02.06.19

The Attack on the Independence of the European Judges Has Apparently Expanded to the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 2:21 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

What happens if Team UPC has shrewdly added its members to the German court that is set to decide on UPC?

Stephan Harbarth

Summary: Questions and doubts linger over the future (or lack thereof) of the Unified Patent Court (UPC); the addition of Stephan Harbarth, however, is rather disturbing as he might become the court’s president in a couple of years and his bias/self-interest is a matter of public record

THE European Patent Office (EPO) does not mention the UPC anymore. Almost never. Seeing the potential scandal over a judge's or future president's appointment, they might be wise to say nothing. We’ve been researching this further and it looks rather ugly; we only abstain from commenting any further because there’s no clear evidence of malice just yet. Might this explain fabricated (albeit false) rumours from Team UPC? They have gotten really desperate.

“The UK can stay in the EPO, but the UPC does not exist and even if it did exist, Britain would be unable to become part of it.”Yesterday Lexology published this piece titled “German Constitutional Complaint Against the UPC Agreement”; Weickmann & Weickmann’s Dr. Markus Herzog oversimplifies this; Hungarian courts would reject the UPC too as it was found to be unconstitutional (by a high court) so Germany isn’t the final stop, Brexit notwithstanding as well. This is the latest spinner of many Team UPC spinners and we watch this closely (as we do Stephan Harbarth).

Yesterday we saw this article from IPPro Magazine’s Ben Wodecki, who obviously misses the point that the UPC is practically dead (bar incredible mischief) and therefore there’s nothing left for the UK to seek participation in. Wodecki wrote this:

Once the UK leaves the EU, it says it will continue to seek participation the Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patent system and will continue to cooperate in relation to IP within existing multilateral treaties.

The UK can stay in the EPO, but the UPC does not exist and even if it did exist, Britain would be unable to become part of it. Seeing the corruption associated with Battistelli’s attack on judges — an attack perpetuated by António Campinos — the Constitutional Court in Germany is expected to ultimately reject UPC/A. Does Team UPC have some trick in the making? Might Stephan Harbarth be part of it? His past statements associate him with Team UPC (he publicly lied about the prospects of UPC while working for a private firm), so he is not an independent observer. He was well paid by those with interest (and investment) in the UPC. He wore “two hats” and received almost the most money while in Parliament (from a private firm).

Managing Intellectual Property, an EPO-connected UPC propaganda site, has meanwhile published another marketing piece from Inspicos P/S. It’s about the EPO’s appeal boards that still lack independence and to quote (with repetition highlighted):

EPO: Appeal board of EPO provides guidance on amendments filed late

In opposition proceedings before the EPO, the formal admissibility of amendments filed late by proprietors is a frequently debated topic and differently decided on. A recent appeal decision, T 500/15, reiterates the criteria for the assessment of admissibility of amendments that are filed late and the specific criteria the competent departments of the EPO should apply when exercising their discretionary powers with regard to admissibility.

[...]

In the subsequent second instance proceedings, the appeal board entrusted with the matter came to the conclusion in decision T 500/15 that the first instance department had not adequately exercised its discretionary powers with regard to the admissibility of the amended claims.

We can quite frankly relate to the appeal boards for two reasons: 1) Team UPC is trying to make them redundant (destroying their very role); 2) Team Battistelli constantly attacks their independence, thus discrediting the perceived legitimacy of their decisions. We might soon see the Constitutional Court in Germany suffering a similar problem (discredited legitimacy because of the addition of Stephan Harbarth).

It’s really a shame that Europe’s patent system — once among the best in the world (if not the best) — became so chaotic. Yesterday we saw this outline of a new Federal Circuit case where it fought back, successfully, against patent maximalists (they like to smear these technical judges, but they cannot fire them or cause resignations). They cited European Patent Application Publication No. 0 094 161:

Last week, in In re Ikeda Food Research Co., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirming the Examiner’s rejection in an ex parte reexamination of claims 22 and 23 of U.S. Application No. 12/851,668 for obviousness. On appeal before the Board, the challenged claims were found obvious in view of three references: European Patent Application Publication No. 0 094 161 (“Senior”) and U.S. Patent Nos. 6,656,702 (“Yugawa A”) and 6,059,946 (“Yugawa B”).

As readers know, we’ve stopped covering US affairs except if (and when) we see threat of a software patents comeback over there. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) continue unabated (patent maximalists report figures for 2019 and it’s roughly the same as before) and 35 U.S.C. § 101 remains largely the same, in lieu with SCOTUS. It’s actually the EPO that now poses a a threat of software patents resurgence. Their plan has, perhaps all along, been to bypass national patent courts with the UPC, extending the EPO’s position on bogus, abstract patents to judges as well. We cannot let that happen. It would severely harm Europe.

As Dr. Ingve Björn Stjerna put it a month ago: “Will Mr Harbarth’s commitment to the European patent reform [sic] be continued at the BVerfG?” (Bundesverfassungsgericht)

Based on our readings, before even reaching the age of 50 this man already has quite a few scandals under his belt.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

  • FSDaily

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/1/2021: Chromium Pains and New Debian Maintainers

    Links for the day



  2. InteLeaks – Part XXIX: Harbor Research Did Not Produce a Study But an Elaborate Hoax for Intel, Suggesting Microsoft Partnership and Outsourcing Based on Zero Evidence and No Solid Rationale

    The pseudo-scientific ‘report’ from Harbor Research is more of the same nonsense we’ve grown accustomed to; unethical if not rogue firms are being paid to lie — or to perpetuate falsehoods which someone stands to gain from



  3. Video: The State of Communities Surrounding GNU/Linux Distributions

    A discussion about the state of volunteer efforts going into the development, maintenance (in the 'maintainership' sense) and support/advocacy of GNU/Linux distros



  4. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 22, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, January 22, 2021



  5. InteLeaks – Part XXVIII: Intel Served Report From Microsoft Boosters, Who Provide No Actual Evidence and No Science to Back Their Supposed 'Findings'

    Findings and recommendations from Harbor 'Research' aren't based on any scientific methods, just perceived loyalty, branding, and a bunch of unsourced quotes (from unnamed people with ridiculous job titles like a soup of buzzwords)



  6. Erosion of Communities, Ascent of Corporate-Industrial Fake Communities

    Despite the attempts to manipulate/trick developers (and sometimes users) into becoming unpaid workforce of for-profit companies, there's an exodus back to real communities, which aren't subjected to the fury of wealthy shareholders who utterly dislike or simply don't care for software freedom



  7. The Corporate 'Left' and the Open Source Pseudo 'Movement'

    President Biden may not be as bad as his predecessor, but that hardly means very much; software freedom is still threatened, along with many other things



  8. Links 22/1/2021: pfSense Plus, Endless OS Foundation, and Many Laptops With GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  9. The Linux Foundation is Trying to Obscure Racism Using Microsoft-Inspired Tactics (Vouchers Disguised as Actual Money)

    The Linux Foundation and its PR stunts don’t help combat racism; one might argue that the Foundation is leveraging racism, which prevails in the US, to paint itself as benevolent and caring (offering immaterial things and self-serving press releases)



  10. InteLeaks – Part XXVII: 'Pulling a Nokia' on Intel (Outsourcing to Microsoft)

    The recommendation of an Intel marriage with Microsoft (even in units that deal mostly with Linux) is an insulting slap across the face of developers employed there; we take a look at recommendations made to IoTG (Intel) by a firm with Microsoft orientation



  11. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 21, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 21, 2021



  12. InteLeaks – Part XXVI: Harbor Research is Horrible 'Research', Lacking Actual Technical Background

    Having looked at the members of staff of Harbor Research (individually), it seems clearer now why they have an affinity for Microsoft and why they're directing Intel to liaise with Microsoft and become a prisoner of Microsoft (even in areas where Microsoft is increasingly irrelevant)



  13. Links 21/1/2021: Raspberry Pi Pico, Ubuntu 21.04 Picks GNOME 3.38, KDE Plasma 5.21 Beta

    Links for the day



  14. How a Newly Inaugurated President Biden Can Advance Software Freedom (If He Actually Wishes to Do So)

    Techrights has 'Four Suggestions' to President Biden, the 46th 'front end' of American plutocracy



  15. InteLeaks – Part XXV: Intel's Brain Drain Leads to Unusual Measures

    As the company once known as 'chipzilla' loses its relevance and dominance in the market it's reaching out to retired people, trying to get them back onboard



  16. Hey Hi (AI) is Just a Trojan Horse for Illegal Software Patents, According to EPO Management and Litigation Firms It's in Bed With

    The longtime pushers or the lobby of patent profiteers just carry on pushing for software patents, nowadays latching onto the inane and unwarranted media hype around Hey Hi (AI) — a hype wave that was co-opted by EPO management to grant unlawful patents



  17. The Central Staff Representatives (CSC) of the EPO Are Petitioning to End the Assault on EPO Staff

    The EPO, just one month after the staff went on strike, is about to receive a compelling petition to stop the assault on EPO staff



  18. InteLeaks – Part XXIV: Love for Microsoft, Not for Free Software or Whatever Replaces Microsoft

    Intel is basing its big decisions on buzzwords and firms that master buzzwords; it's sad that instead of listening to Intel's own (in-house) engineers it's relying on a bunch of clowns who push 'Clown Computing' and 'apps' and 'UX'...



  19. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 20, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 20, 2021



  20. Links 21/1/2021: Google Tightens the Screws on Chromium, VideoLAN VLC 3.0.12

    Links for the day



  21. IBM Panics and Resorts to 'Customer Retention' Tactics With Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

    IBM 'frees' RHEL but with limitations that can restrict growth of small companies (or subject them to financial barriers, originally unforeseen)



  22. Recent Techrights Articles About President Joe Biden

    Instead of writing yet more stuff about the latest US president, let's look back at what we wrote in recent weeks/months



  23. Links 20/1/2021: LibreOffice 7.1 RC2 and the RHEL Contingency

    Links for the day



  24. InteLeaks – Part XXIII: Intel Paying for Bogus 'Research' 'Insights' Which Merely Seek to Justify Outsourcing to Microsoft and Imposing Microsoft's Proprietary Software on Free Software Developers

    Intel's preference for Microsoft monopoly (an imposed/top-down decision) was seemingly certified by so-called 'consultants' and 'analysts' from the outside rather than the inside, basically manufacturing a false perception of consent after managers had already made up their minds



  25. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part V: How FSF Secrecy Ended Up Insulting People, Alienating Trans Developers

    Having just uploaded this introductory video, we delve into the backstory or the real reason the FSF sank into somewhat of a crisis with the trans community almost half a decade ago



  26. InteLeaks – Part XXII: Bubbles and Buzzwords, No Substance at Intel's Internet of Things (IoT) Group (IOTG)

    The video above is continuation of the previous part about a document full of superficial buzzwords (not technical jargon anywhere), in effect recommending to managers that they blindly follow trends and cargo cults (such as Clown Computing) and not what’s most suitable for technical excellence



  27. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 19, 2021



  28. Links 20/1/2021: WireGuard for pfSense and New US President

    Links for the day



  29. Links 19/1/2021: Krita 4.4.2 Released and JingOS Hype

    Links for the day



  30. Team UPC Keeps Pretending That UPCA Can Still be Resurrected (Even Without the UK, Which is Strictly a Requirement)

    The latest distortion of facts regarding the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement (UPCA) as seen from the lens of people who seek to profit from such distortion


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts