EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.09.12

Linux is Not Enough

Posted in FSF, GNU/Linux, Kernel at 10:02 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Tux illustration

Summary: Remark on the context in which we achieve software freedom

I wish to interrupt our flow of news-related commentary and discuss something that has bothered me for over a year. The FSF, one of the few (if not the only) bodies that truly ‘get’ freedom and technology’s effects on it, has lost a lot of key staff. I won’t name them, but it is clear that plenty of brain drain occurred there. The Linux Foundation, which has many members that promote software patents and sell proprietary, freedom-disregarding software, recently accepted money from Microsoft as well. At the same time, the platform which takes over (in FOSS form) is Android, where applications are mostly proprietary and there is no GNU.

Celebrating “victory” when Android takes over is like liberals/progressives celebrating victory just because Romney lost. There is a broader fight to fight.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

12 Comments

  1. mcinsand said,

    November 9, 2012 at 10:35 am

    Gravatar

    Is there any way we can find out the background of The Linux Foundation accepting MS’ money? In a previous company, we had to be worried about just how we turned away certain customers; if their money was good, then we could have been sued for refusing something we sold on the open market. I’m not making excuses, but just wanting to be sure that I understand.

    As for excuses, where I simply cannot make one is in the fact that I have not personally donated to The Linux Foundation. I remember in the ’80′s wishing that I could afford Unix, rather than suffer with MS, but college students couldn’t handle $500 or so in license fees. Now, things are different, and we can have something much better than the toy OS’s (Windows XP-8 or OSX) for much, much less. Those of us that don’t (or no longer) code should contribute in other ways, and it wouldn’t take a lot to make a huge difference. Humble Bundles have shown how much more willing Linux users are to spend money on things like games, and maybe we need to stop being so blithe about downloading the cutting technological edge for free. If we all even contributed 5€ per year, the Linux Foundation wouldn’t have to prostitute themselves out.

    Given what The Humble Bundle has seen with respect to FOSS users, do you think that there could be a chance to have a bundle with a higher minimum price, where the difference goes to The Linux Foundation? Given the attention the Humble Bundle gets, the awareness could excite even more Linux users to buy one, thus benefitting The Linux Foundation and the HB crew.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    If we all even contributed 5€ per year, the Linux Foundation wouldn’t have to prostitute themselves out.

    Same with political parties.

    NotZed Reply:

    Donating to the LF wouldn’t help: they are there to push the agenda of those with the biggest purse. It would be like pretending having a couple of shares in any company would let you have a hand in their decisions – merely statistical noise at best.

    They are not a union for people, they’re a union for money.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    You know it when they insist on saying Open Source and never Free software. It’s about business, not freedom.

    Michael Reply:

    Linus Torvalds:
    —–
    Microsoft isn’t evil
    —–
    There are “extremists” in the free software world, but that’s
    one major reason why I don’t call what I do “free software”
    any more. I don’t want to be associated with the people for
    whom it’s about exclusion and hatred.
    —–

    Amazing how you think the very guy who created Linux is in it all for business reasons. You really have no clue about the open source community.

  2. mcinsand said,

    November 9, 2012 at 10:53 am

    Gravatar

    On another note, since you brought it up (*wink*), celbration over Romney’s loss is a lot broader. Anyone that believes in actually believing in a position from one minute to the next should be opposed to Romney; he changes views more often than some people change their socks. The only consistency was that he would say anything that he thought an audience wanted to hear, if it might possible garner a few more votes. He ended up wasting few opportunities to discredit himself and, by association, the Republican party.

    In all seriousness, I would not think that the Democrats would be celebrating too much. Although the electoral college count was firm, the popular vote was close, and that is with a non-candidate like Romney. The Dems dodged a bullet this time, and I have no doubt that the US would be looking to change presidents in January if someone in Republican leadership had taken 5 minutes to consider the importance of a candidate actually believing something.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I think that election fraud has done more to discredit GOP than Romney did.

    mcinsand Reply:

    We may have to disagree. I think GW Bush did more do discredit the GOP than any election issues. He could not have more clearly, consistenly, or completely shown that the GOP’s age-old messages about reducing the role of big-brother government and responsible spending were empty.

    Personally, I am strictly nonpartisan. Both liberal and conservative perspectives have some value, but the problem is that the two sides now take extreme, tribalistic approaches. We have to get away from each issue being about one party winning to focus on what is best for the country.

    Sorry. Off my soapbox now.

    Regards.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    We may have to disagree.

    We don’t disagree. If you add Bush to this discussion, then I agree.

  3. mcinsand said,

    November 9, 2012 at 12:10 pm

    Gravatar

    I’m not so sure, at least when it comes to my country. We would have to have a major culture change, although we definitely need to rewrite corporate law to revoke individual status. No matter how much individuals contribute, our two parties will depend on their corporate special interests to have any potential advantage over the other party.

    Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Obama won’t address this issue; after all, it would make him a hypocrite.

    http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&id=N00009638

  4. Michael said,

    November 9, 2012 at 4:44 pm

    Gravatar

    The FSF gets freedom? Based on what? There double-talk BS about how a restrictive license is “free”? Listen, if you want to “free” your code then make it public domain.

    Do not take that to mean I am in any way against the GPL. I am not. It is a fine license and if you want to use the protections it offers for your work I am all for it. Great choice and thank you for using a license with such open terms. Amazing how many people are willing to do so and I commend them for it.

    Just do not lie and say you are making your code “free”. You are not. You are placing restrictions on how your code is used. Period. Enough with the cult-like double-talk from the FSF and its ignorant followers.

What Else is New


  1. Links 26/3/2017: Debian Project Leader Elections, SecureDrop and Alexandre Oliva FSF Winners

    Links for the day



  2. His Master's Voice, Jesper Kongstad, Blocks Discussion of Investigative and Disciplinary Procedures at the EPO

    The Chairman of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation is actively preventing not just the dismissal of Battistelli but also discussion of Battistelli's abuses



  3. Heiko Maas and the State of Germany Viewed as Increasingly Complicit in EPO Scandals and Toxic UPC Agenda

    It is becoming hard if not impossible to interpret silence and inaction from Maas as a form of endorsement for everything the EPO has been doing, with the German delegates displaying more of that apathy which in itself constitutes a form of complicity



  4. With IP Kat Coverage of EPO Scandals Coming to an End (Officially), Techrights and The Register Remain to Cover New Developments

    One final post about the end of Merpel’s EPO coverage, which is unfortunate but understandable given the EPO’s track record attacking the media, including blogs like IP Kat, sites of patent stakeholders, and even so-called media partners



  5. Everyone, Including Patent Law Firms, Will Suffer From the Demise of the EPO

    Concerns about quality of patents granted by the EPO (EPs) are publicly raised by industry/EPO insiders, albeit in an anonymous fashion



  6. Yes, Battistelli's Ban on EPO Strikes (or Severe Limitation Thereof) is a Violation of Human Rights

    Battistelli has curtailed even the right to strike, yet anonymous cowards attempt to blame the staff (as in patent examiners) for not going out of their way to engage in 'unauthorised' strikes (entailing dismissal)



  7. Even the EPO's Administrative Council No Longer Trusts Its Chairman, Battistelli's 'Chinchilla' Jesper Kongstad

    Kongstad's protection of Battistelli, whom he is supposed to oversee, stretches to the point where national representatives (delegates) are being misinformed



  8. Thanks to Merpel, the World Knows EPO Scandals a Lot Better, But It's a Shame That IP Kat Helped UPC

    A look back at Merpel's final post about EPO scandals and the looming threat of the UPC, which UPC opportunists such as Bristows LLP still try hard to make a reality, exploiting bogus (hastily-granted) patents for endless litigation all around Europe



  9. EPO Critics Threatened by Self-Censorship, Comment Censorship, and a Growing Threat to Anonymity

    Putting in perspective the campaign for justice at the EPO, which to a large degree relies on whistleblowers and thus depends a great deal on freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and anonymity



  10. Links 25/3/2017: Maru OS 0.4, C++17 Complete

    Links for the day



  11. Judge and Justice Bashing in the United States, EPC Bashing at the EPO

    Enforcement of the law based on constitutional grounds and based on the European Patent Convention (EPC) in an age of retribution and insults -- sometimes even libel -- against judges



  12. Looking for EPO Nepotism? Forget About Jouve and Look Closely at Europatis Instead.

    Debates about the contract of Jouve with the EPO overlook the elephants in the room, which include companies that are established and run by former EPO chiefs and enjoy a relationship with the EPO



  13. Depressing EPO News: Attacks on Staff, Attacks on Life, Brain Drain, Patents on Life, Patent Trolls Come to Germany, and Spain Being Misled

    A roundup of the latest developments at the EPO combined with feedback from insiders, who are not tolerating their misguided and increasingly abusive management



  14. It Certainly Looks Like Microsoft is Already Siccing Its Patent Trolls, Including Intellectual Ventures, on Companies That Use Linux (Until They Pay 'Protection' Money)

    News about Intellectual Ventures and Finjan Holdings (Microsoft-funded patent trolls) reinforces our allegations -- not mere suspicions anymore -- that Microsoft would 'punish' companies that are not paying subscription fees (hosting) or royalties (patent tax) to Microsoft and are thus in some sense 'indebted' to Microsoft



  15. Links 24/3/2017: Microsoft Aggression, Eudyptula Challenge Status Report

    Links for the day



  16. Bernhard Rapkay, Former MEP and Rapporteur on Unitary Patent, Shoots Down UPC Hopes While UPC Hopefuls Recognise That Spain Isn't Interested Either

    Germany, the UK and Spain remain massive barriers to the UPC -- all this in spite of misleading reports and fake news which attempted to make politicians believe otherwise (for political leverage, by means of dirty lobbying contingent upon misinformation)



  17. Links 23/3/2017: Qt 5.9 Beta, Gluster Storage 3.2

    Links for the day



  18. The Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation Has Just Buried an Innocent Judge That Battistelli Does Not Like

    An innocent judge (never proven guilty of anything, only publicly defamed with help from Team Battistelli and dubious 'intelligence' gathering) is one of the forgotten casualties of the latest meeting of the Administrative Council (AC), which has become growingly complicit rather than a mere bystander at a 'crime' scene



  19. Nepotism at the European Patent Office and Suspicious Absence of Tenders for Big Projects

    Carte blanche is a French term which now perfectly describes the symptoms encountered in the European Patent Office, more so once led by a lot of French people (Battistelli and his friends)



  20. “Terror” Patent Office Bemoans Terror, Spreads Lies

    Response to some of the latest utterances from the European Patent Office, where patently untruthful claims have rapidly become the norm



  21. China Seems to be Using Patents to Push Foreign Companies Out of China, in the Same Way It Infamously Uses Censorship

    Chinese patent policies are harming competition from abroad, e.g. Japan and the US, and US patent policy is being shaped by its higher courts, albeit not yet effectively combating the element that's destroying productive companies (besieged by patent trolls)



  22. 22,000 Blog Posts

    A special number is reached again, marking another milestone for the site



  23. The EPO is Lying to Its Own Staff About ILO and Endless (Over 2 Years) EPO Mistrials

    The creative writing skills of some spinners who work for Battistelli would have staff believe that all is fine and dandy at the EPO and ILO is dealing effectively with staff complaints about the EPO (even if several years too late)



  24. EPO’s Georg Weber Continues Horrifying Trend of EPO Promoting Software Patents in Defiance of Directive, EPC, and Common Sense

    The EPO's promotion of software patents, even out in the open, is an insult to the notion that the EPO is adhering to or is bound by the rules upon which it maintains its conditional monopoly



  25. Protectionism v Sharing: How the US Supreme Court Decides Patent Cases

    As the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) starts delivering some decisions we take stock of what's to come regarding patents



  26. Links 22/3/2017: GNOME 3.24, Wine-Staging 2.4 Released

    Links for the day



  27. The Battistelli Regime, With Its Endless Scandals, Threatens to Crash the Unitary Patent (UPC), Stakeholders Concerned

    The disdain and the growing impatience have become a huge liability not just to Battistelli but to the European Patent Office (EPO) as a whole



  28. The Photos the EPO Absolutely Doesn't Want the Public to See: Battistelli is Building a Palace Using Stakeholders' Money

    The Office is scrambling to hide evidence of its out-of-control spendings, which will leave the EPO out of money when the backlog is eliminated by many erroneous grants (or rejections)



  29. In the US Patent System, Evolved Tricks for Bypassing Invalidations of Software Patents and Getting Them Granted by the USPTO

    A roundup of news about patents in the US and how the patent microcosm attempts to patent software in spite of Alice (high-impact SCOTUS decision from 2014)



  30. “Then They Came For Me—And There Was No One Left To Speak For Me.”

    The decreasing number of people who cover EPO scandals (partly due to fear, or Battistelli's notorious "reign of terror") and a cause for hope, as well as a call for help


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts