EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.06.19

The Attack on the Independence of the European Judges Has Apparently Expanded to the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 2:21 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

What happens if Team UPC has shrewdly added its members to the German court that is set to decide on UPC?

Stephan Harbarth

Summary: Questions and doubts linger over the future (or lack thereof) of the Unified Patent Court (UPC); the addition of Stephan Harbarth, however, is rather disturbing as he might become the court’s president in a couple of years and his bias/self-interest is a matter of public record

THE European Patent Office (EPO) does not mention the UPC anymore. Almost never. Seeing the potential scandal over a judge's or future president's appointment, they might be wise to say nothing. We’ve been researching this further and it looks rather ugly; we only abstain from commenting any further because there’s no clear evidence of malice just yet. Might this explain fabricated (albeit false) rumours from Team UPC? They have gotten really desperate.

“The UK can stay in the EPO, but the UPC does not exist and even if it did exist, Britain would be unable to become part of it.”Yesterday Lexology published this piece titled “German Constitutional Complaint Against the UPC Agreement”; Weickmann & Weickmann’s Dr. Markus Herzog oversimplifies this; Hungarian courts would reject the UPC too as it was found to be unconstitutional (by a high court) so Germany isn’t the final stop, Brexit notwithstanding as well. This is the latest spinner of many Team UPC spinners and we watch this closely (as we do Stephan Harbarth).

Yesterday we saw this article from IPPro Magazine’s Ben Wodecki, who obviously misses the point that the UPC is practically dead (bar incredible mischief) and therefore there’s nothing left for the UK to seek participation in. Wodecki wrote this:

Once the UK leaves the EU, it says it will continue to seek participation the Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patent system and will continue to cooperate in relation to IP within existing multilateral treaties.

The UK can stay in the EPO, but the UPC does not exist and even if it did exist, Britain would be unable to become part of it. Seeing the corruption associated with Battistelli’s attack on judges — an attack perpetuated by António Campinos — the Constitutional Court in Germany is expected to ultimately reject UPC/A. Does Team UPC have some trick in the making? Might Stephan Harbarth be part of it? His past statements associate him with Team UPC (he publicly lied about the prospects of UPC while working for a private firm), so he is not an independent observer. He was well paid by those with interest (and investment) in the UPC. He wore “two hats” and received almost the most money while in Parliament (from a private firm).

Managing Intellectual Property, an EPO-connected UPC propaganda site, has meanwhile published another marketing piece from Inspicos P/S. It’s about the EPO’s appeal boards that still lack independence and to quote (with repetition highlighted):

EPO: Appeal board of EPO provides guidance on amendments filed late

In opposition proceedings before the EPO, the formal admissibility of amendments filed late by proprietors is a frequently debated topic and differently decided on. A recent appeal decision, T 500/15, reiterates the criteria for the assessment of admissibility of amendments that are filed late and the specific criteria the competent departments of the EPO should apply when exercising their discretionary powers with regard to admissibility.

[...]

In the subsequent second instance proceedings, the appeal board entrusted with the matter came to the conclusion in decision T 500/15 that the first instance department had not adequately exercised its discretionary powers with regard to the admissibility of the amended claims.

We can quite frankly relate to the appeal boards for two reasons: 1) Team UPC is trying to make them redundant (destroying their very role); 2) Team Battistelli constantly attacks their independence, thus discrediting the perceived legitimacy of their decisions. We might soon see the Constitutional Court in Germany suffering a similar problem (discredited legitimacy because of the addition of Stephan Harbarth).

It’s really a shame that Europe’s patent system — once among the best in the world (if not the best) — became so chaotic. Yesterday we saw this outline of a new Federal Circuit case where it fought back, successfully, against patent maximalists (they like to smear these technical judges, but they cannot fire them or cause resignations). They cited European Patent Application Publication No. 0 094 161:

Last week, in In re Ikeda Food Research Co., the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirming the Examiner’s rejection in an ex parte reexamination of claims 22 and 23 of U.S. Application No. 12/851,668 for obviousness. On appeal before the Board, the challenged claims were found obvious in view of three references: European Patent Application Publication No. 0 094 161 (“Senior”) and U.S. Patent Nos. 6,656,702 (“Yugawa A”) and 6,059,946 (“Yugawa B”).

As readers know, we’ve stopped covering US affairs except if (and when) we see threat of a software patents comeback over there. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) continue unabated (patent maximalists report figures for 2019 and it’s roughly the same as before) and 35 U.S.C. § 101 remains largely the same, in lieu with SCOTUS. It’s actually the EPO that now poses a a threat of software patents resurgence. Their plan has, perhaps all along, been to bypass national patent courts with the UPC, extending the EPO’s position on bogus, abstract patents to judges as well. We cannot let that happen. It would severely harm Europe.

As Dr. Ingve Björn Stjerna put it a month ago: “Will Mr Harbarth’s commitment to the European patent reform [sic] be continued at the BVerfG?” (Bundesverfassungsgericht)

Based on our readings, before even reaching the age of 50 this man already has quite a few scandals under his belt.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

  • FSDaily

What Else is New


  1. Links 20/2/2019: digiKam 6.0.0, Cockpit 188, Mesa 19.0 RC5

    Links for the day



  2. How Long Can the EPO Bend the Rules Before the Avalanche of Invalid Software Patents?

    A 35 U.S.C. § 101/SCOTUS moment in Europe will likely squash loads of abstract European Patents granted by the EPO; shouldn’t the EPO foresee this and immediately cease granting such obviously bogus patents, whose main beneficiary is a bunch of patent trolls?



  3. Battistelli Trashed 223 Millions (of Stakeholders' Euros) on a System That Destroyed the European Patent Office and Made Few Private Corporations a Lot Richer

    A quarter of a billion euros later the EPO finally admits in private that this was a massive failure



  4. Links 19/2/2019: Mesa 18.3.4, Cutelyst 2.7.0, Plasma Pass 1.0.0

    Links for the day



  5. What Happened in the United States Now Happens in Europe: Lots of Patents Turn Out to Be Bunk, Fake, Bogus, Invalid and Thus Worthless

    Worthless patents — not opposition to such patents — are the greatest threat to the legitimacy of the patent system, yet bureaucrats fail to heed the warning in the name of short-term profits



  6. Stephen Rowan's and Nellie Simon's Letter to EPO Staff: eDossier Has “Not Reached the Required Quality Levels.”

    We've just commented on it; here is the raw letter in full, explaining that eDossier and related frameworks will be abandoned entirely and indefinitely within less than a fortnight



  7. Search Matters Not at the European Patent Office

    The EPO has found out that "System Battistelli" has been catastrophic for the quality of patents; it stops short of openly admitting it as such and in fact it keeps the message strictly confidential (explained to insiders, who will inevitably notice a system being abandoned)



  8. António Campinos Still Needs to Undo Battistelli's Union-Busting Activities at the EPO

    Solidarity and support for Laurent Prunier are needed because the new French president lacks empathy even for fellow Frenchmen whose sole 'crime' is that they represented EPO staff



  9. Links 18/2/2019: Linux 5.0 RC7, RISC-V Spreading Fast

    Links for the day



  10. António Campinos Still Needs to Hold Team Battistelli Accountable for Illegally Bringing Weapons to the EPO

    It is imperative that, in order to repair the reputation of the European Patent Office (EPO), António Campinos should pursue accountability for the managers who brought Benalla and firearms to the Office (very serious breach of German law, jail sentence included)



  11. Links 17/2/2019: Compiz 0.9.14.0, Geary 0.13.0, GNU FreeDink 109.6, Debian 9.8, Texinfo 6.6

    Links for the day



  12. Amazon's Patent Policy Should be Enough of a Reason to Boycott Amazon and AWS

    There are many things to criticise Amazon and its founder for; but rarely does the mainstream media bring up the company's appalling patent policy



  13. Don't Use Cloudflare Because You Impose This on People Who Least Want It

    Reasons to stop making the World Wide Web so heavily dependent on some dubious companies like Cloudflare, which already has a worrisome track record



  14. How Many/Most EPO Examiners View 'President' António Campinos

    Based on what readers/insiders have told us, there’s a prevalent perception that António Campinos is afraid of (thus controlled/directed by) Bergot, who is still doing Battistelli’s biddings at the European Patent Office (EPO)



  15. Techrights' Priorities Over the Years

    An old priority of ours, eliminating software patents in the United States, is no longer quite so relevant because such patents are perishing in US courts, with or without outside intervention such as activism



  16. Courts in Disagreement: Warning on Wrongly-Granted European Patents and the Looming Collapse of All Software Patents in Europe

    By devaluing patents and reducing their perceived worth (as is happening in China and Europe) patent offices risk decreasing participation in the very system they fundamentally depend on



  17. Computing Will Not Necessarily Make the World a Better Place

    The vision of "happy world" (because each person has a so-called 'smart' 'phone') is a yuppie delusion that overlooks business models and corporate interests



  18. EPO Grants Fake European Patents -- Including Software Patents -- and European Courts Keep Rejecting These

    The demise of the legitimacy or perceived validity of European Patents is measurable and the system isn't the same anymore; the EPO makes no effort to change this for the better, either



  19. Nobody But Patent Trolls and Litigators Will Benefit From the Corruption of the European Patent Office

    IAM, EPO leadership, Iancu and the rest of these raiders are enabling corruption and facilitating or supporting a racket; that money they collect comes at the expense of future victims of their "clients" or "customers" (that's what they call applicants, to whom they grant dubious monopolies as a matter of urgency)



  20. WSL is a Misleading Acronym/Name Because There's No Linux in It, It's Just Windows

    When Microsoft says "Linux" (as in "Microsoft loves Linux") what it actually means is Windows and/or Azure



  21. Links 16/2/2019: Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS, PyCharm 2019.1 EAP 4

    Links for the day



  22. Outline/Index of the Alexandre Benalla/Battistelli Scandal

    Our writings about the scandals implicating Benalla and the European Patent Office (EPO)



  23. Reading Techrights on a Mobile Device Running Android

    A new Android app for reading this site is being tested



  24. Links 14/2/2019: “I Love Free Software Day” and Mesa 19.0 RC4 Released

    Links for the day



  25. “EPO Lawlessness Again”

    Blackberry uses bogus European Patents (on software) for lawsuits; "all of them pure software patents. Patents on programs for computers as such," as Müller puts it



  26. Unitary Patent (UPC) is All About Imposing Patent Maximalists' Ideology of Greed and Self Interest on Courts in the Name of 'Unification' or 'Consistency' or 'Community'

    Pushers of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) are upset that they don’t always get their way when independent judges get to decide; as it turns out, many European Patents are just fake patents, more so under António Campinos



  27. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part V: Mediapart Explains the 'Raid' Attempt, Reporters Without Borders Involved

    Mediapart, an investigative site that unearths a lot of incriminating things about Battistelli's former bodyguard Alexandre Benalla, was the target of a raid attempt some weeks ago



  28. Links 13/2/2019: Tails 3.12.1, MongoDB Being Dumped

    Links for the day



  29. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part IV: Suspected Offenses of Forgery and Possible Falsification

    In a very underworld fashion, Benalla continues to break the law and create yet more scandals



  30. Battistelli's Bodyguard, Part III: Mars, France Close Protection (Benalla's Family), and Russian Oligarchy

    An article which examines the business background of Benalla, the outrageous salaries, the severance indemnity pay, and contract with a Russian oligarch close to Vladimir Putin


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts