EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

04.05.19

The European Patent Office Will Come to Regret the Fake Patents It Has Granted for Short-Term Financial Gains

Posted in America, Deception, Europe, Patents at 3:57 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

These patents harm not only programmers; they also contribute to the deaths of many patients

Floodable keyboard

Summary: The patent trolls-aligned EPO is a massive liability to Europe; staff of the EPO admits this, but management of the EPO ignores the warnings and carries on granting fake patents (not compliant w.r.t the EPC) like there’s no tomorrow

IN the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 101 undermines a lot of patents on nature and mathematics. It prevents a lot of patent grants but more importantly it’s used to dismiss lawsuits that leverage such bogus patents. The lawyers aren’t happy. It prevents them making a lot of money from lawsuits, whose number is collapsing.

Watchtroll’s new editor (the founder stepped down after two decades) has just used a former Federal Circuit chief judge to pretend patent law is to be made up by bribed politicians, not actual courts (“Judge Paul Michel: Look to Congress, Not Courts, to Fix the U.S. Patent System”). Michel is like a ‘retired’ lobbyist for software patents that patent trolls leverage (David Kappos does the same thing, often alongside Michel). This is nothing new. He always appears alongside the usual people, mostly former USPTO chiefs who are in bed with the litigation ‘industry’ (the new USPTO managers too have come from there). Donald Zuhn takes note of “effort by the Office to increase patent examination quality and efficiency through the development of an automated tool for USPTO examiners…”

Sounds familiar? It is more or less the same language we often see in Europe (“quality”, “efficiency”…) and the same methodology that failed miserably.

The European Patent Office (EPO) is being copied by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). They want to grant lots of questionable patents which they know courts would reject (and judges aren't happy with that).

About a week ago we wrote about the Office kidnapping the branch of justice. It even abducts its overseer, the Administrative Council. There’s no separation of powers (essential for real justice). So it’s getting harder to demonstrate just how appalling patent quality became. The Office hopes to hide the facts and muzzle those who speak about it.

Meanwhile, J A Kemp, a proponent of patents on life, praises the EPO for liaising with nefarious groups. These are not “standards bodies” as the headline claims but more like front groups for patent trolls with their FRAND/SEP thickets which they exploit for anticompetitive blackmail. To quote:

The EPO has announced a cooperation with European Committee of Standardization (CEN) and the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC) under which the three organisations will work together to improve and disseminate knowledge about the relationship between standards and patents. The agreement builds on existing co-operation in this area between the EPO, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and the European Commission.

Whilst the exact nature and intended outcomes of this cooperation are not known, the comments in the EPO’s statement suggest a focus on providing further information resources for inventors and researchers in fields which are, or which may be in the future, affected by standards. This can only be welcomed as the increasing growth of Internet-of-Things development causes more and more diverse areas of industry to be impacted by the need to comply with (and potentially licence patents relating to) communications standards.

As we explained at the time, this is the EPO aligning itself with patent trolls and extortion rackets such as MPEG-LA.

Who can stop the EPO doing this? Seemingly nobody. This article which was cited by SUEPO on Thursday (yesterday) speaks of the judges’ loss of independence:

Alluding to this pending referral, in the present case T 0403/18 one of the parties present at an oral hearing in Haar requested that this hearing be held in Munich. As can be inferred from the minutes of this hearing (the written decision has not been published yet), with agreement of all parties the oral proceedings were indeed relocated to the former home of the Boards of Appeal in Munich, i.e. the Isar building at the Bob-van-Benthem-Platz

It could be argued that all BoA decisions since 2014 have not been entirely valid because Battistelli eliminated judges’ sense of independence and perception of impartiality. They decide with greater caution, having seen what happened to their colleague, Judge Corcoran.

Also cited by SUEPO on Thursday was this new article. Reported by Barney Dixon (IPPro Magazine) was a bunch of stuff based on a document we had published yesterday morning. To quote:

Despite a change of hands at the European Patent Office (EPO), little has changed in terms of social dialogue, representatives from the office’s Central Staff Committee (CSC) have claimed.
In an intervention at the EPO’s most recent Administrative Council meeting, staff representatives claimed that while they would have liked to provide positive news about social dialogue and the social situation at the office, “no progress worth noting has been observed”.

During the meeting, EPO president António Campinos gave an update to the council on the development of the EPO’s strategic plan.

Campinos also discussed developments on social dialogue and the need to foster it.

The first goal of the strategic plan is to build an engaged, knowledgeable and collaborative organisation.

This includes looking at ways to attract talent, as well as achieving more harmonious social relations and to ensure there is meaningful dialogue between social partners.

[...]

SUEPO also noted that despite claims of increasing social dialogue, SUEPO—which represents about half of the staff—is still excluded as a negotiation partner.

So the union is too fearful to speak out, judges cannot speak out, and European authorities refuse to intervene. Immunity entails impunity. So the EPO continues breaking the rules by granting CRISPR patents. Not even a pretense of following the rules or consistency in decisions anymore?

Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review, an advocacy front group for patents on life (still disguised as a “news” site), has just covered this latest example. It’s not an objective article but agenda-setting jingoism. Too much of that nowadays (decay of journalism). To quote:

The European Patent Office (EPO) has issued a new CRISPR/Cas9 patent to inventor Emmanuelle Charpentier, one of the key figures in the CRISPR landscape.

Today, April 3, ERS Genomics, the company providing access to CRISPR/Cas9 IP owned by Charpentier, announced she had been granted European patent number 3,401,400.

We took note of it earlier this week. Here they are granting patents in violation of the EPC. SUEPO has just estimated that about 30,000 such fake patents (European Patents not compliant with the EPC) may have been granted each year. Forward Pharma should know, having seen its granted patent implode, whereupon its very existence came into jeopardy. Yes, the EPO’s abuses are crashing European companies' shares, invoking layoffs. The company has just published these results, taking note of its lost patent:

Research and development costs for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $2.7 million and $20.5 million, respectively. The decrease in research and development costs for the year ended December 31, 2018 is the result of lower costs incurred in connection with the EP2801355 patent (“‘355 Patent”) opposition in Europe (“Opposition Proceeding”), lower share-based compensation and the wind-down of our development efforts of dimethyl fumarate (DMF)-containing formulations.

The damage caused by the deterioration of the EPO remains to be realised. It can take decades to be fully evaluated. In the US, for example, patent trolls are said to have incurred losses of many tens of billions of dollars (taken out of the productive economy). Researchers such as James Bessen have done work to that effect. This is a lot more than the EPO budget for an entire decade. They just externalise the costs for private profits. The public pays.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 24/4/2019: Chrome 74, QEMU 4.0 Released

    Links for the day



  2. Supreme Court of the UK, Which Habitually Throws Out European Patents, May Overturn Troublesome Unwired Planet v Huawei Decision

    A lot of European Patents are facing growing scrutiny from courts (Team UPC, including Bristows, publicly complains about it this month) and "greenwashing" of the Office won't be enough to paint/frame these patents as "ethical"



  3. German Federal Patent Court Curbs the Patent Maximalism of the EPO, Which Promotes Patents on Nature and/or Maths Every Single Day

    European courts are restraining the EPO, which has been trying to bypass or replace such courts (with the UPC); it certainly seems as though European Patents rapidly lose their legitimacy or much-needed presumption of validity



  4. Any 'Linux' Foundation Needs to Be Managed by Geeks, Not Politicians and PR People

    Linux bureaucracy has put profits way ahead of technical merits and this poses a growing threat or constitutes risk to the direction of the project, not to mention its ownership



  5. Links 23/4/2019: Kodi 'Leia' 18.2 and DeX Everywhere

    Links for the day



  6. Code of Coercion

    Entryism is visible for all to see, but pointing it out is becoming a risky gambit because of the "be nice!" (or "be polite!") crowd, which shields the perpetrators of a slow and gradual corporate takeover



  7. António Campinos Would Not Refer to the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal If He Did Not Control the Outcomes

    António Campinos and his ilk aren’t interested in patent quality because his former ‘boss’, who publicly denied there were issues and vainly rejected patent quality concerns as illegitimate, is now controlled by him (reversal of roles) and many new appointees at the top are "yes men" (or women) of Campinos, former colleagues whom he bossed at EUIPO (as expected)



  8. Links 22/4/2019: Linux 5.1 RC6, New Release of Netrunner and End of Scientific Linux

    Links for the day



  9. USPTO and EPO Both Slammed for Abandoning Patent Quality and Violating the Law/Caselaw in Order to Grant Illegitimate Patents on Life/Nature and Mathematics

    Mr. Iancu, the ‘American Battistelli’ (appointed owing to nepotism), mirrors the ‘Battistelli operandi’, which boils down to treating judges like they’re stooges and justices like an ignorable nuisance — all this in the name of litigation profits, which necessitate constant wars over illegitimate patents (it is expensive to prove their illegitimacy)



  10. IRC Proceedings: January 27th, 2019 – March 24th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  11. IRC Proceedings: December 2nd, 2018 – January 26th, 2019

    Many IRC logs



  12. Links 21/4/2019: SuperTuxKart's 1.0 Release, Sam Hartman Is Debian’s Newest Project Leader (DPL)

    Links for the day



  13. The EPO's Use of Phrases Like “High-Quality Patent Services” Means They Know High-Quality European Patents Are 'Bygones'

    The EPO does a really poor job hiding the fact that its last remaining objective is to grant as many European Patents as possible (and as fast as possible), conveniently conflating quality with pace



  14. A Reader's Suggestion: Directions for Techrights

    Guest post by figosdev



  15. Links 20/4/2019: Weblate 3.6 and Pop!_OS 19.04

    Links for the day



  16. The Likes of Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), Team Campinos and Team UPC Don't Represent Europe But Hurt Europe

    The abject disinterest in patent quality and patent validity (as judged by courts) threatens Europe but not to the detriment of those who are in the 'business' of suing and printing lots of worthless patents



  17. The Linux Foundation Needs to Change Course Before GNU/Linux (as a Free Operating System) is Dead

    The issues associated with the Linux Foundation are not entirely new; but Linux now incorporates so many restrictions and contains so many binary blobs that one begins to wonder what "Linux" even means



  18. Largest Patent Offices Try to Leave Courts in a State of Disarray to Enable the Granting of Fake Patents in the US and Europe

    Like a monarchy that effectively runs all branches of government the management of the EPO is trying to work around the judiciary; the same is increasingly happening (or at least attempted) in the United States



  19. Links 19/4/2019: PyPy 7.1.1, LabPlot 2.6, Kipi Plugins 5.9.1 Released

    Links for the day



  20. Links 18/4/2019: Ubuntu and Derivatives Have Releases, digiKam 6.1.0, OpenSSH 8.0 and LibreOffice 6.2.3

    Links for the day



  21. Freedom is Not a Business and Those Who Make 'Business' by Giving it Away Deserve Naming

    Free software is being parceled and sold to private monopolisers; those who facilitate the process enrich themselves and pose a growing threat to freedom in general — a subject we intend to tackle in the near future



  22. Concluding the Linux Foundation (LF) “Putting the CON in Conference!” (Part 3)

    Conferences constructed or put together based on payments rather than merit pose a risk to the freedom of free software; we conclude our series about events set up by the largest of culprits, which profits from this erosion of freedom



  23. “Mention the War” (of Microsoft Against GNU/Linux)

    The GNU/Linux desktop (or laptops) seems to be languishing or deteriorating, making way for proprietary takeover in the form of Vista 10 and Chrome OS and “web apps” (surveillance); nobody seems too bothered — certainly not the Linux Foundation — by the fact that GNU/Linux itself is being relegated or demoted to a mere “app” on these surveillance platforms (WSL, Croûton and so on)



  24. The European Patent Office Does Not Care About the Law, Today's Management Constantly Attempts to Bypass the Law

    Many EPs (European Patents) are actually "IPs" (invalid patents); the EPO doesn't seem to care and it is again paying for corrupt scholars to toe the party line



  25. The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) Once Again Pours Cold Water on Patent Maximalists

    Any hopes of a rebound or turnaround have just been shattered because a bizarre attack on the appeal process (misusing tribal immunity) fell on deaf ears and software patents definitely don't interest the highest court, which already deemed them invalid half a decade ago



  26. Links 17/4/2019: Qt 5.12.3 Released, Ola Bini Arrested (Political Stunts)

    Links for the day



  27. Links 16/4/2019: CentOS Turns 15, Qt Creator 4.9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  28. GNU/Linux is Being Eaten Alive by Large Corporations With Their Agenda

    A sort of corporate takeover, or moneyed interests at the expense of our freedom, can be seen as a 'soft coup' whose eventual outcome would involve all or most servers in 'the cloud' (surveillance with patent tax as part of the rental fees) and almost no laptops/desktops which aren't remotely controlled (and limit what's run on them, using something like UEFI 'secure boot')



  29. Reader's Claim That Rules Similar to the Code of Conduct (CoC) Were 'Imposed' on LibrePlanet and the FSF

    Restrictions on speech are said to have been spread and reached some of the most liberal circles, according to a credible veteran who opposes illiberal censorship



  30. Corporate Media Will Never Cover the EPO's Violations of the Law With Respect to Patent Scope

    The greed-driven gold rush for patents has resulted in a large pool of European Patents that have no legitimacy and are nowadays associated with low legal certainty; the media isn't interested in covering such a monumental disaster that poses a threat to the whole of Europe


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts