old Microsoft v Corel lawsuit reaffirms a trend; companies with deep pockets harass their competitors, knowing that the legal bills are more cumbersome to the defendants; there's a similar example today in Cisco v Arista Networks



  21. The Latest Lies About Unitary Patent (UPC) and the EPO

    Lobbying defies facts; we are once again seeing some easily-debunked talking points from those who stand to benefit from the UPC and mass litigation



  22. Speech Deficit and No Freedom of Association at the EPO

    True information cannot be disseminated at the EPO and justice too is beyond elusive; this poses a threat to the EPO's future, not only to its already-damaged reputation



  23. No, Britain is Not Ratifying 'Unitary' Anything, But Team UPC Insinuates It Will (Desperate Effort to Affect Tomorrow's Outcome)

    Contrary to several misleading headlines from Bristows (in its blog and others'), the UPC isn't happening and isn't coming to the UK; it all amounts to lobbying (by setting false expectations)



  24. The EPO's Paid Promotion of Software Patents Gets Patent Maximalists All Excited and Emboldened

    The software patents advocacy from Battistelli (and his cohorts) isn't just a spit in the face of European Parliament but also the EPC; but patent scope seems to no longer exist or matter under his watch, as all he cares about is granting as many patents as possible, irrespective of real quality/legitimacy/merit



  25. Andrei Iancu Begins His USPTO Career While Former USPTO Director (and Now Paid Lobbyist) Keeps Meddling in Office Affairs

    The USPTO, which is supposed to be a government branch (loosely speaking) is being lobbied by former officials, who are now being paid by private corporations to help influence and shape policies; this damages the image of the Office and harms its independence from corporate influence



  26. Links 14/2/2018: Atom 1.24, OSI Joins UNESCO

    Links for the day



  27. The EPO Now Censors the Central Staff Committee Like It Used to Censor SUEPO

    The EPO's Central Staff Committee (CSC) is now being treated as poorly as SUEPO several years ago (when it was threatened to remove publications from its site or face severe action)



  28. Microsoft-Connected Patent Trolls, Xerox, and Andrei Iancu

    A roundup of news pertaining to Microsoft-connected entities and their patent activity this month; Director Iancu is only loosely connected to one of them (he fought against it)



  29. The Campaign to Subvert the US Patent Office by Misrepresenting Its Successes

    Figureheads of the patent microcosm (firms that profit from patent chaos) are still meddling in affairs which they intentionally mis-portray, conflating innovation with number of patents and so on



  30. Almost All Patent Lawsuits in China Are Filed by the Chinese, But IAM (Cherry) Picks the Exception

    China's patent office (SIPO) is a pretty one-sided office where Mandarin patents get filed primarily by local firms and lawsuits too are filed by local firms; IAM, however, found a "man bites dog" slant


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts