06.28.19

UPC Was the EPO’s (and Patent Maximalists’) Attempt to Abolish Patent Justice

Posted in Europe, Patents at 2:05 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

With people like these in charge…

UIMP event 2014

Summary: If the EPO is an examination office for patents, then it’s failing quite badly; the sole priority at the moment is prosecution, even if unsuccessful, resulting in extraordinary legal costs and not any innovation whatsoever (i.e. what the US patent system suffered from until AIA)

PATENT scope is being narrowed by the courts, but it’s being broadened by patent offices, which knowingly reduce legal certainty. They know that many patents will never be tested in courts, only outside courts (pre-settlements and cross-licensing). There’s lots more about US cases and laws in our latest daily links and it’s more of the same, i.e. courts throwing out lawsuits that involve US patents. Sometimes these patents don’t even reach the courts because they’re invalidated before a lawsuit can even be filed. Sometimes the plaintiff is forced to compensate the defendant. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) are still being targeted by patent extremists, who habitually try to impede patent justice, i.e. invalidation of bogus ones. “On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari to take up Dex Media Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies,” Steve Brachmann (Watchtroll) wrote, “on appeal from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The case will ask the nation’s highest court to determine whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d), which states that decisions to institute inter partes review (IPR) proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) are final and non-appealable…” (e.g. to the Federal Circuit or even SCOTUS)

“Germany’s constitutional considerations are being assessed by the FCC, which is heckled and manipulated, as usual, by Team UPC.”Europe is a different story although similarities exist, e.g. appeals coming under attack by sending judges to Haar and limiting their authority. Can they put an end to European Patents being granted in defiance of the EPC? The EPO has already tried to replace them all with the UPC, but it isn’t happening. Germany’s constitutional considerations are being assessed by the FCC, which is heckled and manipulated, as usual, by Team UPC. Lies are being told about it every month. It has become rather sick.

The EPO is meanwhile proceeding with its suicide plan. Decline in patent quality (and more fake patents granted based on algorithms) is covered up while veteran examiners leave or get pushed out. The EPO has tweeted a link to this (warning: epo.org link) “vision of sustainability,” adding: “The EPO Strategic Plan 2023 has been unanimously adopted! Have a look at what we, together with the EPO’s stakeholders, envisage for the coming years…”

It’s “unanimously adopted” by patent maximalists; as we noted before, the EPO disregarded input in most European languages and from most stakeholders that include the public. The EPO only listens to the patenting and litigation ‘industry’, including the foreign one.

Microsoft and IBM, as expected, have decided to basically reclassify a lot of things to bypass 35 U.S.C. § 101 at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Team Campinos/Battistelli at the European Patent Office (EPO) actively encourages violating the EPC and their media ally, the patent trolls’ front group IAM, helps promote software patents in Europe using the “HEY HI” magic wand as recently as this week. To quote:

The UK’s IPO recently released a report on worldwide AI patenting activity, which it combined with a deep dive into the local landscape and how it compares to other countries. The study complements WIPO’s Technology Trends paper which we analysed to produce a top 10 takeaways piece earlier in the year.

The data analysed for the UKIPO report was pulled from the EPO’s PATSTAT product. The dataset consists of over 160,000 patent applications and 85,000 patent families.

[...]

IBM has the largest AI portfolio, trailed by Microsoft

Globally, IBM has the largest AI portfolio (by patent families). Although American companies take the top two spots, Asian businesses are highly represented in this list.

Those are just software patents. They’re still stockpiling these utterly invalid patents (would not withstand a court’s scrutiny) and patent offices profit from it.

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP’s Alex Nagorniy [1, 2] recalled Supernus again — a subject revisited quite a few times recently. To quote the relevant part: “Supernus, the owner and assignee of the patent-at-issue, filed a Request for Continued Examination (“RCE”) on February 22, 2011 to remove the finality of a rejection during prosecution of U.S. Patent Application No 11/412,100 (“the ‘100 application”) and for consideration of additional information. On August 21, 2012, the EPO notified Supernus’ European Counsel that a Notice of Opposition was filed by Sandoz in an international application that claimed priority to the ‘100 application, and Supernus’ European Counsel informed Supernus of the EPO notification on September 11, 2012. On November 29, 2012—seventy-nine days after being informed or 100 days after the EPO notification of the Sandoz Opposition—Supernus submitted a supplemental IDS to the USPTO to inform them of the opposition and the documents submitted therein. After another round of prosecution, the USPTO issued a Notice of Allowance on February 4, 2014, and the ‘100 application issued as U.S. Patent No. 8,747,897 (“the ‘897 patent”) with a Patent Term Adjustment of 1,260 days.”

So they start the prosecution before the patents are even available.

Kristina Cornish and James Beal make money from litigation (at Kilburn & Strode LLP), so they won’t mind if EPO grants lots of fake patents, leading to frivolous lawsuits against innocent poor people. In the midst of this push for patents on buzzwords (from IAM’s party) there’s also advocacy of PACE (“accelerated prosecution of European patent applications” as they put it). Their opening presumption:

Accelerating the prosecution of a patent application can be useful.

To who?

Do we actually care about justice? It cannot be rushed.

James Ward and David Lewin (Haseltine Lake Kempner LLP) are meanwhile amplifying the EPO’s bundle of lies, which overlooks the fact that the Office grants lots of fake patents in order to fake ‘production’ figures. “According to the EPO Annual Report & Statistics for 2018, and earlier reports,” they wrote, “the median duration of first instance opposition procedures (months from expiry of the nine-month opposition term to the issue of the first instance decision) has fallen, particularly from 2016 to 2018.”

The EPO has been trying hard to discourage and suppress oppositions, as we’ve been showing for years. We’ve heard stories wherein Apple received European Patents despite examiners finding prior art. The EPO is in trouble because it won’t even listen to its own examiners. Here’s World Intellectual Property Review reporting on an obviously bogus Apple patent getting thrown out, for a change:

The European Patent Office (EPO) has dismissed an appeal from Apple, ruling that one of its applied-for patents is unpatentable…

Shades of that infamous patent on progress bars. We wrote about it several times (albeit many years ago).

It’s saddening to see the demise of science at the EPO. It’s like a bunch of clueless, nonscientific politicians and under-qualified career-climbing sociopaths have taken over. All they strive to do is to silence their critics; they’ve blocked Techrights since 2014. They later tried to do the same to IP Kat (until it stopped writing about the EPO’s abuses). The gag was a success.

All those CNIPA and SIPO (same thing, low patent quality) pieces in today’s IP Kat reveal the low levels and standards this kitten sank to. They/the blog used to actually care about quality and justice, but nowadays it’s run by extremists foaming at the mouth for lawsuits (their business model). The likes of Bristows (Annsley Merelle Ward) have been dominating the ‘Kat’, IP Kat , in this case reposting Alexander de Leeuw (Brinkhof). Well, as noted the other day European Patents are already being leveraged by foreign (US) giants, which claim to be worth hundreds of billions of dollars based on exploitative monopolies, to bully generics out of the market. Courts decide the lawsuits are baseless, frivolous. To quote:

“On 19 June 2019 the Dutch District Court of The Hague – the Court with exclusive jurisdiction over patent matters in the Netherlands – issued a decision in merits proceedings between Eli Lilly & Company and Fresenius Kabi regarding Fresenius’ pemetrexed product (a machine translation as published by Mattie de Koning of Simmons is found here).

The product ‘Pemetrexed Fresenius Kabi’ is practically identical to Lilly’s pemetrexed product Alimta, apart from the fact that it contains the tromethamine salt instead of the disodium salt of pemetrexed. The question in many of the pemetrexed proceedings has been whether a pemetrexed product with a different salt falls within the scope of Lilly’s patent, which specifically claims disodium as the salt to be used in a combination therapy with vitamin B12 or a derivative thereof.

Other than in almost all preceding decisions, the Dutch Court ruled that there is no infringement of Lilly’s patent because tromethamine cannot be considered equivalent to disodium. A copy of the Dutch decision can be found here.

Patents that are granted in Europe based on guesswork just to meet “targets” (or “production”) are doing great harm. Judges are not amused (another new case). It’s hardly surprising that Bristows tries hard to just replace the courts with kangaroo ones. Alan Johnson has just said [1, 2] that:

The BVerfG has today announced here that its Second Senate will hold an oral hearing in that first case (“ECB bond purchase program”) on 30 and 31 July 2019.

Nothing to do with the UPC; the title remains misleading, but it’s intended to make it seem as though a decision is imminent — a lie they have been telling for years.

Rose Hughes keeps writing about the EPO but never about scandals, corruption and crimes. IP Kat will never say anything negative about the EPO (as writers who did so have left; the pseudonym “Merpel” is hardly even used anymore). Never do they mention that this Board of Appeal lacks autonomy:

What do European patent attorneys have nightmares about? Trying to achieve re-establishment of rights at the EPO must be among the list. A decision of the Legal Board of Appeal (J 05/18), published this week, is a reminder that even with the best systems in place, an isolated error by any representative involved in the case may be catastrophic.

In some jurisdictions, the test for reinstating an application following refusal due to a missed deadline can be relatively low. At the UK IPO, for example, it is merely necessary to demonstrate that the failure to meet the deadline was “unintentional” (UKPA Section 20A). At the EPO, the test is considerably higher. The applicant must show that the deadline was missed despite “all due care” having been taken.

[...]

The board of appeal (BA) identified the misreading of the email regarding the applicants “interest in further processing” as the critical mistake leading to the missed deadline. The BA was of the view that the presence of a “well-functioning system” was therefore not decisive in this case. In the BA’s view, the letter checked by the US representative, did not give “the slightest indication that the EP representative had already been instructed to request further processing. Quite the contrary, this document clearly demonstrated that no action had been taken at that stage” (r.1.2.3). Furthermore, whilst such an obvious mistake by an assistant may have been excusable, the BA could not excuse a representative for making such a mistake (r.1.2.5).

Therefore, the isolated mistake on behalf of the US attorney in misreading the letter was considered to demonstrate lack of all due care, regardless of any systems that may have been in place. The appeal was dismissed.

Those who wonder why the above blog is full of UPC promotion and void of criticism (of union-busting, attacks on the Boards of Appeal etc.) are urged to see who left the blog and who joined it. This isn’t the same blog that it used to be.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 26/1/2021: Mozilla Firefox 85.0, Tails 4.15, Zentyal Server 7.0, GNOME 40 Alpha

    Links for the day



  2. Instead of Making Access to COVID-19 Solutions Easier Bill Gates Has Made It Harder (Patent Profits)

    Counterproductively — and at a great cost to human civilisation — Bill Gates has once again put profits and monopoly ahead of global goals such as collective health



  3. We Need More Documents Leaked to Know Intel (From the) Inside

    We invite more leaks from the belly of the beast "chipzilla", seeing that it is becoming a drone of Microsoft again, yearning for the "Wintel" days instead of moving on to a world dominated by GNU/Linux and Free/libre software



  4. Why GNU/Linux Users (and the Public at Large) Should Support Leaking/Whistleblowing Sites (Including Wikileaks)

    To demonstrate the value of "scientific journalism" (a term apparently coined by Wikileaks) we take a look at Red Hat's response to embarrassing leaks (demonstrating what a scam their certification and examination programmes really are)



  5. EPO President António Campinos is Still Not Listening, According to Internal EPO Documents

    Increasingly arrogant and unaccountable management of Europe's second-largest institution (EPO) has left staff disillusioned but still defiant; there's clearly unsuitable or unfit-for-purpose management at the EPO, self-selecting based on nepotism/loyalty so as to cover up abuses



  6. Why You Should Give Falkon (the Web Browser) a Chance on GNU/Linux, BSD, or Windows

    In this crazy new world where advertisers are the real customers and Web users ("audiences") have been reduced to mere products we need a browser that isn't controlled by a company; try Falkon



  7. Kluwer Patent Spin and Distortion of Facts (Regarding UPC and More)

    Kluwer Patent Blog disgraces the firm that puts its name on it; instead of sticking to facts they're distorting the facts and the sole/principal goal is to manipulate/mislead the public and public servants



  8. Links 26/1/2021: 4MLinux 35.1, GParted 1.2, Gnuastro 0.14

    Links for the day



  9. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 25, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, January 25, 2021



  10. It's Wrong to Assume Red Hat Competes With Microsoft

    The community ought to stop pretending that one monopoly seeks to replace another despite close partnerships (some would say "collusion") between the two



  11. EPO Staff Representation Complains That EPO Management Exploits Pandemic and 'House Arrests' to Overwork Staff, Lower Quality

    The EPO keeps breaking its promises to workers; not only are key employees seeing their net salary cut (inflation factored in) but pensioners too are being robbed and in the meantime the total time spent on work is increasing



  12. Fake News is Not a 'Wing' Thing

    The two-party corporate-led system (and media) would have us obsess/bicker about accuracy of news based on some binary/dual system of blind loyalty rather than underlying facts and priorities



  13. Links 25/1/2021: Huawei on GNU/Linux, NuTyX 20.12.1, Whisker Menu 2.5.3, Lutris 0.5.8.3, Linux 5.11 RC5

    Links for the day



  14. Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) in ZDNet is the Norm

    ZDNet continues to emit lots of garbage 'journalism', in effect Microsoft PR and what's known as "black PR" for Linux; just like Bleeping Computer, which ZDNet hired this writer from, there's no adherence to facts, just smears and innuendo



  15. Truth Tellers Aren't an Enemy of Free Software

    There's a perpetual attack on people who speak out against actors and corporations in positions of great power, however subtle and indirect those attacks may seem on the surface (they don't wish to be held accountable for defaming activists)



  16. The Linux Foundation, With Over 124 Million Dollars in Annual Revenue, is in Trouble Because of the Pandemic, So It's Trying to Reinvent Itself as Training and Certifications Outfit

    With mountains of cash and a Public Relations (PR) or marketing business model the so-called 'Linux' Foundation became reliant on travel, lodging, booths and speeches on sale; COVID-19 is a great risk to that business model



  17. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 24, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 24, 2021



  18. Our Move Further Away From the World Wide Web, the Browser Monopolies, HTTP, and HTML

    The World Wide Web (WWW) is going down a bad path and a clearly regressive direction; the solution isn't going 'retro' but exploring more sophisticated systems which are robust to censorship (localised or globalised) and downtime (related to censorship) while reducing surveillance by leveraging encryption at the endpoints



  19. Important Issues Not Entertained in the Community, Especially Critics of the Status Quo

    here's corporate infiltration inside communities (for oligarchy hunts volunteer, unpaid labour) and those who speak about that as a threat to our cause and objectives are painted as misguided outcasts who must be ignored



  20. Internet Origins of the Mob

    Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock



  21. When Proprietary Software Users Dictate the Freedom-Leaning Communities

    Fedora doesn't care about software freedom and its steward (or parent company) is sometimes imposing proprietary software on staff; they've quit caring



  22. In 2020 Onwards 'Open Source' is Just a Marketing Ploy of Monopolies, Unlike Free Software

    More people are nowadays seeing or witnessing 'Open Source' for what it truly is; the term has become a misleading marketing term of proprietary software firms looking to rebrand as "ethical" (e.g. by sharing some code with other proprietary software firms, over proprietary platforms such as GitHub)



  23. Microsoft: The Year After We Bought GitHub There Was a Significant Decline in Number of New Projects on GitHub

    Microsoft has just admitted that in 2019 GitHub saw a very significant decline in number of new projects (and users, which it is conveniently miscounting by adding 'phantom' ones) on the site. Just what we had heard before they confirmed it (and they foresaw this effect of the takeover, hence the lies about "loving" Linux).



  24. Social Control Media is a Passing Fad, We Should All Go Back to Blogging and Subscribing to RSS Feeds

    The whole "social control media" phenomenon has been oversold or promoted using lies; in reality, as a mountain of evidence serves to show, it's a way to manage society at a macro scale



  25. As Andrei Iancu Removes Himself From the Patent and Trademark Office All Eyes Are on Biden's Next Nomination

    Patent zealots and their front groups already lobby Joe Biden to put one of them in charge of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; we'll soon see if Joe Biden "means business" or simply means monopoly/large corporations (and their law firms/departments)



  26. Data Point: GNU/Linux Share in Desktops/Laptops Nearly Tripled in the Past Decade, Peaking This Past Month (All-Time High)

    Contrary to what some publishers try to tell us, GNU/Linux is still growing and mostly at the expense of Windows



  27. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 23, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 23, 2021



  28. Links 24/1/2021: Nouveau X.Org Driver Release and GhostBSD 21.01.20

    Links for the day



  29. InteLeaks – Part XXX: Harbor Research's Pseudo-scientific 'Research' for Intel, Bizarrely Suggesting a Microsoft Partnership for a Domain Largely Controlled or Dominated by Linux

    The full document that Intel paid for and in turn used to justify cracking down on Free software (obliterating Free software-based workflows inside Intel), instead outsourcing all sorts of things to proprietary software traps of Microsoft



  30. Chromium and Chrome Are Not Free Software But an Example of Microsoft-Fashioned Openwashing Tactics

    It's time to reject Google's Web monopoly (shared with other companies but still an oligopoly); removing its Web browser would be a good start


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts