10.10.19

The EPO’s President Campinos is a Liar

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 7:07 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

One year ago: ‘Efficiency’ in Action: António Campinos is Sending Jobs Abroad, Then Gagging Critics

António Campinos drunken satire

Summary: It’s becoming ever more apparent that the ‘new’ and ‘improved’ or ‘shy’ and ‘gentle’ EPO President isn’t a credible negotiation partner; it’s a wolf masquerading as a bewildered sheep

THE integrity of the European Patent Office (EPO) cannot be restored under António Campinos. Everything we’ve seen so far only reinforces or proves correct our suspicions of him. He’s another Battistelli or maybe even worse because he’s masking things better — a subject we’ll tackle in our next post. Campinos opposes patent quality and promotes software patents in Europe just as much as Battistelli did. Both like to speak of “quality” and “transparency” while pursuing the exact opposite, but Campinos is a slightly better pretender, which makes him even more dangerous.

“Mr Campinos breaks his promise” is a publication circulated in the EPO last week. It’s worded too politely, probably for diplomatic reasons (bureaucracy has its downsides because crude truth and honesty better convey reality). The full title is “Technologia Staff Survey: Mr Campinos breaks his promise” and as put clearly further down in the text, Campinos is even worse than Battistelli in that regard! Battistelli allowed this survey to go on for more than half a decade after he had taken Office. “After only 14 months as head of the Office,” explains the letter below, “Mr Campinos has achieved the feat of acting in exactly the same way, and, on top of that, pulling back on an earlier commitment. We are speechless.”

You would be “speechless” only if you ever genuinely believed that Campinos would turn things around (we wrote about Campinos way back in 2016, saying he was the likely successor of Battistelli). Here’s the full letter:

Technologia Staff Survey: Mr Campinos breaks his promise

Dear Colleagues,

On 15 May 2019 we wrote an open letter to the President asking him to help the CSC with the logistics of the 4th edition of the Technologia Staff Survey, and to authorise the dispatch of individual survey access codes to all EPO staff members at their @epo.org email address.

On Monday 3 June, during a meeting with the CSC, the President committed to exactly that1. The Staff Representation then made contact with the CIO, following which a positive and productive meeting took place with the CIO and an HR representative. It was clear that the EPO administration had been instructed to facilitate the organisation of the Technologia Staff Survey within the EPO. Procedures on how to distribute the roughly 7000 individual access codes to all EPO employees at their epo.org addresses were discussed in detail, and it was decided that further aspects would be finalised after the summer break with a view to launching the survey mid-September.

On Thursday 11 September the President wrote a letter to the CSC, reneging on his promise of 3 June 2019. In his letter Mr Campinos argued, among other things, that “the sending of mass email is, as a matter of principle and in line with the Office’s IT policy, not among the methods of communication generally available for staff representatives”2. The President further stated that we should not worry about psychosocial risk analysis and prevention in the Office, considering “management’s commitment to improving the wellbeing of staff.”

Unavoidably, a disturbing question comes to mind: If management is truly interested in staff’s wellbeing, why is the President forbidding the CSC to provide each of the 7000 EPO staff members with the opportunity to take part in a survey set up by recognised experts on psychosocial risks?

No need to say that we are deeply disappointed in the President’s decision, which is not contributing to building trust between social partners. We wish to recall that the CSC was able to run the first two editions of the Technologia survey (in 2010 and 2013) using the epo.org addresses of staff without any hindrance from management. Mr Battistelli removed this possibility from the CSC for the third edition of the survey in 2016, at a time when he was busy dismissing elected staff representatives3.

After only 14 months as head of the Office, Mr Campinos has achieved the feat of acting in exactly the same way, and, on top of that, pulling back on an earlier commitment. We are speechless.

We intend to inform the Administrative Council of the above events. However, the fact remains that the CSC can no longer organise the Technologia Staff Survey. None of the proposals made by Mr Campinos in his letter – an attempt to fool the inattentive reader? – are viable, something the President should not ignore4.

We will now turn to SUEPO and ask them whether they will accept taking up the baton once more and running the Technologia Staff Survey on their own behalf, as we think that getting a clear picture of the present situation of EPO staff with respect to psychosocial risks is a must.

The Central Staff Committee

______
1 As reported by SUEPO in this paper (cf. point 5, second bullet).
2 This is an anomaly which is only true at the EPO and only since mid-2013 when Mr Battistelli decided to remove access to mass email from the Staff Representation. In all other International Organisations and in EU institutions or agencies, including the EUIPO (where Mr Campinos comes from), Staff Committees can send emails to all staff.
3 At that time, SUEPO decided to take over the survey and successfully ran it.
4 The CSC does not have the private email addresses of EPO staff, and the CSC does not conduct its business outsid

The EPO’s management does not appear to genuinely care about its main asset — the staff. As we recently showed, this staff is increasingly being replaced by outside contractors. More on that later.

We wish to draw attention to this new comment from “Experienced Examiner” over at Kluwer Patent Blog. To quote: “I get the strong impression that the EPO on purpose uses an unrealistically low discount rate, with the aim to fool the readers (apologies).”

To quote the whole comment:

And it is out: The new President published a set of measures aimed to ensure financial stability of the EPO. Those measures follow the Financial Study (a copy is available here: https://www.epo.org/modules/epoweb/acdocument/epoweb2/377/en/CA-46-19_en.pdf)

Said study has been commented on already, also on this blog. Various issues have been raised, like the lack of regularly adjusting the fees to inflation over the 20 years. Now something new popped up: the discount rates relied upon. You may wish to take a look at pages 38 and 44.In all scenarios, the discount rate starts at 2% and increases quite slowly. A low discount rate means that you need a lot of money now to cover future obligations.Page 44 indicates a strong effect of the discount rate.

We also received news from the actuaries calculating the money needed to fund the pensions. Those actuaries also use a discount rate. They relied on a discount rate of 3.25%, lowered from 3.50% compared to the study a few years ago.

Strange that the EPO relies on two different discount rates to assess its financial situation. The professionals of the trade, the actuaries, use a higher discount rate than the financial study. Speaking only for myself, I get the strong impression that the EPO on purpose uses an unrealistically low discount rate, with the aim to fool the readers (apologies).

So the EPO is perfectly OK with propagandistic, misleading ‘studies’; but when the staff wants to commission something more honest and independent, then the staff is being blocked. Even if people’s lives depend on it.

Lies have become the norm at the EPO; anything that helps refute these lies gets scuttled.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 28/1/2021: Stable Kernels and Sudo Bugfixes

    Links for the day



  2. Showing Solidarity With FSFE Survivors

    What does justice look like?



  3. IBM is Throwing Away Red Hat's 'de Facto Standard' Status in Servers, Wrongly Assuming People Can't (or Won't) Go Elsewhere

    This new video is over half an hour long and it’s a discussion of IBM’s self-harming (shot-in-the-foot) move, which it already seems to regret



  4. Why 6 Screens and 6 Virtual Desktops

    An explanation of how I use computers and how I distribute tasks (across screens and across virtual desktops)



  5. Red Hat Developer Network Promoting Microsoft's Proprietary Software, Sometimes by Mass-Mailing People

    Red Hat is doing a disservice to people who subscribe to E-mail newsletters; those people are almost never into Microsoft's proprietary software, which they want to get away from



  6. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 26, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 26, 2021



  7. Links 26/1/2021: Mozilla Firefox 85.0, Tails 4.15, Zentyal Server 7.0, GNOME 40 Alpha

    Links for the day



  8. Instead of Making Access to COVID-19 Solutions Easier Bill Gates Has Made It Harder (Patent Profits)

    Counterproductively — and at a great cost to human civilisation — Bill Gates has once again put profits and monopoly ahead of global goals such as collective health



  9. We Need More Documents Leaked to Know Intel (From the) Inside

    We invite more leaks from the belly of the beast "chipzilla", seeing that it is becoming a drone of Microsoft again, yearning for the "Wintel" days instead of moving on to a world dominated by GNU/Linux and Free/libre software



  10. Why GNU/Linux Users (and the Public at Large) Should Support Leaking/Whistleblowing Sites (Including Wikileaks)

    To demonstrate the value of "scientific journalism" (a term apparently coined by Wikileaks) we take a look at Red Hat's response to embarrassing leaks (demonstrating what a scam their certification and examination programmes really are)



  11. EPO President António Campinos is Still Not Listening, According to Internal EPO Documents

    Increasingly arrogant and unaccountable management of Europe's second-largest institution (EPO) has left staff disillusioned but still defiant; there's clearly unsuitable or unfit-for-purpose management at the EPO, self-selecting based on nepotism/loyalty so as to cover up abuses



  12. Why You Should Give Falkon (the Web Browser) a Chance on GNU/Linux, BSD, or Windows

    In this crazy new world where advertisers are the real customers and Web users ("audiences") have been reduced to mere products we need a browser that isn't controlled by a company; try Falkon



  13. Kluwer Patent Spin and Distortion of Facts (Regarding UPC and More)

    Kluwer Patent Blog disgraces the firm that puts its name on it; instead of sticking to facts they're distorting the facts and the sole/principal goal is to manipulate/mislead the public and public servants



  14. Links 26/1/2021: 4MLinux 35.1, GParted 1.2, Gnuastro 0.14

    Links for the day



  15. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 25, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, January 25, 2021



  16. It's Wrong to Assume Red Hat Competes With Microsoft

    The community ought to stop pretending that one monopoly seeks to replace another despite close partnerships (some would say "collusion") between the two



  17. EPO Staff Representation Complains That EPO Management Exploits Pandemic and 'House Arrests' to Overwork Staff, Lower Quality

    The EPO keeps breaking its promises to workers; not only are key employees seeing their net salary cut (inflation factored in) but pensioners too are being robbed and in the meantime the total time spent on work is increasing



  18. Fake News is Not a 'Wing' Thing

    The two-party corporate-led system (and media) would have us obsess/bicker about accuracy of news based on some binary/dual system of blind loyalty rather than underlying facts and priorities



  19. Links 25/1/2021: Huawei on GNU/Linux, NuTyX 20.12.1, Whisker Menu 2.5.3, Lutris 0.5.8.3, Linux 5.11 RC5

    Links for the day



  20. Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) in ZDNet is the Norm

    ZDNet continues to emit lots of garbage 'journalism', in effect Microsoft PR and what's known as "black PR" for Linux; just like Bleeping Computer, which ZDNet hired this writer from, there's no adherence to facts, just smears and innuendo



  21. Truth Tellers Aren't an Enemy of Free Software

    There's a perpetual attack on people who speak out against actors and corporations in positions of great power, however subtle and indirect those attacks may seem on the surface (they don't wish to be held accountable for defaming activists)



  22. The Linux Foundation, With Over 124 Million Dollars in Annual Revenue, is in Trouble Because of the Pandemic, So It's Trying to Reinvent Itself as Training and Certifications Outfit

    With mountains of cash and a Public Relations (PR) or marketing business model the so-called 'Linux' Foundation became reliant on travel, lodging, booths and speeches on sale; COVID-19 is a great risk to that business model



  23. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 24, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 24, 2021



  24. Our Move Further Away From the World Wide Web, the Browser Monopolies, HTTP, and HTML

    The World Wide Web (WWW) is going down a bad path and a clearly regressive direction; the solution isn't going 'retro' but exploring more sophisticated systems which are robust to censorship (localised or globalised) and downtime (related to censorship) while reducing surveillance by leveraging encryption at the endpoints



  25. Important Issues Not Entertained in the Community, Especially Critics of the Status Quo

    here's corporate infiltration inside communities (for oligarchy hunts volunteer, unpaid labour) and those who speak about that as a threat to our cause and objectives are painted as misguided outcasts who must be ignored



  26. Internet Origins of the Mob

    Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock



  27. When Proprietary Software Users Dictate the Freedom-Leaning Communities

    Fedora doesn't care about software freedom and its steward (or parent company) is sometimes imposing proprietary software on staff; they've quit caring



  28. In 2020 Onwards 'Open Source' is Just a Marketing Ploy of Monopolies, Unlike Free Software

    More people are nowadays seeing or witnessing 'Open Source' for what it truly is; the term has become a misleading marketing term of proprietary software firms looking to rebrand as "ethical" (e.g. by sharing some code with other proprietary software firms, over proprietary platforms such as GitHub)



  29. Microsoft: The Year After We Bought GitHub There Was a Significant Decline in Number of New Projects on GitHub

    Microsoft has just admitted that in 2019 GitHub saw a very significant decline in number of new projects (and users, which it is conveniently miscounting by adding 'phantom' ones) on the site. Just what we had heard before they confirmed it (and they foresaw this effect of the takeover, hence the lies about "loving" Linux).



  30. Social Control Media is a Passing Fad, We Should All Go Back to Blogging and Subscribing to RSS Feeds

    The whole "social control media" phenomenon has been oversold or promoted using lies; in reality, as a mountain of evidence serves to show, it's a way to manage society at a macro scale


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts