EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.10.19

The EPO’s President Campinos is a Liar

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 7:07 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

One year ago: ‘Efficiency’ in Action: António Campinos is Sending Jobs Abroad, Then Gagging Critics

António Campinos drunken satire

Summary: It’s becoming ever more apparent that the ‘new’ and ‘improved’ or ‘shy’ and ‘gentle’ EPO President isn’t a credible negotiation partner; it’s a wolf masquerading as a bewildered sheep

THE integrity of the European Patent Office (EPO) cannot be restored under António Campinos. Everything we’ve seen so far only reinforces or proves correct our suspicions of him. He’s another Battistelli or maybe even worse because he’s masking things better — a subject we’ll tackle in our next post. Campinos opposes patent quality and promotes software patents in Europe just as much as Battistelli did. Both like to speak of “quality” and “transparency” while pursuing the exact opposite, but Campinos is a slightly better pretender, which makes him even more dangerous.

“Mr Campinos breaks his promise” is a publication circulated in the EPO last week. It’s worded too politely, probably for diplomatic reasons (bureaucracy has its downsides because crude truth and honesty better convey reality). The full title is “Technologia Staff Survey: Mr Campinos breaks his promise” and as put clearly further down in the text, Campinos is even worse than Battistelli in that regard! Battistelli allowed this survey to go on for more than half a decade after he had taken Office. “After only 14 months as head of the Office,” explains the letter below, “Mr Campinos has achieved the feat of acting in exactly the same way, and, on top of that, pulling back on an earlier commitment. We are speechless.”

You would be “speechless” only if you ever genuinely believed that Campinos would turn things around (we wrote about Campinos way back in 2016, saying he was the likely successor of Battistelli). Here’s the full letter:

Technologia Staff Survey: Mr Campinos breaks his promise

Dear Colleagues,

On 15 May 2019 we wrote an open letter to the President asking him to help the CSC with the logistics of the 4th edition of the Technologia Staff Survey, and to authorise the dispatch of individual survey access codes to all EPO staff members at their @epo.org email address.

On Monday 3 June, during a meeting with the CSC, the President committed to exactly that1. The Staff Representation then made contact with the CIO, following which a positive and productive meeting took place with the CIO and an HR representative. It was clear that the EPO administration had been instructed to facilitate the organisation of the Technologia Staff Survey within the EPO. Procedures on how to distribute the roughly 7000 individual access codes to all EPO employees at their epo.org addresses were discussed in detail, and it was decided that further aspects would be finalised after the summer break with a view to launching the survey mid-September.

On Thursday 11 September the President wrote a letter to the CSC, reneging on his promise of 3 June 2019. In his letter Mr Campinos argued, among other things, that “the sending of mass email is, as a matter of principle and in line with the Office’s IT policy, not among the methods of communication generally available for staff representatives”2. The President further stated that we should not worry about psychosocial risk analysis and prevention in the Office, considering “management’s commitment to improving the wellbeing of staff.”

Unavoidably, a disturbing question comes to mind: If management is truly interested in staff’s wellbeing, why is the President forbidding the CSC to provide each of the 7000 EPO staff members with the opportunity to take part in a survey set up by recognised experts on psychosocial risks?

No need to say that we are deeply disappointed in the President’s decision, which is not contributing to building trust between social partners. We wish to recall that the CSC was able to run the first two editions of the Technologia survey (in 2010 and 2013) using the epo.org addresses of staff without any hindrance from management. Mr Battistelli removed this possibility from the CSC for the third edition of the survey in 2016, at a time when he was busy dismissing elected staff representatives3.

After only 14 months as head of the Office, Mr Campinos has achieved the feat of acting in exactly the same way, and, on top of that, pulling back on an earlier commitment. We are speechless.

We intend to inform the Administrative Council of the above events. However, the fact remains that the CSC can no longer organise the Technologia Staff Survey. None of the proposals made by Mr Campinos in his letter – an attempt to fool the inattentive reader? – are viable, something the President should not ignore4.

We will now turn to SUEPO and ask them whether they will accept taking up the baton once more and running the Technologia Staff Survey on their own behalf, as we think that getting a clear picture of the present situation of EPO staff with respect to psychosocial risks is a must.

The Central Staff Committee

______
1 As reported by SUEPO in this paper (cf. point 5, second bullet).
2 This is an anomaly which is only true at the EPO and only since mid-2013 when Mr Battistelli decided to remove access to mass email from the Staff Representation. In all other International Organisations and in EU institutions or agencies, including the EUIPO (where Mr Campinos comes from), Staff Committees can send emails to all staff.
3 At that time, SUEPO decided to take over the survey and successfully ran it.
4 The CSC does not have the private email addresses of EPO staff, and the CSC does not conduct its business outsid

The EPO’s management does not appear to genuinely care about its main asset — the staff. As we recently showed, this staff is increasingly being replaced by outside contractors. More on that later.

We wish to draw attention to this new comment from “Experienced Examiner” over at Kluwer Patent Blog. To quote: “I get the strong impression that the EPO on purpose uses an unrealistically low discount rate, with the aim to fool the readers (apologies).”

To quote the whole comment:

And it is out: The new President published a set of measures aimed to ensure financial stability of the EPO. Those measures follow the Financial Study (a copy is available here: https://www.epo.org/modules/epoweb/acdocument/epoweb2/377/en/CA-46-19_en.pdf)

Said study has been commented on already, also on this blog. Various issues have been raised, like the lack of regularly adjusting the fees to inflation over the 20 years. Now something new popped up: the discount rates relied upon. You may wish to take a look at pages 38 and 44.In all scenarios, the discount rate starts at 2% and increases quite slowly. A low discount rate means that you need a lot of money now to cover future obligations.Page 44 indicates a strong effect of the discount rate.

We also received news from the actuaries calculating the money needed to fund the pensions. Those actuaries also use a discount rate. They relied on a discount rate of 3.25%, lowered from 3.50% compared to the study a few years ago.

Strange that the EPO relies on two different discount rates to assess its financial situation. The professionals of the trade, the actuaries, use a higher discount rate than the financial study. Speaking only for myself, I get the strong impression that the EPO on purpose uses an unrealistically low discount rate, with the aim to fool the readers (apologies).

So the EPO is perfectly OK with propagandistic, misleading ‘studies’; but when the staff wants to commission something more honest and independent, then the staff is being blocked. Even if people’s lives depend on it.

Lies have become the norm at the EPO; anything that helps refute these lies gets scuttled.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/2/2020: PipeWire 0.3 and Osu!

    Links for the day



  2. FSF's Interim Co-President Alexandre Oliva on Being Cancelled

    It was reading this that I realized I’d been cancelled myself. In my case, I was painted misogynist and transphobic, and for a post in which I supported women but denounced a crowd of men twisting the feminist cause, that I share, to attack rms, as if he wasn’t a feminist himself; and in which I express curiosity as to what pronoun to use to refer to zero women to paint me as someone who disregards gender identities and their pronouns.



  3. Good People Need to Run for Free Software Foundation (FSF) Board Positions After an FSF Coup Threw in the Towel, Pushing Out the Founder

    "I have been hit, but not knocked out, and my campaign for free software is not over." --Richard Stallman, October 2019



  4. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, February 22, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, February 22, 2020



  5. Alexandre Oliva's Message About Cancel Culture at the FSF

    Being cancelled is no fun. In my case, it was for standing for a friend who got canceled for defending someone else from an accusation that was later proven false.



  6. Links 22/2/2020: Polish Government Increases GNU/Linux Use, Samza 1.3.1

    Links for the day



  7. Being Rich Does Not Imply Being Smart (Especially When One is Born Into Wealth)

    Presenting the 'genius' (college dropout, but that does not matter when the yardstick of wisdom is wealth alone), with his own predictions overlaid on top of his photo from the show of Bloomberg (another 'genius' whose supposed brilliance is measured using money alone)



  8. The Rise and Fall of Free Software

    "We simply need to make the movement less corporate, and more grassroots."



  9. Why You Should Adopt Debian 10, Not Vista 10 (Windows Vista With Microsoft's Latest Surveillance Add-ons)

    A little personal story and recommendation of Debian "Buster" (10) or Devuan (whose developers persist)



  10. Ethics by Exclusion

    It's the same old philosophical question; can excluding those who are perceived to be intolerant be seen as an act of tolerance?



  11. Even Worse Than Microsoft Inside the Board of the OSI

    The OSI has accepted people from companies that actively attack Software Freedom and there may be more on their way



  12. ZDNet Continues to Stuff Its 'Linux' Section With Proprietary Software of Microsoft

    The above is what the "Linux" section of ZDNet is going to look like throughout the weekend (and this is hardly unusual, either)



  13. IRC Proceedings: Friday, February 21, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, February 21, 2020



  14. Links 21/2/2020: EasyOS 2.2.11 Released, Microsoft's Control of the Linux Foundation Increases and More Binary Blobs Arrive

    Links for the day



  15. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 20, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, February 20, 2020



  16. Video: LinuxWorld 1999, Torvalds and Stallman

    LinuxWorld 1999, Torvalds and Stallman



  17. GNU World Order is a Personal Sacrifice, LinuxWorld Just Business

    As the Linux Foundation shows, Linux is just business (and proprietary software) as usual, software patents included, whereas it’s GNU that continues the Free Software Movement’s battles



  18. Links 20/2/2020: Oracle Solaris 11.4 SRU18, Mesa 20, VirtualBox 6.1.4

    Links for the day



  19. Open Source Did Not Win, It Was Assimilated to and by Proprietary Software

    Don’t fall for the whole “Open Source has won!” spiel; You know we’ve lost the battle (and were in effect gradually conquered) at OSI and elsewhere when those who speak for the OSI are Michael Cheng (Facebook), Max Sills (Google), and Chris Aniszczyk (Linux Foundation); they say “Open Source Under Attack” (FOSDEM talk) but their employers are the ones attacking and they downplay openwashing



  20. Former Microsoft Employees Don't Like Talking About Past and Present Microsoft Back Doors (Designed for Spy Agencies)

    In a typical Microsoftian fashion, once they cannot defend the illusion/delusion that Microsoft values security the 'Softers' run away and block any further debate



  21. Techrights Warns Against Impending Extradition Efforts (Passage of Julian Assange to His Death in the United States)

    Imprisonment of journalists who are effective at exposing crimes (of the powerful, not petty crimes) must never be condoned



  22. Team UPC: Many Mouths and No Ears

    The mental condition of Team UPC gets more worrisome by the week



  23. Team UPC Insults Judges Because the UPC is Dead and UPC Lobbyists Have Nothing Left to Lose

    More judge-shaming tactics are in the mix; Team UPC seems to feel like there's nothing left to lose as the UPC is already dead (hope itself is next to die)



  24. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 19, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, February 19, 2020



  25. China Bashing is Grounded in Fear (That They Can Simply Do Better Than the West)

    The atmosphere of hate towards China — fuelled partly by a white supremacist in the White House — is unhelpful and insulting; dignity and understanding is the way to go



  26. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, February 18, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, February 18, 2020



  27. FFII Press Release: Germany Can No Longer Ratify the Unitary Patent Due to Brexit and the Established AETR Case-law, says FFII

    Germany cannot ratify the current Unitary Patent due to Brexit and the established AETR case-law. The ratification of the UPC (Unified Patent Court) by Germany would constitute a violation of the AETR case-law, which was used during the EPLA negotiations in 2006 to consider a deal with non-EU countries, such as Switzerland.



  28. DRM (Proprietary Software) Already Makes Mozilla Firefox Broken, Unreliable, Undependable (Dependent on Binary Blobs)

    More people are beginning to realise that Mozilla resorted to self-harming DRM and self-inflicted damage that impacts Firefox; can Mozilla (re)join the anti-DRM coalitions?



  29. EPO and Other Patent Updates Over RSS

    Site syndication (over RSS feeds or XML/Atom) is vastly better than what became popular in recent years (censored, centralised, discriminatory "Social Control Media"); here are some feeds of interest



  30. When It Comes to a Unitary Patent System, Bad (or Intentionally Dishonest) Legal Advice Has Become the Norm

    The Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patent (UPC and UP, respectively) reinforce the old saying about lawyers being liars, doing anything to attract clients (to take their money); the UPC is basically dead, but fiction, falsehoods and outrageous fantasies still find their way into Web sites of law firms


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts