EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.02.18

Patent Trolls, USPTO Director Andrei Iancu and Section 101

Posted in America, Europe, Patents at 1:55 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Recent: António Campinos is Working for Patent Trolls at the Expense of Science and Technology

Trump and Iancu

Summary: The world’s most important patent office is now run by a courts-hostile person (an 'American Battistelli') who is happy to ignore the courts’ caselaw and listen to patent trolls instead; this means that science and technology, not to mention the law itself, will suffer

THE DEMISE of patentability of software in the United States is mostly being ignored by the USPTO, which prefers to ignore what courts are saying and carry on issuing software patents. The same thing has been happening at the European Patent Office (EPO) and we shall get to that in a moment. There’s a bit of a “shared struggle” on both sides of the Atlantic, impacting software developers in Europe and the United States. If the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office carries issuing all those abstract patents — as does the EPO — what will be the impact on presumption of validity of US and European Patents (EPs)? This is a key question which is increasingly being raised by technology-centric groups.

“Iancu, the current Director of the USPTO, has been acting like the patent trolls’ mole or at least their apologist.”“Try the Newly Upgraded Anticipat to Complement Your Patent Prosecution Practice,” Anticipat wrote a few days ago, ousting itself for what it really is other than an anti-PTAB ‘tank’ (or propaganda mill); it just targets trolls and prosecutors looking for people to blackmail. They know that their chances in courts or in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) are rather slim and therefore they try to assess risk and cost (an appeal to the Federal Circuit can be rather expensive, perhaps requiring millions of dollars set aside for legal bills). “Harness the power of patent analytics to make better-informed decisions using the power of aggregate appeals data,” they said. They’re not alone in this ‘business’ (of litigation). Sadly, however, today’s leadership at the USPTO sympathises with them.

Neil Wilkof has just published something titled “The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of ‘patent troll’ and ‘internet trolling’” in which he cites the father of patent trolling. Well, first of all, there's no such thing as "IP"; Wilkof could at least correct this misleading terminology and speak of patents instead. The only thing a “patent troll” and “internet trolling” have in common is that they engage in nothing constructive, just harassment.

Iancu, the current Director of the USPTO, has been acting like the patent trolls’ mole or at least their apologist. He has attracted some negative comments for this attitude of his and a few days ago Steven Seidenberg from IP Watch echoed the rhetoric of Iancu with a headline like, “Do Patent Trolls Exist?”

That’s the “teach the controversy” propaganda line; if a patent troll is defined as a firm which practices nothing but lawsuits, then the existence of it is not disputable; it is measurable, too. The name used to describe it may vary (used to be “shark”), but this phenomenon is very much real and it is extremely problematic.

From Seidenberg’s introductory paragraph:

They are called many things. Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs), Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs), Patent Trolls, and on occasion, names not suitable in polite company. They often are accused of harming innovation and the economy, while providing nothing useful in return. They, less often, are said to promote innovation, in part by helping small inventors monetize their discoveries. Two recent academic studies attempt to shed light on this dispute, but their findings seem contradictory – at least at first.

With words like “inventors”, “discoveries” and “monetize” it is hard to take this discussion seriously; most patent trolls use software patents, so we’re speaking of algorithms (programming, not inventions) and much of the ‘research’ that favours trolls is sponsored by the usual suspects.

For about a decade now we’ve been arguing that one effective way to combat patent trolls is to eliminate patents on software. At the moment such patents are being granted, still; they’re not of much/any use in court, but they’re being granted in order to fake production and bring more revenue to the patent offices. Let’s start with the EPO as our case of point.

As Poland turns 100 the “EPO congratulates Polish patent office on its 100th anniversary” (the EPO published this (warning: epo.org link) on Friday just to peddle some fluff/puff pieces); at the same time EPO corruption ruins ILO/ILOAT which are about 100 years old.

“A delegation from the European Patent Office led by EPO President António Campinos participated to the 100th anniversary,” it says and notice how the EPO’s press releases aren’t about the EPO. They’re making the publicity all about António Campinos — the hallmark of Battistelli (who sought to personify the European Patent Office to promote his personal “brand”). Like Donald Trump does…

Campinos frequently promotes software patents in Europe (under the guise of “AI” and other buzzwords). “The Official Journal 11/2018 is now available online,” the EPO wrote in Twitter on Friday; it has mentioned (warning: epo.org link) the EPC, which is routinely violated by the EPO. Who benefits from this?

It is worth noting that Kate Gaudry and Samuel Hayim wrote in Watchtroll a few days ago that “[t]he stark reality appears to be that artificial intelligence technologies are likely to be more heavily scrutinized under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and less likely to be allowed.” (the article’s headline is “Artificial Intelligence Technologies Facing Heavy Scrutiny at the USPTO”).

This is what we have been saying all along, namely that “AI” patents are software patents and are thus fake patents, connected to the “AI” bubble/hype. The EPO wrote on Friday: “Experts discussed how the EPO deals with the challenges of AI in patent applications at this recent conference: http://bit.ly/AIpatents”

They call them “AIpatents”; that in its own right is quite a buzzword. Corporate media nowadays calls just about everything “AI” (even hardware that’s marketed this way); Nowadays everything is being labeled “AI” provided it does something ‘clever’; sometimes it’s exploited to get bogus patents that are software patents and associate them with “health”; Sometimes the patent law firms can just be replaced with some piece of software, whereupon this buzzword is again invoked; how about this financial context? These are all examples pertaining to patents and they’re all from the past week alone.

Campinos is not so unique in that regard however. Iancu and the rest of the Trump-assembled 'swamp' destroy the agenda set forth by Michelle Lee; The CCIA’s Josh Landau doesn’t seem too please and before the weekend he wrote:

The USPTO released the final version of its 2018-2022 Strategic Plan today. I previously wrote about the flaws in the draft strategic plan. The draft plan did, however, at least note the importance of stakeholder engagement. To assist in this goal, the Office asked for comments on the draft.

[...]

The problem is that a detailed comparison of the draft and final plans reveals that a total of two substantive changes were made to the text provided for comment. In one, the final plan notes that ensuring trademark validity is important and announces plans to regularly audit and “de-clutter” the trademark registry. The other change recognizes that user interface is important when rolling out new tools to examiners.

Watchtroll, contrasting CCIA as usual, keeps publishing press releases for the USPTO. This encourages the perception of a strategic link between these judge-bashing extremists and the Office. Some patent boosters who promote this new Watchtroll article (“Iancu Proposes Overcoming 101 ‘Morass’ by Strictly Following Supreme Court Precedent”) don’t want to deal with Section 101 but rather to work around it to get the Iancu-led USPTO (another patent maximalist) to grant fake patents that courts would, without a doubt, reject. In Watchtroll’s own words:

Earlier this week, on Monday, November 26, 2018, Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, delivered remarks to the 10th Annual Patent law & Policy Conference at Georgetown University law School. In his remarks Director Iancu again said what he has been saying for some time — the USPTO is working on fresh guidance relating to patent eligibility for computer implemented innovations (i.e., software related inventions). Director Iancu’s remarks gave a first look at what his reforms will look like, and by all indications these changes will be extremely innovator friendly.

Iancu likes patent trolls, having himself come from a law firm, and sites that groom trolls (and are sponsored by them) keep doing interviews with him. He never seems to speak to any site or publication which focuses on science and technology. He doesn’t even go to their forums, which is rather revealing. Some days ago the USPTO wrote: “USPTO Dir. Andrei Iancu recently spoke on judicial exceptions to Section 101 at @GtownTechLaw’s conference on the role of the courts in patent law and policy.”

These are lawyers, who are eager to water down Section 101; Iancu acts like their ‘mole’ — more and more each day (like Ajit Pai at the FCC). He’s an insider of the litigation industry, including patent trolls, working to harm technology and science for the sake of legal bills. As we shall show later tonight, Section 101 caselaw continues to pile up, consistently against Iancu’s agenda.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC6, New Release of Netrunner and End of Scientific Linux

    Links for the day



  2. USPTO and EPO Both Slammed for Abandoning Patent Quality and Violating the Law/Caselaw in Order to Grant Illegitimate Patents on Life/Nature and Mathematics

    Mr. Iancu, the ‘American Battistelli’ (appointed owing to nepotism), mirrors the ‘Battistelli operandi’, which boils down to treating judges like they’re stooges and justices like an ignorable nuisance — all this in the name of litigation profits, which necessitate constant wars over illegitimate patents (it is expensive to prove their illegitimacy)



  3. IRC Proceedings: January 27th, 2019 – March 24th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  4. IRC Proceedings: December 2nd, 2018 – January 26th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  5. Links 21/4/2019: SuperTuxKart's 1.0 Release, Sam Hartman Is Debian’s Newest Project Leader (DPL)

    Links for the day



  6. The EPO's Use of Phrases Like “High-Quality Patent Services” Means They Know High-Quality European Patents Are 'Bygones'

    The EPO does a really poor job hiding the fact that its last remaining objective is to grant as many European Patents as possible (and as fast as possible), conveniently conflating quality with pace



  7. A Reader's Suggestion: Directions for Techrights

    Guest post by figosdev



  8. Links 20/4/2019: Weblate 3.6 and Pop!_OS 19.04

    Links for the day



  9. The Likes of Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Team Campinos and Team UPC Don't Represent Europe But Hurt Europe

    The abject disinterest in patent quality and patent validity (as judged by courts) threatens Europe but not to the detriment of those who are in the 'business' of suing and printing lots of worthless patents



  10. The Linux Foundation Needs to Change Course Before GNU/Linux (as a Free Operating System) is Dead

    The issues associated with the Linux Foundation are not entirely new; but Linux now incorporates so many restrictions and contains so many binary blobs that one begins to wonder what "Linux" even means



  11. Largest Patent Offices Try to Leave Courts in a State of Disarray to Enable the Granting of Fake Patents in the US and Europe

    Like a monarchy that effectively runs all branches of government the management of the EPO is trying to work around the judiciary; the same is increasingly happening (or at least attempted) in the United States



  12. Links 19/4/2019: PyPy 7.1.1, LabPlot 2.6, Kipi Plugins 5.9.1 Released

    Links for the day



  13. Links 18/4/2019: Ubuntu and Derivatives Have Releases, digiKam 6.1.0, OpenSSH 8.0 and LibreOffice 6.2.3

    Links for the day



  14. Freedom is Not a Business and Those Who Make 'Business' by Giving it Away Deserve Naming

    Free software is being parceled and sold to private monopolisers; those who facilitate the process enrich themselves and pose a growing threat to freedom in general — a subject we intend to tackle in the near future



  15. Concluding the Linux Foundation (LF) “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 3)

    Conferences constructed or put together based on payments rather than merit pose a risk to the freedom of free software; we conclude our series about events set up by the largest of culprits, which profits from this erosion of freedom



  16. “Mention the War” (of Microsoft Against GNU/Linux)

    The GNU/Linux desktop (or laptops) seems to be languishing or deteriorating, making way for proprietary takeover in the form of Vista 10 and Chrome OS and “web apps” (surveillance); nobody seems too bothered — certainly not the Linux Foundation — by the fact that GNU/Linux itself is being relegated or demoted to a mere “app” on these surveillance platforms (WSL, Croûton and so on)



  17. The European Patent Office Does Not Care About the Law, Today's Management Constantly Attempts to Bypass the Law

    Many EPs (European Patents) are actually "IPs" (invalid patents); the EPO doesn't seem to care and it is again paying for corrupt scholars to toe the party line



  18. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Once Again Pours Cold Water on Patent Maximalists

    Any hopes of a rebound or turnaround have just been shattered because a bizarre attack on the appeal process (misusing tribal immunity) fell on deaf ears and software patents definitely don't interest the highest court, which already deemed them invalid half a decade ago



  19. Links 17/4/2019: Qt 5.12.3 Released, Ola Bini Arrested (Political Stunts)

    Links for the day



  20. Links 16/4/2019: CentOS Turns 15, Qt Creator 4.9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  21. GNU/Linux is Being Eaten Alive by Large Corporations With Their Agenda

    A sort of corporate takeover, or moneyed interests at the expense of our freedom, can be seen as a 'soft coup' whose eventual outcome would involve all or most servers in 'the cloud' (surveillance with patent tax as part of the rental fees) and almost no laptops/desktops which aren't remotely controlled (and limit what's run on them, using something like UEFI 'secure boot')



  22. Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF

    Restrictions on speech are said to have been spread and reached some of the most liberal circles, according to a credible veteran who opposes illiberal censorship



  23. Corporate Media Will Never Cover the EPO's Violations of the Law With Respect to Patent Scope

    The greed-driven gold rush for patents has resulted in a large pool of European Patents that have no legitimacy and are nowadays associated with low legal certainty; the media isn't interested in covering such a monumental disaster that poses a threat to the whole of Europe



  24. A Linux Foundation Run by People Who Reject Linux is Like a Children's Charity Whose Management Dislikes Children

    We remain concerned about the lack of commitment that the Linux Foundation has for Linux; much of the Linux Foundation's Board, for example, comes from hostile companies



  25. Links 15/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC5 and SolydXK Reviewed

    Links for the day



  26. Links 14/4/2019: Blender 2.80 Release Plan and Ducktype 1.0

    Links for the day



  27. 'Poor' (Multi-Millionaire) Novell CEO, Who Colluded With Steve Ballmer Against GNU/Linux, is Trying to Censor Techrights

    Novell’s last CEO, a former IBMer who just like IBM decided to leverage software patents against the competition (threatening loads of companies using "platoons of patent lawyers"), has decided that siccing lawyers at us would be a good idea



  28. Guest Post: The Linux Foundation (LF) is “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 2)

    Calls for papers (CfP) and who gets to assess what's presented or what's not presented is a lesser-explored aspect, especially in this age when large corporate sponsors get to indirectly run entire 'community' events



  29. Patent Maximalists Are Enabling Injustices and Frauds

    It's time to come to grips with the simple fact that extreme patent lenience causes society to suffer and is mostly beneficial to bad actors; for the patent profession to maintain a level of credibility and legitimacy it must reject the deplorable, condemnable zealots



  30. Further Decreasing Focus on Software Patents in the United States as They Barely Exist in Valid Form Anymore

    No headway made after almost 4 months of Iancu-led stunts; software patents remain largely dead and buried, so we’re moving on to other topics


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts