10.10.19

Gemini version available ♊︎

The EPO’s President Campinos is a Liar

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 7:07 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

One year ago: ‘Efficiency’ in Action: António Campinos is Sending Jobs Abroad, Then Gagging Critics

António Campinos drunken satire

Summary: It’s becoming ever more apparent that the ‘new’ and ‘improved’ or ‘shy’ and ‘gentle’ EPO President isn’t a credible negotiation partner; it’s a wolf masquerading as a bewildered sheep

THE integrity of the European Patent Office (EPO) cannot be restored under António Campinos. Everything we’ve seen so far only reinforces or proves correct our suspicions of him. He’s another Battistelli or maybe even worse because he’s masking things better — a subject we’ll tackle in our next post. Campinos opposes patent quality and promotes software patents in Europe just as much as Battistelli did. Both like to speak of “quality” and “transparency” while pursuing the exact opposite, but Campinos is a slightly better pretender, which makes him even more dangerous.

“Mr Campinos breaks his promise” is a publication circulated in the EPO last week. It’s worded too politely, probably for diplomatic reasons (bureaucracy has its downsides because crude truth and honesty better convey reality). The full title is “Technologia Staff Survey: Mr Campinos breaks his promise” and as put clearly further down in the text, Campinos is even worse than Battistelli in that regard! Battistelli allowed this survey to go on for more than half a decade after he had taken Office. “After only 14 months as head of the Office,” explains the letter below, “Mr Campinos has achieved the feat of acting in exactly the same way, and, on top of that, pulling back on an earlier commitment. We are speechless.”

You would be “speechless” only if you ever genuinely believed that Campinos would turn things around (we wrote about Campinos way back in 2016, saying he was the likely successor of Battistelli). Here’s the full letter:

Technologia Staff Survey: Mr Campinos breaks his promise

Dear Colleagues,

On 15 May 2019 we wrote an open letter to the President asking him to help the CSC with the logistics of the 4th edition of the Technologia Staff Survey, and to authorise the dispatch of individual survey access codes to all EPO staff members at their @epo.org email address.

On Monday 3 June, during a meeting with the CSC, the President committed to exactly that1. The Staff Representation then made contact with the CIO, following which a positive and productive meeting took place with the CIO and an HR representative. It was clear that the EPO administration had been instructed to facilitate the organisation of the Technologia Staff Survey within the EPO. Procedures on how to distribute the roughly 7000 individual access codes to all EPO employees at their epo.org addresses were discussed in detail, and it was decided that further aspects would be finalised after the summer break with a view to launching the survey mid-September.

On Thursday 11 September the President wrote a letter to the CSC, reneging on his promise of 3 June 2019. In his letter Mr Campinos argued, among other things, that “the sending of mass email is, as a matter of principle and in line with the Office’s IT policy, not among the methods of communication generally available for staff representatives”2. The President further stated that we should not worry about psychosocial risk analysis and prevention in the Office, considering “management’s commitment to improving the wellbeing of staff.”

Unavoidably, a disturbing question comes to mind: If management is truly interested in staff’s wellbeing, why is the President forbidding the CSC to provide each of the 7000 EPO staff members with the opportunity to take part in a survey set up by recognised experts on psychosocial risks?

No need to say that we are deeply disappointed in the President’s decision, which is not contributing to building trust between social partners. We wish to recall that the CSC was able to run the first two editions of the Technologia survey (in 2010 and 2013) using the epo.org addresses of staff without any hindrance from management. Mr Battistelli removed this possibility from the CSC for the third edition of the survey in 2016, at a time when he was busy dismissing elected staff representatives3.

After only 14 months as head of the Office, Mr Campinos has achieved the feat of acting in exactly the same way, and, on top of that, pulling back on an earlier commitment. We are speechless.

We intend to inform the Administrative Council of the above events. However, the fact remains that the CSC can no longer organise the Technologia Staff Survey. None of the proposals made by Mr Campinos in his letter – an attempt to fool the inattentive reader? – are viable, something the President should not ignore4.

We will now turn to SUEPO and ask them whether they will accept taking up the baton once more and running the Technologia Staff Survey on their own behalf, as we think that getting a clear picture of the present situation of EPO staff with respect to psychosocial risks is a must.

The Central Staff Committee

______
1 As reported by SUEPO in this paper (cf. point 5, second bullet).
2 This is an anomaly which is only true at the EPO and only since mid-2013 when Mr Battistelli decided to remove access to mass email from the Staff Representation. In all other International Organisations and in EU institutions or agencies, including the EUIPO (where Mr Campinos comes from), Staff Committees can send emails to all staff.
3 At that time, SUEPO decided to take over the survey and successfully ran it.
4 The CSC does not have the private email addresses of EPO staff, and the CSC does not conduct its business outsid

The EPO’s management does not appear to genuinely care about its main asset — the staff. As we recently showed, this staff is increasingly being replaced by outside contractors. More on that later.

We wish to draw attention to this new comment from “Experienced Examiner” over at Kluwer Patent Blog. To quote: “I get the strong impression that the EPO on purpose uses an unrealistically low discount rate, with the aim to fool the readers (apologies).”

To quote the whole comment:

And it is out: The new President published a set of measures aimed to ensure financial stability of the EPO. Those measures follow the Financial Study (a copy is available here: https://www.epo.org/modules/epoweb/acdocument/epoweb2/377/en/CA-46-19_en.pdf)

Said study has been commented on already, also on this blog. Various issues have been raised, like the lack of regularly adjusting the fees to inflation over the 20 years. Now something new popped up: the discount rates relied upon. You may wish to take a look at pages 38 and 44.In all scenarios, the discount rate starts at 2% and increases quite slowly. A low discount rate means that you need a lot of money now to cover future obligations.Page 44 indicates a strong effect of the discount rate.

We also received news from the actuaries calculating the money needed to fund the pensions. Those actuaries also use a discount rate. They relied on a discount rate of 3.25%, lowered from 3.50% compared to the study a few years ago.

Strange that the EPO relies on two different discount rates to assess its financial situation. The professionals of the trade, the actuaries, use a higher discount rate than the financial study. Speaking only for myself, I get the strong impression that the EPO on purpose uses an unrealistically low discount rate, with the aim to fool the readers (apologies).

So the EPO is perfectly OK with propagandistic, misleading ‘studies’; but when the staff wants to commission something more honest and independent, then the staff is being blocked. Even if people’s lives depend on it.

Lies have become the norm at the EPO; anything that helps refute these lies gets scuttled.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 22/10/2021: Trump's AGPL Violations and Chrome 95 Released

    Links for the day



  2. [Meme] How Corporate Monopolies Demonise Critics of Their Technically and Legally Problematic 'Products'

    When the technical substance of some criticism stands (defensible based upon evidence), and is increasingly difficult to refute based on facts, make up some fictional issue — a straw man argument — and then respond to that phony issue based on no facts at all



  3. Links 22/10/2021: Global Encryption Day

    Links for the day



  4. [Meme] Speaking the Same Language

    Language inside the EPO is misleading. Francophones Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos casually misuse the word “social”.



  5. António Campinos Thinks Salary Reductions Months Before He Leaves is “Exceptional Social Gesture”

    Just as Benoît Battistelli had a profound misunderstanding of the concept of “social democracy” his mate seems to completely misunderstand what a “social gesture” is (should have asked his father)



  6. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 21, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, October 21, 2021



  7. Links 21/10/2021: MX Linux 21 and Git Contributors’ Summit in a Nutshell

    Links for the day



  8. [Meme] [Teaser] Miguel de Icaza on CEO of Microsoft GitHub

    Our ongoing series, which is very long, will shed much-needed light on GitHub and its goals (the dark side is a lot darker than people care to realise)



  9. Gemini Protocol and Gemini Space Are Not a Niche; for Techrights, Gemini Means Half a Million Page Requests a Month

    Techrights on gemini:// has become very big and we’ll soon regenerate all the pages (about 37,500 of them) to improve clarity, consistency, and general integrity



  10. 'Satellite States' of EPO Autocrats

    Today we look more closely at how Baltic states were rendered 'voting fodder' by large European states, looking to rubber-stamp new and oppressive measures which disempower the masses



  11. [Meme] Don't Mention 'Brexit' to Team UPC

    It seems perfectly clear that UPC cannot start, contrary to what the EPO‘s António Campinos told the Council last week (lying, as usual) and what the EPO insinuates in Twitter; in fact, a legal challenge to this should be almost trivial



  12. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part IXX: The Baltic States

    How unlawful EPO rules were unsurprisingly supported by Benoît Battistelli‘s friends in Baltic states; António Campinos maintained those same unlawful rules and Baltic connections, in effect liaising with offices known for their corruption (convicted officials, too; they did not have diplomatic immunity, unlike Battistelli and Campinos)



  13. Links 21/10/2021: GIMP 2.99.8 Released, Hardware Shortages, Mozilla Crisis

    Links for the day



  14. How Oppressive Governments and Web Monopolists Might Try to Discourage Adoption of Internet Protocols Like Gemini

    Popular movements and even some courageous publications have long been subverted by demonisation tactics, splits along unrelated grounds (such as controversial politics) and — failing that — technical sabotage and censorship; one must familiarise oneself with commonly-recurring themes of social control by altercation



  15. [Meme] Strike Triangulations, Reception Issues

    Financial strangulations for Benoît Battistelli‘s unlawful “Strike Regulations”? The EPO will come to regret 2013…



  16. [Meme] Is Saying “No!” to Unlawful Proposals Considered “Impolite”?

    A ‘toxic mix’ of enablers and cowards (who won’t vote negatively on EPO proposals which they know to be unlawful) can serve to show that the EPO isn’t a “social democracy” as Benoît Battistelli liked to call it; it’s just a dictatorship, currently run by the son of a person who actually fought dictatorship



  17. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 20, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 20, 2021



  18. [Meme] EPO Legal Sophistry and Double Dipping

    An imaginary EPO intercept of Administrative Council discussions in June 2013...



  19. Links 21/10/2021: PostgreSQL JDBC 42.3.0 and Maui Report

    Links for the day



  20. [Meme] [Teaser] “Judge a Person Both by His Friends and Enemies”

    Fervent supporters of Team Battistelli or Team Campinos (a dark EPO era) are showing their allegiances; WIPO and EPO have abused staff similarly over the past decade or so



  21. 'Cluster-Voting' in the European Patent Office/Organisation (When a Country With 1.9 Million Citizens Has the Same Voting Power as a Country With 83.1 Million Citizens)

    Today we examine who has been running the Finnish patent office and has moreover voted in the EPO during the ballot on unlawful "Strike Regulations"; they voted in favour of manifestly illegal rules and for 8.5 years after that (including last Wednesday) they continued to back a shady regime which undermines the EPO's mission statement



  22. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVIII: Helsinki's Accord

    The Finnish outpost has long been strategic to the EPO because it can help control the vote of four or more nations; evidence suggests this has not changed



  23. [Meme] Living as a Human Resource, Working for Despots

    The EPO has become a truly awful place/employer to work for; salary is 2,000 euros for some (despite workplace stress, sometimes relocation to a foreign country)



  24. Links 20/10/2021: New Redcore Linux and Hospital Adoption of GNU Health

    Links for the day



  25. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 19, 2021



  26. Links 19/10/2021: Karanbir Singh Leaves CentOS Board, GPL Violations at Vizio

    Links for the day



  27. [Meme] Giving the Knee

    The 'knee' champion Kratochvìl and 'kneel' champion Erlingsdóttir are simply crushing the law; they’re ignoring the trouble of EPO staff and abuses of the Office, facilitated by the Council itself (i.e. facilitated by themselves)



  28. Josef Kratochvìl Rewarded Again for Covering Up EPO Corruption and the EPO Bribes the Press for Lies Whilst Also Lying About Its Colossal Privacy Violations

    Corrupt officials and officials who actively enable the crimes still control the Office and also the body which was supposed to oversee it; it's pretty evident and clear judging by this week's press statements at the EPO's official Web site



  29. [Meme] Sorry, Wrong Country (Or: Slovenia isn't Great Britain)

    Team UPC is trying to go ahead with a total hoax which a high-level European court would certainly put an end to (if or when a referral is initiated)



  30. How Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden Voted on Patently Unlawful Regulations at the EPO

    We look back and examine what happened 8 years ago when oppressed staff was subjected to unlawful new “regulations” (long enjoyed by António Campinos, the current EPO autocrat)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts