EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.28.18

In the EPO Under António Campinos and His Predecessor Battistelli Patents Can Almost be Presumed “Invalid” (in Courts)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:20 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The EPO’s new “away” uniform?

EPO white flag
EPO logo with white background (whitewashing)

Summary: By lowering patent quality for the sake of faked ‘growth’ (in patent awards, not innovation) the patent offices merely harm the perception of patents as valid until/unless proven otherwise

THE EPO and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) both have a patent quality problem. The new USPTO Director seems not to care if SCOTUS narrowed patent scope (recall Iancu's speech at an IPO event). Neither does the ITC, unlike the Federal Circuit, which typically affirms Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs), citing 35 U.S.C. § 101. As for the EPO, it regularly promotes software patents in Europe, more so under António Campinos. They use all sorts of buzzwords and three-letter acronyms (sometimes two- and four-letter acronyms), but the net effect is the same. Abstract patents, which national courts would likely reject, get granted.

What good are patents if or when there’s no legal certainty associated with them? It almost defeats the very essence and purpose of patents.

Professor Dennis Crouch has just taken note of this utterly ridiculous patent which looks like something a child would draw on a chalkboard. The USPTO would become a laughing stock for patents like these. As Crouch put it: “Morgan Irons patented “Ecological System Model” is pretty cool — although deceptively simple. U.S. patent No. 9,970,208 — focusing on space agriculture.”

Crouch has also just noted a decline in the number of patents granted in the US (as projected earlier this year). The overall number is still far too high and many of these are bunk, bogus, worthless as courts would reject them anyway. “We’ve reached the end of FY2018,” Crouch wrote. “During the year, the USPTO has issued just over 300,000 patents. This is a small drop from FY2017, but the second highest year on record.”

Professor James Bessen has meanwhile noted (on Twitter) a new article titled “China Claims More Patents Than Any Country—Most Are Worthless”. This doesn’t surprise us at all as we have been saying this repeatedly for years. The trouble is, Europe and the US go down the same path now; desperate to ‘catch up’ with China, they too try to lower patent quality and grant a lot of dubious patents.

World Intellectual Property Review has just written about the EPO using China as somewhat of role model for patents (even though Chinese patents are regarded as somewhat of a joke). “EPO and CNIPA sign bilateral co-operation agreement,” IPPro Patents said in its headline.

IP Watch, which stopped covering EPO scandals (and its chief took selfies with Campinos, which may or may not say something), wrote some time yesterday about Korea’s patent office (KIPO) using buzzwords to help applicants bypass their own restrictions on software patenting. They even use the EPO’s favourite buzzword/term, “4IR”. To quote this new interview: “To this end, KIPO will strive to secure strong, high-quality patents to have competitiveness in key technical fields of the 4IR such as artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT).”

“They even use the EPO’s favourite buzzword/term, “4IR”.”So does KIPO too lower patent quality, in the name of facilitating/respecting buzzwords? The trouble is, affirmation rates in courts are rather low, which means that a lot of awarded patents can now be presumed invalid. So what good are these really? A paid press release (blocked in EU due to GDPR) was released this week and it’s titled “TFF Pharmaceuticals Receives Notice of Intention to Grant European Patent for Its Thin Film Freezing Process, Providing IP Protection in Europe until 2028″ (but is it valid?)

In the US, even patent maximalists are currently sceptical of the situation. They don’t believe that being more lenient in granting is the ‘solution’ but making the courts more lenient should the goal (i.e. lowering the patent bar). As one patent maximalist put it: “Likely example of what Iancu’s standard will stop: PTO INVENTING NEW categories of judicial exceptions: “claims are directed to the abstract idea of “using categories to organize, store and transmit information” https://e-foia.uspto.gov/Foia/RetrievePdf?system=BPAI&flNm=fd2018001127-09-13-2018-1 …”

That would not, in any way whatsoever, change how courts view these patents. Director Iancu is like a ‘mole’ of lawyers (like himself); he or his firm had worked for Trump before he became Director and IPPro Patents belatedly covered his speech as follows: “The US must stop commingling the categories of invention with the conditions of patentability, according to US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) director, Andrei Iancu.” [via]

But again, that would not change what courts decide. “Iancu says guidance is needed on patentable subject matter eligibility to get out of a “rut”, particularly on the how Section 101 is different from Sections 102, 103 and 112,” Michael Loney wrote. Maybe what’s needed is higher patent bar, even if that means far fewer patents being granted. As Benjamin Henrion put it: “Iancu could have just copy/pasted the European Patent Convention art52, but he just wanted software patents back, and abolish Alice for its clients…”

Well, Iancu does not obey courts; like the President who appointed him, he just overrides the courts. He thinks he’s a lawmaker or something.

“Really,” said one reasonable observer, “it’s Iancu who needs to get on the same page as the courts — particularly the Supreme Court, which does get the final say in these matters until and unless Congress acts. Iancu doesn’t get to make the rules; that’s just how it goes.”

She was citing/quoting the maximalists as saying: “So its nice that Iancu is working on 101, but the courts also need to get on the same page. Whats the point of the PTO fixing their 101 issues only to have the courts kill patents on the same 101 issues a few years later when the patents are enforced?”

This maximalist later clarified to her: “I agree. Proposing all of these changes on 101 is a waste if the courts are going to kill on the same issues. What’s the point? IP still not enforceable. [] While issued patents are valid they aren’t worth the ink or the paper unless they can be enforced. So the pto stops rejecting on 101 and issues SW patents again at a higher rate. PO tries to enforce in court down the line and gets killed due to 101. Massive waste of time & money…”

She later added (lots more in there from her): “Issued patents are *presumed* valid; they are not conclusively valid as an evidentiary matter. If a defendant in an infringement case proves by clear and convincing evidence that the patent was erroneously issued, then the presumption is defeated.”

Therein lies the danger to the EPO. What good are European Patents that aren’t presumed valid or likely to be considered invalid by courts? Lawyers may benefit, but nobody else…

“That’s called the “Rule of Law”,” Henrion remarked on the above conversation. “US is lucky, in Europe we have the EPO that is not bound by any court, and don’t give a damn if for ex the French courts are saying their practice to grant swpat [software patents] don’t have a legal ground. So you are lucky.”

“That’s separation of powers and rule of law for you,” another person remarked.

We cannot have patent offices deciding the rules by which they’re governed. That would be even a laughable proposition in a country like China. We’ll say a lot more about it in the weekend (in relation to the US).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. South Korea's Government Will Show If Microsoft Loves Linux or Just Attacks It Very Viciously Like It Did in Munich

    Microsoft's hatred of all things GNU/Linux is always put to the test when someone 'dares' use it outside Microsoft's control and cash cows (e.g. Azure and Vista 10/WSL); will Microsoft combat its longstanding urge to corrupt or oust officials with the courage to say "no" to Microsoft?



  2. Links 19/5/2019: KDE Applications 19.04.1 in FlatHub and GNU/Linux Adoption

    Links for the day



  3. The War on Patent Quality

    A look at the EPO's reluctance to admit errors and resistance to the EPC, which is its very founding document



  4. Watchtroll, Composed by Patent Trolls, Calls the American Patent System “Corrupt”

    Another very fine piece from Watchtroll comes from very fine patent trolls who cheer for Donald Trump as if he's the one who tackles corruption rather than spreading it



  5. Unified Patent Court Won't Happen Just Because the Litigation Microcosm Wants It

    Unified Patent Court (UPC) hopefuls are quote-mining and cherry-picking to manufacture the false impression that the UPC is just around the corner when in reality the UPC is pretty much dead (but not buried yet)



  6. Links 17/5/2019: South Korea's GNU/Linux Pivot, Linux 5.1.3

    Links for the day



  7. Q2 Midterm Weather Forecast for EPOnia, Part 4: Happy Birthday to the Kötter Group?

    This year the Kötter Group commemorates the 85th anniversary of its existence. But is it really a cause for celebration or would a less self-congratulatory approach be more fitting? And does it create the risk that a routine tendering exercise at the EPO will turn into Operation Charlie Foxtrot?



  8. Links 16/5/2019: Cockpit 194, VMware Acquires Bitnami, Another Wine Announcement and Krita 4.2.0 Beta

    Links for the day



  9. The EPO's Key Function -- Like the UPC's Vision -- Has Virtually Collapsed

    The EPO no longer issues good patents and staff is extremely unhappy; but the Office tries to create an alternate (false) reality and issues intentionally misleading statements



  10. Stanford's NPE Litigation Database Makes a Nice Addition in the Fight Against Software Patent Trolls

    As the United States of America becomes less trolls- and software patents-friendly (often conflated with plaintiff (un)friendliness) it's important to have accurate data which documents the numbers and motivates better policy; The NPE (troll) Litigation Database is a move towards that and it's free to access/use



  11. Q2 Midterm Weather Forecast for EPOnia, Part 3: “Ein kritikwürdiges Unternehmen”

    A brief account of some further controversies in which the Kötter Group has been involved and its strained relations with German trade unions such as Verdi



  12. EPO Had a Leakage Problem and Privacy of Stakeholders Was Compromised, Affecting at Least 100 Cases

    The confidentiality principle was compromised at the EPO and stakeholders weren't told about it (there was a coverup)



  13. Links 15/5/2019: More Linux Patches and More Known Intel Bugs

    Links for the day



  14. False Hope for Patent Maximalists and Litigation Zealots

    Patent litigation predators in the United States, along with Team UPC in Europe, are trying to manufacture optimistic predictions; a quick and rather shallow critical analysis reveals their lies and distortions



  15. The Race to the Bottom of Patent Quality at the EPO

    The EPO has become more like a rubber-stamper than a patent office — a fact that worries senior staff who witnessed this gradual and troublesome transition (from quality to raw quantity)



  16. Q2 Midterm Weather Forecast for EPOnia, Part 2: Meet the Kötters

    An introduction to the Kötter Group, the private security conglomerate which is lined up for the award of a juicy EUR 30 million contract for the provision of security services at the EPO



  17. Links 14/5/2019: Red Hat Satellite 6.5, NVIDIA 430.14 Linux Driver and New Security Bug (MDS)

    Links for the day



  18. Links 14/5/2019: GNU/Linux in Kerala, DXVK 1.2, KDE Frameworks 5.58.0 Released

    Links for the day



  19. Q2 Midterm Weather Forecast for EPOnia, Part 1: Urgent Shitstorm Alert

    Experts at the European Patent Office's (EPO) weather observation station have just issued an urgent alert warning about a major shitstorm looming on the horizon



  20. Patents That Were Gleefully Granted by the EPO Continue to Perish in Courts

    The decreasing quality of granted European Patents already becomes a growing problem if not a crisis of uncertainty



  21. Links 13/5/2019: ExTiX 19.5 and GNU Radio Conference 2019

    Links for the day



  22. The Microsoft Guide to the Open Source Galaxy

    Thou shalt not...



  23. Microsoft Would Kill the Goose for Money

    Microsoft is just 'monetising' Open Source by using it as 'bait' for Microsoft's proprietary software; those who we might expect to antagonise this have effectively been bribed by Microsoft



  24. Links 13/5/2019: Nanonote 1.2.0, OpenMandriva Lx 4.0 RC, and GNUnet 0.11.4

    Links for the day



  25. Professionally Incompetent EPO Management

    The EPO remains an awful employer, with top-level management largely responsible for the loss of talent and even money



  26. Links 12/5/2019: Linux 5.1.1, GDB 8.3, KStars 3.2.2 Released

    Links for the day



  27. Did Battistelli 'Steal' ~$100,000,000 Euros From the EPO?

    While enjoying diplomatic immunity the thug from CEIPI (who is back at the EPO as a jurist) passed millions if not billions (over the long run) in liabilities; this was done with total and inexcusable impunity, no effective oversight



  28. The Biased EPO Does Not Want to Hear From Anyone Except Those Who Pay the EPO

    The EPO's corruption and violations of the law are a threat to everyone in the world; the EPO only ever listens to those who pay for "access" or those who embrace the "religion" of the EPO



  29. Team UPC Has Run Out of Arguments, So Now It's Just Writing Anti-Brexit Rants With Testicles in the Headlines

    Nothing has worked for firms that crafted and lobbied hard for the Unified Patent Court (UPC); after necrophilia a new low is being reached



  30. Making the Patent System About Productive Actors (Again), Not a Bunch of Law Firms and Trolls

    The US patent system is going out of shape and out of tune, just like the EPO when Battistelli came to it, dismantling the rule of law and even judges whom he did not like


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts