EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.22.09

Put the Red Hat on

Posted in Finance, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Novell, Ron Hovsepian, Servers, Steve Ballmer at 5:41 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Red Hat stock

Ron Hovsepian and Steve Ballmer with red hats

Summary: Ballmer and Hovsepian are failing once again to obstruct the leader in GNU/Linux servers

RED HAT is up approximately 5% after market close. It delivered its financial results a few hours ago. The stock has reached a very high value, despite Ron Hovsepian and Steve Ballmer (seen above) signing what several Web sites described as an “anti-Red Hat deal” or anti-Red Hat pact.

Novell recently lost more than $200,000,000, Microsoft is shrinking rapidly. and Red Hat is reportedly growing, which means that expenses do too.

Given the recent developments, Novell will carry on going "downhill", whereas its main rival, Red Hat, has good news for investors as its value soars.

To give a sample of news overage, in chronological order:

1. Ahead Of Red Hat Q3 Earnings

Open source solutions provider Red Hat Inc. (RHT: News ) is set to announce its third-quarter results after the market close Tuesday. On average, 21 analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expect a profit of $0.16 per share for the quarter on sales of $188.29 million. Analysts’ forecast typically excludes one-time items.

2. A Look at the Week Ahead – (BMY, JBL, OSIP, RHT, SQNM, V)

Red Hat Inc. (RHT) reports earnings on Tuesday and is trading right at fresh highs. Thomson Reuters has estimates pegged at $0.16 EPS and $188.49 million in revenues, and while this used to be a takeover target the valuations are now very high and this one almost certainly has to really beat estimates and raise guidance to keep everyone happy.

3. Micron Technology, Tibco Software, Red Hat

Red Hat /quotes/comstock/13*!rht/quotes/nls/rht (RHT 31.35, +1.48, +4.96%) is estimated to report a profit of 16 cents a share in the third quarter, according to analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters.

4. Micron Technology, Red Hat shares gain after hours

5. Red Hat profit, revenue beat Street view

Red Hat Inc (RHT.N) reported higher than-expected profit as the business software maker posted strong growth in the sales of its version of the Linux operating system, sending its stock up 3.5 percent.

The bully from Microsoft never got his way.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

10 Comments

  1. TheTruth said,

    December 22, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    Gravatar

    Nice one Roy, ever heard of “lie by ommision”. You post on how well RH is doing, that’s good. If they were a software company that can be compared to other companies.

    But RH (as you know) does not “sell” software, they sell support contracts, open you’re phone book and you will find a million similar companies.

    As for RH being a star well, lets look at the real facts of RH, you can do this as well Roy it appears you know how to use Yahoo Finance.

    ok:

    August 11 1999 Red Hat Lists on the stock market

    August 11 1999 RH lists on market, ……$42.625
    Jan 3 2000 RH PEAK stock price…………..$132.25 (nice)… SELL
    Sep 24 2001 Minimum stock price……….$3.50 (bad if you hold)

    NOW: 22 Dec 2009 and you think ………$29.37 is good ???

    Yield N/A
    Divident N/A
    P/E 66 !!!! (bigger is worse)

    So if you invested in RH when it listed you are still DOWN a significant amount.
    You could of purchased RH shares when they were $3.50 and you would have made a bit of scratch but you risked losing it all if RH failed, (as it very nearly did).

    In conclusion, RH is not doing that well at all, and they dont sell software, they are just one of millions of IT support companies.
    That are a “dime a dozen” if you just open your phone book and have a look.

    But Roy, we all know you dont really care for the full story, or the real truth do you ? :)

    Are you happy on IRC now you have weeded out anyone who does not agree with you and follow you’re doctrine ? Im sure the chat is exciting now.

    “Roy says something”. “” everybody replies, Roy said it, it MUST be true, all hail Roy””

    And reading your IRC, I find you “thought” up the idea of using the speed of light to measure distance… Wow, who would of thought !.

    Read much science Roy ?

    your_friend Reply:

    Ha ha. The point was to compare Red Hat to Novell, a software company that once dominated corporate networking but is also a services company that flirted with free software.

    It might be more appropriate to compare Red Hat with Novell’s sugar daddy, Microsoft. It seems like only yesterday that Microsoft came crashing down with the other dotcom bombs but their glory days were a full twelve years ago and they never did anything good for investors. How many pension plans squandered their hard earned money on $60 shares of MSFT to have it worth half of that today? That loss is before you adjust for inflation. What’s responsible for this? Could it be that Microsoft offers few goods or services that people actually want, or that the market for software in a box is about as dead as newsprint? Could it be that Red Hat is doing well because they are offering things that people want?

  2. TheTruth said,

    December 23, 2009 at 7:02 am

    Gravatar

    You fail to mention that MSFT had a stock split some years ago.
    (if you dont know what that means, look it up).

    But lets do a similar comparison to MS if you like, you’re favorate whipping boy.

    March 1986 MSFT list on market. ……$0.0955c
    Dec 1999 peak price before stock split……$58.375
    Stock split ~$60 buys 2xMSFT shares so you dividend and markings are 2x previou.

    Current MSFT Stock price ~$30

    Multiply that because you have 2 shares for every one means you have 2x $30 shares, totaling a little over $61 dollars real value assuming you sold.

    So Microsoft is NOT repeat NOT going down, if you think it is you dont understand finance at all. (or you believe Roy).

    so if you buy MS shares at $0.0955 and sell 2 of them at $61 dollars total what kind of profit do you think you would make ?

    (got a calculator !!).

    Im sure it’s ALOT, compared to Red Hat the $1000 you invest in RH or the $1000 dollars you invest in MS. One would make you a millionair the other you have done you money.

    It’s does nothing for Roy credibility to make claims about how poorly MS is going when it’s clear for everyone who cares to look knows full well Roy is not quite telling the truth.

    But do a bit of research, and consider not everything Roy says is true, use you’re own brain instead of being spoon fed by Swestowits.

    Makes you look as uninformed as he appears to be.

  3. TheTruth said,

    December 23, 2009 at 7:27 am

    Gravatar

    NOVL

    Aug 1988 list price. ………$3.4688

    TODAY…………………………$4.18

    I dont know about you, but when I went to school $4.18 was larger than $3.47

    RHT list price……………$42.625
    RHT current price……..$29.87

    and again when I was taught math $29.87 is alot lower than $42.625

    If you dont agree with me, I wonder about your ability to count.
    (or you’ve been believing Roy for way too long).

    If you would like to dispute my FACTS feel free, I would be interested to see you’re positive spin.

    But if you’re going to comment (Roy) on business and finance it would be a good idea for you to actually know what your talking about. you know, take the effort to actually find FACTS. Instead of just making it up to sound good.

    You commented once people dont want facts they just want sound bites. Again sound bites not based on facts meets the definition of an outright lie. And selectively “editing” and lying by omission is exactly the same thing.

    When everything (or most things) you say are clearly untrue, people do not know and cannot tell if you ever tell the truth. Like crying wolf eventually people will just ignore you.

    Sooner or later you will say something that someone else does not agree with, and if you cannot ban them you will just disregard them, or they will disregard you.

    So many posts, so many years and so little effect. Except to show people what you are really like, and what you’re real agenders are.

    Back on topic, I invite anyone to check Roy’s “facts” for yourself, YOU do the math and use your own mighty brain.

    If you still agree with Roy’s conclusions so be it, but Roy’s conclusions are not based on fact. As you can clearly see.

  4. TheTruth said,

    December 23, 2009 at 7:48 am

    Gravatar

    Amasing: !!!!!

    MSFT has had 9 (thats right 9) STOCK SPLITS since it listed.

    if you purchased ONE MSFT share for $0.0955 in 1986 you would have 288 shares of MSFT valued at ~$31.00 each.

    $8928 dollars worth of MSFT shares (288 of them) for your 10cent investment !!!..

    So you think MSFT is doing bad, sure I would have loved to have invested $10 on MSFT stock in 1986.

    So you $10 dollar investment, is worth the best part of a million dollars today. Not bad.

    Or you could spend $42 on RHT, and now have $32, you’ve LOST $10 dollars.

    Not made you’re self a million.

    $12 dollars in 1986 would make you over 1 million dollars in profit if you sold your shares today.

    You do the math, and find out THETRUTH for yourself.

  5. TheTruth said,

    December 23, 2009 at 8:06 am

    Gravatar

    Q. How does a 2-for-1 stock split actually work?

    A. A 2-for-1 split means the investor will have twice as many shares as he had before, at half the market price. Here’s an example: As of the record date (January 27, 2003) if an investor owns 100 shares of MSFT and the market price is $50.00/share, that investor’s total value is $5,000.00. After the split, the investor will have 200 shares of stock, but the market price will be approximately $25.00/share. The investor’s total investment value in MSFT remains the same at $5,000.00 until the stock price moves up or down.

    Q. Why did you split the stock now?

    A. The decision to split the stock was made by Microsoft’s Board of Directors, based on a desire to make our stock more accessible to a broader range of investors.

    Q. How many times have you split the stock?

    A. This is the ninth time the company has split the stock since Microsoft went public back in March 1986. One original share will equal 288 shares after this split is effective.

    http://www.microsoft.com/msft/FAQ/stocksplit.mspx

    So if you have of invested $120 dollars in MSFT in 1986 you would be a multi-millionair, in your own mansion, with a bank of the fastest computers you can buy, nice car, and retired doing what you like. All for less than the price of a night out for dinner !!.

    So it would seem creating a product that people like to use, that does the job and that people can use to get the job done and be productive. People will happily pay for product that they want to use, be it RAM, CPU’s, Hard drives and even the operating system.

    You accuse MS of all sorts of bad things, usually unsupported but you fail to note some of the clear facts that MS is doing very well and has made people alot of money, it’s employed people for many years, given them jobs and income. They contribute to commerce and the world economy. And they do it all by creating and selling product that most (the VERY VAST majority) like to use as it just works for them.

    Roy’s hate of anything that is not OSS, does not mean he speaks the truth or has any understanding of how the real world actually works.

    It’s all just hate talk and venom, with the thinking that if you throw enough mud some will stick.

    Troubleis you seem to be getting more mud on yourself than on anyone else.

    When 5 seconds of searching shows you’re “facts” to be completely false, or at the least, to be as nice as possible misleading.

  6. GeppettoFedora said,

    December 23, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    Gravatar

    To correct “TheTruth”, the historical stock splits are always represented in the current price (which is why the charts on google/yahoo/etc. don’t drop in half after the split). So when you say:

    Dec 1999 peak price before stock split……$58.375

    …that is in todays money. So if you bought RHT and MSFT at their respective peaks, you’d have lost more on the MSFT trade.

    Not that MSFT and RHT are really comparable anyway, if for no other reason than size, but your assertion that “they are just one of millions of IT support companies.” was amusing.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    GeppettoFedora,

    Don’t worry about him.

    It’s just one of the most disruptive trolls, called Mutex (and about 50 more nyms). He currently uses a nickname that Orwell would love, “TheTruth”.

  7. TheTruth said,

    December 23, 2009 at 3:07 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, I know how a stock split works, as the example stated explains.

    If you have one share worth $50, at the time of the split, you end up with two shares with $25 dollars.

    It does not change the fact that if you purchased 1 share in 1986, after the 9 share splits you would own 288 shares for the same outlay, A stock split does not change the overall value of a company, but it changes the number of shares you own for your outlay, you dont make any money from the split, but you have 2 times the potention for profit (or loss) of those shares.

    However, you spin it, investing in MS is a far better idea than investing in RH, and Novell is also better than RH, but not as good as MS.

    As for you Roy, as usual, you have nothing good to say, You say im disruptive for providing the facts you wish to omit. Im sure you dont like being shown to be a straight out lier. But I just check your “facts” and it’s so easy to catch you out with what you do.

    But as usual, you will not enter into a logical debate about subject, you would rather “preach” to your “diciples”. You know the ones that hang off your every word and think you are some kind of demi-god.

    At least they dont check your facts. and Call BS when they see it.

    I guess all the life skills you need is what you get from hanging out on BN IRC 24/7.
    It’s not like you actually have any life experience, or even a job !! :)

    It’s just when you lie all the time Roy, people wont believe you even if you do say something that resembles THETRUTH.

    Good luck with that.

    and as for Trolling, you would have to be the greatest troll of them all, what else do you do, but troll the web for tidbits agaist MS and spam your web site with you’re trolling results.

    You must have a miserable existance Roy, living burried deep in hate and bitterness as you do.

    your_friend Reply:

    Hmph. The worthlessness of Microsoft stocks seems to be a sore spot for you. How much of your savings have you lost to that company?

What Else is New


  1. Links 24/4/2019: Chrome 74, QEMU 4.0 Released

    Links for the day



  2. Supreme Court of the UK, Which Habitually Throws Out European Patents, May Overturn Troublesome Unwired Planet v Huawei Decision

    A lot of European Patents are facing growing scrutiny from courts (Team UPC, including Bristows, publicly complains about it this month) and "greenwashing" of the Office won't be enough to paint/frame these patents as "ethical"



  3. German Federal Patent Court Curbs the Patent Maximalism of the EPO, Which Promotes Patents on Nature and/or Maths Every Single Day

    European courts are restraining the EPO, which has been trying to bypass or replace such courts (with the UPC); it certainly seems as though European Patents rapidly lose their legitimacy or much-needed presumption of validity



  4. Any 'Linux' Foundation Needs to Be Managed by Geeks, Not Politicians and PR People

    Linux bureaucracy has put profits way ahead of technical merits and this poses a growing threat or constitutes risk to the direction of the project, not to mention its ownership



  5. Links 23/4/2019: Kodi 'Leia' 18.2 and DeX Everywhere

    Links for the day



  6. Code of Coercion

    Entryism is visible for all to see, but pointing it out is becoming a risky gambit because of the "be nice!" (or "be polite!") crowd, which shields the perpetrators of a slow and gradual corporate takeover



  7. António Campinos Would Not Refer to the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal If He Did Not Control the Outcomes

    António Campinos and his ilk aren’t interested in patent quality because his former ‘boss’, who publicly denied there were issues and vainly rejected patent quality concerns as illegitimate, is now controlled by him (reversal of roles) and many new appointees at the top are "yes men" (or women) of Campinos, former colleagues whom he bossed at EUIPO (as expected)



  8. Links 22/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC6, New Release of Netrunner and End of Scientific Linux

    Links for the day



  9. USPTO and EPO Both Slammed for Abandoning Patent Quality and Violating the Law/Caselaw in Order to Grant Illegitimate Patents on Life/Nature and Mathematics

    Mr. Iancu, the ‘American Battistelli’ (appointed owing to nepotism), mirrors the ‘Battistelli operandi’, which boils down to treating judges like they’re stooges and justices like an ignorable nuisance — all this in the name of litigation profits, which necessitate constant wars over illegitimate patents (it is expensive to prove their illegitimacy)



  10. IRC Proceedings: January 27th, 2019 – March 24th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  11. IRC Proceedings: December 2nd, 2018 – January 26th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  12. Links 21/4/2019: SuperTuxKart's 1.0 Release, Sam Hartman Is Debian’s Newest Project Leader (DPL)

    Links for the day



  13. The EPO's Use of Phrases Like “High-Quality Patent Services” Means They Know High-Quality European Patents Are 'Bygones'

    The EPO does a really poor job hiding the fact that its last remaining objective is to grant as many European Patents as possible (and as fast as possible), conveniently conflating quality with pace



  14. A Reader's Suggestion: Directions for Techrights

    Guest post by figosdev



  15. Links 20/4/2019: Weblate 3.6 and Pop!_OS 19.04

    Links for the day



  16. The Likes of Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Team Campinos and Team UPC Don't Represent Europe But Hurt Europe

    The abject disinterest in patent quality and patent validity (as judged by courts) threatens Europe but not to the detriment of those who are in the 'business' of suing and printing lots of worthless patents



  17. The Linux Foundation Needs to Change Course Before GNU/Linux (as a Free Operating System) is Dead

    The issues associated with the Linux Foundation are not entirely new; but Linux now incorporates so many restrictions and contains so many binary blobs that one begins to wonder what "Linux" even means



  18. Largest Patent Offices Try to Leave Courts in a State of Disarray to Enable the Granting of Fake Patents in the US and Europe

    Like a monarchy that effectively runs all branches of government the management of the EPO is trying to work around the judiciary; the same is increasingly happening (or at least attempted) in the United States



  19. Links 19/4/2019: PyPy 7.1.1, LabPlot 2.6, Kipi Plugins 5.9.1 Released

    Links for the day



  20. Links 18/4/2019: Ubuntu and Derivatives Have Releases, digiKam 6.1.0, OpenSSH 8.0 and LibreOffice 6.2.3

    Links for the day



  21. Freedom is Not a Business and Those Who Make 'Business' by Giving it Away Deserve Naming

    Free software is being parceled and sold to private monopolisers; those who facilitate the process enrich themselves and pose a growing threat to freedom in general — a subject we intend to tackle in the near future



  22. Concluding the Linux Foundation (LF) “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 3)

    Conferences constructed or put together based on payments rather than merit pose a risk to the freedom of free software; we conclude our series about events set up by the largest of culprits, which profits from this erosion of freedom



  23. “Mention the War” (of Microsoft Against GNU/Linux)

    The GNU/Linux desktop (or laptops) seems to be languishing or deteriorating, making way for proprietary takeover in the form of Vista 10 and Chrome OS and “web apps” (surveillance); nobody seems too bothered — certainly not the Linux Foundation — by the fact that GNU/Linux itself is being relegated or demoted to a mere “app” on these surveillance platforms (WSL, Croûton and so on)



  24. The European Patent Office Does Not Care About the Law, Today's Management Constantly Attempts to Bypass the Law

    Many EPs (European Patents) are actually "IPs" (invalid patents); the EPO doesn't seem to care and it is again paying for corrupt scholars to toe the party line



  25. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Once Again Pours Cold Water on Patent Maximalists

    Any hopes of a rebound or turnaround have just been shattered because a bizarre attack on the appeal process (misusing tribal immunity) fell on deaf ears and software patents definitely don't interest the highest court, which already deemed them invalid half a decade ago



  26. Links 17/4/2019: Qt 5.12.3 Released, Ola Bini Arrested (Political Stunts)

    Links for the day



  27. Links 16/4/2019: CentOS Turns 15, Qt Creator 4.9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  28. GNU/Linux is Being Eaten Alive by Large Corporations With Their Agenda

    A sort of corporate takeover, or moneyed interests at the expense of our freedom, can be seen as a 'soft coup' whose eventual outcome would involve all or most servers in 'the cloud' (surveillance with patent tax as part of the rental fees) and almost no laptops/desktops which aren't remotely controlled (and limit what's run on them, using something like UEFI 'secure boot')



  29. Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF

    Restrictions on speech are said to have been spread and reached some of the most liberal circles, according to a credible veteran who opposes illiberal censorship



  30. Corporate Media Will Never Cover the EPO's Violations of the Law With Respect to Patent Scope

    The greed-driven gold rush for patents has resulted in a large pool of European Patents that have no legitimacy and are nowadays associated with low legal certainty; the media isn't interested in covering such a monumental disaster that poses a threat to the whole of Europe


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts