EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.28.18

In the EPO Under António Campinos and His Predecessor Battistelli Patents Can Almost be Presumed “Invalid” (in Courts)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:20 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The EPO’s new “away” uniform?

EPO white flag
EPO logo with white background (whitewashing)

Summary: By lowering patent quality for the sake of faked ‘growth’ (in patent awards, not innovation) the patent offices merely harm the perception of patents as valid until/unless proven otherwise

THE EPO and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) both have a patent quality problem. The new USPTO Director seems not to care if SCOTUS narrowed patent scope (recall Iancu's speech at an IPO event). Neither does the ITC, unlike the Federal Circuit, which typically affirms Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs), citing 35 U.S.C. § 101. As for the EPO, it regularly promotes software patents in Europe, more so under António Campinos. They use all sorts of buzzwords and three-letter acronyms (sometimes two- and four-letter acronyms), but the net effect is the same. Abstract patents, which national courts would likely reject, get granted.

What good are patents if or when there’s no legal certainty associated with them? It almost defeats the very essence and purpose of patents.

Professor Dennis Crouch has just taken note of this utterly ridiculous patent which looks like something a child would draw on a chalkboard. The USPTO would become a laughing stock for patents like these. As Crouch put it: “Morgan Irons patented “Ecological System Model” is pretty cool — although deceptively simple. U.S. patent No. 9,970,208 — focusing on space agriculture.”

Crouch has also just noted a decline in the number of patents granted in the US (as projected earlier this year). The overall number is still far too high and many of these are bunk, bogus, worthless as courts would reject them anyway. “We’ve reached the end of FY2018,” Crouch wrote. “During the year, the USPTO has issued just over 300,000 patents. This is a small drop from FY2017, but the second highest year on record.”

Professor James Bessen has meanwhile noted (on Twitter) a new article titled “China Claims More Patents Than Any Country—Most Are Worthless”. This doesn’t surprise us at all as we have been saying this repeatedly for years. The trouble is, Europe and the US go down the same path now; desperate to ‘catch up’ with China, they too try to lower patent quality and grant a lot of dubious patents.

World Intellectual Property Review has just written about the EPO using China as somewhat of role model for patents (even though Chinese patents are regarded as somewhat of a joke). “EPO and CNIPA sign bilateral co-operation agreement,” IPPro Patents said in its headline.

IP Watch, which stopped covering EPO scandals (and its chief took selfies with Campinos, which may or may not say something), wrote some time yesterday about Korea’s patent office (KIPO) using buzzwords to help applicants bypass their own restrictions on software patenting. They even use the EPO’s favourite buzzword/term, “4IR”. To quote this new interview: “To this end, KIPO will strive to secure strong, high-quality patents to have competitiveness in key technical fields of the 4IR such as artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT).”

“They even use the EPO’s favourite buzzword/term, “4IR”.”So does KIPO too lower patent quality, in the name of facilitating/respecting buzzwords? The trouble is, affirmation rates in courts are rather low, which means that a lot of awarded patents can now be presumed invalid. So what good are these really? A paid press release (blocked in EU due to GDPR) was released this week and it’s titled “TFF Pharmaceuticals Receives Notice of Intention to Grant European Patent for Its Thin Film Freezing Process, Providing IP Protection in Europe until 2028″ (but is it valid?)

In the US, even patent maximalists are currently sceptical of the situation. They don’t believe that being more lenient in granting is the ‘solution’ but making the courts more lenient should the goal (i.e. lowering the patent bar). As one patent maximalist put it: “Likely example of what Iancu’s standard will stop: PTO INVENTING NEW categories of judicial exceptions: “claims are directed to the abstract idea of “using categories to organize, store and transmit information” https://e-foia.uspto.gov/Foia/RetrievePdf?system=BPAI&flNm=fd2018001127-09-13-2018-1 …”

That would not, in any way whatsoever, change how courts view these patents. Director Iancu is like a ‘mole’ of lawyers (like himself); he or his firm had worked for Trump before he became Director and IPPro Patents belatedly covered his speech as follows: “The US must stop commingling the categories of invention with the conditions of patentability, according to US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) director, Andrei Iancu.” [via]

But again, that would not change what courts decide. “Iancu says guidance is needed on patentable subject matter eligibility to get out of a “rut”, particularly on the how Section 101 is different from Sections 102, 103 and 112,” Michael Loney wrote. Maybe what’s needed is higher patent bar, even if that means far fewer patents being granted. As Benjamin Henrion put it: “Iancu could have just copy/pasted the European Patent Convention art52, but he just wanted software patents back, and abolish Alice for its clients…”

Well, Iancu does not obey courts; like the President who appointed him, he just overrides the courts. He thinks he’s a lawmaker or something.

“Really,” said one reasonable observer, “it’s Iancu who needs to get on the same page as the courts — particularly the Supreme Court, which does get the final say in these matters until and unless Congress acts. Iancu doesn’t get to make the rules; that’s just how it goes.”

She was citing/quoting the maximalists as saying: “So its nice that Iancu is working on 101, but the courts also need to get on the same page. Whats the point of the PTO fixing their 101 issues only to have the courts kill patents on the same 101 issues a few years later when the patents are enforced?”

This maximalist later clarified to her: “I agree. Proposing all of these changes on 101 is a waste if the courts are going to kill on the same issues. What’s the point? IP still not enforceable. [] While issued patents are valid they aren’t worth the ink or the paper unless they can be enforced. So the pto stops rejecting on 101 and issues SW patents again at a higher rate. PO tries to enforce in court down the line and gets killed due to 101. Massive waste of time & money…”

She later added (lots more in there from her): “Issued patents are *presumed* valid; they are not conclusively valid as an evidentiary matter. If a defendant in an infringement case proves by clear and convincing evidence that the patent was erroneously issued, then the presumption is defeated.”

Therein lies the danger to the EPO. What good are European Patents that aren’t presumed valid or likely to be considered invalid by courts? Lawyers may benefit, but nobody else…

“That’s called the “Rule of Law”,” Henrion remarked on the above conversation. “US is lucky, in Europe we have the EPO that is not bound by any court, and don’t give a damn if for ex the French courts are saying their practice to grant swpat [software patents] don’t have a legal ground. So you are lucky.”

“That’s separation of powers and rule of law for you,” another person remarked.

We cannot have patent offices deciding the rules by which they’re governed. That would be even a laughable proposition in a country like China. We’ll say a lot more about it in the weekend (in relation to the US).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 5/4/2020: MindSpore, Covid-19 Projects and More

    Links for the day



  2. EPO is Just Like Some Cruel Political Party and Not a Patent Office

    The "cabal" which runs today's EPO (even the word "Mafia" seems suitable here) isn't acting -- not even remotely -- like a patent office; it's a patent-printing operation ("protection money" as income) that uses shallow political stunts to manufacture consent with the EU's 'generous' assistance



  3. Digitalisation and Digital Technologies as a Ploy to Justify Illegal Software Patents

    Say "hello" to the next weasel word/s; from the "hey hi" hype wave we've now moved to something "digital" (which can mean just about anything, including algorithms of all sorts)



  4. The Fall of the UPC - Part X: How We Shall Catalogue UPC Lies

    The cult that Team UPC became (one member lying to another member, maintaining a false version of reality) will be judged based on underlying facts, not lying about facts; we start with a token of contempt for IP Kat and Bristows LLP (there are overlaps)



  5. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 04, 2020



  6. Major Revelation: Microsoft Blackmail Against LAMP (GNU/Linux and Free Stacks for Servers) Goes At Least 16 Years Back, Predating the Novell Patent Deal

    (Techno-)Anthropological analyses of Microsoft's patent war on Free/libre software must take into account what Microsoft did to MySQL, a Swedish company at the time



  7. Links 4/4/2020: Sparky 5.11, Firefox 74.0.1, POCL 1.5

    Links for the day



  8. IRC Proceedings: Friday, April 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, April 03, 2020



  9. Links 3/4/2020: Ubuntu Beta, GNOME 3.36.1, ExTiX LXQt Mini, NetBSD 8.2 Released

    Links for the day



  10. Digital Communication, Digitalisation and Videogaming Among the EPO's Latest Smokescreens for Illegal and Abstract Patents on Algorithms

    The EPO keeps liaising with the EU to promote patents which EU officials have themselves said were illegal; to make matters worse, the EPO's violations of its own laws inspire the United States to do the same



  11. Emotional Blackmail for Illegal Software Patents

    Semantic tactics the European Patent Office (EPO) uses to promote software patents in Europe and may theoretically use in the future (satire)



  12. Clear Linux is to GNU/Linux What Clearly Defined is to Open Source

    The idea that we need Intel to take GNU/Linux ‘mainstream’ is ludicrous; as OSDL co-founder (now succeeded in the flesh of the Corporate Linux Foundation), Intel is more about Linux (with DRM, “secure boot” and everything that lets it be remotely controlled) than about GNU and it’s not too keen on GPL (copyleft), either



  13. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, April 02, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, April 02, 2020



  14. Links 2/4/2020: Linux 5.6.2, Qt Creator 4.11.2, LineageOS ROM Based on Android 10

    Links for the day



  15. OIN in 2020 Resembles Linux Foundation in 2020 (Corporate Front Group Piggybacking the Linux Brand)

    We regret to say that the Open Invention Network seems not to care at all about Software Freedom; to make matters worse, it is a proponent of software patents and a voice for companies like IBM and Microsoft, not the "Community" it fancies misrepresenting



  16. Inside the Free Software Foundation (FSF) - Part IX: Semi-Happy Ending

    Richard Stallman is here to stay and the FSF will let him stay (as chief of GNU); we want to close the series on a positive note



  17. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, April 01, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, April 01, 2020



  18. Upcoming Articles and Research Areas

    Although we've failed to write as much as usual, we're still preparing some in-depth articles and maintaining Daily Links (in spite of unforeseen ordeals like a forced laptop migration)



  19. Links 2/4/2020: ProtonMail Bridge for Linux, GTK 3.98.2 and Red Hat DNF 4.2.21

    Links for the day



  20. Links 1/4/2020: Linux 5.7 Merges, Qt 5.14.2, GhostBSD 20.03, Linux Mint 20 Ulyana Plans, WordPress 5.4 “Adderley”

    Links for the day



  21. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, March 31, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, March 31, 2020



  22. Techrights to Delete Articles From All Past Years to Save Disk Space

    What if we deleted over 25,000 posts?



  23. IRC Proceedings: Monday, March 30, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, March 30, 2020



  24. Links 30/3/2020: GNU Linux-libre 5.6, WireGuard 1.0.0

    Links for the day



  25. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, March 29, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, March 29, 2020



  26. Links 30/3/2020: Linux 5.6, Nitrux 1.2.7, Sparky 2020.03.1

    Links for the day



  27. The Fall of the UPC - Part IX: Campinos Opens His Mouth One Week Later (and It's That Hilarious Delusion Again)

    Team Campinos said nothing whatsoever about the decision of the FCC until one week later, whereupon Campinos leveraged some words from Christine Lambrecht to mislead everybody in the EPO's official "news" section



  28. Pretending EPO Corruption Stopped Under António Campinos When It is in Fact a Lot Worse in Several Respects/Aspects (Than It Was Under Benoît Battistelli)

    Germany's eagerness to keep Europe's central patent office in Munich (and to a lesser degree in Berlin) means that politicians in the capital and in Bavaria turn a blind eye to abuses, corruption and even serious crimes; this won't help Germany's image in the long run



  29. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, March 28, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, March 28, 2020



  30. Links 28/3/2020: Wine 5.5 Released, EasyPup 2.2.14, WordPress 5.4 RC5 and End of Truthdig

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts