EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.02.19

Even EPO Patent ‘Justice’ is Now Measured in Industrial Terms Like ‘Production’ Rather Than Accuracy

Posted in Courtroom, Europe, Patents at 10:50 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Strip on too many software patents in Europe

Summary: Europe is being flooded with loads of invalid (as per the EPC) patents that are enshrined as European Patents while judges are unable to stop that (there’s a risk to their job if they dare try)

THE concept of justice ceased to exist at the European Patent Office (EPO), both inwards and outwards, i.e. towards employees and the public/stakeholders. Criminals who loot the Office are not being held accountable and innocent, law-abiding staff which insists on basic rights being respected gets punished — or worse — led to illness, sometimes suicide.

“If justice at the EPO wasn’t already sufficiently destroyed, with annual reports from judges bemoaning (out in the open) their loss of independence, now comes another report.”Remember what Battistelli has done even to judges. There was collective punishment (for all colleagues) and António Campinos has not brought them back to Munich after they were illegally sent to exile. This confirmed many people’s fears that Campinos would cover up for his ‘master’, who had rigged the process to secure this job for him (a fellow Frenchman and old friend).

If justice at the EPO wasn’t already sufficiently destroyed, with annual reports from judges bemoaning (out in the open) their loss of independence, now comes another report. “The 2018 Annual Report of the Boards of Appeal is out. Have a look here,” the EPO wrote some hours ago, linking to an annual report page (warning: epo.org link). It has been mentioned by WIPR (and cited by us in passing as recently as this morning) before the EPO announced it, which makes one wonder if the EPO’s PR people coordinated a puff piece with WIPR (whose staff told us there’s a degree of coordination between the two). To quote the EPO:

The Annual report of the Boards of Appeal provides detailed statistics on proceedings before the Boards. It also describes general developments in the Boards during the preceding year.

These statistics don’t tell the full story. It’s not the full picture. They’re quantitative rather than qualitative. They also overlook factors such as judges’ fear of reprisal/retribution (if they rule the ‘wrong’ way, where wrong refers to the Office management’s preferences). How many bogus software patents are being accepted?

The EPO has just used two meaningless buzzwords for illegal software patents being granted in Europe (two in one tweet even!). To quote today’s tweet: “Experience the EPO first-hand by joining our next study visit. The focus will be on AI, the 4th industrial revolution and #patents …”

No more “CII”? How about “ICT”? “This one made my day,” Benjamin Henrion wrote this morning. “When you don’t like something, just rebrand it! Just like Trump proposed to rebrand the Boeing MAX737 with another name. Forbidden software patents being rebranded as AI, 4th industrial revolution, and others.”

Can the Board throw out all this “AI” nonsense? It’s the kind of rubbish SUEPO was alluding to some weeks back.

Regarding the above report, IPPro Magazine’s Barney Dixon and Ben Wodecki (the former speaks with staff, the latter usually just repeats PR from EPO management) have just published this article with a positive headline (as usual, especially for Wodecki). But also as usual, the key bits are further down at the bottom (probably added by Mr. Dixon, based on his source/s). To quote:

The report states that a total of 3,032 technical appeals were received in 2018, an 8.4 percent increase on the previous year. In 2018 2,733 technical appeal cases were settled, a 19.7 percent increase compared with the same period in 2017.

[...]

Timings of examinations are of increasing concern to EPO users, with a majority of users requesting greater flexibility in the timing of examination.

The EPO has faced criticism in recent years over its approach to tackling its backlog. Some of these measures have been linked to an increase in production targets for staff and a drop in overall patent quality.

The EPO has faced both protests and petitions against the perceived quality drop.

[...]

The Boards of Appeal is also undertaking a “comprehensive” revision of its rules. The report states that the aims of these revisions are intended to increase efficiency by reducing the number of issues to be treated, predictability for the parties, and harmonisation.

The revised rules won’t enter into force until 2020, but the report highlights that active case management by the boards will be a central element to the changes.

[...]

A source close to the Staff Union of the EPO said that the Boards of Appeal have already increased their productivity by 18 percent since 2017 and that production/productivity figures are now the “predominant criterion for evaluation” in the Boards of Appeal.

That says nothing about accuracy and quality. One could just assign decisions to a computer and reach decisions within milliseconds, based on so-called ‘AI’ (which doesn’t guarantee anything).

When they’re “increas[ing] their productivity by 18 percent” (read: cutting corners) it doesn’t mean improved justice, only rushed ‘justice’; the same issue that affects examination. You can never deliver a baby in 4.5 months by using two ladies in tandem. Proper work takes time and research, sometimes a lot of effort and contemplation.

Suffice to say, there’s an effort by the EPO to introduce ludicrous courts where judges can be thrown out (limited tenures) and might not even speak the language of defendants! The EPO and the patent zealots thought of altogether replacing or deprecating these boards (even before they lost their independence) and earlier today UDL Intellectual [sic] Property’s [sic] Garry Stuttard was trying to resurrect this zombie. The boards are under attack from many directions; that being the case, no justice can be assured in the EPO, only illusion thereof. It’s a monarchic system of patents where patent maximalism is “God”. God bless “productivity” and “efficiency” (i.e. the granting of as many patents as possible, as fast as possible!).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/10/2019: MX-19, Tails 4, Mesa 19.1.8 Released

    Links for the day



  2. “Stallman Was Right” is Not Just a Meme as It's Usually True

    The track record of Stallman isn't immaculate, but it's exceptionally good if not impressive



  3. EPO Diplomatic Immunity

    What people can get away with at the European Patent Office (EPO) if their name is Battistelli or António Campinos



  4. Dr. Ingve Björn Stjerna Reveals How the German Government Actively Ignored SMEs to Push the Notorious 'Unitary Patent' Sham

    Turning European Patents (which are no longer good patents but expensive or overpriced patent monopolies — patents which European courts will likely reject) into “unitary” ones (i.e. enforceable EU-wide with one legal action) would harm wrongly-accused parties that mostly or only operate in one single country, overriding the authority of those parties’ national laws and courts



  5. Links 22/10/2019: Pacman 5.2, Shame of Disney+ DRM, Microsoft's DRM Scheme, Microsoft Reprimanded for Privacy Abuses

    Links for the day



  6. Patents Need to Exist Only to Pass Information Around and Keep Good Ideas Alive, Not to Feed Litigation Firms and Litigation 'Enthusiasts'

    The current situation or the status quo where legal professionals are advised not to even look at patents means that patents aren’t for “information” and “innovation” anymore; moreover, calling them “intellectual property rights” (or IPRs) is spreading a malicious lie



  7. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 21, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, October 21, 2019



  8. SUEPO Protest Tomorrow. All EPO Staff in Munich Ought to Attend and Prepare to Strike Too.

    Tomorrow’s planned protest should be a bridge towards a full strike, which takes more time to plan for and get authorisation for (because of increasingly strict restrictions)



  9. Looking for Explanations About Samsung's DeX and Other FOSS Initiatives Being Canned

    DeX was primarily a threat to the desktop/laptop monopoly of Microsoft, so its sudden abandonment — without even an explanation — continues to attract speculations



  10. EPO Will Need a Lot More Than Photo Ops and Hoax 'Studies' to Restore the Perception of Lawfulness

    Battistelli‘s illegal attacks on European Patent Office (EPO) judges have tarnished any impression that the EPO serves justice and the current regime torpedoes an assessment of these attacks; EPO workers understand that to follow guidelines from the management may be a breach of the EPC



  11. Links 21/10/2019: More on DeX, Disney DRM and Linux 5.4 RC4

    Links for the day



  12. GNU/Linux is Bigger Than Ever (Used More Than Ever Before), But Communication Means and Brands Have Changed

    The GNU/Linux market is alive and healthy; it's how we measure its health that ought to adapt because things are constantly changing, more rapidly in the realm of technology than anywhere else



  13. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 20, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 20, 2019



  14. Samsung Does Not Say Why It's Dropping DeX, But the ASUS EEE Story Might Offer Clues

    It's not at all outlandish or unreasonable to suggest that Microsoft used patents or bribes or kickbacks as incentives for Samsung to abandon GNU/Linux as a desktop platform



  15. EPO: It's Only Getting Worse

    Inhaling Seagull meme for EPO presidents



  16. It Has Begun: EPO Staff Protests Against António Campinos (Starting Wednesday)

    Wednesday marks the resumption of EPO protests; it’s happening for the first time under Campinos and only a year after he took Office. Even Battistelli, the notorious thug, lasted longer before such escalations/actions or — put another way — he did better than that (if one checks the timeline of his presidency)



  17. Links 20/10/2019: GNU/Linux at Penn Manor School District, Wine-Staging 4.18, Xfce 4.16 Development, FreeBSD 12.1 RC2

    Links for the day



  18. Guest Post: Understanding Autism for More Complete Inclusion

    "...assuming that autistic people are all the same isn't only technically wrong, it is misleading and leads to harmful and needless misunderstandings."



  19. Guest Post: Free Software Freedom is Not a Freedom of Choice

    The concept of "Freedom of Choice" and how the ruling class uses it to give a false impression of "Freedom"



  20. Guest Post: Free Software Developers and Pursuing 'Market Share'

    "The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers. And users are interested in freedom to a very limited extent: the "free beer" side. Even many free software developers are only interested in the "free beer" part of free software."



  21. The Assertion That Microsoft Uses Communist Tactics Against GNU/Linux and Free/Libre Software

    A study of Taistoism might help understand how Free/libre software is being undermined



  22. European Patent Office and US Patent and Trademark Office Cranks Discovered Buzzwords, Stopped Worrying, Started Granting Patents They Know to be Fake

    The world's patent repositories are being saturated with loads of junk patents or patents that have no legal bearing but can still be leveraged for extortion purposes; the EPO is resorting to lies and artificially-elevated buzzwords to justify granting such fake (yet ruinous) patents



  23. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 19, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, October 19, 2019



  24. “The True Hypocrite is the One Who Ceases to Perceive His Deception, the One Who Lies With Sincerity,” Said André Paul Guillaume Gide (Nobel Prize in Literature)

    Lies flow like water in the realm of EPO and its publishers, whose sole role is dissemination of deliberate falsehoods, misnomers and misinformation



  25. The EPO Cannot Guard Fake European Patents From Scrutiny (in the Long Run)

    Legal certainty associated with newly-granted European Patents is already pretty low and as long as the EPO refuses to acknowledge that its courts (or boards) lack autonomy the EPO merely brushes a growing problem under the rug



  26. Links 19/10/2019: DeX Discontinued, DXVK 1.4.3 and Wine 4.18 Released

    Links for the day



  27. 'Corporate Linux' Will Not Protect Software Freedom

    The corporate model is inherently not compatible with software that users themselves fully control (or Software Freedom in general), so we must rely on another model of sovereignty over code and compiled code (binaries)



  28. IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 18, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, October 18, 2019



  29. 26,000 Posts

    We want to thank those who help spread the word; it gives us moral support and morale.



  30. The Myth of 'Analysts'

    People with exaggerated roles (exaggerated by corporate media and corporations that control them) distort public perceptions about their clients; they're in effect just elevated marketing or Public Relations (PR) operatives


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts