EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.10.20

Not Even a Single Corporate Journalist Has Written Anything About These Very Important Bits of News (Updated)

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 8:38 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Is the public actually being given news of importance and relevance to make informed decisions and get involved in the process?

Spock Watching TV: What are you doing? Ssssh. Watching the news.

Summary: Constant propaganda from patent maximalists has long infested the media, which is sometimes controlled and even bribed to set the tone and the agenda; important developments are being tucked away and require very deep digging for ordinary citizens to find

YESTERDAY we bemoaned the lack of journalism about corruption at the European Patent Office (EPO). There’s also that utter lack of proper coverage about the UPC, which threatens the vast majority of people and businesses in Europe. The coverage and the publishers behind that coverage are controlled by Team UPC. It’s like a “media of occupation”. Hey, when was the last time a major European press outlet said anything at all about software patents in Europe? How many years ago was that?

“We’ve also just noticed that Managing IP is defending WIPO’s biggest thug, Francis Gurry, by collectively calling articles that expose WIPO’s abuses “fake news”…”The state of journalism, especially in the area of patents, is appalling.

We’ve also just noticed that Managing IP is defending WIPO‘s biggest thug, Francis Gurry, by collectively calling articles that expose WIPO’s abuses “fake news” (check who’s funding this publisher and you’ll find firms standing to gain from such face-saving spin). So WIPO has its own Donald Trump, who rejects reality.

Over the past few weeks we saw both in German and in English numerous articles serving as a megaphone/loudspeakers for BMJV (despite its attack on the rule of law, as well as the German constitution). Not even once did we see coverage about the actual situation, wherein Brexit dooms the UPC/A. Patrick Breyer (a German MEP) brought this up — he did so even in the public record of the European Parliament. But nobody even noticed until weeks later; nobody in the media mentioned this. Nobody bothered.

Bristows’ Gregory Bacon has again decided to mention Patrick Breyer and say:

The reasoning behind Mr Breyer’s view that Germany can no longer ratify the UPCA (Agreement on a Unified Patent Court) is that the UK (which has ratified the UPCA) is, since Brexit, a “third country” under article 216 TFEU and, according to EU case law (C-22/70), member states cannot enter into agreements with third countries that affect EU rules or alter their scope. However, as the UK government has confirmed that the UK will not be participating in the UPC, if the UK withdraws its ratification of the UPCA before Germany ratifies that issue should not arise.

According to the European Parliament website, written non-priority questions must be answered within 6 weeks of notification to the institution concerned. However, this time limit is often not met. The European Commission’s answer is already overdue (even assuming it was not notified on 5 May but by 20 May, when the question was published). It has been reported that Mr Breyer has recently said that he plans to take legal action should he receive no answer or an unsatisfactory one.

This was mentioned before, even by Bristows, after the May 5th question that we covered not too long afterwards. Why they keep bringing up that question depends on how to interpret the motivation (they also mentioned that FFII had been working on a complaint). A lot of the old Bristows UPC boosters are gone (silent, retired or left the company to join another). The names are changing (a new one emerged lately), so maybe the communication policies changed as well, seeing what terrible prospects UPC has.

Why is the media not covering this? Weeks ago the Financial Times (FT) published a ludicrous piece entitled “UK and Germany hinder court launch”. This is the very same FT which was bribed by the EPO for lots of UPC lies and puff pieces. Where’s the actual journalistic value? This is lobbying. This is a piece shaming two countries into doing something illegal and unconstitutional. And it’s not the first time.

Another item that not a single site has mentioned (not even sites that focus on patents, except perhaps one blog) is the situation of SUEPO’s Laurent Prunier — a subject we wrote about several times over the years. Earlier this week SUEPO wrote once again about the Laurent Prunier settlement (first mentioned two months ago); SUEPO’s message was the first public message in months (the image at the top of the page is suggestive of censorship) and it updated the site one day later with a link to Laurent Prunier’s letter in French [PDF] which was also included here in Union Syndicale’s Web site. SUEPO just copied the first paragraph that said:

In recent years, social dialogue at the European Patent Office has been badly damaged. Since 2014, the EPO has been strongly criticised for its directives which go against the rights and interests of employees. Legal actions have multiplied as the suffering of staff members has increased. Today, a settlement agreement has been reached at the EPO concerning Laurent Prunier.

The remainder of the page says “USF recalls that Mr. Campinos has all the necessary room for manoeuvre to act ex gratia.” António Campinos has thus far been hardly better than Benoît Battistelli and in some respects he was even worse.

Excessive production pressure, a climate of fear, intimidation, harassment, abusive disciplinary procedures against staff and trade union representatives, censorship and non-respect of the right to strike shook the institution in particular during the mandates of Benoit Battistelli. USOEB-SUEPO*, the trade union representing half of the staff at the EPO, has constantly opposed these authoritarian abuses and has tried to find common ground with the administration.

Despite the appointment of a new president of the EPO, António Campinos, in July 2018, a return to normalcy has been slow to materialise. USOEB-SUEPO hoped that the new president would quickly restore social peace by, among other things, putting an end to the unacceptable situation of union representatives, who were unjustly targeted and sanctioned by his predecessor, especially Laurent Prunier. Former secretary of USOEB-SUEPO The Hague and elected member of the Central Staff Committee, he was at the end of 2016 the last of the staff to be unfairly dismissed in connection with his trade union activity. This situation, unprecedented in its scale in the discreet environment of International Organisations, had attracted the full attention of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. In 2018, after having commissioned legal studies on International Organisations, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe concluded in resolutions addressed to member states that the values enshrined in its instruments were insufficiently reflected in the EPO.

Union Syndicale supported Laurent Prunier as soon as he was dismissed because he was, like all the other staff representatives sanctioned, innocent. USF wrote several times to the President and the Administrative Council of the EPO inviting the new management to find a solution to this injustice. We have been informed that the two parties have finally reached a settlement agreement.

However, this agreement at the EPO, which we welcome, only concerns Laurent Prunier. If Mr. Campinos is sincere in his claim that he wants to re-establish a constructive dialogue with USOEB-SUEPO, the large majority union at the EPO, it is high time to ensure that the last two staff representatives who were unfairly sanctioned by his predecessor are now restored to their rights.

USF recalls that Mr. Campinos has all the necessary room for manoeuvre to act ex gratia. Indeed, as a former high-ranking official of the European Union with a legal background, it would be surprising if Mr. Campinos were not able to exercise his political power and use his prerogatives by pronouncing an amnesty for these two staff members in order to restore a productive social climate by drawing a line under the errors of the past.

The role of the trade unions remains more essential than ever to bring the demands of the staff to management while protecting their rights. Solidarity remains a priority for USF as well as for all European public service staff.

At the end they mention a SUEPO contact address, suepothehague@gmail.com.

We’re a bit surprised SUEPO would still entrust this to Google after what happened with “FOSSPatents” and Els Hardon, who used GMail to communicate EPO abuses, according to the EPO’s accusations against Hardon. Google is also a close partner of the EPO and some time in the future we’ll show how GMail hands over entire E-mail accounts to law enforcement (not over terrorism or anything remotely like that). We have a lot of material about this, owing to a police FOIA, and Ryan is working through it to study the material, which we can hopefully publish in a tidy fashion.

All we can say about the above is, the media really ought to have covered it. Years ago it still did (about half a decade). But then the EPO started to bribe and blackmail various publishers. Nowadays they all look the other way and pretend everything is rosy at the EPO; they want us to believe — to the point of deleting critical comments — that Campinos solved all the problems. It’s a lie. It’s a big, massive, shameful lie. If the media exists to perpetuate lies, then well done… mission accomplished.

Update (12/07/2020): SUEPO has just published an English translation of the letter from SUEPO’s Laurent Prunier.

english-prunierl-letter

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Slashdot

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Mega Setup, Mini Budget

    For a sum total of under £800 (eight hundred British pounds are about USD/$1043) one can piece together a versatile working environment (my latest additions, as of 5 days ago, are the 4 plastic plants)



  2. Twitter Appears to Have Taken Vendor/Platform Lock-in up Another Notch, Having Become Almost as Malicious as Facebook

    Twitter jumped the shark



  3. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, August 11, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, August 11, 2020



  4. Infographic by Marcia Wilbur: Where's My Refund?!

    Tweet by Marcia Wilbur:



  5. Links 12/8/2020: New GNU Emacs, GXml-0.20, WordPress 5.5, and Mozilla is Laying off 250 Staff

    Links for the day



  6. You Just Know Somebody is in a State of Retreat When the Strategy Becomes to Discredit One's Critics (or Collectively Paint Them All as Wrong/Crazy)

    A goulash of bullcrap from Bill Gates doesn't add up; it seems like his media strategy has warped (or fallen back) onto discrediting his critics as though they don't exist, don't know anything, or are simply jealous



  7. United States v IBM Archives/Resources

    As the massive case against IBM monopoly (United States v IBM; 104,400 pages of trial transcripts and 17,000 exhibits) predates the World Wide Web it's difficult to find comprehensive literature about it any longer (Wikipedia and more modern sites are instruments of revisionism and reputation laundering)



  8. History Goes in Cycles

    Just like antiwar activism was 'quelled' or 'pacified' half a century ago nowadays we're led to think that software freedom is just fine and there's nothing left to argue about (except words and other petty nonsense)



  9. Looking Back at the Real Story of Microsoft

    Let's take a moment to examine what Microsoft was all along (since its formation in 1975)



  10. Europe Deserves Better Than Today's EPO

    Overly restrictive society with countless monopolies (even on seeds!) will neither serve people nor will it breed general acceptance



  11. European Patent Office Management Swims With Sharks and Liars

    It has become increasingly if not abundantly evident that European Patent Office President Campinos is no better than Battistelli as he’s still a ‘darling’ of patent litigation trolls and their front groups/lawyers



  12. Linked In to Pedophilia

    As the above articles show (one published a couple of days ago), the 'Web of Lies' and the incredible deceit/cover-up run deep and we still lack answers from those who enabled what Salon has just said involved "trafficking five or six girls a day."



  13. Whistleblower Aid Already Showed Cover-up of Bill Gates 'Contributions' to MIT

    The Goodwin Procter report which failed to actually investigate whether Gates and Epstein jointly directed payments to MIT (the latter was already dead) can be understood differently in light of the above leak, which was published earlier this year



  14. IRC Proceedings: Monday, August 10, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, August 10, 2020



  15. Proof (Archived Original Letter): Bill Gates Lied to the New Yorker, BBC and Others About Connection of MIT Money to Mr. Jeffrey Epstein and Their Close Relationship

    As the article (“The anatomy of Bill Gates’ Jeffrey Epstein-facilitated MIT donations”) put it at the time (just 2 days before Dr. Stallman received all the heat at MIT), “Secrecy in the funding of academic programs is highly problematic, as University of Virginia professor Siva Vaidhyanathan explains in a long Twitter thread. “Companies and the billionaires who run them are always bending research agendas (and sometimes even results) to their interests,” he writes. “Anonymity would prevent any examination or accountability.”” But there are more high-level Microsoft links to Mr. Epstein; “Hoffman invited both former MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito and Epstein to an August 2015 dinner in Palo Alto with Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg and Peter Thiel. He tells Axios that he invited Epstein at Ito’s behest, and only because Ito vouched for the convicted criminal, saying that he had successfully cleared MIT’s vetting process.” In 2016 the article “Bill Gates talked to Reid Hoffman about being on Microsoft’s board of directors” was published. “Furthermore,” it notes, “Gates and Hoffman have a lot in common: They both hold board seats and advisory roles, and no other formal status or day-to-day obligations, at the tech companies they founded.”



  16. All This Happened While Bill Gates' Engineer Was on Trial for Amassing Child Pornography

    While MIT relies on the word of someone who repeatedly lied about his relationship with Mr. Epstein (refuted even by MIT itself), the record shows what happened just when Bill Gates’ own engineer faced conviction for pedophilia (the media diverted attention to Dr. Stallman just days after the above E-mails came to light)



  17. Links 10/8/2020: Popcorn Computers Pocket PC, Finnix 121, GhostBSD 20.08.04, EasyOS 2.3.8

    Links for the day



  18. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, August 09, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, August 09, 2020



  19. Release: Bill Gates' Engineer Busted for More Child Pornography Than Reported in the Media

    Based on our analysis, which was repeated carefully twice, the sum of recognised hashes turns out to be about 7,500 (7,430 objects), which is more than was reported in the media after the arrest of Rick Allen Jones at Bill Gates' mansion



  20. Links 10/8/2020: KPhotoAlbum 5.7.0 and MX Linux RC

    Links for the day



  21. UserLibre: What I Want You to Get From This Book

    "Corporate-backed lies run the world, and the FSF used to get in the way."



  22. Even the Mainstream/Corporate Media is Trying to Study Why (or If) Bill Gates and Epstein's Sex Abuse Ring Were Closely Connected

    People in the media are eager to understand why Mr. Gates was so close to Mr. Epstein and even flew his plane (despite having several of his own)



  23. The Incredible Demise of News Sites About Patents

    Sites for (and by) patent lawyers/attorneys seem to be perishing, which means it's hard to know what's going on



  24. Understanding Users and the Three Kinds of Computers: New, Slow and Broken

    "Understanding the user is the first step towards a practical response to misconceptions."



  25. The Good and Bad of a (GNU?) BSD (not GNU/LINUX) Future

    "The software industry now occupies Free software's own territory. No longer is it Free software vs. Windows and MacOS, it's Free software vs. GIAFAM-co-opted Free software."



  26. Links 9/8/2020: Popcorn Computers Pocket PC and New Interview With Richard Stallman

    Links for the day



  27. Education and Free Software

    "If students learn how to code, they'll be able to figure out the applications."



  28. Features Considered Harmful (Revised)

    "But the benefits of Free software, free candy and new features are all meaningless, if the user isn't in control."



  29. If We Weren't Silencing Founders, Critics and People We Just Don't Like

    In the long run, history is rarely very kind to tyrants, especially the ones who did little more than lie to people and demand things that served no real purpose."



  30. I Would Have Supported the Coup (Under Very Different Circumstances)

    Richard Stallman's (rms) ordeals are showing us how not to deal with a founder; this is how power transition could be done instead, according to figosdev


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts